Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 11:1–21. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s40674-023-00202-2

Table 2.

Patient barriers associated with implementation of, and engagement with, virtual care for knee osteoarthritis and potential solutions

Barrier Potential solutions
Reduced sense of rapport with clinician

Prioritise videoconferencing over telephone for synchronous consultations to enable visual as well as verbal contact

Consider asynchronous clinician check-in/follow-up with patients who have been recommended self-directed web- or app-based self-management programs

Consider a blended approach to care (e.g. combining in-person and virtual care, synchronous clinician telehealth consultations with web-/app-based self-directed programs), where necessary

Perception that intervention is not individualised

Consider a blended approach to care — for example, an in-person visit first for thorough assessment — before implementing virtual intervention strategies

Consider use of electronic patient-reported outcome measures and functional performance-based measures (synchronous or asynchronous via video recording) which can be administered/observed remotely

Combine generic/less individualised online programs with individualised/more personal advice for home-based self-management

Technological difficulties/failures

Ensure clinician has optimal software and hardware for virtual consultations to minimise disruptions at the clinician end

Educate patients how to optimise their internet speed/connection at home and set up their environment for optimal audio/video during consultations

Provide clear instructions to the patient on how to set up and use the chosen virtual platform/application

Clinician should be familiar with trouble-shooting solutions to assist the patient during synchronous virtual consultations

Mismatch between expectations and actual intervention

Educate patients about what specific virtual tools can and cannot offer them

Ensure patient has choice in their treatment plans and provide adequate information about the advantages and disadvantages about all in-person and virtual treatment options so that they can make an informed decision

Reduced digital literacy

Determine patient confidence and competence with using the selected virtual tool prior to recommending it

Encourage family member/carer support/assistance where feasible

Follow-up with the patient to monitor engagement/use of recommended virtual tools and adjust treatment plans when necessary

Privacy and data security concerns

Ensure all patient and clinician devices used for virtual care have up-to-date and high-quality anti-virus protection and use firewalls

Ensure Wi-Fi networks used for virtual care are secure and password-protected using strong passwords

Only use/recommend mobile apps that are developed from credible organisations and that are available from reputable app stores (e.g. Google play, Apple’s App Store)

Concerns about trustworthiness of online information Recommend and encourage use of high-quality websites, preferably those with Health on the Net code (HONcode) certification and from academic/non-profit sources