Abstract
Little is known about morbidity for children with rare structural congenital anomalies. This European, population-based data-linkage cohort study analysed data on hospitalisations and surgical procedures for 5948 children born 1995–2014 with 18 rare structural congenital anomalies from nine EUROCAT registries in five countries. In the first year of life, the median length of stay (LOS) ranged from 3.5 days (anotia) to 53.8 days (atresia of bile ducts). Generally, children with gastrointestinal anomalies, bladder anomalies and Prune-Belly had the longest LOS. At ages 1–4, the median LOS per year was ≤3 days for most anomalies. The proportion of children having surgery before age 5 years ranged from 40% to 100%. The median number of surgical procedures for those under 5 years was two or more for 14 of the 18 anomalies and the highest for children with Prune-Belly at 7.4 (95% CI 2.5–12.3). The median age at first surgery for children with atresia of bile ducts was 8.4 weeks (95% CI 7.6–9.2) which is older than international recommendations. Results from the subset of registries with data up to 10 years of age showed that the need for hospitalisations and surgery continued. The burden of disease in early childhood is high for children with rare structural congenital anomalies.
Keywords: rare congenital anomalies, morbidity, length of stay, surgery
1. Introduction
Around 2% of all liveborn children in Europe are diagnosed with a major congenital anomaly [1]. Mortality and morbidity for these children are higher than for children without congenital anomalies [2,3]. A recent study on specific congenital anomalies showed that children with severe congenital heart defects (CHD) and gastro-intestinal anomalies such as oesophageal atresia and intestinal atresia had a median length of stay in hospital of 20 days or more in the first year after birth [4]. Information on childhood morbidity for rare structural anomalies is more limited as there are many challenges in the research on rare anomalies such as difficulties in developing evidence-based treatment guidelines [5]. A recent study on survival up to 10 years of age for children with rare congenital anomalies showed varying survival rates with a low survival rate for children with holoprosencephaly (36%) and a high survival rate for children with Hirschsprung’s anomaly, accessory kidney or epispadias (>95%) [6].
EUROCAT is a network of population-based congenital anomaly surveillance registries in different regions of Europe [7,8]. The EUROlinkCAT study linked congenital anomaly registry data on liveborn children with all types of major congenital anomalies to healthcare databases to obtain information on mortality and morbidity [9]. The aim of this current study is to report overall morbidity for children with rare structural congenital anomalies measured as the risk of hospitalisation, the median number of days spent in hospital, the proportion of children with extended stays of 10 days or more, the proportion of children having surgery, the median number of surgical procedures and age at first surgery.
2. Material and Methods
This study is a European, population-based data-linkage cohort study, including data from nine EUROCAT registries (national and regional) in five countries (Supplementary Table S1). Details about the EUROCAT registries, hospital databases and linkage methods have been published elsewhere [4,9]. All live-born children with rare noncardiac structural congenital anomalies (livebirth prevalence <1 per 10,000 births) registered in the EUROCAT registries and born between 1995 (or the first year of the EUROCAT registry if later) and 2014 were included (termed “rare EUROCAT children”). Data on all live-born children without congenital anomalies born during the same time period and from the same population area covered by the registry were included as a reference population for comparison (termed “reference children”).
Data on hospitalisations and surgical procedures for all children up to their 10th birthday or the end of 2015 (i.e., at least one year of follow-up for all children), whichever came earlier, were obtained by electronic linkage to hospital databases. Hospital stays related to the birth were excluded from the analysis as in most countries almost all children are born in hospitals. The codes used for the exclusion of a hospital stay were ICD-10 codes Z37–Z39 (codes for the outcome of childbirth) or ICD-9 cm (clinical modification) codes V30–V39 (codes for the type of birth). All admissions on the day of birth or on day 1 that included additional diagnoses were included in the study.
Surgical procedures were coded according to the coding systems used in the national health record systems. Italy and Spain used ICD-9 cm for the study period, the United Kingdom (Wales and England) used OPCS-4 and Finland and Denmark used national adaptions of NCSP (NOMESCO Classification of Surgical Procedures). Three paediatricians independently reviewed all the codes from the extensive lists of surgery and procedure codes extracted from the three different coding systems and reached a consensus on which codes to define as surgery [9].
