Table 1.
Brief literature review.
References | Methods | Results |
---|---|---|
Gemignani et al. (2018) | Performed a linear mixed effect model with hair as a fixed effect. | Model accuracy for deoxyHb using the generalized linear model GLM) was significantly higher for blonde subjects when compared to brown-haired subjects. |
Nagels-Coune et al. (2020) | Studied how certain characteristics of hair (thickness, root density, and color) impact fNIRS results using a suitability questionnaire. | Subjects with lower suitability scores (based on hair/skin color) generally had more channels with poor signal-to-noise ratio. |
Fang et al. (2018) | Used Monte Carlo simulation to study light propagation using a visible Chinese human corpse cryosection dataset. | Detected light intensity signal decreased by 15–80% when scalp hair follicle density varied from 1–11%. |
Bronkhorst et al. (2019) | Studied how a simple head maneuver redistributed cerebral blood volume to verify if photon transmission is sufficient in darker-skinned subjects. They compared effects of a head tilt in a pigmented vs. non-pigmented subject. | Data from a pigmented and non-pigmented had comparable Hb patterns to effects of the head tilt. This tilt is recommended as a test to confirm photon transmission in subjects with pigmented skin. |