Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 13.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Cell Res. 2013 Mar 13;319(11):1644–1649. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.03.005

B cells and their Mediators as Targets for Therapy in Solid Tumors

Andrew J Gunderson 1, Lisa M Coussens 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC3743954  NIHMSID: NIHMS454429  PMID: 23499742

Abstract

B cells have recently been appreciated as paracrine mediators of solid tumor development. Their ability to influence various hallmarks of cancer development, aside from antigen presentation, can be attributed to the diversity of soluble mediators they express, including cytokines and immunoglobulins, that can act directly and indirectly on the diversity of leukocyte subsets that infiltrate developing tumors, evolving neoplastic cells, as well as select T cell populations in secondary lymphoid organs and within tumor stroma. Herein, we review the literature supporting these interactions and discuss novel approaches to ameliorate protumoral B cell effects for anti-cancer therapy.

Keywords: cancer, inflammation, B cells, leukocytes, myeloid cells


B lymphocytes, appropriately named for their original discovery in the Bursa of Fabricius, develop and mature in bone marrow, but are activated in peripheral lymphoid tissues in response to antigen (Ag) exposure, similar to T lymphocytes. However, unlike T cells whose primary immunological role is to “help” programming of other leukocytes or to exert selective killing (cytotoxicity), stimulation of naïve B cells culminates in production of secreted versions of B cell receptors (BCR) in the form of immunoglobulins (Ig), commonly referred to as antibodies. In addition, B cells secrete a variety of cytokines, e.g., interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, granulocyte monocyte-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and lymphotoxin (LT), etc., that in turn regulate diverse activities of other leukocytes and non-hematopoietic cells. Moreover, their cell surface expression of major histocompatibility complex class (MHC)-II enables secondary antigen presentation to helper T (TH) cells. In homeostatic tissues, these activities are critical for maintaining tissue/organ health, but in pathological disease processes such as autoimmunity and cancer development, these same activities are diverted1,2. Reviewed herein are the experimental and clinical studies supporting the paradoxical activities of B cells and their products in fostering carcinogenesis, examination of the paracrine mechanisms involved, and a discussion of a potential role for inhibitory B cell therapies in the clinic as either monotherapy, or in combination with chemotherapy, for patients with B cell-regulated solid tumors.

B cell Subtypes in Health and Disease

The developmental progression from hematopoietic progenitor to pro- to pre- to finally immature, antigenically naïve B cell occurs consistently and predictably in every B cell subset prior to their exit from the fetal liver or adult bone marrow (in mammals) and chemotaxis to the periphery (Figure 1). This process is directed by recombination activating genes 1 and 2 (RAG-1/2), DNA recombinases expressed in T and B cells that mediate T cell and B cell receptor gene rearrangement, culminating in cell surface expression, a requisite for peripheral survival3. Once maturation and peripheral residence is established, stochastic paracrine signals determine acquisition of specified functions allowing categorization into individual subsets. These include but are not limited to: B-1 cells that produce natural antibodies, further subdivided in the peritoneum into CD5+ B-1a (marginal zone in the spleen) and CD5 B-1b, transitional-2 marginal zone precursor B subsets, canonical B-2 cells, B10/B regulatory cells (Bregs) that secrete the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, plasma cells that hypersecrete Igs and follicular CD1dloCD5- splenic B cells4 (for a review on B cell development and differentiation, please see3). Most, but not all B cells (e.g., plasma cells), express the CD20 antigen at varying levels, a cell surface receptor with a currently unidentified ligand, that serves as a Ca2+ ion channel5,6 critical for T cell-independent antibody responses7. Importantly, CD20 has been successfully exploited for targeted monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy enabling efficient B cell depletion8. These various B cell subsets possess numerous bioactivities deriving from their functional plasticity – a topic reviewed in greater detail elsewhere9.

Figure 1. B cell development and subset differentiation.

Figure 1

Differentiation of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) progenitors into naïve B cells occurs in the bone marrow of adult mammals and subsequently continues in peripheral lymphoid tissue for further phenotypical differentiation and potential antigen experience (numerical order indicates differentiation progression). Not only do these specific subsets express a unique gene repertoire, but they also are harbored in peripheral tissue sites at relatively higher frequencies to other B cell subsets. For instance, CD5+/CD1d+ B regulatory cells (Bregs) maintain their largest populations in the peritoneal cavity, where they serve an anti-inflammatory function attributed to their high expression of IL-10. GC, germinal center.

