Abstract
The prototypic cancer-predisposition disease Fanconi Anemia (FA) is identified by biallelic mutations in any one of twenty-three FANC genes. Puzzlingly, inactivation of one Fanc gene alone in mice fails to faithfully model the pleiotropic human disease without additional external stress. Here we find that FA patients frequently display FANC co-mutations. Combining exemplary homozygous hypomorphic Brca2/Fancd1 and Rad51c/Fanco mutations in mice phenocopies human FA with bone marrow failure, rapid death by cancer, cellular cancer-drug hypersensitivity and severe replication instability. These grave phenotypes contrast the unremarkable phenotypes seen in mice with single gene-function inactivation, revealing an unexpected synergism between Fanc mutations. Beyond FA, breast cancer-genome analysis confirms that polygenic FANC tumor-mutations correlate with lower survival, expanding our understanding of FANC genes beyond an epistatic FA-pathway. Collectively, the data establish a polygenic replication stress concept as a testable principle, whereby co-occurrence of a distinct second gene mutation amplifies and drives endogenous replication stress, genome instability and disease.
Subject terms: Cancer, Genetics
Tomaszowski et al show that co-mutations in Brca2 and Rad51c synergistically drive cancer and developmental disease, which was unexpected given their epistatic DNA repair roles, and expands our understanding of their tumor suppressive functions.
Introduction
Genetic defects in BRCA2 and RAD51C predispose to familial inherited breast and ovarian cancer. Biallelic inactivation of BRCA2 (FANCD1) or RAD51C (FANCO) also causes Fanconi anemia (FA), an autosomal recessive disorder due to pathogenic mutations in one of twenty-three identified FANC genes. FA patients are small in stature and exhibit congenital abnormalities with skeletal deformations, malformations of inner organs, and impaired fertility1. FA entails bone marrow failure as well as hematological and solid cancers including breast cancer, typically at a young age2,3. In the context of breast cancer predisposition, BRCA2 and RAD51C are well studied for their roles during homology-directed repair (HDR)4. The FA pathway goes beyond these functions, whereby all 23 genes are part of the DNA interstrand-crosslink repair pathway, a genetic tumor suppressor pathway. This pathway is specialized in the replication-coupled repair of particular DNA damage caused by free radicals including reactive oxygen species, aldehyde metabolites and chemotherapeutics that crosslink both DNA strands, such as mitomycin C and cisplatin drugs. By their very nature, FA patient cells are hyper-sensitive to pertinent chemotherapeutic toxicity, and show genomic and chromosomal instability that can drive resistance3,5. FANC pathway activation requires the sequential engagement of the FANC core complex, necessary for the mono-ubiquitination of the FANCD2/FANCI heterodimer, which then allows the recruitment of post-ID2 ubiquitination factors including nucleases, translesion synthesis components, and HDR proteins comprising BRCA1/2, RAD51, RAD51C3. Additionally, FANC genes also play an essential role in other processes during DNA duplication. Irrespective of the nature of the DNA damage that causes a roadblock for semi-conservative replication, FANC proteins promote DNA fork protection at stalled replication forks, which is a genome stability pathway that is genetically and mechanistically separable from DNA repair yet required during replication-coupled inter-strand crosslink repair3,6–8. Indeed, cells with specific patient mutations in either BRCA2/FANCD1 or RAD51/FANCR are defective in replication fork protection but remain proficient for HDR9,10, and restoration of fork protection without restoration of interstrand crosslink repair functions can reestablish hematopoietic stem cell functions in Fancd2-/- mice11, suggesting physiological importance of this distinct molecular pathway in FA disease.
The more recent DNA sequencing efforts of tumors in patients without FA further underscore the importance of the FA pathway during tumor suppression and chemotherapy response, as somatic FANC gene mutations are commonly detected in diverse cancers, providing promise for tailored therapy targeting strategies3,12. The current paradigm is that knowing about FANC gene mutation status could be used as a genetic biomarker to personalize cancer treatment strategies as the mutations should render the repair deficient tumor cells sensitive to specific chemotherapeutics such as platinum drugs and PARP inhibitors. Thus, understanding FANC gene functions and the underlying biological causes that lead to the FA disease is poised to disentangle diverse aspects of cancer pathophysiology spanning from tumor suppression to chemotherapeutic agent efficacy.
Yet, developing fitting FA mouse models has been deemed challenging. While biallelic inactivation of any one of the twenty-three FANC genes serves as the defining clinical marker for the disease diagnostics2,13,14, knock-out (KO) of any one Fanc gene does not cause FA in mice. Instead, Fanc KO mice exhibit select and mild manifestations of the disease and vary with the specific Fanc gene that is affected. Recently, improved FA disease modeling has been achieved by exposing the mice to additional stress in the form of externally applied DNA damaging agents or by increasing endogenous aldehydes by homozygous Aldh2 KO in conjunction with ethanol treatment15. FA is also phenotypically heterogeneous in patients, with members of one family who share the same biallelic FANC mutation exhibiting greatly varying onset and severity of the disease16. It has been speculated that genetic background, modifier genes, chance events, variable teratogenic exposures during each pregnancy, and mosaicism could be potential contributors to observed pleiotropism17.
We here show that combining homozygous hypomorphic Brca2/Fancd1 and Rad51c/Fanco mutations in mice by polygenic crosses recapitulates a wide spectrum of the human FA disease, including congenital anomalies, hematopoietic malfunction, and cancer at a young age. In stark contrast to the polygenic mutant mice, mice with monogenic homozygous hypomorphic Brca2 or Rad51c mutation alone express negligible phenotypes with no significant effect on the overall survival compared to wild-type mice. FA patient DNA analysis confirms that polygenic FANC mutations are a prevalent event in humans. The damaging effect of FANC co-mutations found in patients is supported by tumor DNA analysis of breast cancer patients without FA, who show significantly reduced survival with polygenic compared to monogenic FANC tumor mutations. Molecularly, the replication alteration caused by the Rad51c mutation amplifies the dysfunctional Brca2 mutation resulting in hyperactive replication fork degradation and genome instability without external DNA damage. Thus, the data establishes the concept of polygenic replication stress where one gene mutation is insufficient for pathogenicity on its own, but requires distinct gene co-mutations that drive endogenous replication stress and genome instability. Collectively, the data highlights a non-epistatic FANC tumor-suppressor pathway and the importance of distinct supplemental stress in addition to a biallelic FANC mutation in the development of FA.
Results
Polygenic FANC mutations are frequent in human FA patients
FA is diagnosed by identifying disrupting mutations in one of twenty-three so far identified FANC genes. We performed a literature search and found multiple examples of FA patients with heterozygous or homozygous FANC gene mutations in addition to the inactivating FANC variants that the patient’s disease is attributed to (Supplementary Table 1). To rigorously test for polygenic FANC mutations in FA patients, we performed whole-exome sequencing on DNA from 37 FA patients with known biallelic mutations in one given FANC gene. Strikingly, 27% of the patients tested harbor non-synonymous germline mutations in additional FANC genes (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Table 2), suggesting a high prevalence of polygenic heterozygous or homozygous FANC variants in FA patients.
Polygenic Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mutations synergistically cause congenital defects in mice
Seemingly in contrast to the human diagnostic standards for FA, homozygous knock-outs or mutations in any one Fanc gene alone in mice do not cause FA, but instead only mild and selective disease phenotypes18–20 that are exacerbated with exposure to stress15,21,22. The common occurrence of additional FANC mutations in FA patients led us to hypothesize that Fanc mutations in a second gene in addition to the inactivating biallelic Fanc mutation could have phenotypic relevance. We therefore sought to genetically test if combining Fanc gene mutations could provide an improved mouse model.
