Abstract
Mitochondrial ribosomal proteins (MRPs) are essential components for the structural and functional integrity of the mitoribosome complex. Throughout evolution, the mammalian mitoribosome has acquired new Mrp genes to compensate for loss of ribosomal RNA. More than 80 MRPs have been identified in mammals. Here we document expression pattern of 79 Mrp genes during mouse development and adult tissues and find that these genes are consistently expressed throughout early embryogenesis with little stage or tissue specificity. Further investigation of the amino acid sequence reveals that this group of proteins has little to no protein similarity. Recent work has shown that the majority of Mrp genes are essential resulting in early embryonic lethality, suggesting no functional redundancy among the group. Taken together, these results indicate that the Mrp genes are not a gene family descended from a single ancestral gene, and that each MRP has unique and essential role in the mitoribosome complex. The lack of functional redundancy is surprising given the importance of the mitoribosome for cellular and organismal viability. Further, these data suggest that genomic variants in Mrp genes may be causative for early pregnancy loss and should be evaluated as clinically.
Keywords: MRP, mitochondria, mitoribosome complex, Mrpl1, Mrpl2, Mrpl3, Mrpl4, Mrpl9, Mrpl10, Mrpl11, Mrpl12, Mrpl13, Mrpl14, Mrpl15, Mrpl16, Mrpl17, Mrpl18, Mrpl19, Mrpl20, Mrpl21, Mrpl22, Mrpl23, Mrpl24, Mrpl27, Mrpl28, Mrpl30, Mrpl32, Mrpl33, Mrpl34, Mrpl35, Mrpl36, Mrpl37, Mrpl38, Mrpl39, Mrpl40, Mrpl41, Mrpl42, Mrpl43, Mrpl44, Mrpl45, Mrpl46, Mrpl47, Mrpl48, Mrpl49, Mrpl50, Mrpl51, Mrpl52, Mrpl53, Mrpl54, Mrpl55, Mrpl56, Mrpl57, Mrpl58, Mrpl59, Mrps2, Mrps5, Mrps6, Mrps7, Mrps9, Mrps10, Mrps11, Mrps12, Mrps14, Mrps15, Mrps16, Mrps17, Mrps18a, Mrps18b, Mrps18c, Mrps21, Mrps22, Mrps23, Mrps24, Mrps25, Mrps26, Mrps27, Mrps28, Mrps29, Mrps30, Mrps31, Mrps33, Mrps34, Mrps35, Mrps36, Mrps37, Mrps38, Mrps39
Introduction
Mitochondria are evolutionarily conserved organelles that mammals acquired from alphaproteobacteria through the process of endosymbiosis (1). One remarkable feature of these highly dynamic organelles is the presence of their own circular genome, the nucleoid. Phylogenetic analyses have suggested that most of the mitochondrial related genes found in the eukaryotic nucleus originated from the mitochondrial genome and integrated into the nuclear genome through ancient evolutionary events (1, 2). Though varied in size among species, the mitochondrial genome is quite small when compared to the nuclear genome (3). Over the course of evolution, the mammalian mitochondrial genome has retained the coding sequence for 37 genes which encode for two ribosomal RNAs (rRNA), 22 transfer RNAs (tRNA) and 13 proteins all of which are essential components of the electron transport chain (ETC), the central components of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system (3). The remaining mitochondrial related proteins are encoded by genes in the nuclear genome and translated by the cytosolic translation machinery. This includes all components of the mitochondrial transcription and translation system. The majority of these proteins contain a transit peptide sequence at the N-terminus which allows them to be recognized by the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM) complex and imported into the mitochondria.
Mitochondria are generally termed the “powerhouse” of the cell given their ability to generate vast amounts of energy. Depending on physiological conditions, mitochondria will respond through fusion or fission to achieve adequate energy demands (4–8). In addition to being the major cellular energy source, mitochondria also produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), an essential second messenger, and also have crucial roles in multiple metabolic and biogenetic pathways (9, 10). Hence, dysfunctional mitochondria can have myriad detrimental effects. Indeed, numerous clinical studies show that mutations in mitochondrial related genes are associated with multisystem disorders in humans and early embryonic lethality in mice (11–13). In particular, dysfunctional mitochondrial translation most often results in pre-gastrulation developmental arrest in mouse embryos due to insufficient ATP production and interruption in cell cycle (12).
The mitochondrial translation machinery is composed of tRNAs and the 55S mitoribosome complex which consists of two rRNAs (16S and 12S) and nuclear-encoded mitochondrial ribosomal proteins (MRP) (14). Similar to the cytosolic ribosome complex, the mitoribosome complex contains the P-site (the peptidyl site), A-site (the acceptor site) and E-site (the exit site) (14). The mitoribosome complex has undergone dynamic change during the course of evolution. The metazoan mitoribosome complex has lost some bacterial originated MRPs and regions of the rRNA and acquired new eukaryotic specific MRPs (15, 16). Distinct from the bacterial mitoribosome complex, the mammalian complex has higher protein content (14). In mammals, more than 80 Mrp genes have been identified and this group of genes is classified in two main categories: Mrpl, components of the large subunit, and Mrps, components of the small subunit. The naming of these mammalian Mrp genes is inherited from their prokaryotic homologs for consistency across organisms. Recently, additional proteins have been identified as MRPs based on their cellular localization in the mitochondria and association with other mitoribosome components (17). Currently, the total number of Mrp genes in mice has increased to 84 with 51 Mrpl and 33 Mrps.
Our group has recently characterized knock out phenotypes of embryos lacking the Mrpl3, -l22, -l44, -s18c and -s22 genes along with description of 16 other mitochondrial related gene knockouts (12)(https://blogs.umass.edu/jmager/). Loss of any one of these essential mitochondrial related genes, results in one of two specific phenotypes - null embryos either fail to implant after the blastocyst stage or fail to initiate gastrulation, each with nearly identical mutant phenotype. The surprisingly consistent phenotypes and apparent lack of functional redundancy among the Mrp genes led us to investigate expression patterns and similarities among this large group of genes.