The results for each type of anomaly were pooled across registries and analysed for all children diagnosed with the anomaly. For the rare anomaly studies in EUROlinkCAT, it was not possible to analyse data on isolated anomalies only due to governance restrictions on the use of data based on small numbers in several of the databases providing data for the study.
Statistical Analysis
A common data model was developed to standardise the linked variables from the local hospital databases in each registry [4,6,9]. This enabled all registries to run centrally written syntax scripts in Stata version 13 for linkage quality checks and morbidity analyses. No individual case data were shared as all analyses were performed locally using these linked datasets. The aggregate tables and analytic results produced in a common format were then sent to a Central Results Repository at Ulster University for collation and redistribution to the study team. Analyses were performed on age groups (<1 year, 1–4 years, 0–4 years and 0–9 years) separately. For all nine registries, hospitalisations and surgery were examined in three age groups: <1 year, 1–4 years and 0–4 years. For six of the nine registries, data on hospitalisations and surgery between 5 and 9 years of age were also available (only children born in 1995–2005 reached the age of 10 years before the end of 2015) and for these registries, the outcomes were also examined at 0–9 years.
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the proportions of children experiencing each outcome of interest (admitted to hospital, staying 10 days or more, undergoing surgery), which accounted for censoring due to early exit from the study. The median and interquartile range of the number of days spent in hospital, the number of surgical procedures and age at first surgery by anomaly subgroup were reported by each registry. Details for the meta-analytic methods to combine proportions and medians across registries can be found in a previous publication [4].
3. Results
The study included data on 5948 children with 18 rare congenital anomalies from nine EUROCAT registries in five western European countries (Finland, Denmark, the United Kingdom, Italy and Spain) (Table 1). The number of children born with each anomaly ranged from 27 children with Prune-Belly to 867 children with unilateral renal agenesis, of whom, 21 with Prune-Belly and 816 with unilateral renal agenesis reached at least one year of age during the follow-up period. The proportion of children with rare congenital anomalies admitted to hospital in the first year after birth was very high at 85% or more. The proportion of term-born children with a hospital stay of 10 days or more differed by anomaly type but was very high for children with atresia of the bile ducts (94%), bladder exstrophy (87%) and annular pancreas (76%). The proportion of children admitted to hospital whilst aged 1–4 was at or above 47% for all types of anomalies, but the proportion of children with long stays (10 days or more) was much lower compared to the first year of life. A high proportion of children with arhinencephaly/holoprosencephaly had hospital stays of 10 days or more.
Table 1.
AGE < 1 | AGE 1–4 Years | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No of Children Born | % Admitted a (95% CI) |
% Admitted > 10 Days b (95% CI) |
Median length of Stay c
(95% CI) |
No of Children Reaching 1 Year of Age | % Admitted a (95% CI) |
% Admitted > 10 Days b (95% CI) |
Median Length of Stay per Year c (95% CI) | |
Reference Children | 1,960,272 | 30% (25–36) | 1% (1–2) | 3.0 (2.1–3.9) | 1,935,199 | 23% (17–31) | 1% (1–1) | 0.4 (0.3–0.6) |
