Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 5;12(5):2054. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052054

Table 6.

The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound with qualitative and quantitative evaluations compared with qualitative evaluation.

Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI) Accuracy (95% CI)
CE-EUS qualitative evaluation (%) 61 (44–75) 72 (54–85) 71 (53–85) 62 (45–76) 66 (54–77)
CE-EUS combined evaluation (%) 94 (80–98) 69 (51–83) 78 (62–88) 91 (72–97) 82 (71–90)

PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; CE-EUS: contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound; CE-EUS combined analysis: qualitative and quantitative evaluations of CE-EUS; † Accuracy of CE-EUS combined evaluation was significantly different (p < 0.05) from that of CE-EUS qualitative evaluation.