Results and Discussion
Mrp genes are widely expressed in various mouse tissues:
We evaluated the expression pattern of 79 Mrp genes (50 Mrpl and 29 Mrps) in oocytes, pre-implantation (zygotes and blastocysts) and gastrulation stage (E6.5-E8.5) embryos as well as several adult tissues (kidney, liver, heart, brain and testes). We used intron-spanning RT-PCR primers intentionally designed to amplify all known isoforms of each specific gene.
Forty-six of 50 Mrpl and 20 of 29 Mrps are ubiquitously expressed in all tissues tested (fig. 1). This includes Mrpl1, -l3, -l4, -l9, -l10, -l11, -l13, -l14, -l15, -l16, -l17, -l18, -l19, -l21, -l22, -l23, -l24, -l28, -l30, -l32, -l33, -l34, -l35, -l36, -l37, -l38, -l39, -l40, -l41, -l42, -l43, -l44, -l45, -l46, -l47, -l48, -l49, -l50, -l51, -l52, -l53, -l54, -l55, -l56, -l57, -l58, -s5, -s6, -s9, -s10, -s11, -s14, -s15, -s16, -s17, -s18a, -s18b, -s18c, -s21, -s22, -s23, -s25, -s31, -s33, -s35, and -s36. Details of those that do show temporal or tissue specificity are listed here (fig. 1): Mrpl2 is absent in E8.5 yolk sac; Mrpl12 is absent in E7.5 extraembryonic tissue; Mrpl20 is absent in oocytes, zygotes and blastocysts; Mrpl27 is absent in oocytes; Mrps2 is absent in E8.5 embryonic tissue; Mrps7 is absent in E7.5 extraembryonic tissue; Mrps12 is absent in zygotes; Mrps24 is absent in oocytes and zygotes; Mrps26 is absent in oocytes and zygotes; Mrps27 is absent in zygotes and blastocysts; Mrps28 is absent in oocytes and zygotes; Mrps30 is absent in zygotes; and Mrps34 is absent in oocytes and zygotes. The only notable pattern across all of the Mrp genes is that there is varied expression during the pre-implantation stages, but nearly all Mrp are robustly expressed by E7.5.
Figure 1.

79 Mrp genes are widely expressed throughout early embryo development and in adult mouse tissues. (A-B) RT-PCR gene expression patterns of the 50 Mrpl (A) and 29 Mrps (B) in MII oocytes, E0.5 zygotes, blastocysts and gastrulation stage embryos (E6.5-E8.5), as well as kidney, liver, heart, brain and testes. Gapdh was used as control. “oo” denotes oocytes, “zy” denotes zygotes, “bl” denotes blastocysts, “WE” denotes whole embryos, “emb” denotes embryonic portion, “exe” denotes extraembryonic portion, and “ys” denotes yolk sac. “NTC” denotes no template control. “*” denotes null embryos that are arrested at the pre-gastrulation stage (E6.5); “§” denotes null embryos that are likely to result null embryos that are arrested at E6.5 (they cannot be found at E9.5); “¶” denotes null embryos are not found at E12.5; and “^” denotes mouse knockout strains that failed to produce viable null mouse pups at weaning age but were not examined earlier.
Gastrulation is the first major differentiation and specification of the primary germ layers, a dynamic process involving drastic cell movement which requires energy. Given the role of MRPs in mitochondrial translation system, it is perhaps not surprising that they are all robustly expressed at this time. Three non-mutually exclusive explanations for the varied expression during preimplantation are plausible. The first is that preimplantation development is a series of reduction-divisions resulting in increasingly smaller blastomere size. Additionally, no active movement of cells has been documented in the embryo prior to implantation, suggesting a relatively low cellular energy requirement. The second contributing factor could be the large pool of functional maternal mitoribosomes present in the embryos, mitigating the need for new mitoribosome synthesis. A third possibility is that there may be distinct mitoribosome complexes required at different stages of development, allowing tissue specific expression. If this were true then one would predict tissue and/or temporal specific phenotypes for some Mrp knock-out alleles. However, this appears not to be the case for many Mrp genes.
It is important to note that there are a few discrepancies between our data and older microarray studies. Different from our RT-PCR panel, Zeng et al found that all Mrp are present during all cleavage stage and blastocyst stage embryos (18). We suspect that the microarray probes recognize distinct Mrp splice variants (whereas our primers amplified all variants), which may be of interest to investigate in the future.
Mrp genes are each essential for early embryo development
Our group has previously performed in-depth characterization of many different Mrp knockout phenotypes (12). Our study showed that the absence of each single Mrp gene results in pre-gastrulation arrest. We tabulated these data together with the embryonic phenotyping data collected by the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC) and other studies (19, 20). 22 of the 84 Mrp genes have been knocked out in the mouse, and all but 1 are lethal (95%). Null mouse pups were not recovered at weaning age in 5 of the strains and are identified as preweaning lethal: Mrpl23, -l58, -s21, -s37 and -s39, and the analysis of early stages was not performed leading us to suspect that they are also early lethal phenotypes. 17 of the 22 are identified as embryonic lethal: Mrpl3, -l12, -l18, -l22, -l33, -l44, -l47, -l51, -l59, -s5, -s12, -s18c, -s22, -s25, -s37, -s38, and -s39 (fig. 2). Among the embryonic lethal strains, Mrpl3, -l22, -l44, -l59, -s18c, -s22, and -s25 null embryos were developmentally arrested at the pre-gastrulation stage (E6.5); Mrpl12, -l47, -l51, -s5, -s12, and -s38 null embryos are likely to be arrested at the pre-gastrulation stage as these null embryos were not found at E9.5; and Mrpl18, -l33 and -s29 null embryos are not found at E12.5. Given the involvement of mitochondria in cell movement and proliferation and the large percentage of early embryonic lethal Mrp strains, we speculate that the great majority of Mrp knockouts will likewise undergo early developmental arrest. It is important to point out that we observe no correlation between temporal expression patterns of specific genes and their null phenotype. In other words, the phenotype/stage of lethality cannot be predicted or informed by a specific gene’s expression.
