|
No Effect
|
|
N = 174, 63% |
| “Levels of individuals sitting with their back to the window was unaffected by visitor number or noise.” |
|
Hashmi & Sullivan (2020)
|
| “The groups did not differ in their ability to follow human signals” |
|
Lazarowski et al. (2020)
|
|
Similar or Small Effect Size
|
|
N = 17, 6% |
| “Pair members demonstrated comparable responses towards a male ‘intruder’, as latency to respond and proximity scores were very similar between pair members in the majority of pairs examined” |
|
DeVries, Winters & Jawor (2020)
|
| “We found that individuals called back to sympatric and allopatric calls within similar amounts of time,” |
|
Wu et al. (2021)
|
|
Non-Significant
|
|
N = 71, 26% |
| “Nutcrackers…did not significantly change their caching behaviour when observed by a pinyon jay.” |
|
Vernouillet, Clary & Kelly (2021)
|
| “No significant correlations between degree of laterality and behavioral interest in the stimuli were found” |
|
Lilley, De Vere & Yeater (2020)
|
|
Ambiguous
|
|
N = 16 (6%) |
| “We also found no conclusive evidence that either the visual or the vibratory sensory modalities are critical for prey capture.” |
|
Meza, Elias & Rosenthal (2021)
|
| “No systematic variations on space allocation were observed in neither experiment” |
|
Ribes-Iñesta, Hernández & Serrano (2020)
|