Encephalocele | 136 | 93% (78–98) | 31% (22–41) | 9.7 (7.2–12.1) | 110 | 65% (44–79) | 9% (4–18) | 1.2 (0.6–1.8) |
Arhinencephaly/holoprosencephaly | 94 | 85% (57–96) | 58% (39–74) | 20.6 (11.8–29.5) | 50 | 99% (88–100) | 36% (18–55) | 4.4 (1.7–7.1) |
Anomalies of corpus callosum | 686 | 94% (88–97) | 43% (36–51) | 13.6 (10.0–17.1) | 590 | 73% (64–81) | 17% (13–20) | 2.3 (1.3–3.2) |
Anophthalmos d/microphthalmos | 355 | 92% (84–97) | 30% (21–41) | 9.7 (6.0–13.5) | 292 | 78% (69–85) | 10% (6–16) | 1.2 (0.7–1.7) |
Congenital glaucoma | 167 | 95% (86–98) | 14% (9–21) | 8.1 (6.8–9.4) | 163 | 94% (81–98) | 8% (4–13) | 0.9 (0.4–1.4) |
Anotia | 68 | 97% (81–100) | 14% (5–28) | 3.5 (1.6–5.4) | 64 | 63% (47–76) | 1% (0–10) | 0.5 (0.3–0.8) |
Cystic adenomatous malformation of lung | 370 | 91% (83–95) | 18% (7–34) | 8.6 (2.8–14.5) | 345 | 48% (38–56) | 1% (0–4) | 0.5 (0.2–0.7) |
Hirschsprung’s disease | 687 | 97% (93–99) | 74% (66–81) | 31.2 (25.4–36.9) | 666 | 74% (69–79) | 15% (12–19) | 1.7 (1.2–2.2) |
Anomalies of intestinal fixation | 502 | 98% (96–99) | 67% (58–74) | 19.9 (15.6–24.1) | 430 | 52% (38–65) | 11% (7–15) | 0.7 (0.4–1.0) |
Atresia of bile ducts | 171 | 99% (97–100) | 94% (86–97) | 53.8 (46.8–60.8) | 148 | 84% (71–91) | 39% (29–49) | 6.2 (4.3–8.1) |
Annular pancreas | 99 | 99% (94–100) | 76% (47–90) | 22.2 (17.3–27.0) | 94 | 62% (20–86) | 5% (1–15) | 0.5 (0.2–0.9) |
Unilateral renal agenesis | 867 | 85% (76–90) | 18% (13–23) | 5.4 (3.3–7.4) | 816 | 55% (49–61) | 5% (3–7) | 0.7 (0.5–0.9) |
Accessory kidney | 810 | 90% (83–94) | 18% (11–26) | 6.4 (4.7–8.1) | 779 | 62% (51–72) | 4% (2–7) | 0.7 (0.5–0.9) |
Bladder exstrophy | 130 | 99% (96–100) | 87% (77–93) | 27.0 (20.4–33.6) | 119 | 92% (82–96) | 19% (4–43) | 3.7 (2.0–5.3) |
Posterior urethral valves | 414 | 99% (97–100) | 51% (45–57) | 20.3 (14.2–26.4) | 378 | 84% (70–92) | 7% (4–11) | 1.0 (0.7–1.3) |
Prune Belly | 27 | 98% (80–100) | 63% (22–87) | 44.3 (3.8–84.9) | 21 | 99% (90–100) | 29% (4–63) | 13.4 (5.2–21.7) |
Situs inversus | 196 | 92% (86–95) | 45% (33–55) | 12.5 (8.2–16.7) | 173 | 65% (50–77) | 13% (5–23) | 0.6 (0.4–0.9) |
Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita | 169 | 95% (89–98) | 44% (33–55) | 14.9 (9.9–19.8) | 131 | 88% (77–94) | 13% (4–28) | 2.0 (1.1–2.8) |
a: Number of children ever hospitalised in age period. b: proportion of children born at term with at least one hospital stay of 10 days or more. c: Median length of stay in days per year. Calculated only among children hospitalised in age period. Registries with <3 cases in subgroup not included. d: 76 with a diagnosis of anophthalmos.
The median length of stay in the first year ranged from 3.5 days for children with anotia to 53.8 days for children with atresia of the bile ducts (Table 1). Generally, children with gastrointestinal anomalies, bladder anomalies and Prune-Belly had the longest stay in hospital during the first year. At ages 1–4, the median length of stay per year was under 3 days for the majority of anomalies.
The proportions of children having any surgery are presented in Table 2. The proportion of children having surgery before age 5 ranged from 40–100% and was lowest in children with anotia, unilateral renal agenesis and situs inversus. For 10 of the 18 rare congenital anomalies, the proportion with surgery was higher in the first year compared to ages 1–4, and for eight anomalies, the proportion with surgery was higher at ages 1–4 compared to the first year of life (e. g. agenesis of corpus callosum, anotia, unilateral renal agenesis). Only 53% of children with encephalocele had surgery within the first year and 41% at age 1–4 years.
