Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2008 Mar;37(1):101–viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2007.10.002

Acromegaly

Anat Ben-Shlomo a,b,*, Shlomo Melmed a,b
PMCID: PMC2697616  NIHMSID: NIHMS117844  PMID: 18226732

Acromegaly is a disease of exaggerated somatic growth and distorted proportion arising from hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). The condition was described more than 120 years ago [1] and later ascribed to pituitary secretion and adenomas [2,3]. Acromegaly is a rare condition with a prevalence less than or equal to 70 cases per million and annual incidence of 3 to 4 cases per million [4,5]. The condition in children where there is accelerated growth of epiphyseal plates is referred to as gigantism rather than acromegaly.

Pathogenesis

Hypersecretion of GH or GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) can lead to acromegaly. Pituitary GH-secreting adenomas are responsible for 98% of acromegaly and almost exclusively are benign. The tumors usually are comprised of cells with sparsely or densely granulated cytoplasm secreting GH alone or a mixture of cells secreting either GH or prolactin (PRL). Less commonly, the tumor is composed of mammosomatotroph cells or the more aggressive acidophilic stem cell adenoma secreting GH and PRL. Plurihormonal adenomas secreting GH and many other hormones (PRL, thyrotropin, corticotropin, gonadotropins [follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH)], and α subunit) are rare. Metastatic pituitary carcinoma secreting GH is extremely rare. Some clinically silent somatotroph adenomas are described as associated with high GH and IGF-1 levels [6].

Familial syndromes associated with GH hypersecretion include multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (germ cell inactivation of the MENIN tumor suppressor gene, which includes pituitary, parathyroid, and pancreatic tumors) [7,8], McCune-Albright syndrome (Gsα mutation; clinical appearance includes polyostotic fibrous dysplasia, cutaneous pigmentation, and pituitary hypersecretion) [9], and Carney complex (PRKAR1A gene mutations; clinical appearance includes skin pigmentation, mucocutaneous mixomatosis, cardiac myxoma, thyroid and breast lesions, and GH-secreting pituitary adenoma) [10]. Isolated familial acromegaly is described with loss of heterozygosity in chromosome 11q13 [11] and, recently, low-penetrance germline mutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor–interacting protein gene were found in individuals who had familial pituitary adenoma predisposition [12,13].

Other rare causes of GH hypersecretion are extrapituitary pancreatic islet cell tumors [14] and central (hypothalamic hamartoma, choristoma, and ganglioneuroma) [15] or peripheral (neuroendocrine tumors) GHRH oversecretion [16-18].

Exogenous administration of GH to non-GH deficient subjects as an athletic performance enhancer [19] or anti-aging treatment [20] has been a growing phenomenon during the last decade, exposing GH recipients to pathologies similar to those of patients who have endogenous GH hypersecretion.

Diagnosis

Signs and symptoms

Insidious clinical manifestation of GH excess resulting from a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma renders acromegaly a disease with typically delayed diagnosis, approximately 10 years from symptoms onset [21]. Changes in appearance bring only 13% of patients who have acromegaly to seek medical care [22], even though these changes account for 98% of presenting features [23].

Changes in appearance derive from skeletal growth, and soft tissue enlargement is subtle early in the course of the disease. Facial changes include large lips and nose, frontal skull bossing and cranial ridges, mandibular overgrowth with prognathism, maxillary widening with teeth separation, jaw malocclusion, and overbite. Increased shoe and ring size often are reported [22].

Large joint arthropathy is a common feature of the disease, occurring in approximately 70% of patients [24], resulting from cartilaginous and periarticular fibrous tissue thickening, causing joint swelling, pain, and hypomobility followed by narrowing of joint spaces, osteophytosis, and features of osteoarthritis with chronic disease [25]. Axial involvement is present in up to 60% of patients at presentation and includes disk space widening, vertebral enlargement, and osteophyte formation. Kyphoscoliosis occurs in 21%, cervical or lumbar linearization in 37%, and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in 20% of patients who have active acromegaly [26].

Skin thickening that is noticed mainly in the face, hands, and feet is the result of accumulation of glycosaminoglycans. Oversecretion and hypertrophy of sebaceous and sweat glands result in oily and sweaty skin, respectively. Pigmented skin tags and hypertrichosis are common features of the disease [27].

Upper airways obstruction is the consequence of macroglossia, prognathism, thick lips, and laryngeal mucosal and cartilage hypertrophy; it can cause sleep apnea and excessive snoring and can complicate tracheal intubation during anesthesia. Hypoventilation and hypoxemia also can arise from central respiratory depression [28] and kyphoscoliosis. Lungs show increased distensibility with normal diffusion capacity, suggesting an increase in alveolar size [29] or number [30].

The most common cardiovascular manifestation of acromegaly is biventricular cardiac hypertrophy that develops independently of hypertension and manifests early during the disease course. Approximately 90% of autopsied older patients who have longstanding acromegaly [31] and approximately 20% of young patients who have short disease duration [32] have biventricular cardiac hypertrophy. Diastolic dysfunction at rest or systolic dysfunction on effort can ensue and are exacerbated by exercise. If acromegaly is uncontrolled, diastolic heart failure follows exacerbated by the coexistence of hypertension, diabetes, and aging. The frequency of overt congestive heart failure in patients presenting with acromegaly ranges from less than 1% [33] to 10% [34]. Using highly sensitive angiography, postexercise ejection fraction increase was insufficient in 73% of patients who had active acromegaly [35] and in 40% of patients under age 40 [36]. Cardiac dysrhythmias [37-39] and late potentials [40] are more frequent and exacerbated by exercise. Arterial blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) is higher with loss of normal daily circadian variability [41]. Hypertension was reported in approximately one third of patients who had acromegaly [42,43]; however, whether or not hypertension is more common than in the general population as yet is unclear. When the risk for coronary atherosclerosis was calculated based on clinical risk assessment and measurements of coronary arterial calcifications [44], 41% of patients were at intermediate to high risk for coronary atherosclerosis.

Peripheral paresthesias, symmetric peripheral sensory and motor neuropathy, proximal myopathy, myalgia, and cramps are encountered. Carpal tunnel syndrome develops with medial nerve compression resulting from wrist synovial edema and ligament and tendon growth [45]. Exophthalmos [46] and open-angle glaucoma [47] may develop with hypertrophy of extraoccular tissue and around Schlemm’s canal.

Hyperprolactinemia with or without galactorrhea develops in approximately 30% of patients [48] because of pituitary stalk compression or mixed tumor secretion of GH and PRL. Hypopituitarism ensues by mass compression of normal pituitary tissue in approximately 40% [49] of patients; amenorrhea or impotence [50] or secondary thyroid [51] or adrenal failure can develop. Goiter and thyroid abnormalities are common [52,53], potentially as a result of IGF-1–stimulating effects on thyrocyte growth. Hyperthyroidism rarely develops because of high levels of serum thyrotropin secreted from plurihormonal pituitary tumors [53]. Rarely, Cushing’s disease develops when the pituitary tumor cosecretes GH and corticotropin [54] or as part of the McCune-Albright syndrome [55].

Insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus occur as a result of direct anti-insulin effects of GH [56,57]. GH stimulation of 1α-hydroxylase activity increases levels of serum 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol, resulting in intestinal calcium absorption and hypercalciuria [58]. Osteoporosis may occur as a consequence of secondary gonadal failure [59,60]. A recent cross-sectional study showed that postmenopausal women who had acromegaly develop vertebral fractures in relation to disease activity (IGF-1 and duration). Moreover, vertebral fractures occur even in the presence of normal bone mass density [61].

