Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 25;15(5):1160. doi: 10.3390/nu15051160

Table 7.

Meta-analysis by groups according to the equation used.

Authors G M CI 95% Weight (%) M CI95% p
Fat mass
Equation (1) [22,89] 3 8.19 7.24; 9.15 8.5 10.19 9.41; 10.97 <0.01
Equation (3) [19,21,23,24,25,26,31,48,87,89] 13 12.18 11.06; 13.30 35.9
Equation (6) [27,34,37,89] 4 11.16 10.42; 11.9 11.3
Equation (9) [36,39,46,47,87,89] 6 9.54 7.45; 11.62 16.8
Equation (11) [33,87] 2 9.23 −6.33; 24.78 5.3
Equation (20) [31,88,89] 2 10.02 9.77; 10.27 5.7
Equation (26) [87,88] 6 7.14 6.87; 7.41 16.6
Sum of skinfold
Equation (5) [22,32,34,45] 11 52.18 49.49; 54.87 78.4 53.95 51.19; 56.70 <0.01
Equation (6) [31,40,41] 4 59. 93 55.34; 64.52 21.6

Fat mass: Equation (1) = Carter, 1982; Equation (3) = Durnin and Womersley, 1974; Equation (6) = Faulkner, 1968; Equation (9) = Jackson and Pollock 7 folds, 1978; Equation (11) = Jackson and Pollock 3 folds, 1978; Equation (20) = Reilly, 2009; Equation (26) = Yuhasz, 1974. Sum of skinfolds: Equation (5) = Σ6 skinfolds (triceps, subscapular, supraspinale, abdominal, mid-thigh, and calf); Equation (6) = Σ8 folds (biceps, triceps, subscapular, iliac crest, supraspinale, abdominal, mid-thigh, and calf). G = groups; M = mean.