As indicated above, B cells are the sole producers of Igs and thus serve a critical role as initiators and modulators of humoral immunity. Hence, through their regulated production of antigen-specific Igs, B cells are capable of shaping an immune response through microbial neutralization, promotion of opsonization, chemotaxis, activation, and de-activation of pro-inflammatory myeloid cells; all necessary mechanisms of pathogen elimination. Given that developing solid tumors display similar characteristics to tissues damaged by autoimmune dysfunction, e.g., chronic immune cell infiltration, tissue remodeling, angiogenesis, and altered cell survival pathways, it is not surprising that individuals with some forms of autoimmunity (RA or systemic sclerosis) also harbor an increased relative risk for cancer10,11. To that end, recent studies have begun to shed light on the role of peripheral and tumor-infiltrating B cells as potentiators of solid tumor development (Figure 2).

Figure 2. B cells contribute to solid tumorigenesis.

Figure 2

As discussed in the text, B lymphocytes exhibit numerous tumor-promoting mechanisms systemically (1) through antibody production (IgG) and complement conjugation (C1q) to form immune complexes (CIC), that in turn are deposited into the tumor microenvironment (TME) and subsequently ligate to either FcγR or C5aR expressed on tissue-resident or tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells. CIC/FcγR interactions cooperate with TH2 type cytokines (Il-4, IL-13, IL-10) produced by CD4+ T cells (2), as well as B cell-produced polypeptide growth factors and cytokines (GMCSF, IL-6, IL-10) (3) to initiate and sustain TH2-dominant programming of myeloid cells. These in turn provide pro-survival and pro-angiogenic factors, matrix remodeling enzymes, and pro-metastatic molecules to evolving neoplastic cells (4), as well as factors that suppress CD8+ cytotoxic T cell proliferation/activity (5). Several B cell-derived factors also directly regulate pro-survival and chemo-resistance pathways in malignant tumor cells, including LTβ, WNT16 and TNFα (6). Experimental data indicate that Ig-production by B cells is likely antigen-dependent (7) thus involving trafficking of antigen-presenting cells to secondary (2°) lymphoid organs. Myeloid cell presence in TMEs in part derives from factors expressed by evolving neoplastic cells including toll-like receptor-regulated pathways, GM-CSF, CSF1, the chemokine CCL2, TNFα, etc (8). PC, plasma cell.

B cell cooperation with complement factors

A notable, yet underappreciated role for B cells in tumor development is the proteolytic induction of complement proteins that partner with Igs to form circulating immune complexes (CICs), and subsequently signal through complement receptors that are variably expressed on all leukocytes12. Induction of the complement cascade occurs in blood plasma and tissue, and is coordinated by a series of proteolytic zymogens, triggered on the surface of a pathogen and during activation of diverse inflammatory events. Three unique pathways exist [classical, mannose-binding lectin (MBL), and alternative] and are orchestrated by specific complement proteins (C1q, MBL, and C3 respectively) that are initiated by distinct stimuli (Ag:Ab complexes, MBL:mannose ligation and pathogen surfaces, respectively), but ultimately converge on the C3 convertase, a complement protein necessary for T cell-dependent antibody responses13. Subsequently, these pathways diverge into three ultimate fates: phagocytic recruitment, opsonization and/or innate cytolysis of microbes. C5a, the dominant pro-inflammatory complement factor, decreases the activation threshold of myeloid cells by increasing the ratio of activating:inhibitory Ig receptor ratio providing feed-forward synergism for B cell activity14,15.

In part because of this, preferential binding of IgG1 to inhibitory Ig receptors is hypothesized to be a preventative mechanism for immune complex activation by circulating myeloid cells16. Additional anti-inflammatory properties for IgG1 appear to involve blockade of neutrophil C5a signaling through physical interaction of dectin-1 and downstream SHIP (SH2 domain-containing inositol 5′-phosphatase 1) and Syk (spleen tyrosine kinase) phosphorylation17, adding complexity to the rationale design of myeloid signaling inhibitors dependent on tumor-promoting or tumor-regressing phenotypes. Finally, signaling downstream of the receptor for C5a (C5aR) has been implicated as a novel mechanism for accumulation of immunosuppressive Gr-1+CD11b+ monocytes in tumors and their T cell-inhibitory properties, again supporting the dynamic functionality B cells exhibit in the tumor microenvironment (TME)18.