Table 2.
Type of Anomaly | Number of Children Born | Percentage with Any Surgery (95% CI) | Median Number of Surgical Procedures in the First 5 Years (95% CI) | Median Age in Weeks at First Surgery in the First 5 Years (95% CI) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<1 year | 1–4 years | <5 years | ||||
Reference children | 1,960,272 | 0.8% (0.5–1.1) | 6.2% (4.0–9.2) | 7.0% (4.6–10.0) | 1.0 (1.0–1.0) | 151.0 (130.1–171.9) |
Encephalocele | 136 | 53% (35–68) | 41% (26–55) | 78% (58–90) | 1.3 (0.9–1.8) | 3.5 (0.0–7.2) |
Arhinencephaly/holoprosencephaly | 94 | 36% (14–58) | 55% (30–74) | 63% (32–83) | 3.6 (2.2–5.0) | 13.3 (7.3–19.4) |
Anomalies of corpus callosum | 686 | 31% (24–38) | 41% (33–50) | 51% (41–61) | 2.3 (1.8–2.7) | 21.8 (11.6–31.9) |
Anophthalmos/microphthalmos | 355 | 45% (39–51) | 49% (37–60) | 62% (55–68) | 3.4 (2.4–4.5) | 17.0 (13.0–20.9) |
Congenital glaucoma | 167 | 70% (58–79) | 55% (39–68) | 81% (68–89) | 3.3 (2.2–4.4) | 10.0 (5.9–14.1) |
Anotia | 68 | 23% (12–36) | 31% (9–57) | 46% (28–62) | 2.0 (0.7–3.3) | 41.8 (0.0–85.1) |
Cystic adenomatous malformation of lung | 370 | 50% (29–68) | 24% (14–35) | 71% (53–83) | 1.4 (1.0–1.8) | 32.8 (21.2–44.4) |
Hirschsprung’s disease | 687 | 85% (77–91) | 45% (38–52) | 94% (88–97) | 3.5 (3.1–3.9) | 3.7 (1.3–6.1) |
Anomalies of intestinal fixation | 502 | 85% (81–89) | 21% (14–29) | 90% (87–93) | 2.6 (2.1–3.0) | 0.8 (0.5–1.0) |
Atresia of bile ducts | 171 | 89% (83–93) | 54% (44–63) | 92% (84–96) | 3.6 (2.6–4.7) | 8.4 (7.6–9.2) |
Annular pancreas | 99 | 92% (68–98) | 17% (2–46) | 93% (76–98) | 1.9 (1.3–2.5) | 0.4 (0.1–0.6) |
Unilateral renal agenesis | 867 | 23% (17–29) | 28% (23–34) | 40% (34–46) | 2.2 (1.6–2.7) | 23.9 (11.5–36.4) |
Accessory kidney | 810 | 36% (28–44) | 38% (33–43) | 57% (51–63) | 1.8 (1.5–2.2) | 27.3 (15.1–39.5) |
Bladder exstrophy | 130 | 86% (72–93) | 82% (69–90) | 96% (82–99) | 5.6 (3.7–7.5) | 0.3 (0.2–0.4) |
Posterior urethral valves | 414 | 75% (67–82) | 46% (36–55) | 86% (81–89) | 2.4 (1.9–2.8) | 2.9 (1.7–4.1) |
Prune Belly | 27 | 67% (36–85) | 99% (90–100) | 100% (94–100) | 7.4 (2.5–12.3) | 20.5 (0.0–61.3) |
Situs inversus | 196 | 33% (20–46) | 27% (16–40) | 41% (27–54) | 3.2 (2.5–4.0) | 1.9 (0.0–4.0) |
Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita | 169 | 61% (52–69) | 67% (53–78) | 83% (73–89) | 3.3 (2.7–4.0) | 25.4 (18.3–32.6) |
The median number of surgical procedures before age 5 years was 2.0 or higher for 14 of the 18 anomalies. The lowest median number of surgical procedures was for children with encephalocele at 1.3. Children with Prune-Belly and bladder exstrophy had the highest median number of surgical procedures. The median age at first surgery was less than one week for children with anomalies of intestinal fixation, annular pancreas and bladder exstrophy. For children with atresia of the bile ducts, the median age at surgery was 8.4 weeks (95% CI 7.6–9.2 weeks). The highest median age at first surgery was for children with anotia (41.8 weeks, 95% CI 0.0–85.1), but the confidence interval was very wide due to the relatively small number of cases.
