Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 7;9(3):e14244. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14244

Table 1.

Assessment criteria for locating the LiB manufacturing plants.

Dimensions Criteria Type Sources
Economic Distance from collection centers (D1) Min [[64], [65], [66], [67], [68]]
Distance to a secondary market (D2) Min [64,65,[67], [68], [69], [70], [71]]
Distance to original equipment manufacturers (D3) Min [68,[70], [71], [72], [73]]
Distance to recycling centers (D4) Min [2,9,64,68,71,74]
Financial benefit (D5) Max [9,61,64,[68], [69], [70],73]
Subsidy (D6) Max [2,60,65,70]
Investment cost (D7) Min [2,64,67,70,71]
Operational costs (D8) Min [2,69,71,72,74]
Environmental Air pollution (D9) Min [2,67,70,72]
Eco-disturbance (D10) Min [2,67,68,75]
Eco-awareness (D11) Max [2,60,69,70]
Legislation (D12) Max [2,9,59,62,68]
Social Health & safety (D13) Max [1,60,62,68]
Skilled workforce (D14) Max [2,9,62,76]
Technical Aftermarket service (D15) Max [2,66,76]
Information system (D16) Max [2,68,70,77]
Infrastructure development (D17) Max [2,61,78]
Remanufacturing supply chain (D18) Max [2,59,62,66,67]