Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 12;7(3):2200213. doi: 10.1002/gch2.202200213

Table 1.

Physicochemical, structural, and machine learning properties of selected peptide ACP candidates

ID Amino acid sequence Length Charge Structure Machine learning model Consensus score Prediction
ACPred‐FL AntiCp 2.0

mACP

pred

ALA‐A1 RFFVPLFLVGILFPAILAKQFTK 23 3+ coil–helix–coil–helix 0.980 0.620 0.964 0.836 ACP
ALA‐A2 KLWCKSSQVPQSR 13 3+ helix–coil 0.992 0.480 0.798 0.724 ACP
ALA‐A3 RFFVPLFLVGILFPAILAKQFTKC 24 3+ helix–coil–helix 0.980 0.590 0.977 0.826 ACP
ALA‐A4 LFQISNKLWCKSSQVPQSRN 20 3+ coil 0.944 0.460 0.075 0.319 non‐ACP
BMP‐S6 (positive control)[ 5 , 10 ] FKCRRWQWRMKKLGAPSITCVR 22 7+ coil–helix 0.606 1.000 0.9848 0.842 ACP