Table 1.
Sampling method | Physiological parameter | Tparameter | |r| to yield | |r| to Pi,yield | R2 | Slope |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Even | y_rue | 1.01 ± 0.01 | 0.76 ± 0.04 | 0.77 ± 0.03 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
Random | y_rue | 1.16 ± 0.08 | 0.39 ± 0.08 | 0.45 ± 0.08 | 0.95 | 0.94 |
Top 20 | y_rue | 1.55 ± 0.93 | 0.20 ± 0.09 | 0.27 ± 0.10 | 0.72 | 0.88 |
Even | y_sla | 1.01 ± 0.01 | 0.64 ± 0.05 | 0.65 ± 0.05 | 0.98 | 0.96 |
Random | y_sla | 1.28 ± 1.44 | 0.24 ± 0.10 | 0.26 ± 0.10 | 0.94 | 0.96 |
Top 20 | y_sla | 1.28 ± 0.77 | 0.20 ± 0.09 | 0.22 ± 0.09 | 0.75 | 0.91 |
Even | ll_modifier | 0.77 ± 0.10 | 0.27 ± 0.07 | 0.21 ± 0.07 | 0.99 | 1.02 |
Random | ll_modifier | 0.82 ± 0.10 | 0.47 ± 0.09 | 0.39 ± 0.10 | 0.91 | 1.11 |
Top 20 | ll_modifier | 8.52 ± 65.02 | 0.13 ± 0.08 | 0.10 ± 0.07 | 0 | − 0.05 |
Even | potential_grain_filling_rate | 0.98 ± 0.02 | 0.56 ± 0.06 | 0.55 ± 0.06 | 0.98 | 1.03 |
Random | potential_grain_filling_rate | 0.87 ± 0.12 | 0.29 ± 0.10 | 0.26 ± 0.10 | 0.96 | 0.98 |
Top 20 | potential_grain_filling_rate | 0.85 ± 0.12 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.41 ± 0.08 | 0.52 | 0.96 |
Even | node_no_correction | 0.78 ± 0.20 | 0.18 ± 0.06 | 0.15 ± 0.06 | 0.96 | 0.98 |
Random | node_no_correction | 0.93 ± 0.90 | 0.21 ± 0.09 | 0.18 ± 0.09 | 0.95 | 0.96 |
Top 20 | node_no_correction | 0.67 ± 0.14 | 0.43 ± 0.07 | 0.29 ± 0.09 | 0.63 | 1.05 |
Even | tfac_slope | 1.01 ± 0.03 | 0.35 ± 0.06 | 0.35 ± 0.06 | 0.98 | 1.02 |
Random | tfac_slope | 2.15 ± 6.94 | 0.09 ± 0.07 | 0.09 ± 0.07 | 0.8 | 0.82 |
Top 20 | tfac_slope | 1.71 ± 0.59 | 0.23 ± 0.08 | 0.37 ± 0.08 | 0.73 | 0.82 |
Meaning of the physiological parameters (in italic) follow the order (left to right in Fig. 4): radiation use efficiency (y_rue), potential leaf specific area (y_sla), efficiency of roots to extract soil water (ll_modifier), potential grain growth rate at grain filling (potential_grain_filling_rate), number of growing leaves in the sheath (node_no_correction) and temperature effect on biomass accumulation (tfac_slope).