A direct cause-effect association between acromegaly and cancer initiation has not been proved [62,63] and the controversy as to whether or not the risk for developing cancer in patients who have acromegaly differs from that of the general population is ongoing [64]. Cancer incidence in patients who had acromegaly was not increased in a critical analysis of nine retrospective reports (1956–1998; 21,470 person-years at risk) [63]. Benign colon polyps (adenomatous and hyperplastic) have been reported in 45% of 678 acromegalic patients in 12 prospective studies [63]; however, this incidence seen in patients who had acromegaly is similar to that of the general population [65]. The prevalence of recurrent colon adenomas (but not hyperplastic polyps) correlated with serum IGF-1 levels [66]. Three or more skin tags is a reliable screen for colon polyps in patients over age 50 who have 10 or more years of active disease [67]. In a large literature review, colon cancer was reported in 2.5% of 678 patients who had acromegaly [63]. In 1362 patients who had acromegaly in the United Kingdom, colon cancer mortality but not incidence was higher than in the general population and correlated with GH serum levels [68]. Patients who had active acromegaly should be screened by colonoscopy at baseline and than every 3 to 5 years depending on coexisting risks factors [69].

Mortality ratio in acromegaly calculated from retrospective analysis over the past 30 years is increased significantly compared with healthy subjects [70-73]. Age- and gender-adjusted standardized mortality ratio (SMR) in patients from Finland who had acromegaly and basal serum GH concentration greater than 2.5 μg/L approximately 5 years from beginning of treatment was 1.63 (CI, 1.1–2.35; P<.001) with post-treatment IGF-1 plasma levels not affecting mortality [72]. In a study from New Zealand, observed to expected mortality ratios were 2.6 (95% CI, 1.9–3.6), 2.5 (1.6–3.8), 1.6 (0.9–3), and 1.1 (0.5–2.1) for patients who had 5 or more, less than 5, less than 2, and less than 1 μg/L last follow-up baseline serum GH levels, respectively (P<.001). Also serum IGF-1 levels (SD score) correlated with mortality ratios. Independent predictors of survival by multivariate analysis were last serum GH level (P<.001), last IGF-1 SD score (P<.02), age, duration of symptoms before diagnosis (P<.03), and hypertension (P<.04) [71]. In the West Midlands pituitary database, age-and gender-adjusted SMR of 1.26 (CI, 1.03–1.54; P<.046) was calculated for patients who had acromegaly. Post-treatment basal GH levels greater than or equal to 2 μg/L increased ratio of mortality rates to 1.55 (CI, 0.97–2.50; P<.068) and radiotherapy to 1.67 (CI, 1.09–2.56; P<.018). In this study, IGF-1 was not a predicting factor. Leading causes of death were cerebrovascular and cardiovascular and respiratory disease [70]. Whether or not GH, IGF-1, or both can be independent predictors of mortality requires further assessment as the assays used to measure them increase in sensitivity and specificity.

Biochemical markers

Considering the limitations of GH and IGF-1 biochemical assays currently available and the nonstandardized reporting of results gathered in different studies [74-76], the cutoff defining acromegaly from normalcy is unclear. From an international consensus point of view, however, absolute numbers are used when discussing disease control rather than cure.

Nadir GH serum levels should be below 1 μg/L, preferably less than 0.4μg/L, in the 2 hours after 75-g oral glucose load (oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT]) [69,77]. This criterion often is used for diagnosis of acromegaly and for follow-up during treatment. Serum GH concentrations are affected by circadian periodicity, pulsatile secretion, exercise, starvation, and blood glucose levels. This cutoff is based on the sensitivity of recent sandwich-type immunometric assays with a sensitivity of 0.2 μg/L and even 0.001 μg/L. These assays have replaced competitive radioimmunoassays with detection sensitivity of 0.3 to 0.5 μg/L. Trials conducted for assays’ external quality assessment schemes show lack of standardization and method dependent variability, in many cases of up to 100%. Assay imperfections are the result of a variety of factors, including the use of monoclonal versus polyclonal antibody, sensitivity of the antibody to different GH isoforms (that also may change between patients), the inability to apply a linear “conversion factor,” the use of more than one standardization international reference GH preparation (currently preferred is the 22-kd GH International Reference Preparation (IRP) 98/574) [78], and whether or not plasma GH-binding proteins interfere in the antibody and specific epitope interaction. Efforts currently are underway to overcome these challenges. For now, these confounding factors should be taken into consideration with regard to agreement on a cutoff value to determine disease activity, especially with borderline GH values [75,79]. GH measurements after an OGTT are unreliable in patients who have uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or liver or renal diseases, in patients receiving estrogens, or in patients who are pregnant and during late adolescence [69].

Age and gender serum IGF-1 levels should be within normal ranges. The long half-life and stable (as compared with GH) serum levels of IGF-1 allow for assessment of disease activity. Several factors affect serum IGF-1 levels and need to be taken into account for interpretation. IGF-1 is affected dramatically by age; however, a uniform standard for optimal age ranges has not been established; moreover, body mass index and racial differences currently are not accounted for in most assays. Methods used for removal of IGF binding proteins that interfere with sensitivity and reproducibility differ in their effciency; IGF-1 standard references differ between laboratories as do the affinity and specificity of the antibodies used. Other physiologic factors that influence IGF-1 concentrations include circadian rhythm, nutrition, insulin, thyroxine, and steroid levels [76].

Ideally, GH and IGF-1 values should be obtained to complement evidence for assessing disease activity; however, a discrepancy between abnormal GH levels coexisting with normal IGF-1 serum levels is not encountered uncommonly [80].

Imaging

Pituitary MRI with contrast material is most sensitive for determining a pituitary source of GH oversecretion, detecting tumors as small as 2 mm. MRI also can visualize tumor dimensions, invasiveness, and proximity to the optic chiasm. When the GH source is extrapituitary, CT, MRI, or both can be used to localize the ectopic source [77].

Treatment

Treatment should aim at managing the tumor mass and GH hypersecretion to prevent morbidity and increased mortality while preserving normal pituitary function (Table 1).

Table 1.

Results of acromegaly treatment

Surgery Somatostatin receptor ligands Growth hormone receptor antagonist Dopamine agonist Radiotherapy
Type of therapy or dose of drug Transsphenoidal resection Octreotide (50–400 μg every 8 hours) Pegvisomant (10–40 mg SC daily) Bromocriptine (up to 20 mg daily) Conventional or radiosurgery
Octreotide LAR (10–40 mg IM every 4 weeks) Cabergoline (1–4 mg orally weekly)
Lanreotide SR (30 or 60 mg IM every 10 or 14 or 21 days)
Lanreotide gel (60, 90, or 120 mg deep SC every 4 weeks)
Biochemical control
Mean fasting serum GH level < 2.5 μg/L Macroadenomas < 50%
Microadenomas >80%
Approximately 65% Increases <15% 60% in 10 years
Serum IGF-1 level normalization Macroadenomas < 50%
Microadenomas >80%
Approximately 65% O90% <15% 60% in 10 years
Onset of response Rapid Rapid Rapid Slow (weeks) Slow (years)
Patient compliance One-time consent Must be sustained Must be sustained Good Good
Tumor mass Debulked or resected Growth constrained or shrinkage Unknown Unchanged Ablated
Disadvantages
Cost One time charge Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing One-time charge
Hypopituitarism 10% None Very low IGF-1 if overtreated None >50%
Other Tumor persistence or recurrence: 6% Gallstones 20% Elevated liver enzymes Nausea 30% Local nerve damage
Diabetes insipidus: 3% Nausea; diarrhea Sinusitis Visual and CNS disorders, 2% cerebrovascular risk
Local complications: 5% High dose required

Goals of acromegaly management include controlling GH and IGF-1 secretion and tumor growth, relieving central compressive effects, preserving or restoring pituitary function, treating co-existing illnesses, preventing premature death, and preventing disease recurrence. Percentages denote an approximation of patients having the result after treatment.

