Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 27;15(5):1178. doi: 10.3390/nu15051178

Table 1.

Evolution of the main characteristics of the experimental designs of investigations on caffeine effects on strength performance.

Variables <1980 1980–1999 2000–2009 2010–2014 2015–2022
n papers 3 (1.6%) 8 (4.2%) 18 (9.5%) 29 (15.3%) 131 (69.3%)
Sample size n 2.3 ± 0.6 15.5 ± 10.7 15.7 ± 6.9 16.0 ± 7.8 * 19.7 ± 14.4 *
n Male 2.3 ± 0.6 14.7 ± 7.0 13.8 ± 5.6 13.8 ± 6.7 14.6 ± 13.6
n Female 0 2.3 ± 6.0 1.9 ± 4.4 1.3 ± 3.4 4.6 ± 7.8
Adjusted dose Yes 0 (0%) 5 (62.5%) 14 (77.8%) 20 (69.0%) 96 (73.3%)
No 3 (100%) 3 (37.5%) 4 (22.2%) 9 (31.0%) 35 (26.7%)
Dose–response Yes 0 (0%) 2 (25.0%) 0 (0%) 2 (6.9%) 20 (15.3%)
No 3 (100%) 6 (75.0%) 18 (100%) 27 (93.1%) 111 (84.7%)
Dose Adjusted (mg/kg) 5.8 ± 0.8 5.2 ± 1.3 4.6 ± 1.5 4.8 ± 1.6
Absolute (mg) 300 437.9 ± 69.0 180.3 ± 90.6 226.1 ± 95.9 298.3 ± 142.4
Mix with other
substances
Yes 1 (33.3%) 1 (12.5%) 6 (33.3%) 16 (55.2%) 27 (20.6%)
No 2 (66.7%) 7 (87.5%) 12 (66.7%) 13 (44.8%) 104 (79.4%)
Relationship with other
co-ingested substances
Yes 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (11.1%) 2 (6.9%) 15 (11.5%)
No 3 (100%) 8 (100%) 16 (88.9%) 27 (93.1%) 116 (88.5%)
Placebo-controlled design Yes 2 (66.7%) 8 (100%) 18 (100%) 28 (96.6%) 130 (99.2%)
No 1 (33.3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (3.4%) 1 (0.8%)
Caffeine consumption
reported
Yes 0 (0%) 5 (62.5%) 13 (72.2%) 19 (65.5%) 92 (70.2%)
No 3 (100%) 3 (37.5%) 5 (27.8%) 10 (34.5%) 39 (29.8%)
Reported side effects Yes 0 (0%) 1 (12.5%) 6 (33.3%) 10 (34.5%) 33 (25.2%)
No 3 (100%) 7 (87.5%) 12 (66.7%) 19 (65.5%) 98 (74.8%)
Caffeine form Capsule 1 (33.3%) 4 (50.0%) 11 (61.1%) 9 (31.0%) 73 (55.7%)
Beverage 1 (33.3%) 4 (50.0%) 7 (38.9%) 20 (69.0%) 46 (35.1%)
Gum 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (2.3%)
Mouth rinse 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (3.8%)
Gel 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.8%)
Various forms 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.8%)
N/A 1 (33.3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (1.5%)
Exercise test Upper 2 (66.7%) 1 (12.5%) 5 (27.8%) 8 (27.6%) 31 (23.7%)
Lower 1 (33.3%) 7 (87.5%) 8 (44.4%) 7 (24.1%) 48 (36.6%)
Both 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 5 (27.8%) 14 (48.3%) 52 (39.7%)

Data indicate the number of studies that fulfilled (or did not) each methodological criterion, with percentages between parentheses. * indicates a significant differences with data <1980 (p < 0.05).