Figure 2.

95% lethality in Mrp knockouts. 22 Mrp genes have been deleted thus far in the mouse. 12 Mrpl (Mrpl3, -l12, -l18, -l22, -l23, -l33, -l44, -l47, -l51, -l56, -l58, and -l59) and 10 Mrps (Mrps5, -s12, -s18c, -s21, -s22, -s25, -s29, -s37, -s38, and -s39). Among these Mrp alleles, seven (Mrpl3, -l22, -l44, -l59, -s18c, -s22, and -s25) result in null embryos that are arrested at the pre-gastrulation stage (E6.5); six more (Mrpl12, -l47, -l51, -s5, -s12, and -s38) are likely to result null embryos that are arrested at E6.5 (they cannot be found at E9.5); Mrpl18, -l33 and -s29 null embryos are not found at E12.5; and five strains (Mrpl23, -l58, -s21, -s37, and -s39) failed to produce viable null mouse pups at weaning age but were not examined earlier. Mrpl56 is the only strain that generated viable homozygous knockout animals. Data extracted from IMPC and other studies.
Mrpl56 is the only knockout with homozygous viable mice (21). This gene encodes for the enzyme lactamase beta (LACTB) and in vitro study using mammalian cell line has shown that this enzyme has the ability to alter the mitochondrial lipid metabolism (22). Interestingly, when assessing possible protein-protein interaction in this MRP group based on the STRING database version 11.0 (23), MRPL56 was predicted to be the only member that does not show interaction with any other MRP members rising doubts regarding its involvement in the mitoribosome. This leads us to speculate that although MRPL56 is localized in the mitochondria, it may not be part of the mitoribosome complex. Supporting this idea, previous in vitro study utilizing mammalian cell line suggested MRPL56/ LACTB to be an endoribonuclease, having a similar role to MRPP3 and its family (24).
MRPs share little/no amino acid similarity
To further explore the properties of MRP proteins, we compared the 79 amino acid sequences within this large group to identify possible conserved motifs. We performed T-Coffee multiple sequence alignment of all isoforms encoded by the Mrp genes and each pairwise alignment was scored with BLOSUM62 substitution matrices. The BLOSUM62 scores are alignment scores that indicate how closely related two amino acid sequences are to one another (considering alignment gaps, sequence lengths, and mutation rates). Thus, the greater the alignment score, the greater the sequence similarity between two MRP proteins. Interestingly, other than the 3 MRPS18 homologues (-S18A, -S18B and -S18C) (25), none of the other MRPs share any signature domains. Additionally, our analyses show that all alignment scores greater than 500 are pairwise alignments of MRP gene specific-isoforms and that all of the remaining pair-wise alignments result in very low scores (all <260, not shown), indicating little/no protein homology across all of the MRPs. Therefore we conclude that this group of genes is not a gene family, but rather a similarly named group of proteins which function in the mitoribosome. However, utilizing evolutionary trace analysis, it appears that each MRP does contain conserved amino acid residues across different eukaryotic lineages suggesting that the unique non-redundant role of each Mrp genes is not limited to particular species.
PROSITE analysis (26) indicates that only 15 of the 84 mammalian MRPs contain domains that are identified in other proteins. 9 of these MRPs share distinct signature domains with their orthologs in other species: MRPL3, -L13, -L24, -S2, -S5, -S9, -S11, -S12, and -S18 and the remaining 6 MRP members contain protein domains that are also found in proteins outside of the MRP group. MRPL3 contains an L3 signature domain that is also shared with its orthologs in other organisms. MRPL39 contains a TGS domain which is named after the threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS), GTPase, and guanosine-3’,5’-bis(diphosphate) 3’-pyrophosphohydrolase (SpoT) (27). MRPL42 contains a prokaryotic membrane lipoprotein lipid attachment site which is usually cleaved by specific lipoprotein peptidase in prokaryotes (28). Since this site overlaps with the transit peptide sequence in MRPL42, this domain may not have retained its function in mammalian mitoribosome. MRPL44 and MRPS5 contain dsRNA binding domains suggesting a potential interaction with the 16S/12S rRNA. MRPS18 contains the aminoacyl-tRNA binding domain inferring the importance of this protein in the A-site of the mitoribosome. MRPS27 and MRPS39 both contain the PPR domain which is commonly found in proteins that are involved in RNA processing (29). Lastly, MRPS37 contains a CHCH domain which signals the protein to be imported into the mitochondrial intermembrane space and these proteins are usually involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, maintenance, and translation (26, 30).
The central feature shared among this large group of proteins is their involvement in assembly and/or components of the mitoribosome complex. Based on the unique domains found in some MRPs, it is not surprising that each of these MRPs has a unique role in the mitoribosome complex that cannot be compensated by other MRPs. If MRPs have unique non-redundant functions, then it is not surprising that each gene is robustly expressed in all tissues and stages as we observe. Unique and essential roles within the mitoribosome would also explain the nearly identical knockout phenotype that we observe for many Mrp null embryos (12).
Conclusion
Clinical studies have shown that mitochondrial disorders such as cardiomyopathy, sensorineural deafness, diabetes, lactic acidosis, Leigh syndrome, and combined oxidative phosphorylation deficiency (COXPD) are all associated with mutations in Mrp genes (11, 31–40). Aside from mitochondrial diseases, Mrp genes have also been associated with carcinoma, breast and gastric cancers through their involvement in cell proliferation and apoptosis (41–45).