Six registries were able to provide data on the median length of stay and surgery for the age group 0–9 years, and 5013 children were included (Table 3). The overall pattern is the same as for children aged less than 5 years, but the median number of surgical procedures was higher, indicating that the burden of disease for these children continues after age 5. The median length of stay per year for these 10 years was very high for children with Prune-Belly, atresia of the bile ducts and arhinencephaly/holoprosencephaly (9.6, 8.0 and 3.9 days, respectively). Children with congenital arthrogryposis multiplex congenita had a median length of stay of 2.4 days per year, 89% had surgery performed and the median number of surgical procedures was 4.4 before age 10 years. The median number of surgical procedures for children with anophthalmos/microphthalmos and congenital glaucoma was 4.2 and 4.4 for the first 10 years.
Table 3.
Type of Anomaly | Number of Children Born | Number Hospitalised | Number Registries | Median Length of Stay in Days per Year (95% CI) | Percentage with Any Surgery in the First 10 Years (95% CI) | Median Number of Surgical Procedures in the First 10 Years (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Encephalocele | 118 | 99 | 5 | 1.2 (0.7–1.8) | 82% (71–90) | 1.8 (1.2–2.3) |
Arhinencephaly/holoprosencephaly | 86 | 62 | 5 | 3.9 (2.6–5.3) | 76% (25–95) | 4.0 (2.1–6.0) |
Anomalies of corpus callosum | 569 | 545 | 6 | 1.6 (0.7–2.6) | 66% (56–74) | 3.1 (2.7–3.6) |
Anophthalmos/microphthalmos | 293 | 271 | 6 | 0.8 (0.4–1.2) | 71% (64–77) | 4.2 (3.6–4.8) |
Congenital glaucoma | 120 | 117 | 5 | 1.4 (1.1–1.8) | 82% (67–91) | 4.4 (3.4–5.5) |
Anotia | 55 | 44 | 4 | 0.4 (0.2–0.5) | 67% (48–80) | 2.8 (0.9–4.7) |
Cystic adenomatous malformation of lung | 323 | 299 | 5 | 0.6 (0.5–0.8) | 64% (44–78) | 1.3 (0.8–1.7) |
Hirschsprung’s disease | 587 | 582 | 6 | 3.5 (2.9–4.1) | 96% (92–98) | 4.0 (3.3–4.7) |
Anomalies of intestinal fixation | 440 | 420 | 6 | 2.0 (1.4–2.6) | 92% (87–95) | 2.3 (1.9–2.7) |
Atresia of bile ducts | 134 | 131 | 4 | 8.0 (6.0–10.1) | 99% (88–100) | 3.2 (1.9–4.5) |
Annular pancreas | 81 | 77 | 4 | 2.4 (1.7–3.0) | 88% (78–94) | 2.0 (1.6–2.4) |
Unilateral renal agenesis | 653 | 557 | 6 | 0.6 (0.4–0.8) | 47% (38–56) | 2.6 (1.9–3.2) |
Accessory kidney | 744 | 690 | 6 | 0.9 (0.8–1.0) | 66% (62–70) | 1.8 (1.4–2.2) |
Bladder exstrophy | 114 | 112 | 6 | 5.2 (3.5–7.0) | 99% (84–100) | 6.8 (4.3–9.2) |
Posterior urethral valves | 365 | 353 | 6 | 2.0 (1.7–2.3) | 88% (83–91) | 2.5 (1.9–3.2) |
Prune Belly | 25 | 16 | 2 | 9.6 (1.9–17.3) | 100% (98–100) | 7.8 (3.9–11.7) |
Situs inversus | 159 | 151 | 6 | 1.5 (0.9–2.1) | 55% (42–66) | 4.0 (2.5–5.5) |
Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita | 147 | 136 | 5 | 2.4 (1.6–3.1) | 89% (78–95) | 4.4 (3.4–5.4) |
4. Discussion
This study showed that most children with these rare structural congenital anomalies have long stays in hospital within the first year after birth and most children have more than one surgical procedure performed before age 5 years. We do not know if all surgical procedures performed were directly related to the anomaly. However, to describe the full burden of disease for these children it is necessary to include all surgical procedures, including those that are a consequence of the anomaly or complications to the surgical correction of the anomaly as well as hospital stays and surgical procedures that are unrelated to the anomaly.
