Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 5;128(6):1030–1039. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-02131-8

Table 2.

Response rates in mDLC patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy compared to IDC and ILC.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
mDLC (N = 17) ILC (N = 57) p value IDC (N = 180) p value
Volume reduction (%) 78.5 (62.38, 92.5) 76 (26.5, 90.5) 0.22 75 (40.75, 95.62) 0.29
BCS attempted
 Yes 9 (53%) 19 (33%) 0.16 70 (39%) 0.34
 No 8 (47%) 38 (67%) 110 (61%)
Rate of successful BCS
 Yes 5 (56%) 6 (32%) 0.41 49 (70%) 0.45
 No 4 (44%) 13 (68%) 21 (30%)
pCR
 Yes 3 (18%) 4 (7%) 0.34 24 (13%) 0.71
 No 14 (82%) 52 (93%) 156 (87%)
Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy
Rate of successful BCS mDLC (N = 7) ILC (N = 21) p value IDC (N = 37) p value
 Yes 2 (40%) 6 (60%) 0.61 14 (67%) 0.34
 No 3 (60%) 4 (40%) 7 (33%)
pCR
 Yes 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 No 7 (100%) 21 (100%) 37 (100%)

Volume reduction is presented as a percentage. Median (interquartile) is shown for volume reduction and frequency (%) is shown for other categorical variables.

BCS breast-conserving surgery, pCR pathologic complete response.