Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 21;26(3):106253. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106253

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison between model and experiment

(A) Mean fraction correct in the capture range. Results are shown for congruent (blue), symmetric (teal), and incongruent trials (magenta) from model simulations (Model) and from the three monkeys (N, C, and K). In each case, percent correct was computed from all the trials with PTs in the 75–125 ms range (gray shades in Figures 4A–4C). For the monkey data, error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals from binomial statistics. For the model, error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals across simulations with randomized parameters (SD = 5% for each parameter value; see STAR Methods).

(B) Rise point in performance. The rise point is the PT at which the tachometric curve reaches 75% correct. Format is the same as in A. For the monkey data, error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals from bootstrap. For the model, error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals across simulations with randomized parameters (SD = 5% for each parameter value; see STAR Methods).