Role of immunoglobulins in tumor-associated chronic inflammation

While little is known on the functional significance of circulating immune complexes (CICs; Igs in biochemical complex with complement proteins) in tumor development, the role of CICs in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases has been examined extensively. CIC deposition into tissue parenchyma is a consequence of leaky vasculature, in both tumor1921 and pathologic22 angiogenesis. CIC (and Ig) deposition initiates multiple inflammatory cascades by mechanisms involving activation of complement pathways and/or engagement of the receptors for the crystallizable region (Fc) receptor common γ chain (FcRγ) for IgG broadly expressed on myeloid cells23. As such, FcγRs represent a functional link between adaptive and innate immunity by coupling interactions between circulating (auto) antibodies and innate immune cells16. In humans, four FcγR variants (FcγRI/CD64, FcγRII/CD32, FcγRIII/CD16, and FcγRIV) are constitutively expressed unequally on myeloid cells. Activating types of FcγRs form multimeric complexes with FcRγ that contain an intracellular tyrosine-based activating motif (ITAM), whose activation triggers oxidative bursts, cytokine release, phagocytosis, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and degranulation23. Induction of these processes is the functional downstream consequence of Syk kinase activity, and to some degree Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (Btk) activity. The phosphorylative capabilities of these two enzymes is prompted by initial IgG/FcγR ligation events that initiate a classical intracellular kinase cascade resulting in transcriptional activities of JNK, p38 and ERK1/2, as well as critical Ca2+ secondary messenger signaling24. In contrast, engagement of FcγRII (or FcγRIIb in mice), an inhibitory low-affinity receptor for IgG, terminates activation signals initiated by antigen crosslinking due to its immune tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM)23. Activation of the ITIM motif in this context instead utilizes SHIP, a phosphatase that blunts Btk signaling through its counteracting dephosphorylating catalytic behavior, thus tuning or even abrogating FcγR/ITAM signaling cascades25.

FcRγ expression is necessary for assembly and cell-surface localization of FcγRI, FcγRIII, and FcγRIV; thus, FcRγ-deficient mice26 lack all activating FcγRs, whereas FcγRII expression is unaltered. Since FcRγ-deficient mice are resistant to CIC-mediated hypersensitive reactions (e.g., alveolitis, glomerulonephritis, skin Arthus reaction), whereas mice deficient in FcγRII exhibit enhanced CIC-mediated inflammatory responses23 it is clear that distinct downstream signaling networks are regulated by ITAM versus ITIM motifs and differentially relay humoral immune-mediated signals to myeloid cells.

Regarding solid tumors, while it is well known that cancer patients develop antibodies to tumor-associated antigens (evidence exist for c-myc, HER-2/neu, and p5327) these rarely are sufficient to eradicate tumorigenic cells. Instead, there is a reciprocal relationship between levels of CICs (or presence of CD20+ B cells) within tumor parenchyma for some cancer types where increased presence correlates with increased tumor burden and poor prognosis (reviewed in1), while in other cancer types, no correlation has been identified27. Formation of ectopic tertiary lymphoid structures with organized clusters of CD20+ B cells in these circumstances may instead be indicative of immune activation2830.

Experimental evidence indicating a protumoral role for humoral immunity derives from studies utilizing mouse models of solid tumor development where absence of B cells, FcγR or other B cell-selective effectors is associated with deficient tumorigenesis. Using the K14-HPV16 transgenic mouse model of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) development31, we reported that genetic deletion of B and T lymphocytes attenuated recruitment of innate immune cells (mast cells, monocytes, macrophages, granulocytes) into premalignant skin20. As a consequence, tissue remodeling, angiogenesis and epithelial hyperproliferation were significantly abated, culminating in reduced carcinoma incidence20. Importantly, transfer of B220+CD19+ B cells or serum from K14-HPV16 mice into T and B lymphocyte-deficient/HPV16 mice resulted in restored characteristics of premalignancy, e.g., Ig deposition in neoplastic skin, chronic myeloid cell infiltration, activation of angiogenic vasculature and keratinocyte hyperproliferation20. Similar findings have been reported in murine models of colorectal cancer32. Together, these data indicate that peripheral B cell activation is an essential step for early epithelial neoplasia and that B cell-derived soluble mediators are necessary for establishing chronic inflammatory states that potentiate malignant progression.