Although there are over 80 Mrp genes present in the mammalian genome, this group of genes shares little similarity and early lethality of Mrp null embryos suggests no functional redundancy. The ubiquitous expression of most Mrp genes further suggests the indispensable role of each Mrp member in diverse tissues and cell types. Throughout evolution, mitochondria continue to adjust to diverse energy demand and cell-physiological conditions. Understanding the relationship between these conserved and disease-associated genes and their specific roles in the mitochondrial translation machinery may benefit therapeutic approaches to mitochondrial diseases.
Materials and Methods
Mouse oocytes and embryo retrieval
All embryos and tissues were collected/dissected from C57BL/6NJ mice throughout this study. MII oocytes were retrieved from the infundibulum after superovulation with standard course of 5IU PMSG followed by 5IU HCG 48 hours later. To collect mouse embryos, wildtype male and female mice were housed together, and the morning of the copulation plug was defined as E0.5. Pre-implantation stage embryos were collected on E0.5 (for zygotic stage) and E3.5 (for blastocyst stage). Gastrulation stage embryos were collected on days E6.5, E7.5 and E8.5. Use of animals was approved by the University of Massachusetts IACUC protocol #2018–0003.
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis
RNA was isolated from mouse tissues using either Qiagen RNeasy Plus Micro Kit (Qiagen 74034) or Roche High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (Roche 11828665001) and converted to cDNA using BioRad iScript cDNA Synthesis (BioRad 1708890). Subsequently, RT-PCR was performed for 38 cycles of 30s at 60°C, 72°C and 95°C with the primers listed in table 1 (see appendix). RT-PCR amplicon was electrophoresed in a 1.5% agarose containing 0.2 ug/ml ethidium bromide (Invitrogen 15585011). Gels were run at 120V in 1X TAE for 30min and subsequently visualized and photographed with Syngene inGeninus Bio Imaging system. Pooled C57BL/6NJ oocytes and embryonic tissues collected at the respective stages were used in this study and the RT-PCR analysis was repeated with a minimum of two times.
Amino Acid Sequence comparison analysis
The amino acid sequences of 79 mitochondrial ribosomal proteins were obtained through the UniProt protein sequence database (46). A multiple sequence alignment of the Mrp protein sequences was performed using the Tree-based Consistency Objective Function for Alignment Evaluation program (T-Coffee) (47) and the maximum likelihood tree was visualized using Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) (48).
Funding:
This work supported in part by NIH grant R01HD083311 to JM.
Appendix
Table 1.
Intron-spanning primers for RT-PCR analysis
| Gene | Product size (bp) | Forward primer (5′ to 3′) | Reverse primer (5′ to 3′) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mrpl1 | 406 | CTGCTGCTGCTGCTACAAAG | GCAGCTCCATTTTCTTCTGC |
| Mrpl2 | 420 | GAGCAATGTCCTCCTTCAGC | GCCATCCTGCCTATGTGATT |
| Mrpl3 | 414 | TGTTAGAAATCTCCACAGCAAGA | ATCTGTTTTGGTGGCAGTCC |
| Mrpl4 | 427 | ATTTCAGAGCCGCGAGATAG | GCACTTTCATGGGCAACAT |
| Mrpl9 | 413 | CGCGTGTATAAGTTGGTGGA | CGAGTGATAGGCTCCTCTGG |
| Mrpl10 | 424 | ATGGCTCCAAGGCTGTGAC | TTTAAGACCCGCACCATTTC |
| Mrpl11 | 301 | CAGTTCTGCAAAGAGTTCAACG | CAGAGCCAATGATGGAACG |
| Mrpl12 | 400 | CAGATGCCCAGCGTCTGT | GGTTGATGCCCTGGACGTAG |
| Mrpl13 | 338 | CACTTTTGCTCGAATGTGGT | GCCTTTGCATCATTGTCCTT |
| Mrpl14 | 400 | CCATGTCAGCAGAGCATTCA | CACAAAGTTCTGAGCGATGG |
| Mrpl15 | 214 | AGAAAGGCAGAGAGGAACCC | ACCTCTCCCATTCACAAGCT |
| Mrpl16 | 333 | CCTTTCAAGCCCATCACTCG | CTGCGTCAAGTCATATGGGC |
| Mrpl17 | 414 | CCATCTGCTGCGGAACTTG | CTTGCGTCCTGGTTATGGTG |
| Mrpl18 | 264 | GAAACTGGAGTGTGGGTTCG | ACAACAACCTGGCCGTTAAG |
| Mrpl19 | 233 | ACCCCTATGCCAGTGGAAAA | AAAGGTGCTGTACTCGGGAA |
| Mrpl20 | 218 | CTCAGCATTTTCGGGGAAGG | TTTCCTGTTGAGCTCCACCT |
| Mrpl21 | 243 | TCCTAAGACCTCCCTGAGCT | TTCTCCAGCCGAATCCTCTC |
| Mrpl22 | 215 | TTTACCCACCTCAACTGCCT | CACTGCCATGTCTTGTGCTT |
| Mrpl23 | 217 | GAAGATACCGTGCAGTTCCG | CTGGGAAAGTGAAGGTCTGC |
| Mrpl24 | 403 | GCATCCAAAGCCACTTCCTC | CACGTTCTCCTGCCTCAGTA |
| Mrpl27 | 416 | GGCGCTTACGCTGAGGAC | TGAAGGTTCCCTCAGGTTTG |
| Mrpl28 | 451 | CCCCGGTACACTACAAACCT | TCATAGATGGCTGCTCTCCG |
| Mrpl30 | 406 | AGGTGCAGAATCTCTCATTGG | CTGCTCCACAGGCTTCAGAT |
| Mrpl32 | 424 | AGAGCTGGAGTCGCTTTGTC | ATCCTCTTGCCCTGATCCTT |
| Mrpl33 | 122 | CTGCTCTCCGCTGTCTCTTT | CTCAGCTTCTCTCGGAGTCG |
| Mrpl34 | 231 | GCCCTATTGAGTGGCAGGTA | TCAGTGGCTCAGGGACTTG |
| Mrpl35 | 400 | CCCTTGAATGTCTTGGCATC | TGCTGCAGAACACAAATTCC |
| Mrpl36 | 218 | TCTTCTCCTCGTTCCTGCTG | TTGTCGCTGTTTATGCTTGG |
| Mrpl37 | 400 | TCTGGAGCCCATTACCTACG | CAGCTGTATGAGGCTGTCCA |
| Mrpl38 | 443 | TACTGGAGCGGAAGCACTTT | CTCCTGTCCTTCAGCCACTC |
| Mrpl39 | 405 | AGTTGTGCCATGCATCTGAG | TCTTGCATCAACGTCCAGAG |
| Mrpl40 | 420 | ACACACCCACCAGAGAGCTT | AGGCTGGTATCCCGCTTTAT |
| Mrpl41 | 401 | GTTTCCTGACTGCCGTGACT | GCGTGGGAAATTCTTAGGATA |
| Mrpl42 | 408 | TGGGCGATATCAAACAGAACT | TCTGTCTCTGGGAGGATTCAG |
| Mrpl43 | 436 | TGACCAGCGTCCTCCATAAT | ATCGAAGCTGGAGCAGAATC |
| Mrpl44 | 463 | GGGGAGTGAAGAAGGGATTC | TCTGCACTGAGGGTCAACTG |
| Mrpl45 | 428 | TTGGAGTATGCCAGGAAAGC | CAACGGACATGAACCACTTG |
| Mrpl46 | 425 | CTCGGGAAACAGAAGCTGAC | GAGAAATCGCCTGACCTGAG |
| Mrpl47 | 447 | ACCACGTTGTCAAGGAAAGG | CACATAAGGCATTGCGAAGA |
| Mrpl48 | 412 | AGCAAGGCTTTTCCCTCCTA | ACTCGCTCATGGGTGGTAAG |
| Mrpl49 | 414 | GACGGAAGCTGAGCCAGA | GCCAGGCTTTAAGTTGCTCA |
| Mrpl50 | 353 | TGATCGTGTCTCGGTTAGCA | CATTTGGTGAAGCCTGGAGT |
| Mrpl51 | 302 | CGGCAAGTAGGAGACTGTGG | ATGCAGGTCCTCAATGAACA |
| Mrpl52 | 329 | GTGTCCGGAGATTGCACTG | CGGAAGTGGGCTTCTCAGTA |
| Mrpl53 | 240 | GGTCAAGCTGGTTCGAGTTC | GAGGCCAAGGCACTTAACAT |
| Mrpl54 | 311 | TCCTCAGAAGACCTGGAGGAT | GTGGCGCCAGATATTCTGTT |
| Mrpl55 | 333 | CCTTTGGCCATTCTGCTTAG | TTCTTCCCTCTTCTGCTGGA |
| Mrpl56 | 313 | TCCGGCACTACCGAGTTATC | CTGCTTCCCACAGTTTAGCC |
| Mrpl57 | 202 | TCTTTCCAAGCGAAGGAGAG | GATGGTCTAGCTGGTCTGCAA |
| Mrpl58 | 409 | GTTGACCTGAGCACAGCAAA | TCAGTTGGCTTCTCCTGCTT |
| Mrps2 | 489 | GCCATTACAGCATTCGGATT | TTGCAGTTGGTGTCCACAAT |
| Mrps5 | 440 | TCCCTGCATTGTGTAGCTTG | CTGGACGACCCCACTTTTTA |
| Mrps6 | 217 | CGCTACGAGTTGGCTTTGAT | CAGCACTTGTCGGAGCATAA |
| Mrps7 | 400 | AACCTTCCAGGGCTCACAC | ACCCAATCACAGGCTCACA |
| Mrps9 | 480 | AAGACCCGGAAACTTTTGCT | CGGGTTCAATCAGTTGCTTT |
| Mrps10 | 419 | CGCTCAGTGCCAGTATGAAG | CTGCGTCTTTGTCACTTCCA |
| Mrps11 | 413 | TTAAGAAACTCCGGGTCGTG | ACTCCCTTTCCTGTGGCTTT |
| Mrps12 | 382 | CCTTCTTTATGGCCTCACCA | GCAGTCATACTTGCCCCTCA |
| Mrps14 | 310 | AGTTCCTCCATCAGCGTCAG | TAGCCCGTGGTCAGCTAAGT |
| Mrps15 | 437 | GTAGCGCCAGTCTGCTCTCT | GGTCTGACGGAGGATTTTGA |
| Mrps16 | 387 | GGTCCAGCTCACAACCATTT | TTGGCCTCTGACTCTGCTTT |
| Mrps17 | 324 | ATAGTCCGTTCATCCGTCCA | GAGGGGGCTCTCTAGGTAGG |
| Mrps18a | 444 | CTGGTTATGGCTTCCAGCTC | ATACCCACCTTGTTCCAACG |
| Mrps18b | 516 | ATATGAGAGCGAGCCTTGGA | CCTTGATAGAGTCGGCGAAG |
| Mrps18c | 418 | GGTTGCTCTGTGCAGTGGTA | TTCTCGGTATCTGATGTTACAAACTC |
| Mrps21 | 250 | ATGGCTAAACATCTGAAGTTCATT | ACGGGTCTGCACGGTTCT |
| Mrps22 | 533 | TACAACCACTGAAGCCACCA | AGCCATTCCACCAAAGTGTC |
| Mrps23 | 406 | CCTTTCCACCCCTGAGAGAG | GTTTCTGGCTCCTGCTTCAC |
| Mrps24 | 566 | CGGTCTGCGCCAAGAATC | TGTACTTGTACACGACCTTGGA |
| Mrps25 | 455 | GGGACGTGGTATTCAAGGAG | ACTGGCTTTCAGAGCAGCTT |
| Mrps26 | 420 | CGGAATTCTTCGTGTTGACC | CGGCCCAGTTGTAACTCTTC |
| Mrps27 | 444 | TCACGGTTTGTGGACAACAT | GCCCACTGTGTTCCTTTGTT |
| Mrps28 | 510 | AGAGCGCTTGTCTTCTCCAA | TTACTTGCTGGGTTGCTCCT |
| Mrps30 | 756 | ACGGATTCTCACCAAGATGC | GCTCCAGTCCAAGCAAAAAG |
| Mrps31 | 407 | GTTGACCTGAGCACAGCAAA | TCAGTTGGCTTCTCCTGCTT |
| Mrps33 | 301 | GTCTCCGCTTTCGGAGTATG | TCTCTTCCCTTCTCCTTTCCTC |
| Mrps34 | 578 | AAAGTAAGACCCCGGCTGAT | CGAGTCCTCTCCAGGTTCAG |
| Mrps35 | 434 | TCTGCATTTGACTCCTGTGG | TCTTTGCCCACACATACTCG |
| Mrps36 | 263 | GTGCAGGTAGTGAAGCCACA | CCACGCTGGATAAATTCCAT |
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Conflict statement: We have no conflict of interest or the appearance of conflict of interest with the data presented in this manuscript.
Reference
- 1.Lang MWGBF, and Burger G, Mitochondrial Genome Evolution and the Origin of Eukaryotes. Annual review of genetics 33, 351–397 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.G Burger BFL, Reith M, and Gray MW, Genes encoding the same three subunits of respiratory complex II are present in the mitochondrial DNA of two phylogenetically distant eukaryotes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93, 2328–2332 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Han S. R. L. a. J., Mitochondrial Nucleoid: Shield and Switch of the Mitochondrial Genome. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2017, 1–15 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wenyan Fu YL, and Yin Hang, Mitochondrial Dynamics: Biogenesis, Fission, Fusion, and Mitophagy in the Regulation of Stem Cell Behaviors. Stem Cells International 2019, 1–15 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cong-Hui Yao RW, Wang Yahui, Kung Che-Pei, Weber Jason D, and Patti Gary J, Mitochondrial fusion supports increased oxidative phosphorylation during cell proliferation. eLife 8, e41351 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bliek R. J. Y. a. A. M. v. d., Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science 337, 1062–1065 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chan P. M. a. D. C., Mitochondrial dynamics and inheritance during cell division, development and disease. Nature reviews. Molecular cellular biology. 15, 634–646 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Francois R. Jornayvaz a. G. I. S., Regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis. Essays in Biochemistry 47, 69–84 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jixiang Zhang XW, Vikash Vikash, Ye Qing, Wu Dandan, Liu Yulan, and Dong Weiguo, ROS and ROS-Mediated Cellular Signaling. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2016, 4350965 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Johannes Boonstra a. J. A. P., Molecular events associated with reactive oxygen species and cell cycle progression in mammalian cells. Genes 337, 1–13 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dasmanthie De Silva Y-TT, Amunts Alexey, Fontanesi Flavia, and Barrientos Antoni, Mitochondrial ribosome assembly in health and disease. Cell Cycle 14, 2226–2250 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Agnes Cheong DA, Degani Rinat, Iverson Elizabeth, Tremblay Kimberly, and Mager Jesse, Nuclear-encoded Mitochondrial Ribosomal Proteins Are Required to Initiate Gastrulation. Development 147, dev188714 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ebert C. B. a. S., Development of aerobic metabolism in utero: requirement for mitochondrial function during embryonic and foetal periods. OA Biotechnology 2, 1–16 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nicole Mai ZMAC-L, and Lightowlers Robert N., The process of mammalian mitochondrial protein synthesis. Cell and Tissue Research 367, 5–20 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.T Suzuki MT, Takemoto-Hori C, Hanada T, Ueda T, Wada A, and Watanabe K, Structural Compensation for the Deficit of rRNA With Proteins in the Mammalian Mitochondrial Ribosome. Systematic Analysis of Protein Components of the Large Ribosomal Subunit From Mammalian Mitochondria. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 276, 21724–21736 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Elie Desmond CB-A, Forterre Patrick, and Gribaldo Simonetta, On the last common ancestor and early evolution of eukaryotes: reconstructing the history of mitochondrial ribosomes. Research in Microbiology 162, 53–70 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Emine C Koc HC, Kumcuoglu Beril, Abu Nadiah, Akpinar Gurler, Md Emdadul Haque, Spremulli Linda L, and Koc Hasan, Identification and Characterization of CHCHD1, AURKAIP1, and CRIF1 as New Members of the Mammalian Mitochondrial Ribosome. Frontier in physiology 4, 1–15 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fanyi Zeng DAB, and Schultz Richard M., Transcript profiling during preimplantation mouse development. Developmental Biology 272, 483–496 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim HR CH, Thomas M, Miyazaki T, Monosov A, Monosov E, Krajewska M, Krajewski S, Reed JC, Mammalian dap3 is an essential gene required for mitochondrial homeostasis in vivo and contributing to the extrinsic pathway for apoptosis. FASEB journal 21, 188–196 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Min-chul Kwon B-KK, Moon Jin-Sook, Kim Yoon-Young, Ki Cheol Park Nam-Shik Kim, Mi Yi Kwon Myung-Phil Kong, Yoon Ki-Jun, Im Sun-Kyoung, Ghim Jaewang, Han Yong-Mahn, Sung Key Jang Minho Shong, and Kong Young-Yun, Crif1 is a novel transcriptional coactivator of STAT3. The EMBO Journal 27, 642–653 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dickinson ME FA, Ji X, Teboul L, Wong MD, White JK, Meehan TF, Weninger WJ, Westerberg H, Adissu H, Baker CN, Bower L, Brown JM, Caddle LB, Chiani F, Clary D, Cleak J, Daly MJ, Denegre JM, Doe B, Dolan ME, Edie SM, Fuchs H, Gailus-Durner V, Galli A, Gambadoro A, Gallegos J, Guo S, Horner NR, Hsu CW, Johnson SJ, Kalaga S, Keith LC, Lanoue L, Lawson TN, Lek M, Mark M, Marschall S, Mason J, McElwee ML, Newbigging S, Nutter LM, Peterson KA, Ramirez-Solis R, Rowland DJ, Ryder E, Samocha KE, Seavitt JR, Selloum M, Szoke-Kovacs Z, Tamura M, Trainor AG, Tudose I, Wakana S, Warren J, Wendling O, West DB, Wong L, Yoshiki A, International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium, Jackson Laboratory, Infrastructure Nationale PHENOMIN, Institut Clinique de la Souris (ICS), Charles River Laboratories, MRC Harwell, Toronto Centre for Phenogenomics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, RIKEN BioResource Research Center, MacArthur DG, Tocchini-Valentini GP, Gao X, Flicek P, Bradley A, Skarnes WC, Justice MJ, Parkinson HE, Moore M, Wells S, Braun RE, Svenson KL, de Angelis MH, Herault Y, Mohun T, Mallon AM, Henkelman RM, Brown SD, Adams DJ, Lloyd KC, McKerlie C, Beaudet AL, and Bućan M, Murray SA, High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes. Nature 537, 508–514 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zuzana Keckesova JLD, De Cock Jasmine, Freinkman Elizaveta, Lingrell Susanne, Bachovchin Daniel A., Bierie Brian, Tischler Verena, Noske Aurelia, Okondo Marian C., Reinhardt Ferenc, Thiru Prathapan, Golub Todd R., Vance Jean E., and Weinberg Robert A., LACTB is a tumour suppressor that modulates lipid metabolism and cell state. Nature 543, 681–686 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Damian Szklarczyk ALG, Lyon David, Junge Alexander, Wyder Stefan, Huerta-Cepas Jaime, Simonovic Milan, Doncheva Nadezhda T, Morris John H, Bork Peer, Jensen Lars J, and von Mering Christian, STRING v11: Protein-Protein Association Networks With Increased Coverage, Supporting Functional Discovery in Genome-Wide Experimental Datasets. Nucleic Acids Research 47, D607–D613 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shiri Levy CKA, Liveanu Varda, Habib Mouna R, Gileadi Opher, and Schuster Gadi, Identification of LACTB2, a Metallo-β-Lactamase Protein, as a Human Mitochondrial Endoribonuclease. Nucleic Acids Research 44, 1813–1832 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Muhammad Mushtaq RHA, Kashuba Vladimir, Klein George, and Kashuba Elena, S18 family of mitochondrial ribosomal proteins: evolutionary history and Gly132 polymorphism in colon carcinoma. Oncotarget 7, 55649–55662 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Edouard de Castro CJAS, Gattiker Alexandre, Bulliard Virginie, Langendijk-Genevaux Petra S., Gasteiger Elisabeth, Bairoch Amos, and Hulo Nicolas, ScanProsite: detection of PROSITE signature matches and ProRule-associated functional and structural residues in proteins. Nucleic Acids Research 34, W362–365 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yuri LA Wolf I, Grishin Nick V., and Koonin Eugene V., Evolution of Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases—Analysis of Unique Domain Architectures and Phylogenetic Trees Reveals a Complex History of Horizontal Gene Transfer Events. Genome Research 9, 689–710 (1999). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wu S. H. a. H. C., Lipoproteins in bacteria. Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes 22, 451–471 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Manna S, An overview of pentatricopeptide repeat proteins and their applications. Biochimie 113, 93–99 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nazanine Modjtahedi KT, Dessen Philippe, and Kroemer Guido, Mitochondrial Proteins Containing Coiled-Coil-Helix-Coiled-Coil-Helix (CHCH) Domains in Health and Disease. Trends in biochemical sciences 41, 245–260 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Smits RJRP, Smeitink JAM, and van den Heuvel LP, Sequence Variants in Four Candidate Genes (NIPSNAP1, GBAS, CHCHD1 and METT11D1) in Patients With Combined Oxidative Phosphorylation System Deficiencies. Journal of inherited metabolic disease 33, S13–S19 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nurun Nahar Borna YK, Kohda Masakazu, Lim Sze Chern, Shimura Masaru, Wu Yibo, Mogushi Kaoru, Yatsuka Yukiko, Harashima Hiroko, Hisatomi Yuichiro, Fushimi Takuya, Ichimoto Keiko, Murayama Kei, Ohtake Akira, and Okazaki Yasushi, Mitochondrial Ribosomal Protein PTCD3 Mutations Cause Oxidative Phosphorylation Defects With Leigh Syndrome. Neurogenetics 20, 9–25 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Min Jeong Ryu SJK, Kim Yong Kyung, Choi Min Jeong, Tadi Surendar, Lee Min Hee, Lee Seong Eun, Chung Hyo Kyun, Jung Saet Byel, Kim Hyun-Jin, Jo Young Suk, Kim Koon Soon, Lee Sang-Hee, Kim Jin Man, Kweon Gi Ryang, Park Ki Cheol, Lee Jung Uee, Kong Young Yun, Lee Chul-Ho, Chung Jongkyeong, and Shong Minho, Crif1 Deficiency Reduces Adipose OXPHOS Capacity and Triggers Inflammation and Insulin Resistance in Mice. PLos Genetics 9, e1003356 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Minal J Menezes YG, Zhang Jianguo, Riley Lisa G, Cooper Sandra T, Thorburn David R, Li Jiankang, Dong Daoyuan, Li Zhijun, Glessner Joseph, Davis Ryan L, Sue Carolyn M, Alexander Stephen I, Arbuckle Susan, Kirwan Paul, Keating Brendan J, Xu Xun, Hakonarson Hakon, and Christodoulou John, Mutation in Mitochondrial Ribosomal Protein S7 (MRPS7) Causes Congenital Sensorineural Deafness, Progressive Hepatic and