Table 3.
Comparison of crypt depth measures between Olfm4-stained crypts and hematoxylin stained crypts.1
| Day postinfection | Stain | Uninfected (μm) | Infected (μm) | 
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Olfm4 | 95.8 | 70.8 | 
| Hematoxylin | 121.4 | 91.4 | |
| 3 | Olfm4 | 78.6 | 146.4 | 
| Hematoxylin | 103.8 | 168.0 | |
| 5 | Olfm4 | 86.0 | 172.5 | 
| Hematoxylin | 101.1 | 231.8 | |
| 7 | Olfm4 | 130.6 | 223.7 | 
| Hematoxylin | 145.3 | 256.6 | |
| 10 | Olfm4 | 81.5 | 146.0 | 
| Hematoxylin | 109.8 | 182.6 | |
| 14 | Olfm4 | 77.1 | 128.7 | 
| Hematoxylin | 105.2 | 129.5 | |
| SEM2 | 69.3 | 52.4 | |
| Welch's unequal variance test | Probabilities | ||
| Stain | 0.048 | ||
| Infection status | < 0.0001 | ||
| Day postinfection | 0.0027 | ||
Measures following Olfm4 in situ hybridization using RNAscope 2.5 HD kit (Brown) or Hematoxylin staining in broiler chickens that were infected at 21 d of age with 100,000 Eimeria acervulina oocysts (Infected) or sham infected with sterile water (Uninfected) and sampled at 0 (3 h postinfection), 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 d post infection (dpi). Measurements were taken at 40 X magnification (n = 6) using ImageJ.
SEM = pooled standard error.