Abbreviations: CNS, central nervous system; IM, intramuscular; LAR, long-acting release; SC, subcutaneous; SR, slow release.

Modified from Melmed S. Medical progress: acromegaly. N Engl J Med 2006;355(24):2558–73; with permission. Copyright © 2006, Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.

Surgery currently is the preferred approach for treating most patients. Serum GH levels are controlled within an hour after complete removal of the GH-secreting adenoma. Transsphenoidal microsurgical adenomectomy approach is used most commonly and, in the hands of experienced neurosurgeons, cures the majority of patients who are harboring a well-circumscribed microadenoma and who have serum GH levels less than 40 μg/L [81-83]. In general, approximately 80% of patients who have microadenoma and approximately 50% of those who have macroadenoma normalize serum IGF-1 levels after transsphenoidal adenomectomy [84,85]. In a recent retrospective study of 506 patients in one center, during 19 years, who underwent transsphenoidal surgery, cure rates (as defined by basal GH serum levels less than or equal to 2.5 μg/L, post-OGTT GH serum levels less than or equal to 1 μg/L, and normal IGF-1) were 75% for microadenomas and 50% for macroadenomas. These tests used different biomarker assays, affecting biochemical remission definition and, therefore, the reported percentage of patients in remission. Remission rate in patients who have intrasellar macroadenomas, suprasellar macroadenomas without visual field impairment or visual field impairment, tumors with parasellar or sphenoidal expansion, or giant adenomas were 74%, 45%, 33%, 42%, and 1%, respectively [86]. Transsphenoidal surgery was required for recurrent tumor in 0.4% of patients; however, approximately 6% is reported in a previous literature review [69] and usually is the result of incomplete resection. Presurgical hypopituitarism improved in 30% of patients after transsphenoidal adenomectomy, did not change in 50%, and worsened in 2% [86].

Post-transsphenoidal surgical mortality is rare and most side effects are transient. Permanent diabetes insipidus, cerebrospinal fluid leak, hemorrhage, and meningitis develop in up to 5% [69], and their frequency correlates with tumor size, invasiveness, and neurosurgical experience [81]. Other approaches include endoscopic transsphenoidal and transnasal pituitary surgery, which can be undertaken with intraoperative MRI. These approaches maximize the extent of tumor resection; however, whether or not they improve remission rates is yet to be assessed [87,88].

Somatostatin receptor ligands

Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) are the first-choice pharmacotherapy for treating patients who have acromegaly. Two formulas are available for treatment of acromegaly octreotide (Novartis) and lanreotide (Ipsen). Short- and long-acting derivatives of these molecules have been developed. Both bind to somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SST2) with high affinity and, to a lesser extent, SST5, whereas octreotide also exhibits some SST3 affinity [89]. For clinical use only, octreotide compounds are approved in the United States. Octreotide acetate (Sandostatin) is a cyclic octapeptide administered by deep subcutaneous or intravenous injections. The typical starting dose is 100 to 250 μg thrice daily up to 1500 μg daily [90,91]. Sandostatin LAR Depot is a long-acting octreotide compound. Octreotide acetate encapsulated within microspheres is administered as an intramuscular injection every 4 weeks. Starting dose is 20-mg monthly increasing up to 40 mg depending on clinical and biochemical responses. Lanreotide (Somatulin SR) contains lanreotide (30 or 60 mg) incorporated into a biodegradable polymer microparticle, allowing prolonged release after intramuscular injection every 7 to 14 days. Somatulin Autogel is a depot preparation of lanreotide delivered as an aqueous, small-volume mixture (60, 90, or 120 mg) in prefilled syringes for deep subcutaneous administration every 28 days [92].

Most studies assessing SRLs efficacy in acromegaly define disease control by mean fasting random serum GH levels less than 2.5 μg/L or normalization of age- and gender-matched IGF-1 plasma levels [93]. Sandostatin LAR suppressed GH and IGF-1 levels in 65% and 63% of patients, respectively [70,93-106], whereas Somatulin SR (30 mg every 7 to 14 days) suppressed GH and IGF-1 levels in 55% and 54% of patients, respectively [100,102,107-111]. Treatment with Somatulin SR (60 mg every 21 or 28 days) reduced GH less than 2.5 μg/L in 76% of patients [96,112]. Somatulin Autogel (up to 120 mg every 21 or 28 days) is not shown superior to the other lanreotide compounds [113-116]. If mean fasting baseline serum GH levels less than 1 μg/L are the cutoff for remission, 33% of patients treated with Sandostatin LAR [96,100,103,106] and 25% those treated with of Somatulin SR [96,100] are controlled. Biochemical control improves with longer treatment duration as IGF-1 plasma levels continue to decrease over the years [70,94-96,99,104,117,118]. Primary pharmacotherapy is used for selected patients [94,119]. Approximately 65% of patients receiving either primary or adjuvant SRLs treatment exhibit serum GH levels less than or equal to 2.5 μg/L (64%) or normalization of IGF-1 [70,94,96-99,107], even though treatment-naive patients exhibit higher pretreatment GH and IGF-1 levels than those treated previously with surgery or radiotherapy [96,99]. These studies also demonstrate tumor shrinkage with SRL treatment. Seventy percent tumor shrinkage was demonstrated with Sandostatin LAR, 26% with Somatulin SR (30 mg), and 39% with Somatulin SR (60 mg), and data are not yet reported for Somatulin Autogel [93]. With primary SRLs pharmacotherapy, 79% tumor shrinkage was evident with Sandostatin LAR [94,96,99], 50% with Somatulin (60 mg) [96], and 25% with Somatulin (30 mg) [107,109].

Sandostatin LAR [96,109,120] and Somatulin SR [120-122] reduced left ventricular hypertrophy, improved diastolic dysfunction, improved sleep apnea [70], and improved lipid profile [96,123,124]. Improvement in headache, perspiration, paresthesias, fatigue, osteoarthralgia, and carpal tunnel syndrome and reduction in soft tissue enlargement are reported [94,99,103,106,114,116].

Side effects are documented extensively for Sandostatin LAR, according to manufacturer reports [95,96,99,103-106,125,126], Somatulin Autogel [95,113,114,116] and Somatulin SR [96,100,108,110,111,115,127-130] usually are mild to moderate in severity and transient. Most common side effects include gastrointestinal symptoms, such as abdominal discomfort, flatulence, diarrhea or constipation, and nausea. Biliary tract abnormalities, including gallstones, microlithiasis, sediment, sludge, and dilatation, are reported in up to 50% of patients and develop during the first 2 years of treatment and tend not to progress thereafter. Asymptomatic cholelithiasis is described in 20% to 40% of patients and approximately 1% of these patients require cholecystectomy. Injection site irritation and pain usually is mild and dose dependent. Asymptomatic sinus bradycardia is described in up to 25% and conduction abnormalities in up to 10% of patients treated with subcutaneous octreotide acetate. Abnormal glucose metabolism is described with the use of SRLs, as activation of SST2 and SST5 in the pancreatic insulin-secreting beta cells likely inhibits insulin secretion and counter-regulatory hormones, such as glucagon. Mild hyperglycemia and, rarely, hypoglycemia [131], manifest mostly in patients who have pre-existing glucose abnormalities. Octreotide alters nutrient absorption and may alter gastrointestinal drug absorption. Blood levels of cyclosporine may be attenuated, resulting in transplant rejection. Altered absorption of oral hypoglycemic agents, b-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or agents to control fluid and electrolyte balance may ensue; hence, patient monitoring is required and dose adjustments of these therapeutic agents is recommended. Somatostatin might decrease cytochrome P450 enzyme action; therefore, drugs metabolized mainly by CYP3A4 and that have a low therapeutic index (eg, quinidine, terfenadine, and warfarin) should be used cautiously [126]. SRLs should be avoided in patients treated with drugs known to commonly prolong QT interval, such as cisapride [123].

