Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 27;10:1062117. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1062117

Table 2.

Association of each indicator and overall survival in patients with liver cancer according to cox regression models adjusted for potential confounders.

N Model 0 Model 1 Model 2
HR (95%CI) p-value HR (95%CI) p-value HR (95%CI) p-value
HGS
 As continues 504 0.98 (0.96–0.99) <0.001 0.99 (0.97–1.00) 0.073 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.197
 High HGS 256 Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Low HGS 248 1.90 (1.48–2.44) <0.001 1.57 (1.20–2.04) 0.001 1.50 (1.14–1.98) 0.004
mGPS
 0 148 Ref. Ref. Ref.
 1 202 1.88 (1.36–2.61) <0.001 1.42 (1.02–1.98) 0.040 1.40 (1.00–1.97) 0.055
 2 154 2.48 (1.77–3.47) <0.001 1.93 (1.37–2.70) <0.001 1.84 (1.30–2.61) 0.001
Low mGPS (mGPS = 0) 148 Ref. Ref. Ref.
High mGPS (mGPS = 1 or 2) 356 2.12 (1.57–2.86) <0.001 1.58 (1.16–2.14) 0.004 1.55 (1.14–2.12) 0.001
HGS-mGPS
 Low risk (Neither) 95 Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Median risk 1 (Only low HGS) 53 2.13 (1.25–3.64) 0.006 2.07 (1.21–3.56) 0.008 2.01 (1.16–3.47) 0.013
 Median risk 2 (Only high mGPS) 161 2.19 (1.42–3.37) <0.001 1.86 (1.20–2.86) 0.005 1.84 (1.19–2.85) 0.006
 High risk (Both) 195 3.60 (2.38–5.44) <0.001 2.49 (1.63–3.81) <0.001 2.35 (1.52–3.63) <0.001

Data are presented as hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals). Model 0: unadjusted. Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, tumor stage. Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex tumor stage, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, TSF, smoking and alcohol. HGS, hand grip strength; mGPS, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score; HGS-mGPS, the combination of hand grip strength and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score. Bold values indicate statistically significant level (p < 0.05).