Renal Failure and Lactic Acidemia. Human Molecular Genetics 24, 2297–2307 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Christopher B Jackson MH, Bolognini Ramona, Martin Franck, Szinnai Gabor, Birgit C Donner Uwe Richter, Brendan J Battersby Jean-Marc Nuoffer, Suomalainen Anu, and Schaller André, A Variant in MRPS14 (uS14m) Causes Perinatal Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Neonatal Lactic Acidosis, Growth Retardation, Dysmorphic Features and Neurological Involvement. Human Molecular Genetics 28, 639–649 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Enrico Bugiardini ALM, Rosa Ilaria Dalla, Horning-Do Hue-Tran, Pitmann Alan M, Poole Olivia V, Holton Janice L, Shah Sachit, Woodward Cathy, Hargreaves Iain, Quinlivan Rosaline, Amunts Alexey, Wiesner Rudolf J, Houlden Henry, Holt Ian J, Hanna Michael G, Pitceathly Robert D S, and Spinazzola Antonella, MRPS25 Mutations Impair Mitochondrial Translation and Cause Encephalomyopathy. Human Molecular Genetics 28, 2711–2719 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nicole J Lake BDW, Stroud David A, Richman Tara R, Ruzzenente Benedetta, Compton Alison G, Mountford Hayley S, Pulman Juliette, Zangarelli Coralie, Rio Marlene, Boddaert Nathalie, Assouline Zahra, Sherpa Mingma D, Schadt Eric E, Houten Sander M, Byrnes James, McCormick Elizabeth M, Zarazuela Zolkipli-Cunningham Katrina Haude, Zhang Zhancheng, Retterer Kyle, Bai Renkui, Calvo Sarah E, Mootha Vamsi K, Christodoulou John, Rötig Agnes, Filipovska Aleksandra, Cristian Ingrid, Falk Marni J, Metodiev Metodi D, and Thorburn David R, Biallelic Mutations in MRPS34 Lead to Instability of the Small Mitoribosomal Subunit and Leigh Syndrome. American journal of Human Genetics 101, 239–254 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Louise Galmiche VS, Beinat Marine, Assouline Zahra, Lebre Anne-Sophie, Chretien Dominique, Nietschke Patrick, Benes Vladimir, Boddaert Nathalie, Sidi Daniel, Brunelle Francis, Rio Marlène, Munnich Arnold, and Agnès Rötig, Exome Sequencing Identifies MRPL3 Mutation in Mitochondrial Cardiomyopathy. HUman Mutation 32, 1225–1231 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Valérie Serre AR Beinat Marine, Chretien Dominique, Boddaert Nathalie, Munnich Arnold, Rötig Agnès, and Chrzanowska-Lightowlers Zofia M, Mutations in Mitochondrial Ribosomal Protein MRPL12 Leads to Growth Retardation, Neurological Deterioration and Mitochondrial Translation Deficiency. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1832, 1304–1312 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Felix Distelmaier TBH, Catarino Claudia B, Gallenmüller Constanze, Rodenburg Richard J, Strom Tim M, Baertling Fabian, Meitinger Thomas, Mayatepek Ertan, Prokisch Holger, and Klopstock Thomas, MRPL44 Mutations Cause a Slowly Progressive Multisystem Disease With Childhood-Onset Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Neurogenetics 16, 319–323 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Umar Wazir AJS, Wazir Ahmad M A, Ye Lin, Jiang Wen G, Ster Irina C, Sharma Anup K, and Mokbel Kefah, Effects of the Knockdown of Death-Associated Protein 3 Expression on Cell Adhesion, Growth and Migration in Breast Cancer Cells. Oncology Reports 33, 2575–2582 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Elise Klæstad SO, Engstrøm Monica Jernberg, Ytterhus Borgny, Wik Elisabeth, Bofin Anna Mary, and Valla Marit, MRPS23 Amplification and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer; Association With Proliferation and the Non-Basal Subtypes. Breast cancer research and treatment 180, 73–86 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Balu Wu YP, Liu Guohong, Yang Tian, Jin Yanxia, Zhou Fuling, and Wei Yongchang, MRPS30-DT Knockdown Inhibits Breast Cancer Progression by Targeting Jab1/Cops5. Frontiers in oncology 9, 1–12 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Litao Zhang PL, Yan Lihong, Yang Lijun, Wang Yutao, Chen Junjun, Dai Jie, Li Yahui, Kang Zhiming, Bai Tao, Xi Yanfeng, Xu Jun, Sun Gongqin, and Yang Tao, MRPL35 Is Up-Regulated in Colorectal Cancer and Regulates Colorectal Cancer Cell Growth and Apoptosis. The American journal of pathology 189, 1105–1120 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chen Wang CL, Feng Weiliang, Xia Xianghou, Chen Feng, Qiao Enqi, Zhang Xiping, Chen Daobao, Ling Zhiqiang, and Yang Hongjian ICT1 Knockdown Inhibits Breast Cancer Cell Growth via Induction of Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis. International Journal of Molecular Medicine 39, 1037–1045 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.UniProt-Consortium T, UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Research 47, D506–D515 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fabio Madeira Y. m. P., Lee Joon, Buso Nicola, Gur Tamer, Madhusoodanan Nandana, Basutkar Prasad, Tivey Adrian R.N., Potter Simon C., Finn Robert D., and Lopez Rodrigo, The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019. Nucleic Acids Research 47, W636–W641 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ivica Letunic a. P. B., Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Research 47, W256–W259 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