Growth hormone receptor antagonist

Pegvisomant (Somavert, Pfizer) is a pegylated GH receptor (GHR) antagonist approved for treatment of acromegaly that interferes with the signaling of the GH receptor, inhibiting subsequent IGF-1 generation. Pegvisomant binds through a high affinity site 1 to one GHR dimer subunit but cannot bind through a mutated site 2 to the second GHR dimer subunit, resulting in failure to initiate subsequent GH signal transduction pathways [132-136]. Pegvisomant is more potent than SRLs for inhibition of peripheral IGF-1 levels. Daily pegvisomant (20 mg) given for 12 weeks, normalized IGF-1 levels in 82% of patients who had acromegaly [137]. Daily doses (up to 40 mg given for 12 months) normalized IGF-1 levels in 97% of patients [138]. Open-label, prospective, 1-year treatment with pegvisomant (10–40 mg) in 12 patients resistant to high-dose SRLs reduced IGF-1 serum levels in all patients, with normalization achieved in 75%. In another multicenter, open-label, 32-week trial, 53 patients who had acromegaly, treated previously with octreotide LAR, were switched to pegvisomant (10–40 mg, adjusted based on serum IGF-1 concentrations). At the end of the study, IGF-1 levels were normalized in 78% of patients [139].

Dose-dependent regression of soft tissue swelling, excessive perspiration, and fatigue were observed [137]. Pegvisomant also improves insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, reducing fasting serum insulin and glucose levels [138-142]. Glycated hemoglobin (HgA1C) was not decreased in patients treated for 12 [140,142] or 18 months [138]; however, in a multicenter, open-label trial, 53 patients who had acromegaly who were switched from octreotide LAR to pegvisomant reported decreased HgA1C levels after 32 weeks’ treatment [139]. Serum GH levels are increased as much as 76% over baseline levels and persistent tumor growth is reported [138], even though, in most cases, GH-secreting adenoma volumes do not change [138-140,143]. Current recommendations are to perform a pituitary MRI every 6 months in all patients [69]. Elevation of serum transaminases are reported, which, at times, may necessitate drug discontinuation [138,140,144]. Idiosyncratic chronic active hepatitis, with elevated transaminases more than 3 times above the upper normal range, was reported in 9% of patients receiving pegvisomant for more than a year. Liver biopsy in a single patient revealed chronic mild hepatitis with mixed portal inflammation, including eosinophilic granulocytes [145]. Current recommendations are to assess liver function tests before and monthly during the first 6 months’ treatment and, thereafter, every 6 months [69].

Pegvisomant should be considered in patients resistant to SRLs and also can be administered in combination with octreotide. This offers improved serum IGF-1 levels and improved control of altered glucose metabolism and permits the use of lower doses of a costly drug [146,147]. Because serum GH levels are elevated during pegvisomant treatment, serum IGF-1 levels are the only marker to be used for follow-up. Recurrent pegvisomant injections in one area of the abdominal wall produced lipohypertrophy at injection sites. Therefore, the drug is recommended for injection in different body areas [148]. Possible overtreatment with pegvisomant causes GHR resistance-GH deficiency similar to features of adult GH deficiency and doses of pegvisomant should be monitored carefully during treatment to avoid IGF-1 deficiency.

Dopamine analogs

Bromocriptine and carbegoline have been used as adjuvant therapy for acromegaly [149]. Bromocriptine suppresses serum GH level to less than 5 μg/L in less than 15% of patients who have acromegaly when used in high doses (up to 20 mg per day), and patients report reduced soft tissue swelling, perspiration, fatigue, and headache. Carbegoline is a long-acting dopamine agonist that reduced serum GH levels to less than 2 μg/L and normalized IGF-1 in approximately 30% of patients [150,151]. Side effects include gastrointestinal discomfort, transient nausea and vomiting, nasal congestion, dizziness, postural hypotension, headache, and mood disorders [150]. In light of recent studies demonstrating increased incidence of valvular heart disease with high doses of carbegoline [131,152], this mode of treatment should be undertaken with caution.

Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy usually is reserved for patients who have postoperative persistent or recurrent tumors that are resistant or intolerant to medical treatment. Conventional external deep X-ray therapy usually is given over 5 to 7 weeks in 1.8-cGy doses to a maximum accumulating dose of 40 to 50 cGy. In a multicenter retrospective study encompassing 884 irradiated patients, investigators report a gradual decrease in basal serum GH levels over 20 years correlating with preirradiation basal serum GH levels. Basal GH serum levels were less than 2.5 μg/L in 22% of patients after 2 years, 60% by 10 years, and 77% by 20 years [153]. IGF-1 levels were attenuated in parallel to GH levels in 63% of patients achieving normal ranges after 10 years. Ten years after irradiation, 27% of patients developed thyrotropin deficiency, 18% FSH/LH deficiency, and 15% corticotropin deficiency. Secondary intracranial tumor formation or visual impairment was not observed [153]. Similar results were observed previously, showing that conventional megavoltage irradiation of GH-secreting tumors prevented tumor growth in 99% of patients with a predictable fall in GH serum levels reaching 90% 15 years post irradiation, without evidence of side effects other than pituitary axes deficiencies [154].

Stereotactic radiosurgery using gamma knife delivers a single tumor-focused radiation fraction. A recent study retrospectively analyzed 96 patients who had acromegaly 12 to 120 months after gamma knife radiosurgery (mean follow-up 53 months). Serum IGF-1 levels normalized within 54 months and post-OGTT serum GH levels were less than 1 μg/L after 66 months in 50% of patients. Adenoma growth arrest was observed in all, and shrinkage occurred in 62% of patients. Hypopituitarism developed in 26% of patients only when irradiated by 15 Gy or more [155]. Gamma knife radiosurgery requires precise delineation of the tumor target to allow exact focusing with minimal surrounding tissue exposure, especially to the optic tract.

Treatment approach

For patients who have newly diagnosed acromegaly and a microadenoma or a well-defined intrasellar adenoma, a surgical approach is preferred, as cure is highly probable in the hands of experienced neurosurgeons (Fig. 1). Because surgery may not be curative for patients who have macroadenomas, especially if invasive, other treatment approaches can be undertaken. Tumor debulking is necessary if there is evidence for pressure on the optic chiasm or other vital organs. There is insufficient scientific evidence to support tumor debulking in other instances; however, this approach is taken commonly and there is evidence for enhancement of SRLs action if 75% of the mass adenoma is resected [94,156]. Surgery also should be considered if patients are anticipated to be noncompliant. Primary pharmacotherapy should be considered in newly diagnosed patients who have invasive macroadenoma, especially if patients are reluctant to undertake surgery or cannot endure the procedure. Primary pharmacotherapy usually is a long-acting SRL. The GH receptor antagonist should be considered in patients who have uncontrolled diabetes mellitus where SRLs may exacerbate glucose abnormalities or in patients resistant to or those who cannot tolerate SRLs treatment.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Treatment approach to a patient with acromegaly. (Modified from Melmed S. Medical progress: acromegaly. N Engl J Med 2006;355(24):2558–73; with permission. Copyright © 2006, Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.)