Children with structural anomalies may have associated anomalies in other organ systems or an associated genetic abnormality. Overall, 76% of all congenital anomaly cases in the EUROCAT central database have an isolated structural anomaly [10], but this proportion is expected to be a little higher for liveborn children. The EUROlinkCAT study on the length of stay in hospital for children with more common congenital anomalies showed that children with specific isolated anomalies had a median length of stay in the first year that was approximately 1 day shorter than for all children with the anomaly [4]. Regarding the rare anomalies included in this study, 21% of children with Hirschsprung’s disease have associated anomalies [11] and 13.6% of children with congenital glaucoma have co-morbidities [12]. In general, we would expect morbidity to be less severe and show less variation for children with isolated anomalies only.
For the four gastrointestinal anomalies in this study, surgery is needed for survival, but surgery was not reported for all the children. Some children may die before surgery, although the first week survival for these four anomalies was rather high in the EUROlinkCAT study at 95.8–99.8% [6]. There may be underreporting of surgery in the hospital databases and there may be problems with the registration of surgery in the first days after birth due to delays in having a personal ID number or name. For encephalocele, only half of the children had surgery within the first year. This may be because encephalocele is associated with severe chromosomal defects, Meckel-Gruber syndrome or other severe cerebral anomalies, and therefore, palliative treatment without surgery could be the optimum management.
Children with arhinencephaly/holoprosencephaly had long hospital stays continuing up to age 10 years although only three out of four children had any surgery performed within these 10 years. The extended hospital stays may be due to developmental problems associated with this anomaly, including epilepsy [13]. The EUROlinkCAT survival study found a 10-year survival of children with arhinencephaly/holoprosencephaly of only 36% [6]. These two EUROlinkCAT studies document very high morbidity and mortality for children born with arhinencephaly/holoprosencephaly, although some children with a less severe form of the anomaly may have a normal life [13].
Children with the eye anomalies congenital glaucoma and anophthalmos/microphthalmos had rather short median lengths of stay compared with the other anomaly groups included in this study, but the median numbers of surgical procedures within the first 10 years were high at 4.2 and 4.4, respectively. A Danish study including 40 birth cohorts found a median age at first surgery for children with congenital glaucoma at 21 weeks and with some diagnostic delays from first suspicion to the final diagnosis by an ophthalmologist [12]. In this European study, the median age at first surgery was 10 weeks. We do not know if the distribution of unilateral and bilateral glaucoma was the same in these two populations.
In line with the previous study on the length of stay for more common congenital anomalies, this study indicated a long median length of stay for children with gastrointestinal anomalies. For children with Hirschsprung’s disease, we report a median length of stay of 31.2 days in the first year and 1.7 days per year at age 1–4 years which is lower than the total median length of stay of 49.7 days in children up to 5 years found in a similar study from Australia [3]. Additionally, a study from the UK documented high morbidity in the first years [14]. There is no international consensus on the best surgical treatment for children with Hirschsprung’s disease [15].