For this, we chose hypomorphic mutations in Brca2 and Rad51c for the following reasons: First, we identified an FA patient with polygenic BRCA2 + RAD51C mutations in the NIH dbGap database (Supplementary Table 3). Secondly, heterozygous hypomorphic germline mutations in BRCA2 + RAD51C are also found in families with a history of breast cancer susceptibility23. Thirdly, FA patients’ mutations frequently are small base pair-level variants24–26, rather than gene knock-outs, and fourth, homozygous hypomorphic mutant Brca2 mice are established (Fig. 1b, Brca2Δ27/Δ27). BRCA2 gene KO) is not viable in humans or mice, consistent with the gene’s function in double-strand break repair that is essential to life27,28. While the BRCA2 C-terminus is necessary for fork protection, it is greatly dispensable for DNA break repair10. Some BRCA2/FANCD1 FA patients contain C-terminal truncations (BRCA2 p.Tyr3225fs*30)25 almost identical to the homozygous hypomorphic mutation of the above mouse, making it a fitting model. Yet, mice with the homozygous C-terminal Brca2 gene truncation29 show mild phenotypes with somewhat reduced fertility and an increased risk of cancer with a late-age onset at >60 weeks29, but not nearly FA to the extent seen in patients.
The RAD51C/FANCO mutations associated with FA patients (R258H26 and G264S, Supplementary Table 3), are located within an α-helix, thus affecting the same structural unit (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). Using CRISPR/Cas9 technology, we targeted this Rad51c α-helix in mice. The resulting homozygous Rad51c/Fanco mutant mice are viable and carry a six base-pair deletion mutation resulting in an internal truncation of the α-helix by deleting two leucines at positions 270/271, corresponding to human L261/L262 (Rad51cdah/dah; “dah” denotes “deletions within α-helix”; Fig. 1c, d and Supplementary Fig. 1a–e). The deletion is sandwiched between the FA/cancer patient-associated RAD51C amino acids R258H and G264S, corresponding to murine R267 and G273 (Supplementary Fig. 1a). A two amino-acid deletion within an α-helix causes a rotation of the helix and affects the location, and thus likely the function of the disease suppressing amino acids (Supplementary Fig. 1b). In contrast to Rad51c KO mice27, the mutant Rad51cdah/dah mice express the internally-deleted protein (Fig. 1e), supporting their viability.
As the best approximation to patient FANC mutations, we crossed these hypomorphic Rad51c and Brca2 mice. Polygenic mutant Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice are viable, but the frequency from polygenic heterozygous intercrosses is two-fold to two-and-a-half-fold lower compared to the expected Mendelian birth rate (p = 0.01 and 0.001, respectively; Supplementary Table 4).
FA patients frequently are born with congenital abnormalities causing small stature and skeletal malformations2,13,14. In contrast to the monogenic homozygous mutant mice, Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice are very small and have a significantly reduced weight, which is readily discernable from an early age (Fig. 1f, g). Additionally, Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice, but not single-mutant Rad51cdah/dah or Brca2Δ27/Δ27 mice, exhibit visible skeletal deformations with kinked tails (Fig. 1h, i). We further examined the tails by X-ray imaging to determine the cause of the tail kinks and found that many of the tail vertebrae in Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice are fused and exhibit an abnormal, thickened vertebrae shape (Fig. 1j), similar to vertebral malformations seen with the VACTERL association, which is often connected with FA in humans24,30.
Congenital developmental defects can cause loss of fertility, often observed in FA patients31. We examined the primary sex organs in the mice and found that while the testis of Brca2Δ27/Δ27 mice are smaller compared to Rad51cdah/dah mice or wild-type mice, the testis size in mice with polygenic Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mutations is further significantly reduced (Fig. 1k, l). Histological examination of testis cross-sections using hematoxylin and eosin staining shows that the seminiferous tubuli in Rad51cdah/dah mice testis appear normal, while Brca2Δ27/Δ27 mice show a greater heterogeneity accompanied by some mice expressing a mild decrease in spermatocytes residing in the lumen of the tubuli (Fig. 1m and Supplementary Fig. 2a), consistent with the mild fertility defect previously reported in this mouse model29. In stark contrast, the polygenic Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice show a complete loss of spermatogonia germ cells in addition to all spermatocytes (Fig. 1m, upper panels, and Supplementary Fig. 2a). The data uncovers a Sertoli-cell only phenotype in these mice, which is a common FA patient phenotype31 and causes complete infertility. Similarly, cross-sections of ovaries show the complete loss of ovarian follicles in the Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice, but not in Rad51cdah/dah, Brca2Δ27/Δ27, or wild-type mice (Fig. 1m, lower panels, and Supplementary Fig. 2b, c). Collectively, the polygenic but not monogenic mutant mice show severe congenital development defects resembling those seen in FA patients.
Polygenic Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mutations cause strong hematopoietic defects
FA frequently leads to bone marrow failure, characterized by a hypocellular bone marrow with progressive peripheral pancytopenia resulting in low blood cell counts. We first counted the number of bone marrow cells, which are lowest in Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice (Fig. 2a). To further test if any blood cells are preferentially affected, we performed a blood cell analysis by complete blood counts on young mice (age 8–12 weeks, Fig. 2b–e, and Supplementary Fig. 3a–h). While the number of platelets appears similar in all genotypes at this age (Supplementary Fig. 3a), there is a small but consistent decrease in the white blood cells in the Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice compared to the single mutant mice (Fig. 2c). More specifically, differentiated cells from the myeloid, lymphoid and erythroid lineages are reduced in the polygenic mutant mice, including monocytes, granulocytes, leukocytes, and red blood cells (Fig. 2c, d and Supplementary Fig. 3b–f). Early red cell aplasia is accompanied by macrocytosis, which is one of the earliest hematological disease indicators in FA32. Consistent with the manifestations in FA patients, Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice but not Rad51cdah/dah nor Brca2Δ27/Δ27 mice show significantly enlarged red blood cells, suggesting macrocytosis as a sign of reduced or delayed hematopoiesis (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 3h). Collectively, the data obtained from differentiated cells of myeloid, erythropoietic and lymphatic lineages in young polygenic Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mutant mice is consistent with early bone marrow failure.
To further trace the cells of origin for the hematological defect, we performed hematopoietic lineage flow cytometric analysis33. Consistent with the reduced counts in differentiated cells, the bone marrow of Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice contains less of both, myeloid and common lymphoid progenitor cells, albeit the numbers do not allow for statistical significance in the young mice (Fig. 2f, g and Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). Intriguingly, the frequency of the hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) on the other hand is slightly increased in polygenic compared to single mutant mice at the time-point measured (Fig. 2h). Increased HSCs are a sign of stress-induced HSC proliferation, which can ultimately lead to their early depletion34. We therefore sought to further test bone marrow cell functions. Colony-forming unit assays revealed a functional defect of Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah bone marrow cells, albeit Brca2Δ27/Δ27 proliferation-potent cells too show a reduction in colony formation capacity (Fig. 2i). To stringently test HSC function, we performed a bone marrow repopulation assay by injecting an equal amount of bone marrow cells from either male Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah and female wild-type mice, or male Brca2Δ27/Δ27 and female wild-type mice into irradiated, bone marrow depleted mice (Fig. 2j, k). Strikingly, quantifying the frequency of Y-chromosome DNA in blood cells 16 weeks after transplantation we found that while the bone marrow of Brca2Δ27/Δ27 mice significantly contributes to the make-up of the blood cells in the experimental animals, Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah bone marrow cells completely fail to do so (Fig. 2k). Thus, the data demonstrates a dramatic loss of HSC function in vivo in Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah bone marrow.