Patients who have persistent or recurrent GH-secreting pituitary adenoma usually are considered for pharmacotherapy, unless there are clear indications for second surgery. SRLs usually are the first choice, with pegvisomant as an alternative treatment or as an adjuvant with SRLs, providing a “sparing effect” on daily dose requirements. Increasing dosing frequency is more efficacious than increasing dosing per se. Radiotherapy usually is the last choice for adjuvant therapy when patients are resistant to other medications or cannot tolerate, cannot afford, or refuse long-term pharmacologic treatment. Pharmacotherapy, however, may be required for years after radiation for effective disease control.

Signs and symptoms of acromegaly and serum biomarkers should be monitored quarterly until biochemical control is achieved and the disease is inactive. Thereafter, regardless of the treatment used, annual clinical, biochemical, and MRI evaluations are suggested. Disease recurrence is unlikely if post-OGTT serum GH levels are less than 1 μg/L and IGF-1 is within the normal range. Subtle serum GH elevations can predict recurrence, however, even if serum IGF-1 levels are normal [80], and, conversely, increased serum IGF-1 levels indicate relapse even if serum GH levels are less than 1 μg/L [157]. Patients should be monitored for signs of local tumor growth, including deterioration in visual fields, increased headache, or other signs of mass effect, especially when treated with pegvisomant. Glucose abnormalities, liver function tests (with pegvisomant), endogenous pituitary reserve, cardiovascular function, pulmonary status, and rheumatologic complications should be assessed carefully. Mammography, colonoscopy, and prostate evaluation should be followed as for the general population. Gallbladder ultrasonogram should be performed for signs and symptoms indicating possible cholelithiasis or cholecystitis. Fertility and cosmetic treatments and psychologic support may be required. Patients should be taught about their disease, its complications, modes of therapy, and, if possible, to self-inject medications if so preferred.

Summary

Acromegaly is a rare disease caused by GH hypersecretion, mostly from a pituitary adenoma, driving IGF-1 overproduction. Manifestations include skeletal and soft tissue growth and deformities and cardiac, respiratory, neuromuscular, endocrine, and metabolic complications. Increased morbidity and mortality require early and tight disease control. Surgery is considered the treatment of choice for microadenomas and well-defined intrasellar macroadenomas. Complete resection of large and invasive macroadenomas rarely is achieved, however, hence their low rate of disease remission. Pharmacologic treatments, including long-acting somatostatin analogs, dopamine agonists, and GH receptor antagonists, have assumed more importance in achieving biochemical and symptomatic disease control.