The median age at first surgery for children with atresia of the bile ducts was 8.4 weeks. This means that half of the children in this study had their first surgery after 8 weeks. The general recommendation is that surgery is performed before age 8 weeks for better long-term outcomes without liver transplantation [16,17]. The median length of stay of 8.0 days per year up to 10 years found in our study indicates continuous high morbidity for these children after the initial surgery.
Our results for arthrogryposis multiplex congenita were based on 169 children. An American database studying the outcome of children with this diagnosis includes data on 40 children with the aim of extending the database to 400 children [18]. Treatment is early and intensive physiotherapy combined with surgery. In our data, the median age at first surgery was 25.4 weeks, and the median number of surgical procedures was 3.3 within the first 5 years and 4.4 before age 10, indicating increased morbidity throughout childhood. The EUROlinkCAT study on survival found a 10-year survival at 69.4% for children with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, confirming the severity of this anomaly [6].
Although our study population covers 2 million births there was a limited number of children with some of the anomalies in each registry. We tried to overcome these problems in the way we defined the study questions and inclusions. We believe we have demonstrated a method to obtain pooled and non-identifying information on morbidity for these patients by linking data from patient registries for rare diseases to hospital databases across health systems and coding systems.
Strengths and Limitations
The main strength of this study is the population-based setting covering all children and not, like many existing studies, only those referred to tertiary hospitals for treatment. The study was based on EUROCAT congenital anomaly registries with their high level of case ascertainment and use of standardised definitions and coding of congenital anomalies across the registries. An important limitation is the use of surgery codes from different coding systems that may not be completely comparable. There may be some underreporting of surgery in the hospital databases, although that is unlikely to be significant given that a key function of these databases is for the financial reimbursement of costly treatments such as surgery. It is also a limitation that we were not able to examine children with an isolated anomaly only. This was due to the small numbers in several registries and restrictions on the release of results based on only a few children. However, as the data are from a population-based cohort, the presence of associated anomalies reflects the expected occurrence of anomalies in future births, and, therefore, the results can be considered an unbiased estimate of morbidity for children with these rare anomalies.
5. Conclusions
Children with rare structural congenital anomalies have a high burden of disease within the first 10 years of life with many children having long hospital stays and several surgical procedures performed. It is important to support the child and the family to cope with the diagnosis so that the child can have as normal a childhood as possible. The study covered a birth population of 2 million births, but even so, there were low numbers in some analyses, reflecting the issues in research on rare conditions. Wider international collaboration is needed to combine results from databases across the globe to inform healthcare professionals and families of the immediate outlook and long-term prognoses for children with rare congenital anomalies.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph20054387/s1, Supplementary Table S1: Number of children in the EUROlinkCAT study; Supplementary Table S2: Rules for surgery definitions.
Author Contributions
J.M., M.L. and E.G. designed the EUROlinkCAT study and obtained funding. A.J.N., A.P., C.C.-C., D.T., M.G. and E.G. contributed with data from their EUROCAT registries. A.H., A.C., C.C.-C., E.B., E.L., J.T., L.G.-V., S.J. and S.K.U. linked the EUROCAT data to the hospital databases. M.L. and J.G. performed the standardization of the variables in collaboration with the local registries. A.R., M.D. and E.G. classified the surgery codes. E.L. and J.M. wrote the analysis scripts for the local databases. J.T. and J.M. performed the statistical analysis. E.G. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The University of Ulster obtained Ethics permission for the Central Results Repository on 15 September 2017.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and so are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors after the permission of the participating registries of congenital anomalies.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interest to disclose.
