Table 2.
Variable | Value |
---|---|
Overall scan classification, % (n) | |
Positive | 25.2% (29) |
Negative | 74.8% (86) |
Suspicious lesions on positive scans | |
Total | 44 |
Median (minimum–maximum) | 1 (1–4) |
Number of lesions/positive scan, % (n) | |
1 | 69% (20/29) |
2 | 14% (4/29) |
3 | 14% (4/29) |
4 | 3% (1/29) |
Type of lesions, % (n) | |
Local recurrence | 25% (11/44) |
Lymph node metastasis | 50% (22/44) |
Bone metastasis | 25% (11/44) |
Types of lesions on a positive scan, % (n) | |
Local recurrence only | 24% (7/29) |
Lymph node metastasis only | 34% (10/29) |
Bone metastasis only | 24% (7/29) |
Local recurrence + lymph node | |
metastasis | 10% (3/29) |
Local recurrence + bone metastasis | 3% (1/29) |
Lymph node metastasis + bone | |
metastasis | 3% (1/29) |
SUVmax of suspicious lesions | |
All suspicious lesions | |
Median (minimum–maximum) | 5.3 (2.1–26.3) |
Mean ± SD | 7.2 ± 5.3 |
Local recurrence | |
Median (minimum–maximum) | 5.7 (2.5–19.4) |
Mean ± SD | 8.2 ± 5.6 |
Lymph node metastasis | |
Median (minimum–maximum) | 6.6 (2.1–26.3) |
Mean ± SD | 8.3 ± 5.8 |
Bone metastasis | |
Median (minimum–maximum) | 3.3 (2.3–7.7) |
Mean ± SD | 3.9 ± 1.5 |
Percentages represent proportions of the overall study sample or the subgroup with available data regarding a variable, as applicable. Due to rounding, not all percentages may add up to exactly 100%. Abbreviations: 68Ga, gallium-68; PSMA, prostate-specific membrane antigen; SD, standard deviation; and SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value. a Lesion classifications are putative and not biopsy-confirmed. Figure 4 shows overall detection rates according to PSA doubling time categories (n = 83) (Panels A–B) and Gleason score categories (n = 107) (Panels C–D). Scan positivity is significantly higher (p = 0.04) among men with doubling times ≤ 12 months than among those with slower doubling times. Indeed, only 1/16 patients (6%) in the latter subgroup have positive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. The overall suspicious lesion detection rate is also significantly higher (p = 0.01) in men with Gleason scores ≥ 7b than in patients with lower Gleason scores. Of note, there is no significant difference in the positivity rate between the study centers (p = 0.24).