Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 2;128(6):1095–1104. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-02122-9

Table 1.

Cox proportional hazard analysis for overall survival in the JGOG-TR2 cohort.

Univariate Multivariate (n = 253) Multivariate (n = 156)
Covariates N = 274 HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Age <62 137
>=62 137 1.52 (0.95–2.43) 0.084 1.28 (0.72–2.25) 0.4 0.95 (0.48–1.87) 0.89
Performance status 0 202
>= 1 64 2.05 (1.23–3.43) 0.0063 1.68 (0.94–3.00) 0.083 1.07 (0.51–2.25) 0.85
Surgery PDS 125
IDS 120 2.34 (1.32–4.14) 0.0036 3.05 (1.51–6.17) 0.0019 4.2 (1.67–10.59) 0.0023
NDS 29 7.52 (3.78–14.98) 9.3 × 10−9 3.17 (1.28–7.89) 0.013 8.69 (2.82–26.74) 1.6 × 10−4
Residual tumour R0 162
R1 44 1.73 (0.91–3.30) 0.093 1.47 (0.76–2.86) 0.25 1.53 (0.73–3.20) 0.26
R2 68 3.26 (1.94–5.50) 9.0 × 10−6 3.36 (1.58–7.10) 0.0016 4.26 (1.64–11.03) 0.0028
BRCA1 methylation No 219
Yes 46 1.02 (0.56–1.86) 0.96 2.93 (1.37–6.27) 0.0055 2.86 (1.08–7.60) 0.035
HRD score (median) Low 132
High 133 0.58 (0.36–0.94) 0.028 0.64 (0.36–1.13) 0.12
HRD score (ROC curve) Low 120
High 145 0.61 (0.38–0.98) 0.039 1.54 (0.63–3.75) 0.34
HRDness signature Low 135
High 136 0.48 (0.30–0.79) 0.0039 0.4 (0.21–0.76) 0.0055
HRDness prediction Negative 76
Positive 93 0.4 (0.23–0.70) 0.0012 0.16 (0.06–0.42) 2.2 × 10−4
ConsensusOV IMR 71
MES 77 1.55 (0.83–2.90) 0.17 1.57 (0.78–3.14) 0.2 1.85 (0.73–4.65) 0.19
DIF 80 0.79 (0.39–1.62) 0.53 1.57 (0.69–3.56) 0.28 1.59 (0.59–4.25) 0.36
PRO 43 1.52 (0.73–3.16) 0.26 0.96 (0.41–2.24) 0.93 0.91 (0.32–2.58) 0.86

HR hazard ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, PDS primary debulking surgery, IDS interval debulking surgery, NDS non-debulking surgery, R0 no residual tumour, R1 residual tumour under 1 cm in diameter, R2 residual tumour more than 1 cm in diameter, IMR immunoreactive, MES mesenchymal, DIF differentiated, PRO proliferative.