Abstract
Hepatic fibrosis is a late stage process of many chronic liver diseases. Blocking the fibrosis process will be beneficial to the treatment and recovery of the diseases. Mangiferin has many pharmacological activities. Recently, it has been reported that mangiferin may relieve tissue fibrosis, including renal, myocardial, pulmonary fibrosis via anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects in animal models. Here, we investigate the effects of mangiferin on CCl4-induced liver fibrosis and the underlying mechanism in mice. Thirty-two male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 8 in each group), injected with carbon tetrachloride (10% CCl4) for 8 weeks, and oral administrated with mangiferin (50 mg/kg or 100 mg/kg) from the fifth week. The serum levels of ALT, AST were analyzed to evaluate liver function. H&E, Masson’s trichrome and Sirius red staining were used to assess liver morphology and the degree of liver fibrosis. Quantitative RT-PCR and Western blot were used to assay the gene expression and protein levels. The results showed that mangiferin alleviated the serum levels of AST, ALT, ALP, TBA and TBIL, reduced liver lesions, prevented hepatic parenchymal necrosis, and ameliorated collagen accumulation in the liver of CCl4-treated mice. Meanwhile, mangiferin inhibited the expression of inflammatory genes IL-6 and IL-1β, fibrogenic genes α-SMA, TGF-β and MMP-2 and bile acid metabolism genes ABCB4, ABCB11, SULT2A1 in the liver of CCl4-treated mice. Furthermore, mangiferin reduced collagen accumulation and HSCs activation, inhibited the p-IκB and p-p65 protein levels. Our results suggest that mangiferin could alleviate liver fibrosis in CCl4-treated mice through inhibiting NF-κB signaling, and mango consuming may have beneficial effects to hepatic fibrosis.
Subject terms: Drug discovery, Health care, Medical research
Introduction
Fibrosis is a pathological condition caused by an abnormal process of tissue regeneration in response to chronic injury, which leads to continuous activation of fibroblasts and permanent tissue damage1,2. Liver fibrosis is an important global health problem, characterized by the excessive deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) and the structural disorder of the liver3, which eventually leads to the end stage of liver diseases such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. There are many causes for liver fibrosis, such as viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver, fatty liver disease and autoimmune diseases and so on. Among the activated fibrous cells, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) play the most important role in the development of hepatic fibrosis4, which could transform into proliferative and contractile myofibroblast-like cells, one of the sources of the accumulation of ECM5. In addition, hepatocytes, portal fibroblasts, and bone marrow derived myofibroblasts precursors are the source of ECM6. At present, the therapeutic intervention of liver fibrosis involves in preventing the stimulus or harmful cause, inhibiting hepatic inflammation, interfering in the activation of stellate cells and promoting the deterioration of extracellular matrix7.
In animals, various causes of fibrogenesis have been studied, but the main hepatic fibrosis model is based on repeated application of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) over a period of several weeks8. CCl4 is a hepatotoxin that causes lobular central hepatic necrosis, proinflammatory and profibrotic cytokine release, and the metabolic activation in the liver9, consequently, results in liver fibrosis and even cirrhosis after long-term exposure.
Mangiferin (1, 3, 6, 7-tetrahydroxyxanthone-C2-β-D-glucoside), a naturally occurred C-glucosyl xanthone, is primarily isolated from mango (Anacardiaceae), and exists in at least 16 plant families, including Iridaceae and Gentianaceae10. It has been reported that mangiferin has strong antioxidant11 and anti-inflammatory12 effects and may exert beneficial properties to acute inflammation of the organs such as lung13, kidney14 and cardiovascular system. Moreover, it has also been reported that mangiferin has a wide range of pharmacological roles, including immunomodulatory15, anticancer16, antibacterial, antiviral and neuroprotective17 effects. The emerging evidence has shown that mangiferin could alleviate organ fibrosis18, including renal fibrosis19,20, myocardial fibrosis21, pulmonary fibrosis22 via restraining myofibroblast activation, anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory functions. Furthermore, Hou et al. found that oral administration of mangiferin to adults did not cause significant side effects, suggesting that there is no toxicity to human23. Therefore, mangiferin has been shown as potential candidate for anti-fibrosis agent. In the present study, we investigate whether mangiferin has a therapeutic effect in CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis in mice.
