Abstract
Atherosclerosis is the thickening or hardening of the arteries which is caused by a buildup of atheromatous plaque in the inner lining of an artery. Hypercholesterolemia, inflammation, oxidative stress, and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) are important risk factors for atherosclerosis. Therefore, this study aimed to review the anti-atherosclerotic effects of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium via improving lipid profile and reducing the effects of oxidative stress, inflammation, and TMAO. To prepare the present review, several databases such as Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched, and relevant articles from 1990 until 2022 were selected and reviewed. The present review showed that Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium reduce the risk of atherosclerosis in both in vitro and in vivo studies by breaking down or altering cholesterol metabolism with the help of their by-products and by reducing inflammation and oxidative stress and TMAO. Consumption of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium can be useful in prevention of atherosclerosis.
Key Words: Atherosclerosis, Bifidobacterium Hypercholesterolemia, Inflammation, Lactobacilli, Oxidative stress, TMAO
Introduction
Atherosclerosis is the thickening or hardening of the arteries that is caused by a buildup of atheromatous plaque in the inner lining of an artery. Atheromatous plaque is made up of deposits of fatty substances, cholesterol, cellular waste products, calcium, and fibrin (1). Atherosclerosis is a slow and progressive process that usually develops over several years through a complex series of cellular events occurring within the arterial wall and in response to a variety of local vascular circulating factors (2). Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), which are predominantly the clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis, are the leading cause of death in all regions of the world except Africa (3). CVDs led to 17.3 million deaths in 2008 and it is estimated that by 2030, more than 23.3 million deaths will occur annually in the world (4). Coronary heart diseases (CHDs) are the most common cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) (5). CHDs burden costs $108.9, $23, £30, $94, and €196 billion per year in the United States, Canada, UK, Australia, and Europe, respectively (6-8). Hypercholesterolemia, inflammation and oxidative stress, and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) are important risk factors for atherosclerosis (1, 2, 9).
Hypercholesterolemia is elevated levels of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (subtraction of HDL-C from total cholesterol (TC)), particularly low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (10). The low intake of high-fat diets, free sugar, and carbohydrates can reverse hypercholesterolemia and the risk of CVDs. The treatment of hypercholesterolemia is expensive with severe drawbacks (11). In the USA, about one-third of the hypercholesterolemic subjects are under control and only half of them can be treated (11). Studies have demonstrated that the risk of CHDs and CHDs-related mortality increase by about 35% and 45%, respectively for every 1 mmol increase in serum cholesterol levels; and the risk of CHDs decrease by 2%–3% for every 1% decrease in serum cholesterol levels (12).
The microbial flora of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract of humans and animals plays important roles in various functions. Recently, many scientists have been interested in the use of this useful microbial flora for sustaining and promoting human health (13).
Based on World Health Organization (WHO) definition, probiotics are “live microorganisms when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host”. These useful microorganisms are used in different forms such as yogurt, cheese, and fermented foods as well as capsules, powders, etc., as foods or therapeutic agents for health purposes (4, 13).
Elie Metchnikoff is the first person that declared the useful benefits of probiotics. He believed that lactic acid bacteria (LAB), an important group of probiotics, contained in sour milk are the cause of the longevity of Bulgarian peasants and the inhibition of pathogens (13).
Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium are the most well-known bacterial genera of probiotics which are generally regarded as safe (GRAS) and called friendly bacteria (14-16). It has been shown that several strains of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium are available for human use which have several health benefits, including improvement of intestinal health, amelioration of lactose intolerance symptoms, reduction of the risk of various other diseases such as infectious diseases and cancer (17, 18). These microorganisms are able to reduce the risk of CVDs)by reducing the serum level of total cholesterol and LDL as well as by increasing the serum level of HDL (19, 20). There are studies that have shown the beneficial effects of these microorganisms on atherogenic factors like inflammation and oxidative stress and TMAO (21, 22). Therefore, this study aimed to review the anti-atherosclerotic effects of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium via improving the lipid profile and reducing the effects of oxidative stress, inflammation, and TMAO in in vitro and in vivo (animal and human) studies, with focus on cholesterol-lowering properties.
Effects on cholesterol
Cholesterol metabolism
Cholesterol is an organic molecule that is used in the membrane structure of eukaryotic cells and serves as the precursor of bile acids (BAs), corticosteroids, steroid hormones, and vitamin D. About 75% of the pooled body cholesterol is synthesized by the mevalonate pathway and the remaining 25% is obtained from foods (23, 24). Many enzymes and transporters are involved in cholesterol metabolism in the intestine and liver. Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1) is an important transporter located on enterocytes and hepatocytes which transport dietary cholesterol into the intestine and cholesterol from bile, respectively (25, 26). LDL receptors (LDLR) are located on polarized cells’ surfaces and take up circulating blood cholesterol. The endogenous synthesis of cholesterol is performed in the liver by the mevalonate pathway and starts with the two molecules of acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA). More than 20 enzymes catalyze this pathway, of them, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) is the rate-limiting enzyme of this pathway (27). There is an important transcription factor, sterol-regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBP-2) regulating the uptake and biosynthesis of cholesterol (28).
After cholesterol formation, it is converted to cholesterol ester (CE) and stored in lipid droplets or used in lipoproteins. ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 5 and member 8 (ABCG5/8) transport excess cholesterol to the intestine or the bile (27). Due to the hydrophobicity of cholesterol, it is packaged within lipoproteins to be transported effectively throughout the body. There are four major types of lipoproteins in blood including chylomicrons, very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), LDL, and HDL(27).
Chylomicrons are the least dense cholesterol transport molecules that contain apolipoprotein B-48, C, and E and transport exogenous cholesterol from the intestine to muscles and other tissues. After intestinal absorption of dietary cholesterol by NPC1L1, it is esterified to CE and then packaged with triglycerides and apolipoproteins into chylomicrons (29). Under the action of lipoprotein lipase, chylomicrons are converted to chylomicron remnants which are removed by the liver but a small amount remains and can penetrate the endothelial monolayer of an artery and participate in plaque buildup which increases the risk for atherosclerosis (30).
VLDL particles are synthesized by the liver and contain apolipoprotein B100 and E, triglycerides, and cholesterol. This type of lipoprotein can be degraded by lipoprotein lipase and converted to intermediate-density lipoproteins (IDL) and then metabolized to cholesterol-enriched LDL. LDL particles are the major carriers of cholesterol in the blood which through LDL receptors transport cholesterol to a variety of tissues such as the wall of the artery which can promote atherosclerosis. In addition, LDL particles can directly bind to endothelial scavenger receptor class B type 1 (SR-B1) and penetrate to the subendothelial space of arteries then be oxidized, finally causing a buildup of immune cells and atherosclerotic plaque formation (31, 32). Macrophages internalize oxidized LDL particles to form foam cells that often are trapped in the walls of arteries and contribute to forming atherosclerotic plaque. The atherosclerotic plaques are the main cause of CVD (32, 33). HDL particles transport cholesterol from tissues to the liver, either for excretion or for other uses, in a process known as reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) (30).
The excess cholesterol in macrophages can also be excreted by the ATP-binding cassette subfamily A member 1 (ABCA1) or subfamily G member 1 (ABCG1) which prevents the formation of foam cells thereby reducing the risk of atherosclerosis and CVD (34).
When intracellular cholesterol is increased, liver X receptors (LXR) –ligand-activated transcription factors of the nuclear receptor superfamily– are activated and mediate cholesterol efflux through increased expression of the ABCG5/8 transporters (35, 36). Figure 1 shows the metabolism of cholesterol and its import and export in a polarized cell.
Figure 1.
The schematic of cholesterol metabolism. NPC1L1, Niemann-Pick C1-like 1; CE, cholesterol ester; ABCG5, ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 5; ABCG8, ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 8; ABCG1, ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 1; ABCA1, ATP-binding cassette subfamily A member 1; HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A; HMGCR, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase
Bile acids
Bile acids (BAs) are synthesized from cholesterol via the classical pathway or alternative pathway (Figure 2). The classical pathway is the main production pathway of BAs (90%) in which cholesterol is converted to BAs by the rate-limiting enzyme cholesterol 7 α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1) in the liver. In the alternative pathway, the remaining 10% BAs are produced by sterol 27-hydrolase (CYP27A1) in extrahepatic sites including the vascular endothelium and macrophages (37). There are well-known feedback loops that control gene transcription of the key enzymes in BA synthesis. The nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is one of them that in an increased BA pool induces the expression of small heterodimer partner (SHP), thereby down-regulates CYP7A1expression (38). First, primary BAs, cholic acid, and chenodeoxycholic acid are synthesized and then conjugated with glycine or taurine residues to intestinal bile salts. Conjugated BAs are transported into bile by the bile salt export pump (BSEP) or by ABCG5/8 (39). These conjugated BAs are stored temporarily in the gallbladder until they are released into the small intestine upon meals to facilitate emulsion.
Figure 2.
The schematic of bile acids synthesis (cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid) from cholesterol.CYP7A1, cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase; CYP27A1, sterol 27-hydrolyase; CYP7B1, oxysterol 7α-hydroxylase; CYP8B1, sterol 12α-hydroxylase
About 95% of bile acids are reabsorbed by active transport mainly via the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) from the ileum and secreted into the portal circulation by the organic solute transporters (OST α/β) and recycled back to the liver for further secretion into the biliary system and gallbladder. Increased levels of BAs in the ileum can activate FXR inhibiting ASBT and reabsorption of BAs. In addition, activation of FXR induces the production and secretion of fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) which binds to fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) and activates a signaling pathway that down-regulates CYP7A1 (40).
Mechanisms for cholesterol reduction
There are several possible mechanisms for the cholesterol-lowering effect of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacilli which are obtained based on in vitro and animal studies (Figure 3). These mechanisms include deconjugation of BAs by bile salt hydrolase (BSH), binding to cholesterol and incorporation into the cellular membrane (41, 42), production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (33, 43), trapping cholesterol by peptidoglycan and exopolysaccharides (44, 45), and conversion of cholesterol to coprostanol (46).
Figure 3.
Cholesterol-lowering mechanisms of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium. Blue and red arrows show increase and decrease in activity/expression, respectively. CYP7A1, cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase; CYP8B1, sterol 12α-hydroxylase; CYP51A1, lanosterol 14α-demethylase; RCT, reverse cholesterol transport; FXR, farnesoid X receptor; LXR, Liver X receptor; EPS, exo-polysacharides; CR, cholesterol reductase; BAs, bile acids; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; BSH, bile salt hydrolase; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; NPC1L1, Niemann-Pick C1-like 1; CE, cholesterol ester; ABCG1, ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 1; ABCA1, ATP-binding cassette subfamily A member 1; HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A; HMGCR, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase
The most profound cholesterol-lowering mechanism has been attributed to bile salt hydrolase (BSH) activity (41). Studies have shown that many Bifidobacterium and Lactobacilli species produce BSH which can cleave amide bonds of conjugated BAs and convert them to liberate free primary BAs and amino acid (taurine or glycine) in which BAs are more hydrophobic and less efficiently reabsorbed from intestines and thereby excreted in feces (41, 47-49). Therefore, BSH activity causes an increase in the production of BAs from cholesterol, thus leading to the reduction of cholesterol. Moreover, following the activity of BSH, due to low BAs, the formation of micelles is disrupted, thereby the cholesterol absorption in the intestine is decreased (50).
Another cholesterol-lowering mechanism of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium is the ability to bind cholesterol and incorporate it into cell membranes (51) The ability of cholesterol-binding appeared to be growth and strain-specific. It has been observed that, although live bacterial cells lower more cholesterol than dead cells, the dead bacterial cells can remove cholesterol from media, which indicates cholesterol can also be bound to the cellular surface (52). Some Lactobacilli species have been found to possess surface protease-sensitive receptors which bind to exogenous cholesterol or phosphatidylcholine vesicles and incorporate them into their cell membranes (42, 53).
The cell wall amino acids and peptidoglycan as well as the Exo-polysaccharides (EPS) of probiotics have a role in the reduction of cholesterol (44, 45). Cholesterol-lowering by this mechanism is however strain and growth-dependent (52). Some intestinal microorganisms such as Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium species can synthesize different EPS (54-56). It has been observed that the amount of produced EPS is correlated with the quantity of assimilated cholesterol by probiotic strains. The EPS of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum BR2 and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei M7 showed a cholesterol-lowering effect (57).
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are important components produced from oligosaccharides by gut microbiota and also probiotic strains such as Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium species which have been found to play a vital role in cholesterol reduction (43, 58, 59). It has been reported that SCFAs are able to activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) controls angiopoietin-like protein 4 (ANGPTL4) which inhibits lipoprotein lipase (LPL) (60). Therefore, SCFAs suppress LPL activities by activation of PPARγ and up-regulating ANGPTL4 levels which leads to regulation of fatty acid oxidation in muscle and adipocytes that reduce fat storage (61, 62). It has been reported that butyrate is able to inhibit the synthesis of cholesterol by reducing HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) activity which is the rate-limiting enzyme of cholesterol synthesis (63). SCFA can also stimulate the hepatic synthesis of BAs by up-regulation of CYP7A1 which leads to reduction of cholesterol (64). A high concentration of SCFA in the gut can lower colonic pH and promote the growth of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium species (54, 65, 66).
Another mechanism is the conversion of cholesterol into coprostanol which reduces cholesterol absorption and makes it easily eliminable with defection (67). The efficiency of this mechanism depends on the abundance of bacteria that possess reductase enzymes. This enzyme is present in some species of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium species such as L. acidophilus ATCC 314, L. acidophilus FTCC 0291, L. bulgaricus FTCC 0411, and Bifidobacterium bifidum PRL2010 (64). In another study, it has been observed that L. acidophilus, L. bulgaricus and Lacticaseibacillus casei ATCC 393 contain both intracellular and extracellular cholesterol reductase (20, 42).
Liver X receptors (LXRs) can be stimulated by Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium species which down-regulate NPC1L1 expression in the liver and intestine thereby reducing cholesterol absorption in the intestines and re-absorption in the liver (68-70). LXRs also down-regulate two genes, squalene synthase and lanosterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51A1) genes that encode key enzymes in the synthesis of cholesterol (71). In a study, L. plantarum lowered cholesterol levels via up-regulation of LXR (72, 73). LXR also plays an important role in RCT by regulating several transporters including ABCA1 and ABCG1, so can help to reduce cholesterol and atherosclerosis (74). NPC1L1 acts as a negative regulator of NPC2, therefore down-regulation of NPC1L1 up-regulates NPC2 which in return increases cholesterol exporters such as ABCG5/8 (75).
Also, the farnesoid X receptor (FXR), a bile acid nuclear receptor may be stimulated by deconjugated BAs. FXR senses the increased level of hepatic BAs and induces the expression of SHP which down-regulates rate-limiting enzymes CYP7A1 and sterol-12α-hydroxylase (CYP8B1) (76, 77).
In vitro and animal studies on cholesterol-lowering
Numerous studies have been performed on the cholesterol-lowering effect of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium species most of which are in vitro and animal experiments. These experiments have shown significant efficacy of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium species on cholesterol reduction (20, 78, 79).
Lactobacilli species
Lactobacilli species have been shown in various studies to have a high ability to decrease cholesterol (78, 80-84) some of which are listed below.
L. plantarum is the most common Lactobacilli investigated in cholesterol-lowering efficacy. In a study, the effect of L. plantarum PH04 at a dose of 107 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mouse daily for 14 days on serum cholesterol and TGs levels of hypercholesterolemic mice was investigated. L. plantarum PH04 resulted in 7% and 10% reduction in the serum cholesterol and TGs, respectively (82). Also, L. plantarum CK 102 at a dose of 5×107 CFU/ml has significantly reduced the serum levels of total cholesterol and LDL-C in Sprague-Dawley rats (85). In some studies, the cholesterol-lowering ability of L. plantarum in three conditions of growing, resting, and death has been examined. For example, in an in vitro study, four strains of L. plantarum (TGCM 15, TGCM 26, TGCM 33, and TGCM 128) showed more than 50%, (13.11–23.28%), and (11.44–19.53%) cholesterol reduction in growing, resting, and dead cells, respectively (83). In a similar study, L. plantarum strains isolated from mustard removed cholesterol by growing (110.67 to 167.03 μg/ml), resting (1.40 to 35.44 μg/ml) and dead (0-54.21 μg/ml) cells (86). It has been shown that double-coated L. plantarum KCTC3928 with proteins and polysaccharides can significantly reduce the serum LDL-C and TGs levels in mice (87). Cholesterol-lowering ability of L. plantarum strains obtained from various sources such as kefir grains (47), traditional fermented milk (88), and local fermented food products (89) has been displayed. BSH activity and cholesterol coprecipitation are the most common mechanisms seen in L. plantarum strains (83, 85). Expression of the LDL-R and HMGCR were marginally affected and CYP7A1 was significantly up-regulated following live L. plantarum KCTC3928 feeding (87, 89).
Also, L. acidophilus has a remarkable cholesterol-lowering ability. In a study by Sarkar in 2003, the cholesterol-lowering ability of L. acidophilus was demonstrated. This study reported that cholesterol reduction is due to the assimilation or/and attachment of cholesterol to the surface of L. acidophilus cells (90). L. acidophilus also has shown BSH activity and co-precipitation with cholesterol ability, the ability that increases with decreasing pH (91). The cell-free supernatant (CFS) of L. acidophilus ATCC 43121 can reduce cholesterol in the broth in the presence of bile salts (92).
L. casei is another Lactobacilli with cholesterol-lowering ability. L. casei has demonstrated that it is able to reduce serum cholesterol levels alone (93) or/and in combination with prebiotics (94).
There are other Lactobacilli species that have been less examined for their cholesterol-lowering activities. Lactobacillus crispatus isolated from gherkins (fermented cucumber) has significantly reduced cholesterol (95). Lactobacillus bulgaricus (96), Limosilactobacillus reuteri (97), and Lactobacillus gasseri SBT0270 (98) have significantly improved the lipid profile of rats, mice, and rats, respectively. In a study, L. plantarum 9-41-A and Limosilactobacillus fermentum M1-16 resulted in significant reduction in the serum levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, and TGs in rats, whereas HDL-C level was not significantly changed (P>0.05) (99). In a similar study, the cholesterol-lowering effect of Lactobacillus pentosus KF923750 was examined on the lipid profile of rabbits. Total cholesterol, LDL-C, and TGs levels were significantly decreased, while no significant change was seen in HDL-C levels (100). Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus BFE5264 could reduce the serum levels of cholesterol that were accompanied by changes in gut microbiota and production of SCFA (101). In Asan-Ozusaglam et al. (2019) study, the cholesterol reduction ability of L. fermentum strains isolated from human breast milk varied from 34.84 to 91.15%. The supernatants showed higher cholesterol reduction ability compared with pellets (102). In an interesting study, Wang et al. (2019) demonstrated that L.casei pWQH01 and L. plantarum AR113 with high BSH activity are able to significantly reduce the serum cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolemic mice, whereas L. casei LC2W without BSH activity has a poor capability to reduce cholesterol (103).
Bifidobacterium species
Bifidobacterium species have shown cholesterol-lowering ability in various studies (104-109). Bifidobacterium longum (B. longum) and B. bifidum are the most common Bifidobacterium species that have been used to evaluate the cholesterol-lowering effects (48, 104-106, 109). In a study, consumption of yogurt containing Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum G4 or B. longum BB536 for 8 weeks led to improvements in the lipid profile and increased fecal excretion of BAs in rats compared with the control groups (106). Administration of B. longum BB536 resulted in a significant reduction of total cholesterol, lipid deposition of liver and adipocyte size, and positively affected the function of kidney and liver in hypercholesterolaemic Sprague-Dawley rats. Cholesterol-lowering effect of B. longum BB536 significantly increased in the presence of inulin (105). Also, B. animalis subsp. Lactis F1-7 (77) and B. pseudolongum (107) have reduced the serum cholesterol levels in mice. It has been shown that the cholesterol-lowering efficacy of Bifidobacterium species increases in combination with Lactobacilli species (108). Ranji et al. (2019) reported that oral consumption of B. bifidum and Lactobacilli leads to a significant decrease in the TGs and LDL-C in mice (P<0.005) (104). In a study, B. longum strains (CCFM 1077, I3, J3, and B3) showed different levels of cholesterol reduction which raised the strain-specific effects in reducing cholesterol (109). BSH activity is the most common mechanism investigated in Bifidobacterium species (44, 48).
Clinical studies on cholesterol-lowering
Several clinical studies have been performed on the cholesterol-lowering effects of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium species which are summarized in Table 1. Clinical studies are different based on country, bacteria, sample size, duration, dosage, delivery, subjects, and outcome.
Table 1.
Clinical studies of cholesterol-lowering efficacy of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium species
| Study | Country | Bacteria | Sample size |
Duration
(weeks) |
Dosage | Delivery | Subjects | Outcome | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ejtahed et al. (2011) | Iran |
L. acidophilus
La5 and B. lactis Bb12 |
60 | 6 | 300 g daily | Yogurt | Type 2 diabetic patients | Significant decrease in total cholesterol and LDL-C, no significant changes in TG and HDL-C |
(125) |
| Mazloom et al. (2013) | Iran |
L. acidophilus, L. bulgaricus,
L. bifidum, and L. casei |
34 | 6 | 1500 mg probiotic capsules twice daily |
Capsule | Type 2 diabetic patients | No significant difference in serum levels of TG, total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C levels |
(126) |
| Fuentes et al. (2016) | Spain | L. plantarum | 60 | 12 | 1.28–3.01×109 CFU daily | Capsule | Hypercholesterolemic subjects | Significant reduction in LDL-C, total-C, LDL-C:HDL-C ratio, oxidized LDL and triglycerides, and a significant increase in HDL-C | (110) |
| Xiao et al. (2003) | Japan | B. longum strain BL1 | 32 | 4 | >108 CFU/ml, 300 ml daily | Yogurt | Healthy subjects | Significant decrease in serum total cholesterol | (116) |
| Lee et al. (2017) | USA | B. animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 | 30 | 4 | Each smoothie/capsule contained 3.16 × 109 CFUs/ day |
Yogurt/capsule | Healthy subjects | No significant change in total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, and TGs | (123) |
| Chiu et al. (2021) | Taiwan | L. acidophilus (La5), L. casei (TMC), B. lactis (Bb12) | 40 | 10 | 2 ×106 CFU/g of each strain |
Powder | Healthy mild hypercholesterolemic subjects | Significantly reduced (P<0.05) the levels of total cholesterol and LDL-C |
(115) |
| Greany et al. (2004) | USA |
L.acidophilus DDS-1
and B. longum) |
37 | 6 | 109 CFU | Capsule | Mildly hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women | Significant reduction in serum TC, LDL-C, and TG, and increase in HDL-C | (127) |
| Ahn et al. (2015) | Republic of Korea | L. curvatus HY7601 and L. plantarum KY1032 | 128 | 12 | 2 g/day of a powdered supplement containing L. curvatus HY7601 and L. plantarum KY1032 |
Powder | Hypercholesterolemic subjects | Significant reduction in TGs and increases in the plasma apo A-V |
(114) |
| Sadrzadeh-Yeganeh et al. (2009) | Iran |
L. acidophilus
La5 and B. lactis Bb12 |
90 | 6 | Daily 300 g probiotic yogurt containing Lactobacilli species. | Yogurt | Healthy subjects | No difference in TG and LDL-cholesterol, but a decrease in total cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol ratio, and an increase in HDL-cholesterol | (121) |
| Simons et al. (2006) | Australia | L. fermentum | 44 | 10 | 2×109 CFU/capsule, 2 capsules twice daily | Capsule | Hypercholesterolemic subjects | No significant changes in total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, or TGs | (112) |
| Rerksuppaphol et al. (2015) | Thailand | L. acidophilus, B. bifidum | 64 | 6 | 109 CFU/capsule, thrice daily | Capsule | Hypercholesterolemic subjects | TC levels in the probiotics group decreased | (129) |
| Naruszewicz et al. (2002) | Sweden | L. plantarum 299v | 36 | 6 | 5×107 CFU/ml, 400 ml daily | A rose-hip drink | Smoker | no significant changes in total cholesterol, triacylglycerol, and lipoprotein | (128) |
| Lewis SJ (2005) | UK | L. acidophilus | 79 | 6 | 3 × 1010 CFU, thrice daily | Capsule | Hypercholesterolemic subjects | there were no changes in serum lipids seen throughout the study | (113) |
| Larkin et al. (2009) | Australia | L. acidophilus; B. bifidus and L. GG | 15 | 5 | 3×108 CFU daily | Yogurt | Hypercholesterolemic subjects | significantly decreased total cholesterol | (118) |
| Jones et al. (2012) | Canada | L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 | 127 | 9 | 2×109 CFU/capsule, twice daily | Capsule | Hypercholesterolemic subjects | significantly reduced LDL-C and total cholesterol. HDL-C was unchanged |
(120) |
| Ivey et al. (2015) | Australia | L. acidophilus La5; B. animalis subsp Lactis Bb12 | a:77 b:79 | 6 | 3×109 CFU daily | a: yogurt b: capsule | Overweight men and women | no significant change in serum total cholesterol LDLC, HDLC, or triglycerides | (124) |
| Fuentes et al. (2013) | Spain | L. plantarum CECT 7527, 7528 and 7529 | 60 | a:6; b:12 | 1.2 × 109 CFU daily | Capsule | Hypercholesterolemic subjects | Significant reduction in plasma total cholesterol, LDL-C, and oxidized LDL-C | (111) |
| Costabile et al. (2017) | UK | L. plantarum ECGC 13110402 | 46 | 12 | 2×109 CFU/capsule, twice daily | Capsule | Hypercholesterolemic subjects | Significant reduction in LDL-C, TC, TG, and an increase in HDL-C | (119) |
| Ataie-Jafari et al. (2009) | Iran | L. acidophilus; B. lactis | 14 | 6 | 2 ×106 CFU/g, 300 g daily | Yogurt | Hypercholesterolemic subjects | Significant decrease in serum total cholesterol | (122) |
| Anderson et al. (1999) | USA | L. acidophilus L1 | 40 | 4 | 107 CFU/g, 200 g daily | Yogurt | Hypercholesterolemic subjects | Significant reduction of serum cholesterol concentration | (117) |
Most clinical studies have been performed on hypercholesterolemic individuals. In two studies, Fuentes et al. evaluated the cholesterol-lowering effect of L. plantarum strains in hypercholesterolemic adults. They reported that administration of L. plantarum-containing capsules significantly improves the lipid profile of patients. They also declared that the biofunctionality of L. plantarum strains has better effects in patients with higher levels of cholesterol (110, 111). Another study showed that administration of L. fermentum-containing capsules has no significant efficacy on serum lipids in individuals with elevated serum cholesterol (112). In Lewis et al. (2005) study, although L. acidophilus significantly reduced in vitro cholesterol, no effect was seen in the serum lipid profile of hypercholesterolaemic volunteers (113).
Also, a powder containing L. curvatus HY7601 and L. plantarum KY1032 has reduced TGs levels in hypertriglyceridemic individuals. (114). In addition to capsules and powder, other delivery methods have been used to evaluate the cholesterol-lowering efficacy of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium, especially in hypercholesterolemic individuals. Yogurt and fermented milk which contain Lactobacilli or/and Bifidobacterium are the most common delivery methods. It has been shown that probiotic milk formula (PMF) containing L. acidophilus (La5), L. casei (TMC), and B. lactis (Bb12) can significantly reduce the total cholesterol and LDL-C of hypercholesterolemic volunteers. (115). Also, milk fermented by B. longum strain BL1 (116) and fermented milk containing L. acidophilus l1 (117) have reduced the serum concentrations of total cholesterol, LDL-C, and TGs, while not changing the level of HDL-C. Combination of soy with a probiotic containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, B. bifidus, and Lactobacillus GG resulted in a significant reduction of total cholesterol and LDL-C in mildly hypercholesterolaemic subjects (118). It has been found that in addition to in vitro and animal studies, BSH-active Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium have remarkable effects on cholesterol in human studies. L. plantarum ECGC 13110402 (119) and L. reuteri NCIMB 30242 (120), strains with high BSH activity, have demonstrated significant improvement in the lipid profile of hypercholesterolaemic subjects.
After hypercholesterolemic subjects, most clinical studies have been done on the lipid profile of healthy subjects. It seems that Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium are more effective in hypercholesterolemic subjects than in healthy subjects. Although yogurt containing L. acidophilus La5 and B. lactis Bb12 (121) and probiotic yogurt fermented with L. acidophilus and B. lactis (122) have decreased total cholesterol, they had no significant effects on TGs and LDL-C in healthy adults. Also, in other studies, B. animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and L. acidophilus La5 did not significantly improve the lipid profile including total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, and TGs in healthy participants (123, 124).
In type 2 diabetic patients, consumption of probiotic yogurt containing L. acidophilus and B. lactis resulted in a 4.54% decrease in total cholesterol and a 7.45% in LDL-C, and a significant reduction in the total cholesterol:HDL-C ratio and LDL-C:HDL-C ratio (125), but consumption of probiotic-containing lactobacilli did not reduce the serum TGs concentration, total cholesterol, and LDL-C levels (126).
It has been shown that L. acidophilus DDS-1, B. longum, and L. plantarum 299v do not change significantly the serum cholesterol levels in postmenopausal women (127) and smokers (128), respectively.
Although improved lipid profiles are often associated with decreased serum levels of LDL-C and total cholesterol and increased HDL-C, in many clinical studies many cases were unchanged in HDL-C. Even in a study by Rerksuppaphol et al. (2015) (129), HDL-C decreased which seems illogical, and the author did not explain it.
Effects on inflammation and oxidative stress and trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO)
Hypercholesterolemia has been generally considered an important cause of atherosclerosis (130). However, other studies have demonstrated that despite the reduction of serum level of LDL-C more than 50% of cardiovascular risk still remains (131, 132). So, we have to look for other causes of this important disease, one of which is inflammation and oxidative stress and the other is trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO). There are studies that have shown the beneficial effects of probiotics on these atherogenic factors (21, 22). Figure 4 shows the hypothesized anti-atherosclerotic mechanisms of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium on inflammation and oxidative stress and TMAO based on performed studies.
Figure 4.
Anti-atherosclerotic effects of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium through improving A) inflammation and oxidative stress and B) TMAO. ROS, reactive oxygen species; NF-KB, nuclear factor kappa B ; ox-LDL, oxidized low-density lipoprotein ; MDA, Malondialdehyde; SOD, super oxide dismutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase ; NO, Nitric oxide ; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase ; TMA, trimethylamine; TMAO, Trimethylamine N-oxide; FMO3, flavin-containing monooxygenases. *, inhibition of atherosclerosis
Inflammatory and oxidative stress factors
Studies have shown that in addition to hypercholesterolemia, inflammation and oxidative stress also play a vital role in the progression of atherosclerosis (21). Atherosclerosis is regulated by various immune cells such as macrophages, lymphocytes, and dendritic cells, and causes foam cells to form in the subendothelial region by the deposition of cholesterol. Atherosclerotic plaques express a complex network of proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukins (IL), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interferons (21, 133). IL-1β has substantial effects on cell types that cause atherosclerotic plaques (21). TNF-α produced by smooth muscle cells, macrophages, and endothelial cells of atherosclerotic arteries, has potent estrogenic effects via stimulating the formation of new vessels, adhesion of leukocytes to endothelial cells, chemotaxis, and developing atheroma features. In addition, inhibitors of nuclear factor kappa B (IκB) proteins including IκBα, β, and γ are regulatory proteins that bind to nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and prevent transcription and nuclear translocation of NF-κB, a factor with an important role in the expression of proinflammatory cytokines.
Oxidative stress is the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in such a way that anti-oxidant systems are unable to control or repair their damage (134). ROS including free oxygen radicals, oxygen ions, and peroxides at moderate concentrations play critical roles in the regulation of various cell functions and biological processes such as vascular tone, oxygen sensing, cell growth and proliferation, apoptosis, and inflammatory responses (135). Uncontrolled production of ROS resulted in oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction. Oxidative stress plays an important role in the atherosclerosis process (135).
Malondialdehyde (MDA) and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) are oxidative biomarkers that arise following oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation by ROS (134, 136). It has been shown that ox-LDL plays a key role in several steps of atherogenesis and also inhibits endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity in endothelial cells (134, 137). In several studies, ox-LDL was elevated in the plasma of atherosclerotic patients (134, 138). Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), paraoxonase (PON), and thioredoxins are major anti-oxidants in the vascular wall (4, 134).
Nitric oxide (NO) synthesized by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and/or neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) have anti-atherosclerotic activity, whereas NO produced by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) plays a pro-atherogenic role (135). Activation of iNOS can form uncoupled eNOS which is a ROS generator and contributes to atherogenesis (134). Inflammation, oxidative stress, bacterial endotoxins, and sepsis, activate iNOS, which produces Ca2+-independent NO at a rate 1,000-fold greater than that of eNOS (137, 139).
Various studies have demonstrated the ability of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium species in modulating inflammation and oxidative stress (140-143). In a study, Hassan et al. (2020) reported that L. plantarum ATCC 14917 is able to exert its anti-atherosclerotic effects via modulation of proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress. They observed that feeding L. plantarum ATCC 14917 to Apo E−/− mice daily for 12 weeks had no effect on body weight and lipid profile, but significantly inhibited atherosclerotic lesion formation. In addition, the oxidative stress factors such as oxLDL and MDA, as well as inflammatory factors including NF-κB and IL-1β levels were significantly reduced, whereas the level of SOD was induced. Furthermore, administration of L. plantarum ATCC 14917 significantly attenuated the IκBα protein degradation and inhibited translocation of the p65 subunit of NF-κB, and also modulated the gut microbiota composition in ApoE−/− mice (21). In another study, Fang et al. (2019) evaluated the effect of L. rhamnosus GR-1 on atherosclerotic plaque formation in ApoE-/- mice fed with a high-fat diet. Administration of GR-1 had no efficacy in body weight or serum levels of lipid, but reduced the progression of atherosclerosis and plaque formation. Also, administration of GR-1 reduced the values of oxLDL and MDA, inhibited the translocation of NF-κB p65, and diminished the expression of inflammation cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 (132). Also, Chen et al. (2013) showed similar results when using L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 (142). Treatment with L. fermentum MTCC: 5898 had beneficial effects on inflammation and oxidative stress in hypercholesterolemic Wistar rats. It significantly reduced atherogenic index, coronary artery risk index, lipid peroxidation, and mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) and significantly increased anti-oxidative enzymes (catalase, SOD, and GSH-Px) (144). In another study, the anti-oxidative effects of L. casei Zhang on hyperlipidemic rats were evaluated. Treatment with L. casei Zhang significantly decreased MDA levels and increased SOD and GSH-Px in the serum and liver of rats. Authors also declared that the anti-oxidative effect of L. casei Zhang is more effective in hyperlipidemic rats compared with normal rats, and application of different therapeutics doses have variant effects on hyperlipidemic rats (145). Kim et al. (2013) examined the inhibitory effects of (pLTA)- lipoteichoic acid (LTA) of L. plantarum- on atherosclerotic inflammation. They observed that pLTA prevented the production of proinflammatory cytokines and NO in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated cells. The authors declared that the inhibitory effect of pLTA is due to inhibition of NF-κB and activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAP kinases). They concluded that their results emphasize the role of pLTA in suppressing atherosclerotic inflammation (146).
Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO)
It has been shown that one of the causes of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases is linked to the high level of TMAO (147). TMAO is oxidized from trimethylamine (TMA) by hepatic flavin-containing monooxygenase3 (FMO3). TMA is produced from dietary L-carnitine, phosphatidylcholine, choline, and betaine by intestinal microbiota (22). Precursors of TMA are highly present in foods of animal origin such as red meat, dairy products, and eggs. Seafood such as fish has more carnitine and choline and also TMA and TMAO compared with other foods (148). The serum level of TMAO is dictated by several factors such as gut microbiota, diet, drug administration, and liver FMO3 activity (149). TMAO mediated by intestinal microbiota has been a promising target for the treatment of atherosclerosis (150).
Although the atherosclerotic mechanisms of TMAO are not fully understood, some hypotheses are related to cholesterol metabolism. TMAO can activate SHP and FXR and down-regulate enzymes that synthesize BAs including CYP7A1 and CYP27A1 (151). Activation of FXR can decrease reverse cholesterol transport and induce FMO3 which can lead to atherosclerosis. It has been shown that TMAO is able to reduce the expression of NPC1L1 and ABCG5/8 (152) and also up-regulate ABCG5/8 in the small intestine (153). Some studies have shown the down-regulation effect of TMAO on ABCA1 and ABCG1 (152-154) and scavenger receptor A (SRA) and cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36) (155) expression in macrophages which cause the formation of foam cells and atherosclerotic plaques. It has been suggested that supplementation with probiotic strains such as Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium strains might change TMAO levels. Qiu et al. (2018) showed that L. plantarum ZDY04 significantly reduced serum TMAO and cecal TMA levels by modulating the gut microbiota in apolipoprotein-E knockout (ApoE−/−) mice (a mouse model of atherosclerosis). They also reported that the reduction of serum TMAO and cecal TMA was not due to influencing the expression levels of hepatic FMO3 and metabolizing choline, TMA, and TMAO. In this study, L. plantarum ZDY04 could significantly inhibit the development of TMAO-induced atherosclerosis in ApoE−/− mice as compared with the control (22).
Discussion
Here we reviewed the effects of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium on important risk factors of atherosclerosis including hypercholesterolemia, inflammation, oxidative stress, and TMAO. Given that hypercholesterolemia is one of the most important risk factors for atherosclerosis, a significant part of the present review is devoted to the cholesterol-lowering effects of these probiotics in vitro, animal, and human studies. This review showed that in vitro and animal studies have shown a greater cholesterol-lowering effect than human studies. The reasons for these differences may include differences in bacterial species and strains, duration of the studies, dosage, delivery method, studied individuals, and also the used composition. The present review mentioned various possible cholesterol-lowering mechanisms of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium, of which, deconjugation of bile by the BSH enzyme is more studied and well-known. In reviewed studies, Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium strains that have shown high BSH activity significantly reduced the cholesterol levels. This mechanism is not yet clear enough, so further studies are needed to determine the exact effects of the BSH enzyme. In reviewed clinical studies, the cholesterol-lowering ability of probiotic strains in hypercholesterolemic individuals was more promising than in other individuals. It can be found out that although several clinical studies have been performed on cholesterol reduction by Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium strains, most of them have only examined their effectiveness, and unlike in vitro and animal studies, the mechanism of cholesterol reduction has not been studied. Therefore, more studies are needed in both in vitro and in vivo (animal and human) conditions to shed more light on the effects and mechanisms of cholesterol-lowering. However, other studies have shown that despite reduced serum LDL-C levels, more than 50% of cardiovascular risks persist which raises the involvement of other factors in causing this disease. Indeed, inflammation and oxidative stress are now widely considered to play a vital role in atherosclerotic progression. Thus, in addition to the cholesterol-lowering effect, the effects of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium on inflammation and oxidative stress have attracted the attention of researchers and fortunately yielded promising results. An important point in our review is that although some Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium strains may not show significant cholesterol-lowering effects in human studies, it should be hoped that these strains can have anti-atherosclerotic effects via reduction of inflammation, oxidative stress, and TMAO.
Conclusion
This review presented the effects of two well-known bacterial probiotics including Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium on the most important risk factors for atherosclerosis such as hypercholesterolemia, inflammation, oxidative stress, and TMAO. Our review showed that these microorganisms are able to reduce cholesterol significantly in vitro, in animals and humans, although this ability is greater in vitro in animals than in humans. These useful microorganisms are also able to reduce the risk of atherosclerosis via reducing the serum levels of TMAO by improving the gut microbiota. Also, it can be concluded that these probiotics can diminish the risk of atherosclerosis by inhibiting inflammation and oxidative stress, an interesting and promising mechanism. Finally, we propose further studies to elucidate the effects and mechanisms of cholesterol-lowering, serum TMAO reduction, and inhibition of inflammation and oxidative stress by Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium.
Authors’ Contributions
MA searched the databases and wrote the manuscript; HEGG edited the manuscript; RR designed and supervised the study.
Conflicts of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the Clinical Development Unit of Baqiyatallah Hospital, Tehran, Iran, for guidance and advice. No funding to declare.
References
- 1.Rafieian-Kopaei M, Setorki M, Doudi M, Baradaran A, Nasri H. Atherosclerosis: Process, indicators, risk factors and new hopes. Int J Prev Med. 2014;5:927–946. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hansson GK, Hermansson A. The immune system in atherosclerosis. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:204–212. doi: 10.1038/ni.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mendis S, Puska P, Norrving B, Organization WH. Global atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control: World Health Organization. 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ôunpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364:937–952. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Abubakar I, Tillmann T, Banerjee A. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;385:117–171. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, Butler J, Dracup K, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: A policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:933–944. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820a55f5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe K, Wilkins E, Townsend N. Trends in the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the UK. Heart. 2016;102:1945–1952. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nichols M, Townsend N, Luengo-Fernandez R, Leal J, Gray A, Scarborough P, et al. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2012. 1st ed. European Heart Network; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Din AU, Hassan A, Zhu Y, Yin T, Gregersen H, Wang G. Amelioration of TMAO through probiotics and its potential role in atherosclerosis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:9217–9228. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-10142-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Arsenault BJ, Rana JS, Stroes ES, Després J-P, Shah PK, Kastelein JJ, et al. Beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: Respective contributions of non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, triglycerides, and the total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio to coronary heart disease risk in apparently healthy men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;55:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Control CfD, Prevention Vital signs: prevalence, treatment, and control of high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-United States, 1999-2002 and 2005-2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:109–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liong M, Shah N. Acid and bile tolerance and cholesterol removal ability of lactobacilli strains. J Dairy Sci. 2005;88:55–66. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72662-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Upadhyay N, Moudgal V. Clinical review-probiotics: A Review. J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2012;19:76. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gregoret V, Perezlindo M, Vinderola G, Reinheimer J, Binetti A. A comprehensive approach to determine the probiotic potential of human-derived Lactobacillus for industrial use. Food Microbiol. 2013;34:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fuller R. Probiotic in man and animals. J Appl Bacteriol. 1989;66:131–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abdi M, Ranjbar R. A review on antiviral efficacy of Bifidobacterium species. Rev Med Microbiol. 2021;27:21–28. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Toma MM, Pokrotnieks J. Probiotics as functional food: microbiological and medical aspects. Acta Universitatis Latviensis. 2006;710:117–129. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Salminen SJ, Gueimonde M, Isolauri E. Probiotics that modify disease risk. J Nutr. 2005;135:1294–1298. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.5.1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ichim TE, Patel AN, Shafer KA. Experimental support for the effects of a probiotic/digestive enzyme supplement on serum cholesterol concentrations and the intestinal microbiome. J Transl Med. 2016;14:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0945-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ishimwe N, Daliri EB, Lee BH, Fang F, Du G. The perspective on cholesterol‐lowering mechanisms of probiotics. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015;59:94–105. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201400548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hassan A, Din AU, Zhu Y, Zhang K, Li T, Wang Y, et al. Anti-atherosclerotic effects of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 14917 in ApoE−/− mice through modulation of proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104:6337–6350. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10693-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Qiu L, Tao X, Xiong H, Yu J, Wei H. Lactobacillus plantarum ZDY04 exhibits a strain-specific property of lowering TMAO via the modulation of gut microbiota in mice. Food Funct. 2018;9:4299–4309. doi: 10.1039/c8fo00349a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature. 1990;343:425–430. doi: 10.1038/343425a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kapourchali FR, Surendiran G, Goulet A, Moghadasian MH. The role of dietary cholesterol in lipoprotein metabolism and related metabolic abnormalities: a mini-review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016;56:2408–2415. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2013.842887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yamamoto H, Yamanashi Y, Takada T, Mu S, Tanaka Y, Komine T, et al. Hepatic expression of niemann-pick C1-like 1, a cholesterol reabsorber from bile, exacerbates western diet–induced atherosclerosis in LDL receptor mutant mice. Mol Pharmacol. 2019;96:47–55. doi: 10.1124/mol.119.115840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yu L. The structure and function of Niemann–Pick C1-like 1 protein. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2008;19:263–269. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3282f9b563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Luo J, Yang H, Song B-L. Mechanisms and regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:225–245. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0190-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Radhakrishnan A, Goldstein JL, McDonald JG, Brown MS. Switch-like control of SREBP-2 transport triggered by small changes in ER cholesterol: A delicate balance. Cell metab. 2008;8:512–521. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dash S, Xiao C, Morgantini C, Lewis GF. New insights into the regulation of chylomicron production. Annu Review Nutr. 2015;35:265–294. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Feingold KR, Grunfeld C. The Effect of inflammation and infection on lipids and lipoproteins. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al., editors. Endotext, South Dartmouth (MA); 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huang L, Chambliss KL, Gao X, Yuhanna IS, Behling-Kelly E, Bergaya S, et al. SR-B1 drives endothelial cell LDL transcytosis via DOCK4 to promote atherosclerosis. Nature. 2019;569:565–569. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1140-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis. Nature. 2000;407:233–241. doi: 10.1038/35025203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vourakis M, Mayer G, Rousseau G. The role of gut microbiota on cholesterol metabolism in atherosclerosis. International J Mol Sci. 2021;22:8074. doi: 10.3390/ijms22158074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hardy LM, Frisdal E, Le Goff W. Critical role of the human ATP-binding cassette G1 transporter in cardiometabolic diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:1892. doi: 10.3390/ijms18091892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Repa JJ, Berge KE, Pomajzl C, Richardson JA, Hobbs H, Mangelsdorf DJ. Regulation of ATP-binding cassette sterol transporters ABCG5 and ABCG8 by the liver X receptors α and β. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:18793–18800. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109927200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Baranowski M. Biological role of liver X receptors. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2008;59:31–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Smith LP, Nierstenhoefer M, Yoo SW, Penzias AS, Tobiasch E, Usheva A. The bile acid synthesis pathway is present and functional in the human ovary. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xu Y, Li F, Zalzala M, Xu J, Gonzalez FJ, Adorini L, et al. Farnesoid X receptor activation increases reverse cholesterol transport by modulating bile acid composition and cholesterol absorption in mice. Hepatology. 2016;64:1072–1085. doi: 10.1002/hep.28712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wahlström A, Sayin SI, Marschall H-U, Bäckhed F. Intestinal crosstalk between bile acids and microbiota and its impact on host metabolism. Cell Metab. 2016;24:41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li T, Chiang JY. Bile acid-based therapies for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and alcoholic liver disease. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020;9:152. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.09.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lye H-S, Rahmat-Ali GR, Liong M-T. Mechanisms of cholesterol removal by lactobacilli under conditions that mimic the human gastrointestinal tract. Int Dairy J. 2010;20:169–175. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lye H-S, Rusul G, Liong M-T. Removal of cholesterol by lactobacilli via incorporation and conversion to coprostanol. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93:1383–1392. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ranjbar R, Vahdati SN, Tavakoli S, Khodaie R, Behboudi H. Immunomodulatory roles of microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids in bacterial infections. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;141:111817. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bordoni A, Amaretti A, Leonardi A, Boschetti E, Danesi F, Matteuzzi D, et al. Cholesterol-lowering probiotics: In vitro selection and in vivo testing of bifidobacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:8273–8281. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5088-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Guo Z, Liu X, Zhang Q, Shen Z, Tian F, Zhang H, et al. Influence of consumption of probiotics on the plasma lipid profile: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;21:844–850. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2011.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gérard P. Metabolism of cholesterol and bile acids by the gut microbiota. Pathogens. 2014;3:14–24. doi: 10.3390/pathogens3010014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Huang Y, Wang X, Wang J, Wu F, Sui Y, Yang L, et al. Lactobacillus plantarum strains as potential probiotic cultures with cholesterol-lowering activity. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96:2746–2753. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kim GB, Yi SH, Lee BH. Purification and characterization of three different types of bile salt hydrolases from Bifidobacterium strains. J Dairy Sci. 2004;87:258–266. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73164-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.McAuliffe O, Cano RJ, Klaenhammer TR. Genetic analysis of two bile salt hydrolase activities in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:4925–4929. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.8.4925-4929.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Song M, Yun B, Moon J-H, Park D-J, Lim K, Oh S. Characterization of selected Lactobacillus strains for use as probiotics. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2015;35:551–556. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.4.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hosono A. Bile tolerance, taurocholate deconjugation, and binding of cholesterol by Lactobacillus gasseri strains. J Dairy Sci. 1999;82:243–248. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75229-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kimoto H, Ohmomo S, Okamoto T. Cholesterol removal from media by lactococci. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85:3182–3188. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74406-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kumar M, Nagpal R, Kumar R, Hemalatha R, Verma V, Kumar A, et al. Cholesterol-lowering probiotics as potential biotherapeutics for metabolic diseases. Exp Diabetes Res. 2012;2012:902917. doi: 10.1155/2012/902917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Korcz E, Kerényi Z, Varga L. Dietary fibers, prebiotics, and exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria: Potential health benefits with special regard to cholesterol-lowering effects. Food Funct. 2018;9:3057–3068. doi: 10.1039/c8fo00118a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Prasanna P, Grandison AS, Charalampopoulos D. Bifidobacteria in milk products: An overview of physiological and biochemical properties, exopolysaccharide production, selection criteria of milk products and health benefits. Food Res Int. 2014;55:247–262. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Angelin J, Kavitha M. Exopolysaccharides from probiotic bacteria and their health potential. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;162:853–865. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sasikumar K, Vaikkath DK, Devendra L, Nampoothiri KM. An exopolysaccharide (EPS) from a Lactobacillus plantarum BR2 with potential benefits for making functional foods. Bioresour Technol. 2017;241:1152–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kahouli I, Malhotra M, Tomaro-Duchesneau C, Saha S, Marinescu D, Rodes L, et al. Screening and in vitro analysis of Lactobacillus reuteri strains for short chain fatty acids production, stability and therapeutic potentials in colorectal cancer. J Bioequivalence Bioavailab. 2015;7:39. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Usta-Gorgun B, Yilmaz-Ersan L. Short-chain fatty acids production by Bifidobacterium species in the presence of salep. Electronic J Biotechnol. 2020;47:29–35. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hoda M. Probiotics bacteria from egyptian infants cause cholesterol removal in media and survive in yoghurt. Food Nutr Sci. 2011;2 [Google Scholar]
- 61.Korecka A, de Wouters T, Cultrone A, Lapaque N, Pettersson S, Doré J, et al. ANGPTL4 expression induced by butyrate and rosiglitazone in human intestinal epithelial cells utilizes independent pathways. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2013;304:G1025–G1037. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00293.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Alex S, Lange K, Amolo T, Grinstead JS, Haakonsson AK, Szalowska E, et al. Short-chain fatty acids stimulate angiopoietin-like 4 synthesis in human colon adenocarcinoma cells by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ. Mol cell biol. 2013;33:1303–1316. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00858-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Marcil Vr, Delvin E, Garofalo C, Levy E. Butyrate impairs lipid transport by inhibiting microsomal triglyceride transfer protein in Caco-2 cells. J Nutr. 2003;133:2180–2183. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.7.2180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Reis S, Conceição L, Rosa D, Siqueira N, Peluzio M. Mechanisms responsible for the hypocholesterolaemic effect of regular consumption of probiotics. Nutri Res Rev. 2017;30:36–49. doi: 10.1017/S0954422416000226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Richards LB, Li M, van Esch BC, Garssen J, Folkerts G. The effects of short-chain fatty acids on the cardiovascular system. Pharma Nutr. 2016;4:68–111. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Prasad PD, Gurav A, Zhu H, Martin PM, Vijay-Kumar M, Singh N. Dietary Fiber for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Elsevier; 2017. The relationship between probiotics and dietary fiber consumption and cardiovascular health; pp. 73– 90. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kriaa A, Bourgin M, Potiron A, Mkaouar H, Jablaoui A, Gérard P, et al. Microbial impact on cholesterol and bile acid metabolism: current status and future prospects. J Lipid Res. 2019;60:323–332. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R088989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Jia L, Betters JL, Yu L. Niemann-pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1) protein in intestinal and hepatic cholesterol transport. Annu Rev Physiol. 2011;73:239–259. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Trasino SE, Dawson HD, Urban Jr JF, Wang TT, Solano-Aguilar G. Feeding probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei to Ossabaw pigs on a high-fat diet prevents cholesteryl-ester accumulation and LPS modulation of the Liver X receptor and inflammatory axis in alveolar macrophages. J Nutr Biochem. 2013;24:1931–1939. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Liang X, Lv Y, Zhang Z, Yi H, Liu T, Li R, et al. Study on intestinal survival and cholesterol metabolism of probiotics. Food Sci Tech. 2020;124:109132. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wang Y, Rogers PM, Su C, Varga G, Stayrook KR, Burris TP. Regulation of cholesterologenesis by the oxysterol receptor, LXRα. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:26332–26339. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804808200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Yoon Hs, Ju Jh, Lee Je, Park Hj, Lee Jm, Shin Hk, et al. The probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus BFE5264 and Lactobacillus plantarum NR74 promote cholesterol efflux and suppress inflammation in THP‐1 cells. J Sci Food Agric. 2013;93:781–787. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.5797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Gorenjak M, Gradišnik L, Trapečar M, Pistello M, Kozmus CP, Škorjanc D, et al. Improvement of lipid profile by probiotic/protective cultures: Study in a non-carcinogenic small intestinal cell model. New Microbiol. 2014;37:51–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zhao C, Dahlman-Wright K. Liver X receptor in cholesterol metabolism. J Endocrinol. 2009;204:233–240. doi: 10.1677/JOE-09-0271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Yamanashi Y, Takada T, Shoda JI, Suzuki H. Novel function of Niemann‐Pick C1‐like 1 as a negative regulator of Niemann‐Pick C2 protein. Hepatology. 2012;55:953–964. doi: 10.1002/hep.24772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Jones ML, Tomaro-Duchesneau C, Prakash S. The gut microbiome, probiotics, bile acids axis, and human health. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:306–308. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Liang X, Zhang Z, Zhou X, Lu Y, Li R, Yu Z, et al. Probiotics improved hyperlipidemia in mice induced by a high cholesterol diet via down-regulating FXR. Food Funct. 2020;11:9903–9911. doi: 10.1039/d0fo02255a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Sudha MR, Chauhan P, Dixit K, Babu S, Jamil K. Probiotics as complementary therapy for hypercholesterolemia. Biol Med. 2009;1:1–13. [Google Scholar]
- 79.Miremadi F, Ayyash M, Sherkat F, Stojanovska L. Cholesterol reduction mechanisms and fatty acid composition of cellular membranes of probiotic Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria. J Funct Foods. 2014;9:295–305. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Taranto M, Medici M, Perdigon G, Holgado AR, Valdez G. Evidence for hypocholesterolemic effect of Lactobacillus reuteri in hypercholesterolemic mice. J Dairy Sci. 1998;81:2336–2340. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)70123-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Pereira DI, McCartney AL, Gibson GR. An in vitro study of the probiotic potential of a bile-salt-hydrolyzing Lactobacillus fermentum strain, and determination of its cholesterol-lowering properties. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:4743–4752. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4743-4752.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Nguyen T, Kang J, Lee M. Characterization of Lactobacillus plantarum PH04, a potential probiotic bacterium with cholesterol-lowering effects. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;113:358–361. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Sirilun S, Chaiyasut C, Kantachote D, Luxananil P. Characterisation of non human origin probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum with cholesterol-lowering property. African J Microbiol Res. 2010;4:994–1000. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Abdi M, Lohrasbi V, Asadi A, Esghaei M, Jazi FM, Rohani M, et al. Interesting probiotic traits of mother’s milk Lactobacillus isolates; from bacteriocin to inflammatory bowel disease improvement. Microb Pathog. 2021;158:104998. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.104998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Ha C-G, Cho J-K, Lee C-H, Chai Y-G, Ha Y, Shin S-H. Cholesterol lowering effect of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from human feces. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;16:1201–1209. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wang SC, Chang CK, Chan SC, Shieh JS, Chiu CK, Duh P-D. Effects of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented mustard on lowering cholesterol. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2014;4:523–528. doi: 10.12980/APJTB.4.201414B54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Jeun J, Kim S, Cho S-Y, Jun H-j, Park H-J, Seo J-G, et al. Hypocholesterolemic effects of Lactobacillus plantarum KCTC3928 by increased bile acid excretion in C57BL/6 mice. Nutrition. 2010;26:321–330. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2009.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Guan X, Xu Q, Zheng Y, Qian L, Lin B. Screening and characterization of lactic acid bacterial strains that produce fermented milk and reduce cholesterol levels. Braz J Microbiol. 2017;48:730–739. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Qu T, Yang L, Wang Y, Jiang B, Shen M, Ren D. Reduction of serum cholesterol and its mechanism by Lactobacillus plantarum H6 screened from local fermented food products. Food Funct. 2020;11:1397–1409. doi: 10.1039/c9fo02478f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Sarkar S. Potential of acidophilus milk to lower cholesterol. Nutr Food Sci. 2003;33:273–277. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Liong M, Shah N. Bile salt deconjugation ability, bile salt hydrolase activity and cholesterol co-precipitation ability of lactobacilli strains. Int Dairy J. 2005;15:391–398. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kim Y, Whang JY, Whang KY, Oh S, Kim SH. Characterization of the cholesterol-reducing activity in a cell-free supernatant of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008;72:1483. doi: 10.1271/bbb.70802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Minelli EB, Benini A, Marzotto M, Sbarbati A, Ruzzenente O, Ferrario R, et al. Assessment of novel probiotic Lactobacillus casei strains for the production of functional dairy foods. Int Dairy J. 2004;14:723–736. [Google Scholar]
- 94.Liong M, Shah N. Effects of a Lactobacillus casei synbiotic on serum lipoprotein, intestinal microflora, and organic acids in rats. J Dairy Sci. 2006;89:1390–1399. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72207-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Anandharaj M, Sivasankari B, Santhanakaruppu R, Manimaran M, Rani RP, Sivakumar S. Determining the probiotic potential of cholesterol-reducing Lactobacillus and Weissella strains isolated from gherkins (fermented cucumber) and south Indian fermented koozh. Res Microbiol. 2015;166:428–439. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2015.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Beena A, Prasad V. Effect of yogurt and bifidus yogurt fortified with skim milk powder, condensed whey and lactose-hydrolysed condensed whey on serum cholesterol and triacylglycerol levels in rats. J Dairy Res. 1997;64:453–457. doi: 10.1017/s0022029997002252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Taranto M, Sesma F, De Valdez GF. Localization and primary characterization of bile salt hydrolase from Lactobacillus reuteri. Biotechnol Lett. 1999;21:935–938. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Hosono A. Effect of administration of Lactobacillus gasseri on serum lipids and fecal steroids in hypercholesterolemic rats. J Dairy Sci. 2000;83:1705–1711. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75039-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Xie N, Cui Y, Yin Y-N, Zhao X, Yang J-W, Wang Z-G, et al. Effects of two Lactobacillus strains on lipid metabolism and intestinal microflora in rats fed a high-cholesterol diet. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011;11:1–11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Bendali F, Kerdouche K, Hamma-Faradji S, Drider D. In vitro and in vivo cholesterol lowering ability of Lactobacillus pentosus KF923750. Benef Microbes. 2017;8:271–280. doi: 10.3920/BM2016.0121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Park S, Kang J, Choi S, Park H, Hwang E, Kang Y, et al. Cholesterol-lowering effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus BFE5264 and its influence on the gut microbiome and propionate level in a murine model. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0203150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Asan-Ozusaglam M, Gunyakti A. Lactobacillus fermentum strains from human breast milk with probiotic properties and cholesterol-lowering effects. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2019;28:501–509. doi: 10.1007/s10068-018-0494-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Wang G, Huang W, Xia Y, Xiong Z, Ai L. Cholesterol-lowering potentials of Lactobacillus strain overexpression of bile salt hydrolase on high cholesterol diet-induced hypercholesterolemic mice. Food Funct. 2019;10:1684–1695. doi: 10.1039/c8fo02181c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Ranji P, Agah S, Heydari Z, Rahmati-Yamchi M, Alizadeh AM. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum probiotics on the serum biochemical parameters, and the vitamin D and leptin receptor genes on mice colon cancer. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2019;22:631–636. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2019.32624.7806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Al-Sheraji S, Amin I, Azlan A, Manap M, Hassan F. Effects of Bifidobacterium longum BB536 on lipid profile and histopathological changes in hypercholesterolaemic rats. Benef Microbes. 2015;6:661–668. doi: 10.3920/BM2014.0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Al-Sheraji SH, Ismail A, Manap MY, Mustafa S, Yusof RM, Hassan FA. Hypocholesterolaemic effect of yoghurt containing Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum G4 or Bifidobacterium longum BB536. Food Chem. 2012;135:356–361. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.04.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Bo T-b, Wen J, Zhao Y-c, Tian S-j, Zhang X-y, Wang D-h. Bifidobacterium pseudolongum reduces triglycerides by modulating gut microbiota in mice fed high-fat food. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2020;198:105602. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2020.105602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Lokapirnasari WP, Sahidu AM, Maslachah L, Yulianto A, Najwan R, editors . The effect of combination Bifidobacterium sp and Lactobacillus acidophilus probiotic on egg yolk cholesterol, HDL and LDL IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 109.Jiang J, Wu C, Zhang C, Zhang Q, Yu L, Zhao J, et al. Strain-Specific effects of Bifidobacterium longum on hypercholesterolemic rats and potential mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:1305. doi: 10.3390/ijms22031305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Fuentes MC, Lajo T, Carrión JM, Cuñé J. A randomized clinical trial evaluating a proprietary mixture of Lactobacillus plantarum strains for lowering cholesterol. Med J Nutr Metab. 2016;9:125–135. [Google Scholar]