More recently, the B cell-dependent mechanisms involved in regulating squamous carcinogenesis have been identified, that being activation of Fcγ receptor-dependent pathways in infiltrating myeloid cells, specifically mast cells and macrophages, following their ligation by Ig-containing CIC deposited in parenchyma of premalignant tissue20,33. Notably, this protumorigenic paracrine pathway can be reprogrammed to instead resist tumor progression by either B cell- or Fcγ-genetic deletion, wherein infiltrating mast cells and macrophages lose their protumorigenic properties (angiogenic, CD8+ T cell-suppressive), and instead secrete angiostatic (CXCL10)33 and CD8+ T cell-chemoattractant chemokines functionally significant for instilling tumor repression (Coussens lab, unpublished observations). Similarly, pharmacological inhibition of Syk in K14-HPV16 mice halts pre-malignant progression, analogous to genetic B cell or FcRγ-deficiency (Coussens lab, unpublished observations). Whether this represents biology unique to myeloid cell reprogramming or also inhibition/reprogramming of other Syk-expressing cells (such as required for BCR signaling) remains to be elucidated.

Tumorigenic Roles for B cell-derived cytokines

The data above indicate that B cells potentiate solid tumor development by mechanisms involving humoral immunity; however, in other experimental tumor models, serum CIC/Ig fails to reinstate B cell-dependent tumor parameters thus implying a role for other B cell-derived mediators (Figure 2). During prostate carcinogenesis, the wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 16B (WNT16B) is upregulated by nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer (NF-κB) in B cells after DNA damage, and via a paracrine mechanism activates the canonical Wnt program in evolving tumor cells, the result of which is chemoresistance, in combination with enhanced tumor cell survival and disease progression34. In addition, B cell-derived lymphotoxin (LT)-β promotes survival of metastatic prostate cancer cells in castration-resistant disease by stimulating I kappa B kinase (IκK)-alpha and STAT3 activity in malignant cells, thus provoking androgen-refractory regrowth and metastasis35.

In contrast to HPV16-induced SCCs, squamous carcinomas possessing an activated ras oncogene, whereas B cells are required for progression to full malignancy, is dependent on B cell-derived TNFα36. In the absence of B cell-derived TNFα, neoplastic tissue instead contains increased levels of interferon (IFN)-γ and CD8+ T cells, and significant reductions in IL-10–producing B regulatory cells, thus indicating that tumor cell-intrinsic oncogenic signaling can also direct mechanisms of pro-tumoral leukocyte programming. Because CD5+ B cells in mice include well-defined populations of IL-10-expressing cells (Bregs/B10; CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B cells in humans37), it seems plausible to hypothesize that some of the Ig-independent pro-tumorigenic properties of B cells involve these regulatory populations. This perhaps represents B cell biology unique to conditions of “sterile” inflammation where an immune response would have no imperative to eliminate a pathogenic microorganism, and instead would favor resolution of acute inflammation to avoid harmful, chronic immune activation. These phenomena have been observed in several other cancer models where Breg cells residing in the peritoneum provide a reservoir of resistant B cells to anti-CD20 mAb therapy in mice9. B cells that resist depletion by anti-CD20 antibodies are predominantly of a CD5+/CD1dhi phenotype that encompasses the majority of IL-10-producing B cells; these cells greatly enhance implantable A20 lymphoma expansion in an IL-10-dependent manner38. Interestingly, macrophages co-cultured with B10 lymphoma cells display reduced major histocompatibility complex (MHC)II and CD86 expression, and resist lipopolysaccharide-stimulated TNFα and nitric oxide production38 thus indicating that IL-10 production by B cells directly favors protumorigenic type 2 programming of macrophages, while simultaneously inhibiting macrophage-mediated antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) of anti-CD20-bound B cells6. Several other studies have circumstantially implicated IL-10 production by B cells in mediating the macrophage-regulated CD8+ T cell anti-tumor response, the remainder of which will be discussed below.