Results
Mangiferin attenuates CCl4 induced liver fibrosis in mice
The administration of CCl4 is known to induce toxicity in the liver by producing highly reactive metabolites, resulting in severe damage to liver cells and subsequently developing into fibrosis24. In order to determine whether mangiferin could relieve liver injury, mice were intraperitoneally injected with 10% CCl4 for 8 weeks, and mangiferin was given intragastrically every day from the fifth week (Fig. 1A). At the end of the experiment, the liver/body weights were calculated, and the levels of AST, ALT, ALP, TBA and TBIL were measured. We found that mangiferin reduced the liver/body weight rational increased by CCl4, but did not changed body weight (Fig. 1B,C). The levels of serum ALP, ALT and AST, important markers reflecting liver function25, were increased in CCl4-treated group compared to those of CCl4-untreated group, indicating the liver function was impaired by the CCl4 administration. Mangiferin treatment significantly reduced the ALT, AST and ALP level both in low and high dose mangiferin treated groups (Fig. 1D–F). The levels of serum TBA and TBIL, representing the accumulation of bile acids in liver fibrosis, were all increased in CCl4-treated group. Mangiferin treatment also significantly attenuated TBA and TBIL content between CCl4-treated group and mangiferin-treated group (Fig. 1G–H). These data suggest that mangiferin could alleviate liver injury and improve liver function caused by the administration of CCl4.
Mangifein alleviates liver pathological damages and fibrosis scores in CCl4 treated mice
Next, we investigated whether mangiferin could relieve liver fibrosis and protect the liver damage from CCl4 toxicity. H&E, Masson’s trichrome and Sirius red staining were used to analyze histology and collagen deposit in the liver section. As shown in Fig. 2A, the livers of control group mice had normal lobular structure with central vein and radial hepatic cord, however, there was necrosis in the center of the hepatic lobules, deposition of lipid droplets in hepatocytes, inflammatory cell infiltration, and lipid degeneration in CCl4-treated group following the administration of CCl4 for 8 weeks, whereas mangiferin treatment inhibited these pathological changes, as showed by the decrease in hepatocytes degeneration, inflammatory cell accumulation and lipid deposition, indicating that mangiferin may relieve hepatic steatosis in CCl4 induced mice (Fig. 2D). Masson's trichrome staining revealed that the administration of CCl4 resulted in connective tissue proliferation, notably structure distorted and fibrous collagen deposition between the portal vein and lobules in the liver of the mice compared with the control group, suggesting that liver fibrosis was established (Fig. 2B). On the contrary, mangiferin treatment significantly decreased collagen fiber accumulation, suggesting that mangiferin has protective effect on hepatic fibrosis (Fig. 2E). In Sirius red staining, we found collagen accumulated obviously in the liver of CCl4-treated mice, and mangifeirn reversed those changes (Fig. 2C). Taken together, these data indicate that mangiferin could attenuate liver fibrosis and improve liver function in CCl4 treated mice.
