. 2023 Feb 26;9(3):e14124. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14124

Table 3.

Phosphorus sorption indices in both models.

LUT	P sorption indices LE						P sorption indices FI
	X_M	K	EPR	MBC	R²	B	Kf	EPR	R²
	mg/kg	L.mg/kg	mg/kg	L/kg		L.kg	mg/kg	Mg/kg
Enset	136^e	4.36^a	45.9^e	592.96^b	0.94	0.07^b	1.22^d	42.2^d	0.95
Cultivated soil without Lime	620.7^c	0.76^c	180.77^c	471.70^d	0.96	0.01^e	1.83^c	141.11^c	0.92
Grazing land	694.3^b	0.83^b	244.3^b	576.25^c	0.94	0.10^a	2.35^b	226.22^b	0.95
Enclosure Area	731.7^a	1.3^b	398.7^a	957.84^a	0.94	0.017^d	2.73^a	323.33^a	0.99
Cultivated soil with Lime	526.3^d	0.6^d	149.8^d	315.79^e	0.98	0.02^c	1.83^c	142.3^c	0.93
LSD_(0.05)	1.37	0.08	7.63	9.71	–	0.00	0.14	9.17	–
CV (%)	0.13	2.72	1.95	0.89	–	1.03	3.78	4.08	–

LE: Langmuir Equation, MBC: maximum buffering capacity, FI: Freundlich Equation, X_M Langmuir sorption maximum, k: binding Energy, SPR: standard p Requirement, Kf: Freundlich surface coverage.