Polygenic Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah cells show hyper-replication instability and aggravated sensitivity to chemotherapeutics
The FA pathway suppresses several hallmarks of cancer, most prominently genome instability upon DNA damage. FANC proteins are critical for the specialized repair of DNA crosslink damage and the stabilization of stalled replication forks. Replication stress also drives hematopoietic dysfunction35, and hematopoietic cell function in Fancd2-/- mice can be rescued by restoring DNA fork protection, a distinct form of DNA fork stabilization11. We therefore next focused on the replication fork function of the Brca2 and Rad51c genes and performed single-molecule DNA fiber spreading to assess DNA replication fork protection in mouse adult fibroblasts (MAF) isolated from monogenic and polygenic mutant mice. Even without external replication stress, the DNA fibers of the polygenic Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah MAFs show the shortest nascent tracts, indicating higher intrinsic replication stress (Supplementary Fig. 5a).
To gain a better understanding of the particular replication reactions, we assessed both DNA replication restart and DNA fork protection capacities in these cells. Replication restart is the ability to resume replication after stalling, while replication fork protection is the suppression of degradation of the nascent DNA that was synthesized before replication stalling10,36. Previous reports showed that while RAD51C is involved in both replication restart and fork protection, BRCA2 plays a role during fork protection only and is dispensable for replication restart10,37. Consistently, we find that Brca2Δ27/Δ27 MAFs show a considerable fork protection defect upon replication stalling with high concentrations of hydroxyurea (HU, Fig. 3a), but are proficient for replication restart (Fig. 3b). Rad51cdah/dah MAFs on the other hand show a considerably milder fork protection defect with high concentrations of HU (Fig. 3a), but in contrast to the Brca2Δ27/Δ27 MAFs exhibit a significant defect in replication restart (Fig. 3b). Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah MAFs show the strongest fork protection defect, which can be partially rescued by overexpressing wild-type Rad51c in these cells, suggesting that both Rad51c and Brca2 contribute to the observed replication instability phenotype (Supplementary Fig. 5b, c). With mild external replication stress upon low concentrations of HU, there is little degradation of nascent strands in either the Brca2Δ27/Δ27 MAFs or Rad51cdah/dah MAFs (Fig. 3c). In stark contrast, the Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah MAFs show significantly shorter replication tracts even under these mild conditions (Fig. 3c). Taken together, the data shows that cells with polygenic Fanc mutations show intrinsically augmented replication stress that amplifies the DNA replication instability with otherwise insignificant replication stalling.
High genome instability is also linked to hypersensitivity to DNA crosslinking agents, which is a key feature of FA patients’ cells3,5, and on the flip side of the coin renders the disease a valuable natural model system to understand FANC mutation-related drug sensitivity. Using a colony formation assay, we see that bone marrow cells from Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice show severe cellular sensitivity to mitomycin C (MMC) on survival, consistent with an FA cell profile (Fig. 3d). In comparison, cells from Rad51cdah/dah or Brca2Δ27/Δ27 mice exhibit only very mild to moderate sensitivity (Fig. 3d). Metaphase spreads of primary ear fibroblasts exposed to a high concentration of MMC (20 ng/ml) show increased chromosomal aberrations in both Rad51cdah/dah and Brca2Δ27/Δ27 fibroblasts compared to wild-type fibroblasts. In contrast, Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah fibroblasts had significantly more aberrations including radial formation than any of the other genotypes, which are partially repressed by transient expression of wild-type Rad51c (Fig. 3e–g and Supplementary Fig. 6a, b). In agreement with the DNA fiber results, we observed that radial structures were less pronounced in Brca2Δ27/Δ27 fibroblasts at a lower concentration of MMC (2 ng/ml), compared to what is seen in Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah fibroblasts, suggesting that the polygenic mutant mice are substantially more sensitized even at low amounts of DNA damage (Fig. 3e, f). Without any external genotoxic stress, neither Rad51cdah/dah nor Brca2Δ27/Δ27 fibroblasts showed any more measurable aberrations compared to wild-type fibroblasts (Fig. 3h, i and Supplementary Fig. 6c). Yet, spontaneous chromosomal aberrations are significantly increased in Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah fibroblasts, suggesting strong intrinsic genomic vulnerability of the polygenic FANC mutant cells.
Polygenic Brca2/Rad51c mutations cause T-cell leukemia in mice
We next determined the overall survival of polygenic mutant FA mice. Dramatically, all Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice die between 3-4 months of age (87-120 days, Fig. 4a). This is in stark contrast to wild-type and either of the single-gene mutant mice, where neither Rad51cdah/dah nor the Brca2Δ27/Δ27 mice show any significant difference in overall survival in the first year of life.
Patients with FA related to defects of BRCA2/FANCD1 exhibit a variety of cancers, including T-cell leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, medulloblastoma, Wilms and other embryonal-type tumors3,24,38. We found that the polygenic mutant mice develop strikingly enlarged thymus and spleen (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 7a), suggestive of hematologic malignancy. Moreover, leukemic mice have an unusually elevated number of white blood cells (Supplementary Fig. 7b), and blood smears show the occurrence of blast cells with a uniform appearance (Fig. 4c, white arrows). Additional hematopoietic lineage analysis of Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice by flow cytometry revealed that thymus cells are greatly enlarged in the mutant mouse (Supplementary Fig. 7c), and exhibit strongly abnormal T-cell differentiation (Fig. 4d). Furthermore, lymphatic tissues including the bone marrow, spleen and blood all show a large number of CD4 + /CD8 + progenitor T-cells (Fig. 4e, f), but not B-lymphocytes or myeloid cells (Supplementary Fig. 7d, e), indicating the presence of lymphoblastic T-cell leukemia (T-ALL).
Neoplasms in FA patients are characterized by high genomic instability. To further analyze leukemia arising in Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice we assessed chromosome copy numbers and T-cell clonality using next-generation whole-exome sequencing. Copy number variations were greatly enriched in the leukemia samples compared to non-malignant ear samples (Fig. 4g). Moreover, by analyzing the frequency of T-cell receptors α and β, we found that Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice show oligo- or monoclonal T-cell expansion (Fig. 4h, i). The overall frequency of T-cell clones was strongly reduced in T-ALL mice compared to control samples. Together, the analysis suggests that the polygenic Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice die of T-cell leukemia that, in contrast to classic T-ALL, shows a high degree of intrinsic genomic instability, consistent with the characteristics of FA patient malignancies.