B cells as inhibitors of TH1-mediated anti-tumor Immunity

In addition to altering local and circulating levels of cytokines, a significant role for B cells as (indirect) promoters of tumorigenesis lies in their ability to inhibit TH1-mediated anti-tumor immunity (Figure 3). Enhanced TH1 (IFN-γ producing TH cells) and Tc (cytotoxic CD8+ T cells) anti-tumor immunity in B cell deficient mice (IgM−/−) leads to rejection and/or slowed onset of multiple transplanted tumor grafts39. Accordingly, direct IgG ligation of FcγRI/III on macrophages inhibits IL-12 and upregulates IL-10 expression, a hallmark trait for protumorigenic macrophages40,41. Moreover, co-culturing total splenocytes from B cell-deficient mice with irradiated tumor cells enhances IFN-γ production from CD8+ T cells, in part mediated by CD40L/CD40 interaction and increased production of tumor cell-stimulated IL-10 production from B cells42. Given that macrophage-mediated cytotoxic mechanisms in pancreatic adenocarcinomas are agonistically provoked following therapeutic CD40 antibody therapy43,44, it is tempting to speculate that some of the clinical efficacy of agonist CD40 therapy is due to functional reprogramming of tumor-promoting B cells in manners similar to Syk inhibition.

Figure 3. Interactions of B cells with T cells.

Figure 3

B cells foster cancer development by also regulating diverse T lymphocyte responses, in particularly enhancing TH2-type programming of CD4+ T helper cells (TH) (1) while simultaneously repressing CD4+ TH1 cells (2) that in turn indirectly (3), or directly (4) influence CD8+ cytotoxic T cell (Tc) bioactivity. A role for B cells in regulating IL-17-expressing TH cells (TH17) or IL-9 expressing TH cells (TH9) can only be inferred at this point in time based on documented roles for B cells following infection, and in some autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disorders (5), however a recent study has identified a direct role for CD19+CD24hiCD38hi Breg cells in regulating TH17 cell differentiation in patients with rheumatoid arthtitis37.

Perspectives and therapeutic opportunities

From a classical point of view, it would seem likely that B cells contribute to tumorigenesis by impairing the process, and in deed they may under some circumstances. That the vast majority of humans do not develop cancer could in part be attributed to B cells, and other leukocytes, performing their intended vocations as they do when maintaining homeostatic tissue/organ health. However, as scientists begin to evaluate the fundamental molecular and cellular mechanisms contributing to cancer development using more sophisticated immune-competent in vivo models, similar to previously unappreciated protumorigenic roles for select T cell and myeloid cell subsets recently revealed (reviewed in45,46), B cells now also emerge as possessing protumorigenic activities. Given the inherent plasticity embedded within all leukocyte subsets, these discoveries present interesting opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