- 111.Fuentes MC, Lajo T, Carrión JM, Cuné J. Cholesterol-lowering efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 7527, 7528 and 7529 in hypercholesterolaemic adults. Br J Nutr. 2013;109:1866–1872. doi: 10.1017/S000711451200373X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Simons LA, Amansec SG, Conway P. Effect of Lactobacillus fermentum on serum lipids in subjects with elevated serum cholesterol. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2006;16:531–535. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2005.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Lewis S, Burmeister S. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on plasma lipids. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59:776–780. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Ahn HY, Kim M, Chae JS, Ahn Y-T, Sim J-H, Choi I-D, et al. Supplementation with two probiotic strains, Lactobacillus curvatus HY7601 and Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032, reduces fasting triglycerides and enhances apolipoprotein AV levels in non-diabetic subjects with hypertriglyceridemia. Atherosclerosis. 2015;241:649–656. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Chiu H-F, Fang C-Y, Shen Y-C, Venkatakrishnan K, Wang C-K. Efficacy of probiotic milk formula on blood lipid and intestinal function in mild hypercholesterolemic volunteers: A placebo-control, randomized clinical trial. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2021;13:624–632. doi: 10.1007/s12602-020-09728-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Xiao J, Kondo S, Takahashi N, Miyaji K, Oshida K, Hiramatsu A, et al. Effects of milk products fermented by Bifidobacterium longum on blood lipids in rats and healthy adult male volunteers. J Dairy Sci. 2003;86:2452–2461. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73839-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Anderson JW, Gilliland SE. Effect of fermented milk (yogurt) containing Lactobacillus acidophilus L1 on serum cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic humans. J Am Coll Nutr. 1999;18:43–50. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1999.10718826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Larkin TA, Astheimer LB, Price WE. Dietary combination of soy with a probiotic or prebiotic food significantly reduces total and LDL cholesterol in mildly hypercholesterolaemic subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63:238–245. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Costabile A, Buttarazzi I, Kolida S, Quercia S, Baldini J, Swann JR, et al. An in vivo assessment of the cholesterol-lowering efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum ECGC 13110402 in normal to mildly hypercholesterolaemic adults. PloS One. 2017;12:1–21. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Jones ML, Martoni CJ, Parent M, Prakash S. Cholesterol-lowering efficacy of a microencapsulated bile salt hydrolase-active Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242 yoghurt formulation in hypercholesterolaemic adults. Br J Nutr. 2012;107:1505–1513. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511004703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Sadrzadeh-Yeganeh H, Elmadfa I, Djazayery A, Jalali M, Heshmat R, Chamary M. The effects of probiotic and conventional yoghurt on lipid profile in women. Br J Nutr. 2010;103:1778–1783. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509993801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Ataie-Jafari A, Larijani B, Majd HA, Tahbaz F. Cholesterol-lowering effect of probiotic yogurt in comparison with ordinary yogurt in mildly to moderately hypercholesterolemic subjects. Ann Nutr Metab. 2009;54:22–27. doi: 10.1159/000203284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Lee Y, Ba Z, Roberts RF, Rogers CJ, Fleming JA, Meng H, et al. Effects of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis BB-12® on the lipid/lipoprotein profile and short chain fatty acids in healthy young adults: A randomized controlled trial. Nutr J. 2017;16:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12937-017-0261-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Ivey KL, Hodgson JM, Kerr DA, Thompson PL, Stojceski B, Prince RL. The effect of yoghurt and its probiotics on blood pressure and serum lipid profile; a randomised controlled trial. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;25:46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Ejtahed H, Mohtadi-Nia J, Homayouni-Rad A, Niafar M, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Mofid V, et al. Effect of probiotic yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis on lipid profile in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:3288–3294. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-4128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Mazloom Z, Yousefinejad A, Dabbaghmanesh MH. Effect of probiotics on lipid profile, glycemic control, insulin action, oxidative stress, and inflammatory markers in patients with type 2 diabetes: a clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2013;38:38–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Greany KA, Nettleton JA, Wangen KE, Thomas W, Kurzer MS. Probiotic consumption does not enhance the cholesterol-lowering effect of soy in postmenopausal women. J Nutr. 2004;134:3277–3283. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.12.3277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Naruszewicz M, Johansson M-L, Zapolska-Downar D, Bukowska H. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v on cardiovascular disease risk factors in smokers. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:1249–1255. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/76.6.1249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Rerksuppaphol S, Rerksuppaphol L. A randomized double-blind controlled trial of Lactobacillus acidophilus plus Bifidobacterium bifidum versus placebo in patients with hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:1–4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11867.5728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Kuipers R, De Graaf D, Luxwolda M, Muskiet M, Dijck-Brouwer D, Muskiet F. saturated fat, carbohydrates and cardiovascular. Neth J Med. 2011;69:372–378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto Jr AM, Kastelein JJ, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Fang Y, Chen H, Zhang X, Zhang H, Xia J, Ding K, et al. Probiotic administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 attenuates atherosclerotic plaque formation in ApoE-/-mice fed with a high-fat diet. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23:3533–3541. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201904_17722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Gerrit L, Sijbrands EJ, Staub D, Coll B, Folkert J, Feinstein SB, et al. Noninvasive imaging of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. Curr probl Cardiol. 2010;35:556–591. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2010.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Kattoor AJ, Pothineni NVK, Palagiri D, Mehta JL. Oxidative stress in atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017;19:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s11883-017-0678-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Li H, Horke S, Förstermann U. Vascular oxidative stress, nitric oxide and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2014;237:208–219. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Gaweł S, Wardas M, Niedworok E, Wardas P. Malondialdehyde (MDA) as a lipid peroxidation marker. Wiad Lek. 2004;57:453–455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Lubos E, Handy DE, Loscalzo J. Role of oxidative stress and nitric oxide in atherothrombosis. Front Biosci. 2008;13:5323–5344. doi: 10.2741/3084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Mehta JL. American College of Cardiology Foundation Washington. 2006. Oxidized or native low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: Which is more important in atherogenesis? pp. 980–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Pautz A, Art J, Hahn S, Nowag S, Voss C, Kleinert H. Regulation of the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Nitric Oxide. 2010;23:75–93. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2010.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Ding Y-H, Qian L-Y, Pang J, Lin J-Y, Xu Q, Wang L-H, et al. The regulation of immune cells by Lactobacilli: A potential therapeutic target for anti-atherosclerosis therapy. Oncotarget. 2017;8:59915–59928. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Kong Y, Olejar KJ, On SL, Chelikani V. The potential of Lactobacillus spp for modulating oxidative stress in the gastrointestinal tract. Anti-oxidants. 2020;9:610. doi: 10.3390/antiox9070610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Chen L, Liu W, Li Y, Luo S, Liu Q, Zhong Y, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 attenuates the atherosclerotic progression through modulation of oxidative stress and inflammatory process. Int Immunopharmacol. 2013;17:108–115. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2013.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Din AU, Hassan A, Zhu Y, Zhang K, Wang Y, Li T, et al. Inhibitory effect of Bifidobacterium bifidum ATCC 29521 on colitis and its mechanism. J Nutr Biochem. 2020;79:108353. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2020.108353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Yadav R, Khan SH, Mada SB, Meena S, Kapila R, Kapila S. Consumption of probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum MTCC: 5898-fermented milk attenuates dyslipidemia, oxidative stress, and inflammation in male rats fed on cholesterol-enriched diet. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2019;11:509–518. doi: 10.1007/s12602-018-9429-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Zhang Y, Du R, Wang L, Zhang H. The anti-oxidative effects of probiotic Lactobacillus casei Zhang on the hyperlipidemic rats. Eur Food Res Technol. 2010;231:151–158. [Google Scholar]
- 146.Kim JY, Kim H, Jung BJ, Kim N-R, Park JE, Chung DK. Lipoteichoic acid isolated from Lactobacillus plantarum suppresses LPS-mediated atherosclerotic plaque inflammation. Mol Cells. 2013;35:115–124. doi: 10.1007/s10059-013-2190-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Fu BC, Hullar MAJ, Randolph TW, Franke AA, Monroe KR, Cheng I, et al. Associations of plasma trimethylamine N-oxide, choline, carnitine, and betaine with inflammatory and cardiometabolic risk biomarkers and the fecal microbiome in the Multiethnic Cohort Adiposity Phenotype Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;111:1226–1234. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Cho CE, Taesuwan S, Malysheva OV, Bender E, Tulchinsky NF, Yan J, et al. Trimethylamine‐N‐oxide (TMAO) response to animal source foods varies among healthy young men and is influenced by their gut microbiota composition: A randomized controlled trial. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61:1600324. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201600324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Canyelles M, Tondo M, Cedó L, Farràs M, Blanco-Vaca F. Trimethylamine N-oxide: a link among diet, gut microbiota, gene regulation of liver and intestine cholesterol homeostasis and HDL function. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:3228. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Wang Z, Roberts AB, Buffa JA, Levison BS, Zhu W, Org E, et al. Non-lethal inhibition of gut microbial trimethylamine production for the treatment of atherosclerosis. Cell. 2015;163:1585–1595. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Ding L, Chang M, Guo Y, Zhang L, Xue C, Yanagita T, et al. Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO)-induced atherosclerosis is associated with bile acid metabolism. Lipids Health Dis. 2018;17:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12944-018-0939-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Koeth RA, Wang Z, Levison BS, Buffa JA, Org E, Sheehy BT, et al. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of L-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2013;19:576–585. doi: 10.1038/nm.3145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Zhao Z-H, Xin F-Z, Da Zhou Y-QX, Liu X-L, Yang R-X, Pan Q, et al. Trimethylamine N-oxide attenuates high-fat high-cholesterol diet-induced steatohepatitis by reducing hepatic cholesterol overload in rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:2450–2462. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i20.2450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Collins HL, Drazul-Schrader D, Sulpizio AC, Koster PD, Williamson Y, Adelman SJ, et al. L-Carnitine intake and high trimethylamine N-oxide plasma levels correlate with low aortic lesions in ApoE−/− transgenic mice expressing CETP. Atherosclerosis. 2016;244:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.10.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Geng J, Yang C, Wang B, Zhang X, Hu T, Gu Y, et al. Trimethylamine N-oxide promotes atherosclerosis via CD36-dependent MAPK/JNK pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;97:941–947. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