Polygenic FANC mutations in breast tumors are associated with significantly lower survival of breast cancer patients
Germline mutations in certain FA genes predispose patients to cancer including breast cancer3. The polygenic mouse model revealed a stark mutual reinforcement between germline mutations in Brca2 and Rad51c with increased genome instability and substantially worse organismal outcome. We therefore asked whether this phenomenon extended beyond FA and tested if somatic polygenic RAD51C + BRCA2 mutations in tumors of cancer patients without FA could similarly show functional synergism. We analyzed the overall survival of patients with tumors harboring BRCA2, RAD51C or combinations of BRCA2 + RAD51C mutations using the breast cancer genome datasets available at cBioportal.org39,40. cBioportal defines mutations as reported by the original study and includes non-synonymous mutations, amplifications and deletions (Supplementary Table 5). As any of these mutations can cause functional gene defects, we remained agnostic to the type of mutation and solely assessed the genetic association of polygenic compared to monogenic BRCA2 and RAD51C mutation with the overall survival of the patient as a phenotypic outcome and endpoint. Strikingly, polygenic mutations in BRCA2 + RAD51C in breast tumors led to significantly more severe disease and reduced the overall survival by >90 months compared to patients with single BRCA2 or RAD51C mutations only (Figs. 5a, 3.2-fold decrease in median overall survival in breast cancer patients with polygenic compared to monogenic BRCA2 or RAD51C tumor mutations, 3.5-fold decrease in median survival in patients with polygenic tumor mutations compared to patients with no BRCA2 or RAD51C mutation). In contrast, monogenic BRCA2 or RAD51C tumor mutations confer only a minor but insignificant decrease in overall survival compared to patients with no BRCA2 or RAD51C mutation (Fig. 5a), revealing genetic vulnerability associated with the polygenic BRCA2 + RAD51C mutations.
We further tested if the effect of polygenic mutations extends to FANC genes other than BRCA2 and RAD51C. For this we focused on the altogether sixteen FANC gene mutation combinations that we identified to be present in FA patients through literature searches (Supplementary Table 1) and in a diagnostic setting (Supplementary Table 2). We first compared the overall survival of breast cancer patients with tumors without FANC mutations (Fig. 5b, “NO FANC”) to those harboring single mutations in any one of the FANC genes (Fig. 5b, “MONOGENIC FANC)”. The data shows that tumors with monogenic FANC mutations are not per se associated with more adverse patient survival outcome compared to tumors that have no FANC mutation. In contrast, the overall survival of breast cancer patients with tumors harboring polygenic FANC mutations in these sixteen FA patient-associated gene pairs show a significantly reduced overall survival by >55 months compared to patients with monogenic FANC-gene mutations only (Fig. 5b, “FA patient POLYGENIC FANC”). The data is consistent with the second mutation promoting a more adverse outcome when in combination with the other FANC gene defect in the FA patient-associated gene pairs. Of note, while the pathological make-up of breast cancer subtypes observed with polygenic FANC mutations is similar compared to those with single mutations (Supplementary Fig. 8a), these tumors are genetically more unstable as seen by a significantly increased count of somatic mutations throughout the genome in the polygenic FANC tumors (Supplementary Fig. 8b).
While we so far identified sixteen polygenic FANC mutation combinations in FA patients, there are 253 possible combinations between all twenty-three FANC genes. Importantly, when querying all 253 combinations, effectively there is no difference in the overall survival between patients with tumors containing polygenic, monogenic or no FANC mutations (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 8c). Taken together, the data shows not all polygenic FANC mutation combinations per se are associated with lower survival in breast cancer patients. Instead it supports the notion that the polygenic FANC mutations identified in FA patients may not have been found by chance but have functional consequences in a non-epistatic manner.
Discussion
Clinically, FA is caused by inactivation of one of 23 so far identified FANC genes2,13,14. Of note, Guido Fanconi, the Swiss pediatrician after whom the disease is named, speculated that the disease was too complex to be caused by one gene41. We here show that polygenic, double-homozygous Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah gene mutations in mice closely recapitulate the FA disease manifestations found in patients, providing a comprehensive preclinical cancer mouse model of FA.
Similar to other Fanc mutant mouse models, monogenic homozygous Brca2Δ27/Δ27or Rad51cdah/dah mutations on their own do not elicit profound FA phenotypes in mice. Interestingly, externally applied agents that cause DNA damage and DNA replication stress by aldehydes15 or DNA crosslinks21,22 in monogenic Fanc mutant mice much better model the human FA disease manifestations compared to the single Fanc gene alterations alone. We find that cells from the polygenic mutant mice show significantly worse DNA replication instability. While the Brca2Δ27/Δ27 mice also are fork protection defective to some degree, they are proficient in restarting stalled forks. We suggest that the additional restart defect conferred by the Rad51c mutation in the polygenic mice is one means of causing sufficient internal replication stress in this mouse model to promote unchecked replication fork degradation and replication hyper-instability. Thus, the genetic combination of Fanc inactivation could cause endogenous stress, in analogy to the principle of oncogene-induced replication stress42. In support of this idea, cells from polygenic mutant mice exhibit significantly higher spontaneous chromosomal aberrations, while the single mutant mouse cells only show increased genomic instability compared to wild-type cells with exogenously provoked DNA damage. FA genes act in many biological processes, most notably during various DNA repair processes, so the phenotypes in the mice could in principle stem from defects other than those involving their direct function in replication reactions. Nevertheless, DNA damage ultimately too results in DNA replication stress and instability. Our proposed concept of “polygenic replication stress” by compounding genetic alterations resulting in strong DNA replication instability furthermore is affirmed by the observation that the same Fanc gene knockouts cause varying phenotypic severity depending on the genetic background of the purebred animals19,43,44, with the gravest phenotypes seen in the C57BL strain backgrounds. Indeed, we find that MAFs from C57BL/ 6NCrl mice but not other mouse strain backgrounds show an intrinsic fork protection defect (Supplementary Fig. 9a), which could explain the more severe phenotype of a particular Fanc gene inactivation in this but not other mouse strains.
It previously was reported that combining FANCD2 with BRCA1 or BRCA2 depletions can cause increased fork protection defects in cells45,46. However, the dramatic physiological effects of polygenic Fanc gene inactivation as seen in our mouse model reveal an unexpected synergism of genetic interactions within the FA tumor suppressor pathway that shapes disease manifestations and the response to chemotherapeutics. Indeed, polygenic FANC tumor mutations in breast cancer patients are also associated with significantly decreased overall survival, suggesting that polygenic FANC mutations in humans have physiological relevance beyond FA also in cancer. Importantly, the genetic interactions are not random and do not occur with any FANC gene combination. Thus, the data implies that FA can inform of previously unappreciated synthetic lethal interactions exploitable for new therapeutic strategies.
FA occurs with a frequency of 1:100,000–250,000. Inconsistently, ~4.3% of individuals in the Western population carry heterozygous disease-causing FANC variants, making the disease far less frequent than what would be expected from Mendelian transmission47,48. In recent years it has become evident that there is a proportion of patients that present only in adulthood, which may have skewed these estimates to some extent. On the other hand, the requirement for stress factors in addition to biallelic FANC mutations too could account in part for this discrepancy. This additional stress can include physical DNA damage caused by endogenous or exogenous aldehyde damage, such as previously seen in Fancd2-/-+Aldh2-/- mice15. While there are reports of FA patients with heterozygous ALDH2 co-mutations, phenotypic manifestations in mice appear to require homozygous Aldh2 mutations49. Consistent with this observation, we find predominantly heterozygous co-mutations in humans, while the polygenic homozygous mice show the most severe phenotypes. This seeming discrepancy could perhaps reflect the sterile living environment of laboratory animals. Indeed, we find that heterozygous co-mutations accelerate phenotypes when exposed to extrinsic damage such as gamma irradiation (Supplementary Fig. 9b).
