Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 3;24(5):4925. doi: 10.3390/ijms24054925

Table 3.

Comparison of the selected properties of glucosamine sulfate and glucosamine hydrochloride on the basis of the literature.

Variables Glucosamine Sulfate
(GS)
Glucosamine Hydrochloride
(GH)
References
Molecular structure C6H15NO9S C6H14ClNO5 [36,37]
Molecular weight [unit] 277.25 215.63 [36,37]
Stability and purity Needs compound stabilizers in the form of salts, usually potassium chloride (KCl) or sodium chloride (NaCl). It has a 74% purity. Does not need compound stabilizers.
It has a 99% purity.
[38,39]
Pharmacokinetic parameters when administrated 1500 mg once daily steady-state Cmax (mean)
1602 ± 425 ng/mL
8.9 ± 2.4 μmol/L
T 1/2 (h)
15
Cmax (mean)
492 ± 161 ng/mL
2.7 ± 0.9 μmol/L
T 1/2 (h)
2.51 ± 1.84
[38,39]
Expression of catabolic and anabolic genes Stronger inhibition Weaker inhibition [40]
Antioxidant potential Pronounced reducing power, superoxide/hydroxyl radical scavenging ability, quite weak ferrous ion chelating effect. Considerable reducing power, superoxide/hydroxyl radical scavenging ability, limited ferrous ion chelating potency. [41,42]

Cmax—maximum/peak concentration, T1/2—half-life.