Table 3.
Analysis | k | #ES | g | 95% CI | p | τ | I 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||
TLMA 1 | 42 | 91 | −0.15 | [−0.23, −0.06] | <0.001 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 37% | 32% |
Excluding outliers | 40 | 83 | −0.11 | [−0.18, −0.04] | 0.002 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 7% | 36% |
Including follow-up data | 42 | 117 | −0.17 | [−0.25, −0.08] | <0.001 | 0.25 | 0.14 | 54% | 16% |
TLMA 2 | 35 | 79 | −0.11 | [−0.23, 0.001] | 0.053 | 0.32 | 0.17 | 57% | 17% |
Excluding outliers | 34 | 75 | −0.15 | [−0.25, −0.05] | 0.003 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 51% | 13% |
Including follow-up data | 35 | 94 | −0.15 | [−0.26, −0.04] | 0.007 | 0.33 | 0.12 | 63% | 9% |
Note. k = number of independent samples; #ES = number of effect sizes; g = Hedges g; CI = confidence interval; τ = variability (standard deviation) of effect sizes on Levels 2 and 3; I2 = heterogeneity of effect sizes on Levels 2 and 3.