Table 2.
Photosynthetic rate, transpiration, stomatal conductance and chlorophyll content in tomato leaves under salinity stress.
| Tomato cultivar | Growth system | Salt | Salinity level (mM) | Photosynthetic rate (µmol CO2 m−2s−1) |
Transpiration (mmol H2O m−2s−1) |
Stomatal conductance (mol m−2s−1) |
Chlorophyll (mg/g) |
Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BINATomato-5 | Hydroponic cultivation with vermiculite and half-strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution | NaCl | 0, 60, 120 mM | 12.2 ↘ 4.9 | 0.27 ↘ 0.151 | – | Hossain et al. (2012) | |
| Tomato | Hydroponic system with aerated Hoagland nutrient solution | NaCl | 0, 100, 150 mM | 31.3 ↘ 24.1 | 10.6 ↘ 5.8 | 0.6 ↘ 0.2 | – | Lovelli et al. (2012) |
| Tomato | Sandy loam soil | NaCl | 0, 100, 150 mg/L | 25.2 ↘ 5.90 | 3.7 ↘ 1.39 | 0.5 ↘ 0.04 | 12.8 ↘ 7.0 | Giannakoula and Ilias (2013) |
| Belladonna | Hydroponic system with perlite and standard nutrient solution | NaCl | 0, 50 mM | 25.70 ↗ 27.28 | – | 0.55 ↘ 0.50 | – | Costan et al. (2020) |
| Super Chef | Hydroponic system with aerated half-strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution | NaCl | 0-120 mM | – | 1.373 ↘ 0.811 | 1.373 ↘ 0.811 | Taheri et al. (2020) | |
| Tomato | Silt loam (sand 20.84 %, silt 57.46 % and clay 21.7 %) | NaCl | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 dS m-1 | – | – | 0.08 ↘ 0.02 | – | Parvin et al., (2015) |
| Moneymaker | Coconut coir fiber irrigated with Hoagland no. 2 solution | NaCl | 0, 75 mM | 8.5 ↘ 6.1 | – | 0.41 ↘ 0.20 | – | Renau-Morata et al. (2017) |
| Tomato | Sandy loam soil | NaCl | 0.6, 2, 4, 6 dS m-1 | 11.10 ↘ 8.86 | 2.65 ↘ 2.26 | 0.114 ↘ 0.092 | 39.81 ↘ 37.74 | Yang et al. (2020) |
| CF Momotaro York | Coconut fiber and rice husks in hydroponic system with Enshi nutrient solution | NaCl | 1.2, 6.0 dS m-1 |
14.7 ↘ 13.2 | 5.2 ↘ 3.8 | 0.47 ↘ 0.36 | – | Maeda et al. (2020) |
| Endeavour | 17.7 ↘ 15.5 | 5.7 ↘ 4.3 | 0.54 ↘ 0.41 | – | ||||
| Belle | Vermiculite and rockwool flocks in hydroponic system with standard nutrient solution | NaCl | 2, 4, 6 dS m-1 |
30.6 ↘ 17.1 | 25.7 ↘ 12.1 | 4.0 ↘ 0.4 | – | Marsic et al. (2018) |
| Gardel | 32.5 ↘ 19.4 | 17.6 ↘ 15.7 | 4.6 ↘ 0.4 | – | ||||
| Ailsa Craig | Hydroponic cultivation with half-strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution | NaCl | 0, 125 mM | 5.97 ↘ 2.74 | – | 0.51 ↘ 0.25 | – | Gharbi et al. (2017a) |
| Lakshmi | Sand | NaCl | 0, 0.3, 0.5 g/kg | 27 ↘ 21 | – | – | 0.996 ↘ 0.751 (Chl a) 0.256 ↘ 0.185 (Chl b) |
Singh et al. (2016) |
| Tomato | Perlite-vermiculite (1:3 v/v) with half-strength modified Hoagland nutrient solution | NaCl | 0, 40, 80, 160 mM | – | – | – | 0.645 ↘ 0.618 | Martínez et al. (2014) |
↑, Increase in parameter value; ↓, decrease in parameter value.