Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 27;14:1133880. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1133880

Table 2.

Comparison of EMBU, FMPS-C, and MJT Chinese standard edition scores between the two groups (scores).

OCD group (n = 231) Control group (n = 246) F P
EMBU
Paternal parenting style
F1’ scores 48.8 ± 9.1 49.7 ± 12.3 0.251 0.616
F2’ scores 29.1 ± 7.6 16.3 ± 6.1 137.295 <0.001
F3’ scores 25.3 ± 4.7 17.1 ± 5.0 23.762 <0.001
F4’ scores 6.5 ± 5.2 6.3 ± 5.8 0.026 0.872
F5’ scores 15.4 ± 4.2 8.7 ± 3.4 93.649 <0.001
F6’ scores 15.4 ± 2.8 9.3 ± 3.1 33.363 <0.001
Maternal parenting style
M1’ scores 49.0 ± 8.3 50.2 ± 8.0 0.741 0.322
M2’ scores 43.2 ± 4.7 34.5 ± 5.0 79.921 <0.001
M3’ scores 16.2 ± 4.9 11.9 ± 4.1 26.273 <0.001
M4’ scores 14.9 ± 5.8 11.7 ± 5.2 5.993 0.021
M5’ scores 5.3 ± 4.8 6.1 ± 5.3 1.536 0.294
FMPS-C
Adaptive dimension scores 17.3 ± 5.1 24.1 ± 6.0 78.571 <0.001
Maladaptive dimension scores 75.12 ± 10.4 57.59 ± 9.7 115.395 <0.001
Score of MJT Chinese standard edition 8.8 ± 2.0 15.2 ± 5.9 66.527 <0.001

EMBU Parenting Style Evaluation Scale; M1 emotional warmth and understanding; M2 excessive interference and protection; M3 Reject, deny; M4 punishment, severe; M5 prefers subjects; F1 emotional warmth and understanding; F2 punishment, severity; F3 excessive interference; F4 prefers subjects; F5 Reject, deny; F6 overprotection; FMPS-C Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale Chinese version; MJT Moral Judgment Test.