Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 14;23(2):165–172. doi: 10.1007/s40256-022-00565-2

Table 2.

Occurrence of thrombotic and bleeding events in CYP2C9 LoF carriers and noncarriers treated with clopidogrel

Event CYP2C9 LoF carriers [N = 352] (%) Poor metabolizers [n = 42] (%) Intermediate metabolizers [n = 310] (%) CYP2C9 LoF noncarriers [N = 526] (%) HR (CI)a p value
Composite of thrombotic outcomes 22 (6.3) 4 (9.5) 18 (5.8) 31 (5.9) 1.16 (0.67–2.02) 0.60
All-cause death 13 (3.7) 1 (2.4) 12 (3.9) 12 (2.3) 1.82 (0.82–4.03) 0.14
Cardiovascular death 5 (1.4) 0 (0) 5 (1.6) 6 (1.1) 1.36 (0.41–4.51) 0.61
MI 14 (4.0) 4 (9.5) 10 (3.2) 22 (4.2) 1.05 (0.53–2.06) 0.90
TVR 4 (1.1) 1 (2.4) 3 (1.0) 4 (0.8) 1.58 (0.39–6.40) 0.53
ST 1 (0.3) 1 (2.4) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.2) 1.35 (0.09–21.65) 0.83
Stroke 4 (1.1) 0 (0.0) 4 (1.3) 4 (0.8) 1.61 (0.40–6.56) 0.51
Bleeding outcomes
BARC 2–5 bleeding 44 (12.5) 5 (11.9) 39 (12.6) 78 (14.8) 0.90 (0.62–1.30) 0.57
BARC 3 or 5 bleeding 13 (3.7) 1 (2.4) 12 (3.9) 20 (3.8) 1.08 (0.53–2.19) 0.83
PLATO minor or major bleeding 40 (11.4) 5 (11.9) 35 (11.3) 73 (13.9) 0.86 (0.58–1.27) 0.45
PLATO major bleeding 10 (2.8) 1 (2.4) 9 (2.9) 17 (3.2) 0.93 (0.42–2.05) 0.86

The event rates for poor (*2/*2, *2/*3 or *3/*3) and intermediate (*1/*2 or *1/*3) metabolizers are also shown. Differences in event rates for both poor and intermediate metabolizers were compared with CYP2C9 LoF noncarriers using Cox proportional hazard models. All comparisons were not statistically different (p value > 0.05).

BARC Bleeding Academic Research Consortium, CI confidence interval, CYP cytochrome P450, HR hazard ratio, LoF loss-of-function, MI myocardial infarction, PLATO PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes, ST stent thrombosis, TVR target vessel revascularization

aHRs are calculated by comparing CYP2C9 LoF carriers with noncarriers. The composite of thrombotic outcomes consists of cardiovascular death, MI and stroke. HRs were adjusted for CYP2C19 LoF allele carrier status and diagnosis at discharge