Regarding specific inhibition of pro-tumoral B cells, adjuvant use of rituximab, a depleting, humanized anti-CD20 MAb, either as monotherapy or (more likely) in combination with chemotherapy would theoretically be of clinical benefit. Explored on a small scale, previous use of rituximab for solid tumor therapy demonstrated limited clinical success47,48 likely owing to its use as monotherapy. That said, it is also clear that some B cell subsets, specifically Breg cells, are refractory to depletion via anti-CD20 mAb38,49; thus, other therapeutic strategies targeting Breg cells, in addition to other B cell subsets may need to be considered. For example, ibrutinib, a small molecule inhibitor of Btk has shown efficacy in B-CLL/SLL50 patients as well as in mouse models of cMyc-induced insulinoma51; thus, Btk (as well as Syk) inhibitors could also prove tractable for other cancers where B cells (and Btk or Syk signaling) contribute necessary mechanisms for tumor growth. Further interrogation of the significant B cell-regulated mechanisms contributing to solid tumor development will certainly reveal the degree to which B cells and their downstream effectors can be targeted therapeutically to improve outcomes for patients with cancer.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank members of the Coussens laboratory for critical discussions on content. AJG is supported by T32I078903-04. LMC acknowledges support from the NIH/NCI, a DOD BCRP Era of Hope Scholar Expansion Award, Susan B Komen Foundation, and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Tan TT, Coussens LM. Humoral immunity, inflammation and cancer. Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19:209–216. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2007.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pillai S, Mattoo H, Cariappa A. B cells and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2011;23:721–731. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2011.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.LeBien TW, Tedder TF. B lymphocytes: how they develop and function. Blood. 2008;112:1570–1580. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-078071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dilillo DJ, Matsushita T, Tedder TF. B10 cells and regulatory B cells balance immune responses during inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1183:38–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05137.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bubien JK, Zhou LJ, Bell PD, Frizzell RA, Tedder TF. Transfection of the CD20 cell surface molecule into ectopic cell types generates a Ca2+ conductance found constitutively in B lymphocytes. J Cell Biol. 1993;121:1121–1132. doi: 10.1083/jcb.121.5.1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Uchida J, et al. Mouse CD20 expression and function. Int Immunol. 2004;16:119–129. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kuijpers TW, et al. CD20 deficiency in humans results in impaired T cell-independent antibody responses. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:214–222. doi: 10.1172/JCI40231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McLaughlin P, White CA, Grillo-Lopez AJ, Maloney DG. Clinical status and optimal use of rituximab for B-cell lymphomas. Oncology (Huntingt) 1998;12:1763–1769. discussion 1769-1770, 1775-1777. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haas KM, Poe JC, Steeber DA, Tedder TF. B-1a and B-1b cells exhibit distinct developmental requirements and have unique functional roles in innate and adaptive immunity to S. pneumoniae. Immunity. 2005;23:7–18. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Leandro MJ, Isenberg DA. Rheumatic diseases and malignancy--is there an association? Scand J Rheumatol. 2001;30:185–188. doi: 10.1080/030097401316909486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bernatsky S, Ramsey-Goldman R, Clarke A. Malignancy and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006;18:129–134. doi: 10.1097/01.bor.0000209423.39033.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Carroll MC. The complement system in regulation of adaptive immunity. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:981–986. doi: 10.1038/ni1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pepys J, Wells ID, D’Souza MF, Greenberg M. Clinical and immunological responses to enzymes of Bacillus subtilis in factory workers and consumers. Clin Allergy. 1973;3:143–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1973.tb01318.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shushakova N, et al. C5a anaphylatoxin is a major regulator of activating versus inhibitory FcgammaRs in immune complex-induced lung disease. J Clin Invest. 2002;110:1823–1830. doi: 10.1172/JCI200216577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Godau J, et al. C5a initiates the inflammatory cascade in immune complex peritonitis. J Immunol. 2004;173:3437–3445. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.5.3437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV. Analyzing antibody-Fc-receptor interactions. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;415:151–162. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-570-1_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Karsten CM, et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of IgG1 mediated by Fc galactosylation and association of FcgammaRIIB and dectin-1. Nat Med. 2012;18:1401–1406. doi: 10.1038/nm.2862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Markiewski MM, et al. Modulation of the antitumor immune response by complement. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:1225–1235. doi: 10.1038/ni.1655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.de Visser KE, Eichten A, Coussens LM. Paradoxical roles of the immune system during cancer development. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:24–37. doi: 10.1038/nrc1782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.de Visser KE, Korets LV, Coussens LM. De novo carcinogenesis promoted by chronic inflammation is B lymphocyte dependent. Cancer Cell. 2005;7:411–423. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nakahara T, Norberg SM, Shalinsky DR, Hu-Lowe DD, McDonald DM. Effect of inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling on distribution of extravasated antibodies in tumors. Cancer Res. 2006;66:1434–1445. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aurora AB, et al. Immune complex-dependent remodeling of the airway vasculature in response to a chronic bacterial infection. J Immunol. 2005;175:6319–6326. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.10.6319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Takai T. Fc receptors and their role in immune regulation and autoimmunity. J Clin Immunol. 