Table 4.
Results of the multiple regression analyses by self-regulation domain.
| Predictor | b | se | t | p | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| a) Appetite self-regulation | 0.100 | ||||
| Intercept | 0.204 | 0.957 | 0.213 | 0.832 | |
| Mother Food Craving SR | 0.518 | 0.217 | 2.386 | 0.020* | |
| Child sex | 0.442 | 0.348 | 1.271 | 0.208 | |
| Child age | 0.172 | 0.233 | 0.741 | 0.461 | |
| b) Attentional control | 0.410 | ||||
| Intercept | −3.723 | 0.975 | −3.818 | 0.000** | |
| Mother Flanker % correct | 0.019 | 0.021 | 0.904 | 0.369 | |
| Child sex | 0.191 | 0.336 | 0.569 | 0.571 | |
| Child age | 1.550 | 0.218 | 7.106 | 0.000** | |
| c) Inhibitory control | 0.308 | ||||
| Intercept | −2.532 | 0.523 | −4.844 | 0.000** | |
| Mother GNG‡ | −0.342 | 0.472 | −0.725 | 0.472 | |
| Child sex | 0.099 | 0.170 | 0.579 | 0.564 | |
| Child age | 0.660 | 0.112 | 5.894 | 0.000** | |
Note. The dependent variable for all regressions was child self-regulation (SR) for that domain (appetite SR: Snack Delay score; attentional control: Flanker computed score; inhibitory control: GNG composite). All parameters were calculated using pooled estimates from multiply imputed data sets. GNG = Go/NoGo task.
variable transformed.
p < .05.
p < .01.