Mangiferin regulates the mRNA expression of inflammation, bile acid metabolism and fibrotic genes
Mangiferin could play anti-fibrosis roles through NF-κB, Smad/TGF-β signaling pathways, which is related to the anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties26. To investigate the molecular mechanisms regarding the mangiferin protecting against CCl4 induced liver fibrosis, we measured the mRNA expression of proinflammatory cytokines, bile acid metabolism and profibrotic related genes by quantitative RT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 3A, the expression of α-SMA, a marker of hepatic stem cell activation, MMP-2 and TGF-β, the fibrogenesis related genes, were increased in CCl4-treated group, whereas these genes were significantly decreased with the treatment of mangiferin. In contrast, there was no significant different in the mRNA expression of COL1A1, COL3A1, PDGF and TIMP-2. The data indicated that mangiferin may inhibit CCl4 induced fibrogenesis via the suppression of the expression of α-SMA, MMP-2 and TGF-β in the liver. The expression of proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-1β were increased in the liver of CCl4-treated mice, while these were decreased by mangiferin treatment, however, the expression level of TNF-α and MCP-1 were not significantly changed between the groups, indicating that mangiferin may inhibit inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-1β induced by CCl4 (Fig. 3B). CCl4-treatment inhibited the mRNA level of ABCB4, ABCB11, SULT2A1, NTCP and CY7A1, the bile acid metabolism related genes, in the liver of the mice. Compared with that in the CCl4-treated mice, the expression of ABCB4, ABCB11, SULT2A1 was increased in mangiferin treated group (Fig. 3C), although NTCP and CY7A1 remained unchanged. The data indicate that the suppression of the expression of bile acid metabolism and proinflammatory related genes may also involve in the liver protective effects of mangiferin. These findings collectively demonstrated that mangiferin may relieve liver fibrosis through regulating proinflammatory cytokines, bile acid metabolism and pro-fibrotic related pathways.
Mangiferin reduces collagen accumulation, HSCs activation and inhibits NF-κB signaling
IHC experiments showed that α-SMA levels were markedly increased in CCl4 treated mice compared to those in the control group, while mangiferin treatment repressed α-SMA levels (Fig. 4A). Next, western blot was used to verify the protein levels of COL1 and α-SMA. As shown in Fig. 4B and C, CCl4 administration upregulated COL1 and α-SMA protein expression, mangiferin decreased the protein contents of COL1 and α-SMA induced by CCl4, suggesting that mangiferin may alleviate the formation of fibrosis through the reduction of collagen accumulation and hepatic stem cell activation. Furthermore, we determined the p-IκB, p-p65 protein levels, and found that mangiferin inhibited the p-IκB protein contents (Fig. 4D,E). Meanwhile, it also inhibited p-p65 levels (Fig. 4F). Taken together, the data indicate that mangiferin may improve the liver fibrosis through inhibiting NF-κB signaling.
Discussion
CCl4-induced liver fibrosis animals have been widely used as a model to simulate the pathogenesis of human liver fibrosis27. The current study demonstrated that mangiferin treatment had beneficial effects on liver fibrosis induced by CCl4. Mangiferin administration reduced CCl4-induced inflammatory cell infiltration and the release of pro-inflammatory factors, inhibited CCl4-induced NF-κB pathway activation in mice.
Overabundance of ECM deposition in the liver tissue and the activation of HSCs are the key factors involved in the formation of fibrosis and pro-fibrotic cytokines28,29. Previous reports have shown that mangiferin could improve renal, pulmonary, myocardial fibrosis by inhibiting the collagen deposition and the ECM aggregation in the lung, kidney and heart tissues19–22. In this study, we found that mangiferin reduced collagen accumulation and inhibited the mRNA and protein levels of α-SMA, the marker of the HSC activation. In addition, mangiferin also inhibited the protein level of COL1 and the mRNA levels of TGF-β, the key factor involved in the formation of fibrosis and pro-fibrotic cytokines. These data indicate that mangiferin may suppress fibrogenesis in the liver via the activation of HSCs.
Liver cell injury accounts for increasing inflammatory cell infiltration and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which is a major inducer of liver fibrosis. By measuring the levels of ALT and AST, the liver injury markers, we found that mangiferin reduced CCl4-induced liver injury. The bile acid metabolism disorder usually accompanies the liver injury. Thus, we tested the expression of bile acid metabolism related genes. We found that mangiferin could reduce the bile acids accumulation in CCl4-induced mice, supporting that mangiferin may improve the liver injury induced by CCl4. Previous studies have shown that mangiferin has anti-inflammatory effects in the lung and kidney fibrosis animals19,22. The present study found that mangiferin alleviated inflammatory cell infiltration, and inhibited the expression of pro-inflammatory factors IL-6 and IL-1β in the liver of CCl4-induced mouse model. Considering these cytokines are the inducers of pro-fibrotic pathogenesis, we speculate that mangiferin may inhibit the hepatic fibrogenesis partly through the suppression of inflammatory signaling.
We further explored the underlying mechanism of mangiferin anti-inflammatory effect in liver fibrosis. It has been demonstrated that NF-κB is an important regulator in the series of inflammatory response and linked to the regulation of liver injury, liver fibrosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and other diseases30. Inhibition of NF-κB signaling could ameliorate liver fibrosis31. Previous studies have reported that mangiferin ameliorated renal and pulmonary inflammation by inhibiting NF-κB pathway20,32, and mangiferin-riched mango peel powder supplementation inhibited fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration in the liver of CCl4-induced hepatic fibrotic rats33. In this study, we showed that mangiferin reduced the p-IκB and p-p65 protein levels in the liver of CCl4-induced mice. Thus, the alleviating effect of mangifeirn on CCl4-induced liver fibrosis may via downregulating NF-κB signaling pathway.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we showed that mangiferin could alleviate liver injury and inflammation, suppress the accumulation of collagen, regulate the mRNA levels of bile acid metabolism and pro-fibrotic genes in the liver of CCl4 induced mice, furthermore, mangiferin also inhibit the protein levels in NF-κB pathway. Our data suggest that mangiferin may exert anti-fibrosis effect through inhibiting NF-κB pathway and may be a potential choice for the treatment of hepatic fibrosis.
Materials and methods
Materials
Mangiferin was obtained from ALFA (Chengdu, China). Carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) was purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China).
Animals and treatments
The procedures for this study were approved by Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (PZSHUTCM190912014). All animal experiments in this study were conducted in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals34. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The thirty-two male C57BL/6 mice (Six-week-old), weighing 23–29 g, were purchased from the SLAC Laboratory (Shanghai, China). All mice were housed under the controlled temperature (22–23 °C) and on a 12 h light and 12 h dark cycle with food and water ad libitum. All animals were adapted to their new housing conditions for one week before the experiments.
The mice were randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 8 in each group) as follows: control group, CCl4-treated model group, high and low dose (50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg) of mangiferin co-treated group. Diagram of this research showed in Fig. 1A. CCl4-treated mice were injected intraperitoneally with 10% CCl4 (2 ml/kg of body weight) diluted in olive oil every other day for 8 weeks. From the 5th week, the mice were orally administered with mangiferin or same volume of vehicle for 4 weeks. At the end of the animals experiment, mice were fasted overnight. Using 20% urethane anesthetized mice and collected cardiac blood and liver tissue.
Serum biochemical
After anesthetizing, the vascular blood was taken from the heart, and the supernatant was collected after 3000 rpm centrifugation for 15 min at the room temperature and stored at − 80 °C for further experimental analysis. The serum levels of ALT, AST, TBA, ALP and TBIL were measured by an automatic biochemical analyzer (Hitachi 7020, Japan).
Liver histology
The liver tissues were fixed in 4% formalin solution, embedded in paraffin, cut at 5 µm and stained with haematoxylin–eosin (HE), Masson trichrome and Sirius red staining according to standard procedures. The morphology was observed with a microscope (Zeiss, Germany). The degree of fibrosis was graded by METAVIR scoring system35.
Immunohistochemistry analysis
For α-SMA staining, paraffin-embedded sections were incubated with goat α-SMA polyclonal antibody (cat. no. ab5694, Lot: GR3183259-37Abcam, Cambridge, MA) overnight at 4 °C after antigen removal using sodium citrate repair solution. All slides were then incubated with goat anti-rabbit HRP secondary antibody (mp-7,452, Vector, Burlingame, CA) for 30 min at room temperature. Slides were incubated with DAB for 2 min, counterstained with hematoxylin for 2 min, and counterstained with blue reagent for 10 s.
RNA extraction and RT-qPCR analysis
Real-time quantitative PCR was performed as previously described36. Briefly, Total RNA was extracted from the liver tissues using the Trizol reagent (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RT-qPCR was first performed using a cDNA kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) with 1 μg of total RNA as the template to synthesize cDNA under the following conditions: 42 °C for 2 min, 50 °C for 15 min, and 85 °C for 5 s. Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out using ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) on an ABI StepOne Plus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA). β-actin was used as the internal reference for the expression level of mRNA of all genes. Statistical analysis was carried out by using 2−∆∆Ct method. The sequences of all primers were listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Gene | Forward primer | Reverse primer |
---|---|---|
β-Actin | TGTCCACCTTCCAGCAGATGT | AGCTCAGTAACAGTCCGCCTAGA |
ABCB4 | CGGCGACTTTGAACTAGGCA | CAGAGTATCGAACAGTGTCAAC |
ABCB11 | CGGACCTGTATTGTCATTGC | CCCTTCTGGTCCATCAGTTT |
COL1A1 | CAAGGTCACGGTCACGAA | TGGCAAAGACGGACTCAA |
COL3A1 | GTAGTCTCATTGCCTTGC | TCCAGAACATTACATACC |
CYP7A1 | GTGGTAGTGAGCTGTTGCATATGG | CACAGCCCAGGTATGGAATCA |
IL-1β | TCGTGCTGTCGGACCCATAT | GGTTCTCCTTGTACAAAGCTCATG |
IL-6 | AACCACGGGCTTCCCTACTT | TCTGTTGGGAGTGGTATCCTCTGT |
MCP-1 | AGGTCCCTGTCATGCTTC | GTGCTTGAGGTGGTTGTG |
MMP2 | CTGTCCGCCAAATAAACC | CCCCGATGCTGATACTGA |
NTCP | TATCAGCCCCCTTCAATTTC | GTGAGCCTTGATCTTGCTGA |
PDGF | TTCCTGTCTCCTCCTCCC | TAACACCAGCAGCGTCAA |
SHP | GGAGTCTTTCTGGAGCCTTG | ATCTGGGTTGAAGAGGATCG |
α-SMA | TCGGATACTTCAGCGTCA | GGGAGTAATGGTTGGAATG |
SULT2A1 | GAACTGGCTGATTGAGAT | AGGTTAGAGTCGTGGTC |
TGF-β | GGGAGTAATGGTTGGAATG | GGGAGTAATGGTTGGAATG |
TIMP2 | TGACCCAGTCCATCCAGAG | CACGCTTAGCATCACCCA |
TNF-α | ATGGATCTCAAAGACAACCAACTAG | ACGGCAGAGAGGAGGTTGACTT |
Protein extraction and Western Blot analysis
The protein was extracted from the liver tissues using RIPA buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) containing protease inhibitor, phosphatase inhibitor and Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). 30 μg proteins were separated using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide (SDS-PAGE) gel, and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. Blocked in 5% BSA for 2 h at the room temperature, and incubated in primary antibody for α-SMA (cat. no. ab5694, Lot: GR3183259-37, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), COL1 (cat. no. ab34710, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), IκB α (cat. no. 4814; Cell Signaling Technology), p-IκB α (cat. no. 2859; Cell Signaling Technology), p65 (cat. no. 8242; Cell Signaling Technology), p-p65 (cat. no. 3033; Cell Signaling Technology), GAPDH and β-Actin (Huabio, Hangzhou, China), with 1:1000 dilution in 3% BSA at 4 °C overnight. Then, the membranes were washed three times with TBST each 10 min, and the membranes were incubated in the secondary antibody at room temperature for 2 h. The blots were visualized using ECL chemiluminescence kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). GAPDH was used as loading control and Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used for densitometric analysis of the bands.
Statistics analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism V.7.00 (La Jolla, CA, USA). All date were presented as means ± standard error of the mean (S.E.M). Comparisons were carried out via One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s tests. Differences were considered statistically significant when p was < 0.05.
Supplementary Information
Abbreviations
- ABCB
ATP binding cassette subfamily B member
- ALP
Alkaline phosphatase
- ALT
Alanine aminotransferase
- AST
Aspartate transaminase
- a-SMA
Alpha smooth muscle actin
- CCl4
Carbon tetrachloride
- Col3A1
Alpha 1 chain of type III collagen
- Col1A1
Collagen type I alpha 1
- CYP
Cytochrome 450
- CYP7A1
Cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase
- ECM
Extracellular matrix
- HSC
Hepatic stellate cell
- IL
Interleukin
- MAPK
Mitogen activated protein kinase
- MCP-1
Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1
- MMP
Matrix metalloproteinase
- NLRP3
NOD-like receptor family: pyrin domain: containing 3
- Nrf-2
Nuclear factor-E2-related factor 2
- NTCP
Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide
- PDGF
Platelet derived growth factor
- PMSF
Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
- SHP
Small heterodimer partner
- SULT2A1
Hydroxysteroid sulfotransferase
- TBA
Total bile acid
- TBIL
Total bilirubin
- TGF-β
Transforming growth factor-β
- TIMP-2
Tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase
- TNF-α
Tumor necrosis factor-α
Author contributions
C.H., S.J.F. and L.J.Z. designed the research; L.J.Z., C.H.L, and L.F.Y. performed the experiments and L.J.Z. analyzed the data. L.J.Z., C.H. and S.J.F. wrote the manuscript.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Cheng Huang, Email: chuang@shutcm.edu.cn.
Shengjie Fan, Email: shengjiefan@shutcm.edu.cn.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-023-30582-3.
References
- 1.Schuppan D, Kim YO. Evolving therapies for liver fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2013;123:1887–1901. doi: 10.1172/JCI66028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mora AL, Rojas M, Pardo A, Selman M. Emerging therapies for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a progressive age-related disease. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2017;16:810. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cordero-Espinoza L, Huch M. The balancing act of the liver: Tissue regeneration versus fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2018;128:85–96. doi: 10.1172/JCI93562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mao Y, et al. Ghrelin attenuates liver fibrosis through regulation of TGF-beta1 expression and autophagy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015;16:21911–21930. doi: 10.3390/ijms160921911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mannaerts I, et al. Gene expression profiling of early hepatic stellate cell activation reveals a role for Igfbp3 in cell migration. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e84071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kumar V, Mahato RI. Delivery and targeting of miRNAs for treating liver fibrosis. Pharm. Res. 2015;32:341–361. doi: 10.1007/s11095-014-1497-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Altamirano-Barrera A, Barranco-Fragoso B, Mendez-Sanchez N. Management strategies for liver fibrosis. Ann. Hepatol. 2017;16:48–56. doi: 10.5604/16652681.1226814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chang ML, Yeh CT, Chang PY, Chen JC. Comparison of murine cirrhosis models induced by hepatotoxin administration and common bile duct ligation. World J. Gastroenterol. 2005;11:4167–4172. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i27.4167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weber LW, Boll M, Stampfl A. Hepatotoxicity and mechanism of action of haloalkanes: Carbon tetrachloride as a toxicological model. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2003;33:105–136. doi: 10.1080/713611034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sanugul K, et al. Isolation of a human intestinal bacterium that transforms mangiferin to norathyriol and inducibility of the enzyme that cleaves a C-glucosyl bond. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2005;28:1672–1678. doi: 10.1248/bpb.28.1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dar A, et al. Analgesic and antioxidant activity of mangiferin and its derivatives: The structure activity relationship. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2005;28:596–600. doi: 10.1248/bpb.28.596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Saha S, Sadhukhan P, Sil PC. Mangiferin: A xanthonoid with multipotent anti-inflammatory potential. BioFactors. 2016;42:459–474. doi: 10.1002/biof.1292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mahalanobish S, Saha S, Dutta S, Sil PC. Mangiferin alleviates arsenic induced oxidative lung injury via upregulation of the Nrf2-HO1 axis. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019;126:41–55. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sadhukhan P, Saha S, Dutta S, Sil PC. Mangiferin ameliorates cisplatin induced acute kidney injury by upregulating Nrf-2 via the activation of PI3K and exhibits synergistic anticancer activity with cisplatin. Front. Pharmacol. 2018;9:638. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Makare N, Bodhankar S, Rangari V. Immunomodulatory activity of alcoholic extract of Mangifera indica L. in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2001;78:133–137. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(01)00326-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Miura T, et al. Antidiabetic activity of a xanthone compound, mangiferin. Phytomedicine. 2001;8:85–87. doi: 10.1078/0944-7113-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Biradar SM, Joshi H, Chheda TK. Neuropharmacological effect of Mangiferin on brain cholinesterase and brain biogenic amines in the management of Alzheimer's disease. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2012;683:140–147. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.02.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang L, Huang C, Fan S. Mangiferin and organ fibrosis: A mini review. BioFactors. 2020 doi: 10.1002/biof.1693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Song Y, et al. Mangiferin alleviates renal interstitial fibrosis in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice through regulating the PTEN/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. J. Diabetes Res. 2020;2020:9481720. doi: 10.1155/2020/9481720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pal PB, Sinha K, Sil PC. Mangiferin attenuates diabetic nephropathy by inhibiting oxidative stress mediated signaling cascade, TNFα related and mitochondrial dependent apoptotic pathways in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e107220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Song J, et al. Mangiferin activates Nrf2 to attenuate cardiac fibrosis via redistributing glutaminolysis-derived glutamate. Pharmacol. Res. 2020;157:104845. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jia L, et al. Mangiferin attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice through inhibiting TLR4/p65 and TGF-beta1/Smad2/3 pathway. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2019;71:1017–1028. doi: 10.1111/jphp.13077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hou S, et al. Pharmacokinetic study of mangiferin in human plasma after oral administration. Food Chem. 2012;132:289–294. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.10.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu C, et al. Kupffer cells are associated with apoptosis, inflammation and fibrotic effects in hepatic fibrosis in rats. Lab. Invest. 2010;90:1805–1816. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2010.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kubes P, Jenne C. Immune responses in the liver. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2018;36:247–277. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-051116-052415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nunez Selles AJ, Daglia M, Rastrelli L. The potential role of mangiferin in cancer treatment through its immunomodulatory, anti-angiogenic, apoptopic, and gene regulatory effects. BioFactors. 2016;42:475–491. doi: 10.1002/biof.1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Forbes SJ, Newsome PN. Liver regeneration–mechanisms and models to clinical application. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016;13:473–485. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yin C, Evason KJ, Asahina K, Stainier DY. Hepatic stellate cells in liver development, regeneration, and cancer. J. Clin. Investig. 2013;123:1902–1910. doi: 10.1172/jci66369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Parola M, Pinzani M. Liver fibrosis: Pathophysiology, pathogenetic targets and clinical issues. Mol. Aspects Med. 2019;65:37–55. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2018.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Luedde T, Schwabe RF. NF-κB in the liver–linking injury, fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011;8:108–118. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tu S, et al. Fluorofenidone protects liver against inflammation and fibrosis by blocking the activation of NF-κB pathway. FASEB J. Off. Pub. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2021;35:e21497. doi: 10.1096/fj.202002402R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Impellizzeri D, et al. Protective effect of polyphenols in an inflammatory process associated with experimental pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Br. J. Nutr. 2015;114:853–865. doi: 10.1017/s0007114515002597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ulla A, et al. Mango peel powder supplementation prevents oxidative stress, inflammation, and fibrosis in carbon tetrachloride induced hepatic dysfunction in rats. J. Food Biochem. 2017 doi: 10.1111/jfbc.12344. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.McGrath JC, Lilley E. Implementing guidelines on reporting research using animals (ARRIVE etc.): New requirements for publication in BJP. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2015;172:3189–3193. doi: 10.1111/bph.12955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Arjmand A, et al. Quantification of liver fibrosis–a comparative study. Appl. Sci. 2020 doi: 10.3390/app10020447. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fan S, et al. Extract of Kuding tea prevents high-fat diet-induced metabolic disorders in C57BL/6 mice via liver X receptor (LXR) beta antagonism. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e51007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.