2005;25:1–18. doi: 10.1007/s10875-005-0353-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV. Fcgamma receptors as regulators of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:34–47. doi: 10.1038/nri2206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV. Fc-receptors as regulators of immunity. Adv Immunol. 2007;96:179–204. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(07)96005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Takai T, Li M, Sylvestre D, Clynes R, Ravetch JV. FcR gamma chain deletion results in pleiotrophic effector cell defects. Cell. 1994;76:519–529. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90115-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lu H, Goodell V, Disis ML. Humoral immunity directed against tumor-associated antigens as potential biomarkers for the early diagnosis of cancer. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:1388–1394. doi: 10.1021/pr700818f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kobayashi A, et al. Functional attributes of mucosal immunity in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and effects of HIV infection. Cancer Res. 2004;64:6766–6774. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kobayashi A, et al. Lymphoid Follicles Are Generated in High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia and Have Differing Characteristics Depending on HIV Status. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:151–164. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64359-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Carragher DM, Rangel-Moreno J, Randall TD. Ectopic lymphoid tissues and local immunity. Semin Immunol. 2008;20:26–42. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Coussens LM, Hanahan D, Arbeit JM. Genetic predisposition and parameters of malignant progression in K14-HPV16 transgenic mice. Am J Pathol. 1996;149:1899–1917. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Barbera-Guillem E, May KF, Jr, Nyhus JK, Nelson MB. Promotion of tumor invasion by cooperation of granulocytes macrophages activated by anti-tumor antibodies. Neoplasia. 1999;1:453–460. doi: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Andreu P, et al. FcRgamma activation regulates inflammation-associated squamous carcinogenesis. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:121–134. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sun Y, et al. Treatment-induced damage to the tumor microenvironment promotes prostate cancer therapy resistance through WNT16B. Nat Med. 2012;18:1359–1368. doi: 10.1038/nm.2890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ammirante M, Luo JL, Grivennikov S, Dedospasov S, Karin M. B-cell-derived lymphotoxin promotes castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature. 2010;464:302–306. doi: 10.1038/nature08782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schioppa T, et al. B regulatory cells and the tumor-promoting actions of TNF-alpha during squamous carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:10661–10667. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100994108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Flores-Borja F, et al. CD19(+)CD24(hi)CD38(hi) B cells maintain regulatory T cells while limiting Th1 and Th17 differentiation. Sci Trans Med. 2013;5:173ra123. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Horikawa M, Minard-Colin V, Matsushita T, Tedder TF. Regulatory B cell production of IL-10 inhibits lymphoma depletion during CD20 immunotherapy in mice. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:4268–4280. doi: 10.1172/JCI59266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shah SA, Obaidullah, Fahimullah An assessment of incomplete facial Basal cell carcinoma excision. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005;15:149–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sutterwala FS, Noel GJ, Salgame P, Mosser DM. Reversal of proinflammatory responses by ligating the macrophage Fcgamma receptor type I. J Exp Med. 1998;188:217–222. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.1.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Biswas SK, et al. A distinct and unique transcriptional program expressed by tumor-associated macrophages (defective NF-kappaB and enhanced IRF-3/STAT1 activation) Blood. 2006;107:2112–2122. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-01-0428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Inoue S, Leitner WW, Golding B, Scott D. Inhibitory effects of B cells on antitumor immunity. Cancer Res. 2006;66:7741–7747. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vonderheide RH, et al. Clinical activity and immune modulation in cancer patients treated with CP-870,893, a novel CD40 agonist monoclonal antibody. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:876–883. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.3311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Beatty GL, et al. CD40 agonists alter tumor stroma and show efficacy against pancreatic carcinoma in mice and humans. Science. 2011;331:1612–1616. doi: 10.1126/science.1198443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shiao SL, Ganessan AP, Rugo HS, Coussens LM. Immune microenvironments in solid tumors: new targets for therapy. Genes Dev. 2011;15:2559–2572. doi: 10.1101/gad.169029.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hanahan D, Coussens LM. Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:309–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Aklilu M, et al. Depletion of normal B cells with rituximab as an adjunct to IL-2 therapy for renal cell carcinoma and melanoma. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:1109–1114. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Barbera-Guillem E, et al. B lymphocyte pathology in human colorectal cancer. Experimental and clinical therapeutic effects of partial B cell depletion. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2000;48:541–549. doi: 10.1007/PL00006672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hamaguchi Y, et al. The peritoneal cavity provides a protective niche for B1 and conventional B lymphocytes during anti-CD20 immunotherapy in mice. J Immunol. 2005;174:4389–4399. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.7.4389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Advani RH, et al. Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib (PCI-32765) Has Significant Activity in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:88–94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.7906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Soucek L, et al. Mast cells are required for angiogenesis and macroscopic expansion of Myc-induced pancreatic islet tumors. Nat Med. 2007;13:1211–1218. doi: 10.1038/nm1649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES