Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 1;66(6):3664–3702. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01229

Figure 20.

Figure 20

Schematic representation of intragenic SL strategy in comparison with classical drug design for antiviral drug development. (A) Classical drug design approach in which the drug binds to sites R and E typically in the active site in nonproperly selected zones. Progressively two mutations occur, E to A and R to G, causing drug resistance. (B) The molecules developed using the SL strategy, binding the invariant zones of virus wild-type proteins, may induce a double mutation (D to S and K to D), developing again a strategic drug resistance which leads to the inactivation of the affected protein and ultimately to the virus replicative failure.