Regardless, the data presented here suggests that endogenous replication stress by additional Fanc gene mutations is sufficient to cause the disease phenotypes in mice. The concept of polygenic Fanc interactions beyond an epistatic FA repair pathway is consistent with previously inexplicable epistasis studies in Fanc KO mice, whereby Fancc-/-+Fancg-/- but not Fancc-/-+Fanca-/- mice showed a worsening of the otherwise mild phenotypes43,50. As FANC genes are increasingly found to participate in non-canonical repair and replication processes51,52, it will be of great interest to comprehensively unravel the specific causes and functional defects of unexpected FANC interactions in future studies. Moreover, the additional synergistic mutations may not be restricted to so far identified FANC genes but feasibly can include other genetic mechanisms that induce stress. In support of this idea, Fancc-/-+Sod1-/- mice with the latter gene mutation promoting oxidative stress show a much improved FA disease modeling over the monogenic Fanc model53, as do Fancd2-/-+Aldh2-/- mice15 demonstrating the broader importance of polygenic mutations in FA development beyond Brca2 and Rad51c. The data here show that polygenic FANC mutations are a frequent event in FA patients, together lending support to the concept of polygenic replication stress as an alternative mechanism to induce FA disease manifestations. It further suggests that additional gene analysis in FA patients could aid in predicting the severity of the disease as an added parameter, which is of particular importance in families with clinically heterogeneously affected siblings54.
The concept of requiring polygenic gene inactivation for disease manifestation may usefully inform other rare genetic disease models beyond FA. In an as yet experimentally untested mathematical model, the co-recessive inheritance theory by Lambert and Lambert predicted that diseases caused by mutations in DNA damage response genes may require more than one gene inactivation55, including ataxia telangiectasia (AT, associated with mutations in ATM), xeroderma pigmentosum and Cockayne syndrome (XP and CS, involving nucleotide excision repair genes), and cancer. A requirement of polygenic stress by synergistic gene mutations may at least in part resolve why single-gene inactivation alone only poorly models AT and CS in mice resulting in mild symptoms, respectively, while additional gene inactivation results in better disease modeling56,57. This phenomenon was so far unexplained. Thus, polygenic stress defining disease presentation as postulated, based on the observations of our mouse model, may point to a general concept.
Notably, polygenic risk evaluation, whereby the risk scores of multiple genes are added up to a compounded risk factor, is emerging as a promising tool in predicting many rare genetic diseases, including neurodevelopmental disorders, autism, Alzheimer’s disease, and breast cancer58–61. Yet challenges remain in defining proper predictive parameters. The polygenic replication stress concept presented here predicts that the promising but so far incomplete success of polygenic risk prediction can be improved by considering the non-random and synergistic nature of the FANC mutation combinations presented here. The data here further has additional implications for tumor passenger mutation, whereby a seemingly unremarkable mutation in one gene is asymptomatic and tolerated, similar to the mutation in the monogenic Rad51cdah/dah mice. However, within the context of an additional mild somatic mutation, represented in our mouse model by the Brca2Δ27/Δ27 mutation, it causes severe and aggressive cancer. Collectively, the presented mouse model offers a comprehensive preclinical model to faithfully investigate diverse FA disease manifestations and establishes the concept of polygenic replication stress synergism driving disease severity and therapy response as a testable principle for disease prognosis and new synthetic lethal cancer-therapeutic strategies.
Methods
Institutional review board statement
All procedures and methods were conducted in accordance with federal and state regulations as well as MD Anderson Cancer Center institutional guidelines and policies, as all procedures performed on animals were described in an Animal Care and Use Form (ACUF) and approved by the institutional animal care and use committee at the MD Anderson Cancer Center (IACUC).
Mouse models
Rad51dah/dah mice were generated by pronuclear injection using the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system. Cas9 and sgRNA 5′-CTTCGTACTCGATTACTAAATGG-3′ were injected into pronuclear stage mouse embryos from FVB/J mice to generate founder animals. Brca2Δ27/Δ27 mice, carrying a C-terminal truncation, were obtained from NCI Mouse Repository (SWR.129P2(Cg)-Brca2tm1Kamc/Nci, Strain code: 01XG9, SWR.129P2). Mice carrying both the Brca2 C-terminal deletion and the Rad51c 6 base pair deletion were generated by crossing Brca2 and Rad51c heterozygous mutant mice. The obtained offspring were subsequently intercrossed to obtain double-mutant mice and control genotypes in FVB/J SWR.129 hybrid background. Mice were maintained in pathogen-free conditions. Animal experiments were performed per approved animal protocol by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.
For genotyping, the ears of mice were clipped and genomic DNA was extracted using DirectPCR Lysis Reagent (Viagen Biotech). PCR amplification was performed using GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega) or Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (NEB) according to the manufacturer’s introduction. PCR products (Rad51c-Forward, 5′-CGTCATGACCTTGAAGATC-3′, Rad51c-Reverse, 5′-GATTATTTGCAAGGCTGATC-3′; Brca2-Forward, 5′-GAGAGCCCCATGCAGCCTCCACTTGCTGTG-3′, and Brca2-Reverse, 5′-CTGCCTCCAGAGACCTGAGCCGTC-3′) were directly analyzed by agarose gel based on product size.
Generation of mouse adult fibroblasts
Primary ear fibroblasts were derived from age-matched males and females. Briefly, a portion of the ear was cut off, rinsed two times with PBS containing kanamycin (100 μg/mL) and digested with collagenase D/dispase II protease (4 mg/mL, respectively) for 45 min at 37 °C. After dilution with five times Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s high-glucose media (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 5% Antibiotic-Antimycotic, cells were incubated overnight at 37 °C. The following day, cells were passed through a 0.7 μM cell strainer, washed with PBS and plated for cultivation in standard media consisting of DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 units/ml Pen-Strep. Mouse adult fibroblasts (MAFs) were grown at 37 °C and 5% CO2, routinely passaged two times per week and passages 2–10 were used for experiments.
Transfection of mouse adult fibroblasts
For transfection, 2.5 × 105 mouse adult fibroblasts were plated for 48 h in standard DMEM media into 6-well plates. Afterward, cells were transfected with 1 μg of Rad51c-GFP-expressing vector (NM_053269, OriGene) using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Cytogenetic analysis
For chromosomal aberration analysis, 5 × 104 mouse adult fibroblasts were plated for 24 h in standard DMEM media. On the next day, exponentially growing cells were treated with the indicated concentration of mitomycin C for 15 h followed by incubation with colcemid (0.1 mg/ml, Gibco) for 5 h. Afterwards, cells were swollen with 0.04% KCl solution (12 min, 37 °C), fixed in methanol/acetic acid (3:1), dropped onto microscope slides, stained with 5% Giemsa solution and directly imaged with a Nikon Eclipse Ti-U inverted microscope. Images were analyzed using ImageJ software.
Histological analysis
Testis and ovaries from adult mice were resected and fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific) overnight and stored in 70% ethanol. Formalin-fixed tissues were paraffin-embedded and tissue sections were counterstain in eosin-phloxine B solution for 30 s to 1 min. Images were obtained using a Nikon Eclipse Ti-U inverted microscope.
Bone marrow harvest
Bone marrow cells were isolated from femurs of 8–12-weeks-old mutant mice and appropriate controls. Skin and muscle surrounding the bone were removed and bone marrow cells were isolated by flushing out cells with PBS using a 27 gauge needle. Pelleted cells were treated with red cell lysis buffer (Lonza) for two minutes to eliminate red blood cells.
Flow cytometry
Flow cytometry was performed on freshly isolated bone marrow cells. The following antibodies were used to stain for hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and progenitor populations: biotin-conjugated lineage cocktail with antibodies anti-TER-119, anti-CD11b, anti-Ly-6G/Ly-6C (Gr-1), anti-CD3e and anti-CD45R/B220 (BioLegend), anti-streptavidin (APC-Cy7, BD Pharmingen) was used as the secondary antibody, anti-c-kit (APC, clone 2B8, BD Pharmingen), anti-Sca-1 (PerCP-Cy5.5, clone D7, eBioscience), anti-CD34 (FITC, clone RAM34, eBioscience), anti-CD135 (Flt3) (PE, clone A2F10, eBioscience), and anti-CD127 (PE-Cy7, clone SB/199, eBioscience). For analyzing progenitor and mature blood cells, single cell suspension from the thymus and spleen were obtained by mashing the tissue through a 0.45 µM cell strainer and removing red blood cell using red cell lysis buffer. Bone marrow cells were harvested as described above. Afterward, cells were stained using a cocktail with the following antibodies: anti-CD3 (APC, clone 145-2C11, BD Pharmingen), anti-CD4 (PE, clone RM4-5, BD Pharmingen), anti-CD8 (FITC, clone 53-6.7, BD Pharmingen), anti-Gr-1 (unconjugated, BioLegend), anti-CD45 (PerCP-Cy5.5, clone 30-F11, BioLegend), anti-B220 (PE-Cy7, clone RA3-6B2, BioLegend), and anti-CD11b (BV605, clone M1/70, BioLegend). The samples were incubated with primary antibodies for 90 min at 4 °C in the dark. Following the washing steps, cells were incubated with secondary antibody anti-streptavidin (APC-Cy7, BD Pharmingen) for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark. For quantification of cell numbers, AccuCheck counting beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were included in samples and calculation was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions. Dead cells were excluded using SYTOX Blue/Dead Cell Stain (ThermoFisher). Flow cytometric analysis was performed using an LSRFortessa X-20 Analyzer and data were analyzed with FlowJo 10.4.2 (FlowJo, LLC).
Western blot
Testes were collected from adult male Rad51c mutant and wild-type mice, and protein lysates were used for immunoblotting using standard techniques. MAFs were harvested by adding hot 1x SDS running buffer onto the cells, collected and further processed for immunoblotting using standard techniques. The following antibodies were used: anti-Rad51c (clone 2H11/6, Novus Biologicals), anti-a-Tubulin (SantaCruz).
Peripheral blood analysis
Whole blood was collected from 8–12-weeks-old mice in EDTA microcuvette tubes (BD Biosciences) and complete blood counts were analyzed using ADVIA 2120i Hematology systems (Siemens Healthineers) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Whole blood slides were stained with Diff-Quick stain.
Colony formation unit assay
Hematopoietic colony formation unit assays were performed using bone marrow cells harvested as described above. The number of bone marrow cells was enumerated using trypan blue staining in a Neubauer chamber (Thermo Fisher). Appropriate numbers of total bone marrow cells were then exposed to various concentrations of MMC and seeded into 6-well plates with MethoCult GF M3434 (Stem Cell Technologies) media following the manufacturer’s instructions.
X-ray imaging
X-ray imaging from mouse tails was performed using an IVIS Lumina X5 imager.
Irradiation of mice
Mice for repopulation assay received a dose of 9 Gy of total body irradiation. Additionally, mice were treated prophylactically with enrofloxacin (Baytril) in the drinking water for one week before irradiation and for 3 weeks after irradiation. Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice for survival analysis after irradiation received ten times 1.5 Gy of body irradiation daily.
Competitive repopulation assay
To assess the HSC function the competitive repopulation assay was performed essentially as described previously62. Briefly, male bone marrow cells (5 × 104 or 2 × 105) from Brca2mut and Brca2Δ27/Δ27 + Rad51cdah/dah mice were mixed with 5 × 104 of wild-type female bone marrow and injected into lethally irradiated (900 Gy) female wild-type recipients. Three to four recipients were used for each genotype. After 16 weeks, recipient mice were killed and genomic DNA from peripheral blood was extracted using PureLink Genomic DNA Kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Thereafter, the relative contribution of the tested donor mutant and wild-type bone marrow to peripheral blood chimerism was assessed using quantitative PCR (qPCR) for the presence of male-specific Y-chromosome (SRY-Forward, 5′- TGTTCAGCCCTACAGCCACA-3′, and SRY-Reverse, 5′-CCTCTCACCACGG- GACCAC-3′), and detection was performed with the TaqMan probe SRY-T, and 5′-FAM– ACAATTGTCTAGAGAGCATGGAGGGCCA–BHQ1-3′. Primers for murine b-actin sequence were b- actin-Forward, 5′-ACGGCCAGGTCATCACTATTG-3′, and b-actin-Reverse, 5′- ACTATGGCCTCAAGGAGTTTTGTCA-3′, and detected with the TaqMan probe b -actin-T, 5′-FAM–AACGAGCGGTTCCGATGCCCT–BHQ1-3′. The amplification reaction was performed using TaqMan Multiplex Mix Kit (ThermoFisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Whole-exome sequencing of FA patient DNAs
Library preparation and target enrichment were achieved using the SureSelect Human All Exon system of different versions (Agilent) or TruSeq DNA Exome technology (Illumina), and was followed by next-generation sequencing on a HiSeq2500 instrument (Illumina). The average exome coverage was determined using a complete list of human exons generated by the UCSC Table Browser. The same procedure was performed for FA gene coverage. Generally ≥80 of the reads were on target with >85% of bases covered at 10× depth. Data were analyzed using NextGENe Sequence Analysis software (Softgenetics). Finally, a manual filtering step based on data mining was carried out to prioritize relevant mutations. A minimum coverage of 10 reads was set as the threshold for any variant to be considered faithful. The variant detection frequency was limited to a minimum of 20% of the reads covering any aberration. Potentially pathogenic variants were verified by Sanger sequencing generally using an Applied Biosystems 3130xl instrument. dbGAP analysis of “Etiological Investigation of Cancer Susceptibility in Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes: A Natural History Study”: The data/analyses presented in the current publication are based on the use of study data downloaded from the dbGaP website, under phs001481.v1.p1, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs001481.v1.p1. The raw data of Supplementary Table 2 are protected and are not available due to data privacy laws.
Whole-exome sequencing data analysis
Paired-end raw sequence reads (2 × 100 bp) in fastq format were aligned to the reference genome (Mus Musculus - house mouse, mm10) using BWA mem with 31 bp seed length. The aligned BAM files are subjected to mark duplication, re-alignment, and re-calibration using Picard and GATK before any downstream analyses. In addition, the paired-end raw sequence reads (2 × 100 bp) in fastq format were also aligned to the reference (Mus Musculus, mmu) V, D, J and C genes of T- or B- cell receptors directly using MiXCR to get T-cell receptor clonality. Based on the alignment results (BAM files) processed above, somatic mutations, including single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions and deletions (INDELs), and structural variants (SVs) were obtained through merging variants from multiple somatic variant callers – MuTect, Pindel, and Manta/Strelka2. Mutations previously reported in a public database (dbSNP v137) with >1% allele frequency were removed. Next, we applied the following mutation-filtering criteria: (i) sequencing depth ≥ 20 for tumor and ≥10 for normal, (ii) tumor variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥ 5%, and normal VAF < 2%. Associations between somatic mutations and disease progression/treatment response were analyzed and visualized using Maftools. Somatic copy-number aberration (SCNA) analysis was conducted using the in-house application ExomeLyzer (a modified version of HMMcopy). The resulting normalized log2ratios were segmented using circular binary segmentation (CBS) algorithm implemented in the DNAcopy package of Bioconductor. The copy ratios of segments were then assigned to the over-lapping genes by CNTools with thresholds (−0.3 < seg.mean < 0.3) and visualized by GenVisR. The obtained SCNAs were furthermore verified using CNVkit, and also visualized by the Python package - matplotlib.
cBioportal analysis of breast cancer patient data
Breast cancer data sets deposited on cBioportal.org39,40 that had information on both, FANC gene mutations (mutations and copy number alterations as defined by cbioportal.org, Metabric and TCGA PanCancer Atlas datasets, 3593 samples total) and overall survival data was used to create the Kaplan–Meier curves as indicated in the Figures. Patient data was grouped in patients with tumors containing no FANC mutation, polygenic FANC mutations (combinations of two FANC mutations) and monogenic FANC mutations using the FANC combinations identified in FA patients (Supplementary Tables 1 and S2) or any of the 253 possible FANC combinations when combining any two of the 23 FANC genes. cBioportal defines mutations as reported by the original study and includes non-synonymous mutations, amplifications and deletions. LOH and zygosity status was inferred from the reported allele frequency and CNA.
DNA Fiber analysis
DNA Fiber experiments were performed as previously described10. Briefly, replication tracts of log-phase cells were pulse-labeled with 50 μM IdU and CldU before or after exposure to hydroxyurea, respectively, as indicated in the sketches. Cells were harvested, lysed and spread to obtain single DNA molecules on microscope slides before standard immunofluorescence with antibodies against IdU and CldU (Novus Biologicals, BD Biosciences).
Statistical analysis
Statistical data analysis was performed using GraphPad software. Significant differences between sample groups for mouse experiments were determined using ANOVA. Statistical analysis for DNA fiber assays was determined using the Mann-Whitney test. Statistical analysis for cancer genome data uses the log-rand test and was calculated on cBioportal.org39,40. Statistical significance is indicated with asterisks as follows (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, n.s. p > 0.05).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. John A. Tainer, Davide Moiani, Michael Longo and Gareth Williams for sharing information and discussions on the RAD51C crystal structure, Dr. Tamara M. Haygood for advice on tail pathologies seen with X-ray, as well as the MDACC Genetically Engineered Mouse Facility (GEMF), the Small Animal Imaging Facility, the Research Histology Core Laboratory core facilities, the Advanced Cytometry & Sorting Facility at South Campus (ACSF), and the Veterinary and Comparative Pathology facility at MD Anderson Cancer Center for critical support. The work was supported by the NIEHS under award 1R01ES029680, and by CPRIT RP180463, R1312 and RP180813 (K.S.), and the FA research group at the University of Wuerzburg was supported by grants from the Schroeder Kurth Fund (D.S.). Carolina Guerrero and Poojan Shukla were supported by the CPRIT Research Training Award CPRIT Training Program (RP210028). K.S. is a Rita Allen Foundation Fellow and a CPRIT scholar in Cancer Biology (previous award R1312).
Author contributions
K.H.T. designed and performed the experiments. D.S. performed passenger mutation analysis of FA patients and a literature search. C.K., S.R., and Y.C. performed the DNA fiber analysis, C.G. and P.S. together with K.S. performed cBioportal analysis, X.W and J.Z performed the bioinformatics analysis, M.O. experimentally contributed to the understanding during the development of the work. C.D. contributed to the clinical understanding during the development of the work. K.S. conceived the project, designed experiments, contributed to the literature search and the DNA fiber and bioinformatics analysis, and wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
All data pertaining to the results in the manuscript are available in the main text, the Supplementary materials, and Source Data file. The raw data in Supplementary Table 2 are protected and are not available due to data privacy laws. Any additional data and material requests are required to comply with institutional policies and can be requested by contacting the corresponding authors. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Change history
3/12/2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41467-024-46561-9
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-36933-y.
References
- 1.Fiesco-Roa MO, Giri N, McReynolds LJ, Best AF, Alter BP. Genotype-phenotype associations in Fanconi anemia: a literature review. Blood Rev. 2019;37:100589. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2019.100589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Blanche P. Alter. et al. Fanconi Anemia Guidelines For Diagnosis And Management. 4th edn. (Fanconi Anemia Research Fund, Inc., 2014).
- 3.Niraj J, Farkkila A, D’Andrea AD. The Fanconi Anemia Pathway In Cancer. Annu Rev. Cancer Biol. 2019;3:457–478. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-030617-050422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen CC, Feng W, Lim PX, Kass EM, Jasin M. Homology-directed repair and the role of BRCA1, BRCA2, and related proteins in genome integrity and cancer. Annu Rev. Cancer Biol. 2018;2:313–336. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-030617-050502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kottemann MC, Smogorzewska A. Fanconi anaemia and the repair of Watson and Crick DNA crosslinks. Nature. 2013;493:356–363. doi: 10.1038/nature11863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ceccaldi R, Sarangi P, D’Andrea AD. The Fanconi anaemia pathway: new players and new functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016;17:337–349. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schlacher K, Wu H, Jasin M. A distinct replication fork protection pathway connects Fanconi anemia tumor suppressors to RAD51-BRCA1/2. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Long DT, Raschle M, Joukov V, Walter JC. Mechanism of RAD51-dependent DNA interstrand cross-link repair. Science. 2011;333:84–87. doi: 10.1126/science.1204258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang AT, et al. A dominant mutation in human RAD51 reveals its function in DNA interstrand crosslink repair independent of homologous recombination. Mol. Cell. 2015;59:478–490. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schlacher K, et al. Double-strand break repair-independent role for BRCA2 in blocking stalled replication fork degradation by MRE11. Cell. 2011;145:529–542. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Balcerek J, et al. Lnk/Sh2b3 deficiency restores hematopoietic stem cell function and genome integrity in Fancd2 deficient Fanconi anemia. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3915. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06380-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nalepa G, Clapp DW. Fanconi anaemia and cancer: an intricate relationship. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2018;18:168–185. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Inc., F. A. F. Fanconi Anemia: Guidelines For Diagnosis And Management. 1-429 (Fanconi Anemia Research Fund, 2014).
- 14.Olson, T. S. in UpToDate (ed Post T. W.) (UpToDate, 2020).
- 15.Langevin F, Crossan GP, Rosado IV, Arends MJ, Patel KJ. Fancd2 counteracts the toxic effects of naturally produced aldehydes in mice. Nature. 2011;475:53–58. doi: 10.1038/nature10192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Neveling K, Endt D, Hoehn H, Schindler D. Genotype-phenotype correlations in Fanconi anemia. Mutat. Res. 2009;668:73–91. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Reina-Castillon J, et al. Detectable clonal mosaicism in blood as a biomarker of cancer risk in Fanconi anemia. Blood Adv. 2017;1:319–329. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016000943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wong JC, Buchwald M. Disease model: Fanconi anemia. Trends Mol. Med. 2002;8:139–142. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4914(01)02262-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Parmar K, D’Andrea A, Niedernhofer LJ. Mouse models of Fanconi anemia. Mutat. Res. 2009;668:133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bakker ST, de Winter JP, te Riele H. Learning from a paradox: recent insights into Fanconi anaemia through studying mouse models. Dis. Model Mech. 2013;6:40–47. doi: 10.1242/dmm.009795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang T, et al. Loss of Faap20 causes hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell depletion in mice under genotoxic stress. Stem Cells. 2015;33:2320–2330. doi: 10.1002/stem.2048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Koomen M, et al. Reduced fertility and hypersensitivity to mitomycin C characterize Fancg/Xrcc9 null mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2002;11:273–281. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.3.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ahlborn LB, et al. Identification of a breast cancer family double heterozygote for RAD51C and BRCA2 gene mutations. Fam. Cancer. 2015;14:129–133. doi: 10.1007/s10689-014-9747-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alter BP, Rosenberg PS, Brody LC. Clinical and molecular features associated with biallelic mutations in FANCD1/BRCA2. J. Med. Genet. 2007;44:1–9. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2006.043257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Howlett NG, et al. Biallelic inactivation of BRCA2 in Fanconi anemia. Science. 2002;297:606–609. doi: 10.1126/science.1073834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vaz F, et al. Mutation of the RAD51C gene in a Fanconi anemia-like disorder. Nat. Genet. 2010;42:406–409. doi: 10.1038/ng.570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Evers B, Jonkers J. Mouse models of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiency: past lessons, current understanding and future prospects. Oncogene. 2006;25:5885–5897. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kuznetsov SG, Haines DC, Martin BK, Sharan SK. Loss of Rad51c leads to embryonic lethality and modulation of Trp53-dependent tumorigenesis in mice. Cancer Res. 2009;69:863–872. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McAllister KA, et al. Cancer susceptibility of mice with a homozygous deletion in the COOH-terminal domain of the Brca2 gene. Cancer Res. 2002;62:990–994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Alter BP, Giri N. Thinking of VACTERL-H? rule out Fanconi Anemia according to PHENOS. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2016;170:1520–1524. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tsui V, Crismani W. The fanconi anemia pathway and fertility. Trends Genet. 2019;35:199–214. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2018.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sousa R, et al. Increased red cell distribution width in Fanconi anemia: a novel marker of stress erythropoiesis. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 2016;11:102. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0485-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mayle A, Luo M, Jeong M, Goodell MA. Flow cytometry analysis of murine hematopoietic stem cells. Cytometry A. 2013;83:27–37. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Matatall KA, et al. Chronic infection depletes hematopoietic stem cells through stress-induced terminal differentiation. Cell Rep. 2016;17:2584–2595. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Flach J, et al. Replication stress is a potent driver of functional decline in ageing haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2014;512:198–202. doi: 10.1038/nature13619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Quinet A, Carvajal-Maldonado D, Lemacon D, Vindigni A. DNA fiber analysis: mind the gap! Methods Enzymol. 2017;591:55–82. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2017.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lemaçon D, et al. MRE11 and EXO1 nucleases degrade reversed forks and lead to MUS81-dependent fork rescue in BRCA2-deficient cells. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:860. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01180-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hirsch B, et al. Association of biallelic BRCA2/FANCD1 mutations with spontaneous chromosomal instability and solid tumors of childhood. Blood. 2004;103:2554–2559. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-06-1970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gao J, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal. 2013;6:pl1. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cerami E, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:401–404. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lobitz S, Velleuer E. Guido Fanconi (1892-1979): a jack of all trades. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2006;6:893–898. doi: 10.1038/nrc2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bartkova J, et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints. Nature. 2006;444:633–637. doi: 10.1038/nature05268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Noll M, et al. Fanconi anemia group A and C double-mutant mice: functional evidence for a multi-protein Fanconi anemia complex. Exp. Hematol. 2002;30:679–688. doi: 10.1016/S0301-472X(02)00838-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wong JC, et al. Targeted disruption of exons 1 to 6 of the Fanconi Anemia group A gene leads to growth retardation, strain-specific microphthalmia, meiotic defects and primordial germ cell hypoplasia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2003;12:2063–2076. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kais Z, et al. FANCD2 maintains fork stability in BRCA1/2-deficient tumors and promotes alternative end-joining DNA repair. Cell Rep. 2016;15:2488–2499. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Michl J, Zimmer J, Buffa FM, McDermott U, Tarsounas M. FANCD2 limits replication stress and genome instability in cells lacking BRCA2. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016;23:755–757. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rogers KJ, Fu W, Akey JM, Monnat RJ., Jr. Global and disease-associated genetic variation in the human Fanconi anemia gene family. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014;23:6815–6825. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Meyer S, et al. Fanconi anaemia, BRCA2 mutations and childhood cancer: a developmental perspective from clinical and epidemiological observations with implications for genetic counselling. J. Med. Genet. 2014;51:71–75. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hira A, et al. Variant ALDH2 is associated with accelerated progression of bone marrow failure in Japanese Fanconi anemia patients. Blood. 2013;122:3206–3209. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-507962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Pulliam-Leath AC, et al. Genetic disruption of both Fancc and Fancg in mice recapitulates the hematopoietic manifestations of Fanconi anemia. Blood. 2010;116:2915–2920. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-08-240747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Luzwick JW, et al. MRE11-dependent instability in mitochondrial DNA fork protection activates a cGAS immune signaling pathway. Sci. Adv. 2021;7:eabf9441. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf9441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Benitez A, et al. FANCA promotes DNA double-strand break repair by catalyzing single-strand annealing and strand exchange. Mol. Cell. 2018;71:621–628 e624. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hadjur S, et al. Defective hematopoiesis and hepatic steatosis in mice with combined deficiencies of the genes encoding Fancc and Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase. Blood. 2001;98:1003–1011. doi: 10.1182/blood.V98.4.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hutson SP, Alter BP. Experiences of siblings of patients with Fanconi anemia. Pediatr. Blood Cancer. 2007;48:72–79. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lambert WC, Lambert MW. Co-recessive inheritance: a model for DNA repair, genetic disease and carcinogenesis. Mutat. Res. 1985;145:227–234. doi: 10.1016/0167-8817(85)90031-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lavin MF. The appropriateness of the mouse model for ataxia-telangiectasia: neurological defects but no neurodegeneration. DNA Repair. 2013;12:612–619. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jaarsma D, van der Pluijm I, van der Horst GT, Hoeijmakers JH. Cockayne syndrome pathogenesis: lessons from mouse models. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2013;134:180–195. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2013.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Oetjens MT, Kelly MA, Sturm AC, Martin CL, Ledbetter DH. Quantifying the polygenic contribution to variable expressivity in eleven rare genetic disorders. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:4897. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12869-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Desikan RS, et al. Genetic assessment of age-associated Alzheimer disease risk: development and validation of a polygenic hazard score. PLoS Med. 2017;14:e1002258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Niemi MEK, et al. Common genetic variants contribute to risk of rare severe neurodevelopmental disorders. Nature. 2018;562:268–271. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0566-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kuchenbaecker KB, et al. Evaluation of polygenic risk scores for breast and ovarian cancer risk prediction in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109:djw302. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Navarro S, et al. Hematopoietic dysfunction in a mouse model for Fanconi anemia group D1. Mol. Ther. 2006;14:525–535. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data pertaining to the results in the manuscript are available in the main text, the Supplementary materials, and Source Data file. The raw data in Supplementary Table 2 are protected and are not available due to data privacy laws. Any additional data and material requests are required to comply with institutional policies and can be requested by contacting the corresponding authors. Source data are provided with this paper.