Table 4.
Head doctor’s experience with staff recall and automatized staff recall systems (N = 54)
| Low degree | Neither/Nor | High degree | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Head doctors knows EPHCC plans for recalling staff during mass influx of patients | 22.2% | 11.1% | 66.6% |
| Head doctors know when to execute plans for staff recall | 19% | 22.2% | 58.8% |
| EPHCC staff are trained in executing plans for staff recall | 42.9% | 20.6% | 36.5% |
| EPHCC will execute plans for staff recall when expecting 5 patients | 37.5% | 17.2% | 45.4% |
| EPHCC will execute plans for staff recall when expecting 10 patients | 21.8% | 3.1% | 75% |
| EPHCC will execute plans for staff recall when expecting 15 patients | 17.2% | 0% | 82.8% |
| The system used for recalling staff now is well-functioning | 35.9% | 35.9% | 28.1% |
| Head doctor’s experienced with use of automatized staff recall systems (ex. previous job in hospital) | 67.2% | 7.8% | 25% |
| Have knowledge with automatized staff recall systems | 59.7% | 17.7% | 22.6% |
| Consider plan to call all staff on-by-one as good enough | 50% | 21.0% | 29% |
| Consider plan to send an SMS to all staff as good enough | 48.5% | 25% | 26.6% |
| Believe that an automatized staff recall system would streamline the process of recalling staff at the EPHCC | 25% | 28.3% | 46.7% |
| Believe that an automatized staff recall system would relieve the staff at the EPHCC, to perform other tasks | 15% | 28.3% | 56.7% |
| Need for a better staff recall system at the EPHCC | 25% | 39.1% | 35.9% |
EPHCC = Emergency primary health care center. Scored on a Likert scale, where 1 = to a very low degree, 2 = to a low degree (1 + 2 recoded to 1 = low degree), 3 = neither/nor (recoded to 2 = neither/nor), 4 = to a high degree, and 5 = to a very high degree (4 + 5 recoded to 3 = high degree).