Funding Statement
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 733001. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Boyle B., Addor M.C., Arriola L., Barisic I., Bianchi F., Csáky-Szunyogh M., de Walle H., Dias C.M., Draper E., Gatt M., et al. Estimating Global Burden of Disease due to congenital anomaly: An analysis of European data. Arch. Dis. Child.-Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103:F22–F28. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Glinianaia S.V., Morris J.K., Best K.E., Santoro M., Coi A., Armaroli A., Rankin J. Longterm survival of children born with congenital anomalies: A systematic review and meta-Analysis of population-Based studies. PLoS Med. 2020;17:e1003356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Colvin L., Bower C. A retrospective population-based study of childhood hospital admissions with record linkage to a birth defects registry. BMC Pediatr. 2009;9:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Urhoj S.K., Tan J., Morris J., Given J., Astolfi G., Baldacci S., Barisic I., Brigden J., Cavero-Carbonell C., Evans H., et al. Hospital length of stay among children with and without congenital anomalies across 11 European regions—A population-Based data linkage study. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0269874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Groft S.C., Posada M., Taruscio D. Progress, challenges and global approaches to rare diseases. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110:2711–2716. doi: 10.1111/apa.15974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Coi A., Santoro M., Pierini A., Rankin J., Glinianaia S.V., Tan J., Reid A.-K., Garne E., Loane M., Given J., et al. Survival of children with rare structural congenital anomalies: A multi-Registry cohort study. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2022;17:142. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02292-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Boyd P.A., Haeusler M., Barisic I., Loane M., Garne E., Dolk H. Paper 1: The EUROCAT network—Organization and processes. Birth Defects Res. Part A Clin. Mol. Teratol. 2011;91:S2–S15. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kinsner-Ovaskainen A., Lanzoni M., Garne E., Loane M., Morris J., Neville A., Nicholl C., Rankin J., Rissmann A., Tucker D., et al. A sustainable solution for the activities of the European network for surveillance of congenital anomalies: EUROCAT as part of the EU Platform on Rare Diseases Registration. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2018;61:513–517. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Morris J.K., Garne E., Loane M., Barisic I., Densem J., Latos-Bieleńska A., Neville A., Pierini A., Rankin J., Rissmann A., et al. EUROlinkCAT protocol for a European population-based data linkage study investigating the survival, morbidity and education of children with congenital anomalies. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e047859. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Garne E., Dolk H., Loane M., Wellesley D., Barisic I., Calzolari I., Densem J., A EUROCAT Working Group Paper 5: Surveillance of multiple congenital anomalies: Implementation of a computer algorithm in European registers for classification of cases. Birth Defects Res. (Part A) 2011;91:S44–S50. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Moore S.W. The contribution of associated congenital anomalies in understanding Hirschprung’s disease. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2006;4:305–315. doi: 10.1007/s00383-006-1655-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pedersen K.B., Kappelgaard P., Kessel L., Sandfeld L., Zibrandtsen N., Bach-Holm D. Primary congenital glaucoma in Denmark, 1977–2016. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98:182–189. doi: 10.1111/aos.14207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dubourg C., Bendavid C., Pasquier L., Henry C., Odent S., David V. Holoprosencephaly. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2007;2:8. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-2-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huerta C.T., Ramsay W.A., Davies J.K., Saberi R.A., Gilna G.P., Parreco J.P., Sola J.E., Perez E.A., Thorson C.M. Nationwide Outcomes of Newborns with Recto-Sigmoid versus Long-Segment Hirschsprung Disease. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2023. online ahead of print . [DOI] [PubMed]
- 15.Allin B.S.R., Bradnock T., Kenny S., Kurinczuk J.J., Walker G., Knight M., The NETS1HD Collaboration NETS study: Development of a Hirschsprung’s disease core outcome set. Arch. Dis. Child. 2017;102:1143–1151. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fawaz R., Baumann U., Ekong U., Fischler B., Hadzic N., Mack C.L., McLin V.A., Molleston J.P., Neimark E., Ng V.L., et al. Guideline for the Evaluation of cholestatic jaundice in infants: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition and the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, hepatology and Nutrition. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2017;64:154–168. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Islek A., Tumgor G. Biliary atresia and congenital disorders of the extrahepatic bile ducts. World J. Gastrointest. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022;13:33–46. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v13.i4.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dahan-Oliel N., van Bosse H., Darsaklis V.B., Rauch F., Bedard T., Bardai G., James M., Raney E., Freese K., Hyer L., et al. Epidemiology, aetiology, interventions and genomics in children with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: Protocol for a multisite registry. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e060591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and so are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors after the permission of the participating registries of congenital anomalies.