References

  • 1.Marie P. On two cases of acromegaly: marked hypertrophy of the upper and lower limbs and head. Rev Med. 1886;6:297–333. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cushing H. Partial hypophysectomy for acromegaly: with remarks on the function of the hypophysis. Ann Surg. 1909;50:1002–17. doi: 10.1097/00000658-190912000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Evans H, Long J. The effect of the anterior lobe of the pituitary administered intra-peritoneally upon growth, maturity and oestrus cycle of the rat. Anat Rev. 1921;21:62. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Alexander L, Appleton D, Hall R, et al. Epidemiology of acromegaly in the Newcastle region. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1980;12(1):71–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1980.tb03135.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ritchie CM, Atkinson AB, Kennedy AL, et al. Ascertainment and natural history of treated acromegaly in Northern Ireland. Ulster Med J. 1990;59(1):55–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sakharova AA, Dimaraki EV, Chandler WF, et al. Clinically silent somatotropinomas may be biochemically active. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(4):2117–21. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chandrasekharappa SC, Guru SC, Manickam P, et al. Positional cloning of the gene for multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1. Science. 1997;276(5311):404–7. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5311.404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Teh BT, Kytola S, Farnebo F, et al. Mutation analysis of the MEN1 gene in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, familial acromegaly and familial isolated hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(8):2621–6. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.8.5059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Weinstein LS, Shenker A, Gejman PV, et al. Activating mutations of the stimulatory G protein in the McCune-Albright syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(24):1688–95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199112123252403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Boikos SA, Stratakis CA. Carney complex: the first 20 years. Curr Opin Oncol. 2007;19(1):24–9. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32801195eb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gadelha MR, Prezant TR, Une KN, et al. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 11q13 in two families with acromegaly/gigantism is independent of mutations of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type I gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(1):249–56. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.1.5370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vierimaa O, Georgitsi M, Lehtonen R, et al. Pituitary adenoma predisposition caused by germline mutations in the AIP gene. Science. 2006;312(5777):1228–30. doi: 10.1126/science.1126100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Daly AF, Vanbellinghen JF, Khoo SK, et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein gene mutations in familial isolated pituitary adenomas: analysis in 73 families. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(5):1891–6. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Thorner MO, Perryman RL, Cronin MJ, et al. Somatotroph hyperplasia. Successful treatment of acromegaly by removal of a pancreatic islet tumor secreting a growth hormone-releasing factor. J Clin Invest. 1982;70(5):965–77. doi: 10.1172/JCI110708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Asa SL, Scheithauer BW, Bilbao JM, et al. A case for hypothalamic acromegaly: a clinicopathological study of six patients with hypothalamic gangliocytomas producing growth hormone-releasing factor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984;58(5):796–803. doi: 10.1210/jcem-58-5-796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wilson DM, Ceda GP, Bostwick DG, et al. Acromegaly and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome secondary to an islet cell tumor: characterization and quantification of plasma and tumor human growth hormone-releasing factor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984;59(5):1002–5. doi: 10.1210/jcem-59-5-1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ezzat S, Ezrin C, Yamashita S, et al. Recurrent acromegaly resulting from ectopic growth hormone gene expression by a metastatic pancreatic tumor. Cancer. 1993;71(1):66–70. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930101)71:1<66::aid-cncr2820710112>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Melmed S. Acromegaly. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(14):966–77. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199004053221405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nelson AE, Ho KK. Abuse of growth hormone by athletes. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007;3(3):198–9. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet0429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Perls TT, Reisman NR, Olshansky SJ. Provision or distribution of growth hormone for “antiaging”: clinical and legal issues. JAMA. 2005;294(16):2086–90. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.16.2086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jadresic A, Banks LM, Child DF, et al. The acromegaly syndrome. Relation between clinical features, growth hormone values and radiological characteristics of the pituitary tumours. Q J Med. 1982;51(202):189–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nabarro JD. Acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1987;26(4):481–512. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1987.tb00805.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Molitch ME. Clinical manifestations of acromegaly. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1992;21(3):597–614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lieberman SA, Bjorkengren AG, Hoffman AR. Rheumatologic and skeletal changes in acromegaly. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1992;21(3):615–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dons RF, Rosselet P, Pastakia B, et al. Arthropathy in acromegalic patients before and after treatment: a long-term follow-up study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1988;28(5):515–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1988.tb03686.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Scarpa R, De Brasi D, Pivonello R, et al. Acromegalic axial arthropathy: a clinical case-control study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(2):598–603. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ben-Shlomo A, Melmed S. Skin manifestations in acromegaly. Clin Dermatol. 2006;24(4):256–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Grunstein RR, Ho KY, Berthon-Jones M, et al. Central sleep apnea is associated with increased ventilatory response to carbon dioxide and hypersecretion of growth hormone in patients with acromegaly. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150(2):496–502. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.2.8049836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Garcia-Rio F, Pino JM, Diez JJ, et al. Reduction of lung distensibility in acromegaly after suppression of growth hormone hypersecretion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164(5):852–7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.5.2005059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Donnelly PM, Grunstein RR, Peat JK, et al. Large lungs and growth hormone: an increased alveolar number? Eur Respir J. 1995;8(6):938–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lie JT. Pathology of the heart in acromegaly: anatomic findings in 27 autopsied patients. Am Heart J. 1980;100(1):41–52. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(80)90277-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Minniti G, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Moroni C, et al. Echocardiographic evidence for a direct effect of GH/IGF-I hypersecretion on cardiac mass and function in young acromegalics. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1998;49(1):101–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1998.00493.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hayward RP, Emanuel RW, Nabarro JD. Acromegalic heart disease: influence of treatment of the acromegaly on the heart. Q J Med. 1987;62(237):41–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Damjanovic SS, Neskovic AN, Petakov MS, et al. High output heart failure in patients with newly diagnosed acromegaly. Am J Med. 2002;112(8):610–6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01094-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fazio S, Cittadini A, Cuocolo A, et al. Impaired cardiac performance is a distinct feature of uncomplicated acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79(2):441–6. doi: 10.1210/jcem.79.2.8045960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Colao A, Cuocolo A, Marzullo P, et al. Impact of patient’s age and disease duration on cardiac performance in acromegaly: a radionuclide angiography study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(5):1518–23. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.5.5674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kahaly G, Olshausen KV, Mohr-Kahaly S, et al. Arrhythmia profile in acromegaly. Eur Heart J. 1992;13(1):51–6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rodrigues EA, Caruana MP, Lahiri A, et al. Subclinical cardiac dysfunction in acromegaly: evidence for a specific disease of heart muscle. Br Heart J. 1989;62(3):185–94. doi: 10.1136/hrt.62.3.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lombardi G, Colao A, Marzullo P, et al. Improvement of left ventricular hypertrophy and arrhythmias after lanreotide-induced GH and IGF-I decrease in acromegaly. A prospective multi-center study. J Endocrinol Invest. 2002;25(11):971–6. doi: 10.1007/BF03344070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Herrmann BL, Bruch C, Saller B, et al. Occurrence of ventricular late potentials in patients with active acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2001;55(2):201–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2001.01319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Terzolo M, Matrella C, Boccuzzi A, et al. Twenty-four hour profile of blood pressure in patients with acromegaly. Correlation with demographic, clinical and hormonal features. J Endocrinol Invest. 1999;22(1):48–54. doi: 10.1007/BF03345478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pietrobelli DJ, Akopian M, Olivieri AO, et al. Altered circadian blood pressure profile in patients with active acromegaly. Relationship with left ventricular mass and hormonal values. J Hum Hypertens. 2001;15(9):601–5. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Minniti G, Moroni C, Jaffrain-Rea ML, et al. Prevalence of hypertension in acromegalic patients: clinical measurement versus 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1998;48(2):149–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cannavo S, Almoto B, Cavalli G, et al. Acromegaly and coronary disease: an integrated evaluation of conventional coronary risk factors and coronary calcifications detected by computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(10):3766–72. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-2857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jenkins PJ, Sohaib SA, Akker S, et al. The pathology of median neuropathy in acromegaly. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(3):197–201. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-3-200008010-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zafar A, Jordan DR. Enlarged extraocular muscles as the presenting feature of acromegaly. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20(4):334–6. doi: 10.1097/01.iop.0000132179.74910.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Howard GM, English FP. Occurrence of glaucoma in acromegalics. Arch Ophthalmol. 1965;73:765–8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1965.00970030767003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Barkan AL, Stred SE, Reno K, et al. Increased growth hormone pulse frequency in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;69(6):1225–33. doi: 10.1210/jcem-69-6-1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Greenman Y, Tordjman K, Kisch E, et al. Relative sparing of anterior pituitary function in patients with growth hormone-secreting macroadenomas: comparison with nonfunctioning macroadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(5):1577–83. doi: 10.1210/jcem.80.5.7745003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kaltsas GA, Mukherjee JJ, Jenkins PJ, et al. Menstrual irregularity in women with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(8):2731–5. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.8.5858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Eskildsen PC, Kruse A, Kirkegaard C. The pituitary-thyroid axis in acromegaly. Horm Metab Res. 1988;20(12):755–7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kasagi K, Shimatsu A, Miyamoto S, et al. Goiter associated with acromegaly: sonographic and scintigraphic findings of the thyroid gland. Thyroid. 1999;9(8):791–6. doi: 10.1089/thy.1999.9.791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gasperi M, Martino E, Manetti L, et al. Prevalence of thyroid diseases in patients with acromegaly: results of an Italian multi-center study. J Endocrinol Invest. 2002;25(3):240–5. doi: 10.1007/BF03343997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tahara S, Kurotani R, Ishii Y, et al. A case of Cushing’s disease caused by pituitary adenoma producing adrenocorticotropic hormone and growth hormone concomitantly: aberrant expression of transcription factors NeuroD1 and Pit-1 as a proposed mechanism. Mod Pathol. 2002;15(10):1102–5. doi: 10.1097/01.MP.0000030451.28828.00. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mantovani G, Bondioni S, Lania AG, et al. Parental origin of Gsalpha mutations in the McCune-Albright syndrome and in isolated endocrine tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(6):3007–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Coculescu M, Niculescu D, Lichiardopol R, et al. Insulin resistance and insulin secretion in non-diabetic acromegalic patients. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2007;115(5):308–16. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-961797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kasayama S, Otsuki M, Takagi M, et al. Impaired beta-cell function in the presence of reduced insulin sensitivity determines glucose tolerance status in acromegalic patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2000;52(5):549–55. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2000.00986.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lund B, Eskildsen PC, Norman AW, et al. Calcium and vitamin D metabolism in acromegaly. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1981;96(4):444–50. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.0960444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ezzat S, Melmed S, Endres D, et al. Biochemical assessment of bone formation and resorption in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;76(6):1452–7. doi: 10.1210/jcem.76.6.8501150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lesse GP, Fraser WD, Farquharson R, et al. Gonadal status is an important determinant of bone density in acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1998;48(1):59–65. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1998.00349.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bonadonna S, Mazziotti G, Nuzzo M, et al. Increased prevalence of radiological spinal deformities in active acromegaly: a cross-sectional study in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(10):1837–44. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jenkins PJ, Mukherjee A, Shalet SM. Does growth hormone cause cancer? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2006;64(2):115–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02404.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Melmed S. Acromegaly and cancer: not a problem? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(7):2929–34. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.7.7635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Jenkins PJ, Besser M. Clinical perspective: acromegaly and cancer: a problem. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(7):2935–41. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.7.7634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Renehan AG, Bhaskar P, Painter JE, et al. The prevalence and characteristics of colorectal neoplasia in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(9):3417–24. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.9.6775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Jenkins PJ, Frajese V, Jones AM, et al. Insulin-like growth factor I and the development of colorectal neoplasia in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(9):3218–21. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.9.6806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ezzat S, Strom C, Melmed S. Colon polyps in acromegaly. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(9):754–5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-9-754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Orme SM, McNally RJ, Cartwright RA, et al. Mortality and cancer incidence in acromegaly: a retrospective cohort study. United Kingdom Acromegaly Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(8):2730–4. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.8.5007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Melmed S. Medical progress: acromegaly. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(24):2558–73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra062453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ayuk J, Clayton RN, Holder G, et al. Growth hormone and pituitary radiotherapy, but not serum insulin-like growth factor-I concentrations, predict excess mortality in patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(4):1613–7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Holdaway IM, Rajasoorya RC, Gamble GD. Factors influencing mortality in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(2):667–74. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kauppinen-Makelin R, Sane T, Reunanen A, et al. A nationwide survey of mortality in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(7):4081–6. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sheppard MC. GH and mortality in acromegaly. J Endocrinol Invest. 2005;28(11 Suppl):75–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Pokrajac A, Wark G, Ellis AR, et al. Variation in GH and IGF-I assays limits the applicability of international consensus criteria to local practice. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007;67(1):65–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02836.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bidlingmaier M, Strasburger CJ. Growth hormone assays: current methodologies and their limitations. Pituitary. 2007;10(2):115–9. doi: 10.1007/s11102-007-0030-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Clemmons DR. IGF-I assays: current assay methodologies and their limitations. Pituitary. 2007;10(2):121–8. doi: 10.1007/s11102-007-0032-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Melmed S, Casanueva F, Cavagnini F, et al. Consensus statement: medical management of acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;153(6):737–40. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Trainer PJ, Barth J, Sturgeon C, et al. Consensus statement on the standardisation of GH assays. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;155(1):1–2. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Popii V, Baumann G. Laboratory measurement of growth hormone. Clin Chim Acta. 2004;350(1–2):1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Freda PU, Nuruzzaman AT, Reyes CM, et al. Significance of “abnormal” nadir growth hormone levels after oral glucose in postoperative patients with acromegaly in remission with normal insulin-like growth factor-I levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(2):495–500. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Gittoes NJ, Sheppard MC, Johnson AP, et al. Outcome of surgery for acromegalydthe experience of a dedicated pituitary surgeon. QJM. 1999;92(12):741–5. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/92.12.741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Shimon I, Cohen ZR, Ram Z, et al. Transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: endocrinological follow-up of 98 patients. Neurosurgery. 2001;48(6):1239–43. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200106000-00008. discussion: 1244–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kreutzer J, Vance ML, Lopes MB, et al. Surgical management of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas: an outcome study using modern remission criteria. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(9):4072–7. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.9.7819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ahmed S, Elsheikh M, Stratton IM, et al. Outcome of transphenoidal surgery for acromegaly and its relationship to surgical experience. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1999;50(5):561–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00760.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Laws ER, Vance ML, Thapar K. Pituitary surgery for the management of acromegaly. Horm Res. 2000;53(Suppl 3):71–5. doi: 10.1159/000023538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Fahlbusch R, Keller B, Ganslandt O, et al. Transsphenoidal surgery in acromegaly investigated by intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;153(2):239–48. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.01970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Schwartz TH, Stieg PE, Anand VK. Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(1 Suppl):ONS44–51. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000193927.49862.b6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Jho HD. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurooncol. 2001;54(2):187–95. doi: 10.1023/a:1012969719503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Patel YC. Somatostatin and its receptor family. Front Neuroendocrinol. 1999;20(3):157–98. doi: 10.1006/frne.1999.0183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Barnard LB, Grantham WG, Lamberton P, et al. Treatment of resistant acromegaly with a long-acting somatostatin analogue (SMS 201–995) Ann Intern Med. 1986;105(6):856–61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-105-6-856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Freda PU. Somatostatin analogs in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(7):3013–8. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.7.8665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Biermasz NR, Romijn JA, Pereira AM, et al. Current pharmacotherapy for acromegaly: a review. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005;6(14):2393–405. doi: 10.1517/14656566.6.14.2393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ben-Shlomo A, Melmed S. Somatostatin agonists for treatment of acromegaly. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2007.11.024. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Colao A, Attanasio R, Pivonello R, et al. Partial surgical removal of growth hormone-secreting pituitary tumors enhances the response to somatostatin analogs in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(1):85–92. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Bronstein M, Musolino N, Jallad R, et al. Pharmacokinetic profile of lanreotide autogel in patients with acromegaly after four deep subcutaneous injections of 60, 90 or 120 mg every 28 days. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2005;63(5):514–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02372.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Attanasio R, Baldelli R, Pivonello R, et al. Lanreotide 60 mg, a new long-acting formulation: effectiveness in the chronic treatment of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(11):5258–65. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ayuk J, Stewart SE, Stewart PM, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of depot long-acting somatostatin analogs for the treatment of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(9):4142–6. doi: 10.1210/jc.2001-011913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Bevan JS, Atkin SL, Atkinson AB, et al. Primary medical therapy for acromegaly: an open, prospective, multicenter study of the effects of subcutaneous and intramuscular slow-release octreotide on growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-I, and tumor size. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(10):4554–63. doi: 10.1210/jc.2001-012012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Colao A, Ferone D, Marzullo P, et al. Long-term effects of depot long-acting somatostatin analog octreotide on hormone levels and tumor mass in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(6):2779–86. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.6.7556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Chanson P, Boerlin V, Ajzenberg C, et al. Comparison of octreotide acetate LAR and lanreotide SR in patients with acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2000;53(5):577–86. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2000.01134.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Cozzi R, Dallabonzana D, Attanasio R, et al. A comparison between octreotide-LAR and lanreotide-SR in the chronic treatment of acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol. 1999;141(3):267–71. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1410267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Turner HE, Vadivale A, Keenan J, et al. A comparison of lanreotide and octreotide LAR for treatment of acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1999;51(3):275–80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00853.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Lancranjan I, Atkinson AB. Results of a European multicentre study with Sandostatin LAR in acromegalic patients. Sandostatin LAR Group. Pituitary. 1999;1(2):105–14. doi: 10.1023/a:1009980404404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Davies PH, Stewart SE, Lancranjan L, et al. Long-term therapy with long-acting octreotide (Sandostatin-LAR) for the management of acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1998;48(3):311–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1998.00389.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Flogstad AK, Halse J, Bakke S, et al. Sandostatin LAR in acromegalic patients: long-term treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(1):23–8. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.1.3572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Lancranjan I, Bruns C, Grass P, et al. Sandostatin LAR: a promising therapeutic tool in the management of acromegalic patients. Metabolism. 1996;45(8 Suppl 1):67–71. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(96)90087-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Amato G, Mazziotti G, Rotondi M, et al. Long-term effects of lanreotide SR and octreotide LAR on tumour shrinkage and GH hypersecretion in patients with previously untreated acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2002;56(1):65–71. doi: 10.1046/j.0300-0664.2001.01438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Verhelst JA, Pedroncelli AM, Abs R, et al. Slow-release lanreotide in the treatment of acromegaly: a study in 66 patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2000;143(5):577–84. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1430577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Baldelli R, Colao A, Razzore P, et al. Two-year follow-up of acromegalic patients treated with slow release lanreotide (30 mg) J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(11):4099–103. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.11.6948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Caron P, Morange-Ramos I, Cogne M, et al. Three year follow-up of acromegalic patients treated with intramuscular slow-release lanreotide. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(1):18–22. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.1.3714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.al-Maskari M, Gebbie J, Kendall-Taylor P. The effect of a new slow-release, long-acting somatostatin analogue, lanreotide, in acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1996;45(4):415–21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1996.8270836.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Ambrosio MR, Franceschetti P, Bondanelli M, et al. Efficacy and safety of the new 60-mg formulation of the long-acting somatostatin analog lanreotide in the treatment of acromegaly. Metabolism. 2002;51(3):387–93. doi: 10.1053/meta.2002.30526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Caron P, Cogne M, Raingeard I, et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of 3-year lanreotide autogel treatment in patients with acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2006;64(2):209–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02450.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Lucas T, Astorga R. Efficacy of lanreotide Autogel administered every 4–8 weeks in patients with acromegaly previously responsive to lanreotide microparticles 30 mg: a phase III trial. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2006;65(3):320–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02595.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Gutt B, Bidlingmaier M, Kretschmar K, et al. Four-year follow-up of acromegalic patients treated with the new long-acting formulation of Lanreotide (Lanreotide Autogel) Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2005;113(3):139–44. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-837520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Caron P, Beckers A, Cullen DR, et al. Efficacy of the new long-acting formulation of lanreotide (lanreotide Autogel) in the management of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(1):99–104. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.1.8153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Ronchi CL, Varca V, Beck-Peccoz P, et al. Comparison between six-year therapy with long-acting somatostatin analogs and successful surgery in acromegaly: effects on cardiovascular risk factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(1):121–8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-1704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Freda PU, Katznelson L, van der Lely AJ, et al. Long-acting somatostatin analog therapy of acromegaly: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(8):4465–73. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-0260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Ben-Shlomo A, Melmed S. Clinical review 154: the role of pharmacotherapy in perioperative management of patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(3):963–8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Colao A, Spinelli L, Cuocolo A, et al. Cardiovascular consequences of early-onset growth hormone excess. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(7):3097–104. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.7.8573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Baldelli R, Ferretti E, Jaffrain-Rea ML, et al. Cardiac effects of slow-release lanreotide, a slow-release somatostatin analog, in acromegalic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(2):527–32. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.2.5467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Hradec J, Kral J, Janota T, et al. Regression of acromegalic left ventricular hypertrophy after lanreotide (a slow-release somatostatin analog) Am J Cardiol. 1999;83(10):1506–9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00135-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Al-Khatib SM, LaPointe NM, Kramer JM, et al. What clinicians should know about the QT interval. JAMA. 2003;289(16):2120–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.16.2120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ronchi C, Epaminonda P, Cappiello V, et al. Effects of two different somatostatin analogs on glucose tolerance in acromegaly. J Endocrinol Invest. 2002;25(6):502–7. doi: 10.1007/BF03345491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Newman CB, Melmed S, Snyder PJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of long-term octreotide therapy of acromegaly: results of a multicenter trial in 103 patients—a clinical research center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(9):2768–75. doi: 10.1210/jcem.80.9.7673422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.List Rx. The Internet Drug Index. Sandostatin LAR Available at: www.rxlist.com.
  • 127.Lucas T, Astorga R, Catala M. Preoperative lanreotide treatment for GH-secreting pituitary adenomas: effect on tumour volume and predictive factors of significant tumour shrinkage. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2003;58(4):471–81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01741.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Giusti M, Gussoni G, Cuttica CM, et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of slow release lanreotide treatment in active acromegaly: six-month report on an Italian multicenter study. Italian multicenter slow release lanreotide Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(6):2089–97. doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.6.8964833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Marek J, Hana V, Krsek M, et al. Long-term treatment of acromegaly with the slow-release somatostatin analogue lanreotide. Eur J Endocrinol. 1994;131(1):20–6. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1310020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Morange I, De Boisvilliers F, Chanson P, et al. Slow release lanreotide treatment in acromegalic patients previously normalized by octreotide. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79(1):145–51. doi: 10.1210/jcem.79.1.8027218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Bruttomesso D, Fongher C, Silvestri B, et al. Combination of continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin and octreotide in Type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2001;51(2):97–105. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(00)00210-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Schade R, Andersohn F, Suissa S, et al. Dopamine agonists and the risk of cardiac-valve regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(1):29–38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Chen WY, White ME, Wagner TE, et al. Functional antagonism between endogenous mouse growth hormone (GH) and a GH analog results in dwarf transgenic mice. Endocrinology. 1991;129(3):1402–8. doi: 10.1210/endo-129-3-1402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Chen WY, Wight DC, Wagner TE, et al. Expression of a mutated bovine growth hormone gene suppresses growth of transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87(13):5061–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.13.5061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Fuh G, Cunningham BC, Fukunaga R, et al. Rational design of potent antagonists to the human growth hormone receptor. Science. 1992;256(5064):1677–80. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5064.1677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Muller AF, Kopchick JJ, Flyvbjerg A, et al. Clinical review 166: growth hormone receptor antagonists. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(4):1503–11. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-022049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Kopchick JJ, Parkinson C, Stevens EC, et al. Growth hormone receptor antagonists: discovery, development, and use in patients with acromegaly. EndocrRev. 2002;23(5):623–46. doi: 10.1210/er.2001-0022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Trainer PJ, Drake WM, Katznelson L, et al. Treatment of acromegaly with the growth hormone-receptor antagonist pegvisomant. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(16):1171–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004203421604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.van der Lely AJ, Hutson RK, Trainer PJ, et al. Long-term treatment of acromegaly with pegvisomant, a growth hormone receptor antagonist. Lancet. 2001;358(9295):1754–9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06844-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Barkan AL, Burman P, Clemmons DR, et al. Glucose homeostasis and safety in patients with acromegaly converted from long-acting octreotide to pegvisomant. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(10):5684–91. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-0331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Colao A, Pivonello R, Auriemma RS, et al. Efficacy of 12-month treatment with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly resistant to long-term, high-dose somatostatin analog treatment: effect on IGF-I levels, tumor mass, hypertension and glucose tolerance. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154(3):467–77. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Lindberg-Larsen R, Moller N, Schmitz O, et al. The impact of pegvisomant treatment on substrate metabolism and insulin sensitivity in patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(5):1724–8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.De Marinis L, Bianchi A, Fusco A, et al. Long-term effects of the combination of pegvisomant with somatostatin analogs (SSA) on glucose homeostasis in non-diabetic patients with active acromegaly partially resistant to SSA. Pituitary. 2007;10(3):227–32. doi: 10.1007/s11102-007-0037-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Frohman LA, Bonert V. Pituitary tumor enlargement in two patients with acromegaly during pegvisomant therapy. Pituitary. 2007;10(3):283–9. doi: 10.1007/s11102-007-0042-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Feenstra J, van Aken MO, de Herder WW, et al. Drug-induced hepatitis in an acromegalic patient during combined treatment with pegvisomant and octreotide long-acting repeatable attributed to the use of pegvisomant. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154(6):805–6. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Biering H, Saller B, Bauditz J, et al. Elevated transaminases during medical treatment of acromegaly: a review of the German pegvisomant surveillance experience and a report of a patient with histologically proven chronic mild active hepatitis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154(2):213–20. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Jorgensen JO, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Frystyk J, et al. Cotreatment of acromegaly with a somatostatin analog and a growth hormone receptor antagonist. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(10):5627–31. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-0531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Feenstra J, de Herder WW, ten Have SM, et al. Combined therapy with somatostatin analogues and weekly pegvisomant in active acromegaly. Lancet. 2005;365(9471):1644–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)63011-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Maffei P, Martini C, Pagano C, et al. Lipohypertrophy in acromegaly induced by the new growth hormone receptor antagonist pegvisomant. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(4):310–2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Colao A, Ferone D, Marzullo P, et al. Effect of different dopaminergic agents in the treatment of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(2):518–23. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.2.3648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Abs R, Verhelst J, Maiter D, et al. Cabergoline in the treatment of acromegaly: a study in 64 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(2):374–8. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.2.4556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Muratori M, Arosio M, Gambino G, et al. Use of cabergoline in the long-term treatment of hyperprolactinemic and acromegalic patients. J Endocrinol Invest. 1997;20(9):537–46. doi: 10.1007/BF03348016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Zanettini R, Antonini A, Gatto G, et al. Valvular heart disease and the use of dopamine agonists for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(1):39–46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Jenkins PJ, Bates P, Carson MN, et al. Conventional pituitary irradiation is effective in lowering serum growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I in patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(4):1239–45. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-1616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Eastman RC, Gorden P, Glatstein E, et al. Radiation therapy of acromegaly. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1992;21(3):693–712. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Jezkova J, Marek J, Hana V, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for acromegalydlong-term experience. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2006;64(5):588–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02513.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Jallad RS, Musolino NR, Kodaira S, et al. Does partial surgical tumour removal influence the response to octreotide-LAR in acromegalic patients previously resistant to the somatostatin analogue? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007;67(2):310–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02885.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES