. 2023 Feb 26;9(3):e14124. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14124

Table 2.

Chemical properties of soil as affected by land-use types at Kuto Sorpela Keble

LUT	pH	Ex.Aci.	Ex. Al	OM	OC	TN	Fe	Av.p	CEC	Ca	Mg
LUT	pH	meq/100 g		%			mg/kg		cmo_l (+)kg⁻¹
Enset	6.81^a	0.45^c	0.42^d	3.82^a	2.21^a	0.19^a	1.07^d	26.49^a	24.36^a	6.71^a	3.06^a
Cultivated	5.16^b	1.77^b	0.81^c	2.35^d	1.36^d	0.12^d	24.76^c	14.98^b	25.16^a	3.36^b	1.86^c
Grazing	5.02^c	1.96^a	0.83^b	3.04^c	1.76^c	0.15^c	27.56^a	13.95^c	21.63^b	2.93^c	2.13^b
En. Area	5.02^c	1.96^a	1.19^a	3.48^b	1.97^b	0.17^b	26.36^b	14.03^c	24.73^a	2.93^c	1.93^c
LSD_(0.05)	0.01	0.14	0.01	0.05	0.05	0.006	1.005	0.21	1.14	0.29	0.26
CV (%)	0.98	0.39	1.07	0.92	0.91	1.89	2.52	0.59	2.38	3.75	5.79

LUT = land use types, En. Area = enclosure area, Av.P = available phosphorous, pH = power hydrogen, Ex.Al = exchangeable aluminum, Ex. acidity = exchangeable acidity, OM = organic matter.