Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 24;3:936752. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2022.936752

Table 3.

Characteristics of included studies.

Authors Year Diabetes Type Study Participants Study Quality
App (Intervention) Control Intervention (n) Control (n) Age (years, mean % and SD) Gender (%) Duration of Diabetes (years, mean % and SD) Ethnic Groups (ethnic group, mean %)
Valentiner et al. (28) 2019 Type 2 InterWalk Smartphone App with additional support InterWalk Smartphone App without additional support 18 19 Experiment; 66.7 ± 7.3
Control; 65.1 ± 6.4
Experiment; Male = 64.9
Control; Male = 70.3
N/A N/A Low
Heisler et al. (29) 2019 Type 2 Peer Coaching with eHealth educational tool (iDecide) Peer Coaching alone 146 144 Experiment; 64.3 ± 9.7
Control; 62.1 ± 10.5
Experiment; Male = 96.6
Control; Male = 98.6
Experiment; 15.0 ± 10.2
Control; 15.3 ± 9.9
Experiment; African American = 63.4, White = 36.6
Control; African American = 61.8, White = 36.8 Other = 1.4%
Low
Wang et al. (30) 2019 Type 2 Continuous care for patients with type 2 diabetes using mobile health application Traditional discharge nursing 60 60 Experiment; 45.1 ± 7.8
Control; 45.8 ± 8.3
Experiment; Male = 55.0
Control; Male = 51.6
N/A N/A Acceptable
Skrøvseth et al. (31) 2015 Type 1 Diabetes Diary (DD) Smartphone App Usual Care 15 15 Experiment; 41.08 ± 13.5
Control; 38.33 +- 7.3
Experiment; Male = 33.33
Control; Male = 40.00
N/A N/A Low
Kooiman et al. (32) 2018 Type 2 Fitbit Zip and Online Lifestyle Programme Usual care 40 32 Experiment; 56.8 ± 11.4
Control; 55.8 ± 11.4
N/A Experiment; 15.5 ± 7.7
Control; 14.9 ± 5.3
N/A Low
Yu et al. (33) 2019 Type 2 Smartphone App: Diabetes-Carer combined with Self-monitoring Blood Glucose No Intervention 45 47 Experiment; 50.3 ± 10.4
Control; 56.2 ± 8.4
Experiment; Male = 66.0
Control; Male = 61.7
N/A N/A Low
Hansel et al. (34) 2017 Type 2 Patient E-Coaching Nutritional Support Usual Care 60 60 Experiment; 57.6 ± 8.1
Control; 55.5 ± 10.3
Experiment; Male = 33.3
Control; Male = 33.3
N/A N/A Acceptable
Klee et al. (35) 2018 Type 1 Webdia Smartphone App Usual Care 28 27 Experiment; 13.6 ± 2.4
Control; 13.7 ± 2.4
Experiment; Male = 75%
Control; Male = 37%
Experiment; 7.5 ± 4
Control; 5.5 ± 3.25
N/A Low
Agarwal et al. (36) 2019 Type 2 BlueStar Mobile App for Self-management Usual Care 72 67 Experiment; 51.5 ± 10.6
Control; 52.1 ± 10.7
Experiment; Male = 55.0
Control; Male = 49.0
N/A Experiment; Caucasian = 41.8. Non-Caucasian = 58.2
Control; Caucasian = 44.3, non-Caucasian = 53.0
Low
Sun et al. (37) 2019 Type 2 Smartphone App for Self-management for Older People Usual Care 44 47 Experiment; 67.9 (66-71)
Control; 68.04 (66-72)
Experiment; Male = 43.0
Control; Male = 38.0
Experiment; 11.19 ± 6.39
Control; 11.52 ± 7.73
N/A Low
Kim et al. (38) 2019 Type 2 mDiabetes Smartphone App for Self-management Paper Version 90 82 Experiment; 60.0 ± 8.4
Control; 56.7 ± 9.1
Experiment; Male = 55.60
Control; Male = 47.60
Experiment; 13.2 ± 8.0
Control; 12.5 ± 7.3
N/A Low
Gunawardena et al. (39) 2019 Type 2 Smart Glucose Manager (SGM) Smartphone App Usual Care 27 25 Experiment; 52 ± 12
Control; 53 ± 11
Experiment; Male = 63.0
Control; Male = 57.0
Experiment; 11 ± 6
Control; 11 ± 7
N/A Acceptable
Kerfoot et al. (40) 2017 Type 2 Team Based Online Game for Veterans with T2DM Offline civics game 277 229 Experiment; 59.62 ± 10.3
Control; 59.9 ± 9.4
Experiment; Male = 94.7
Control; Male = 93.0
N/A N/A High
Frias et al. (41) 2017 Type 2 Digital medicine offering (DMO) wearable sensor patches and a mobile device app Usual Care 80 29 Experiment; 57.8 ± (SE) 1.1
Control; 61.6 ± (SE) 1.7
Experiment; Male = 44.0
Control; Male = 65.0
N/A Experiment; Caucasian = 66.0, non-Caucasian = 44.0
Control; Caucasian = 66.0, non-Caucasian = 44.0
Low
Kleinman et al. (42) 2017 Type 2 Gather Health Smartphone App to Improve Medication Adherence and Frequency of Blood Glucose Self-Testing Usual Care 44 46 Experiment; 48.8 ± 9.0
Control; 48.0 ± 9.5
Experiment; Male = 81.8
Control; Male = 58.7
Experiment; 10.0 (5-16)
Control; 8.5 (4-14)
N/A Acceptable
Quinn et al. (43) 2016 Type 2 Web Portal to manage T2DM Usual Care 62 56 1) Age <55 Experiment; 47.3 ± 6.8
Age <55 Control; 47.4 ± 7.5
2) Age >55Experiment; 59.0 ± 2.9
Age >55 Control; 59.5 ± 2.8
1) Age <55 Experiment Male; 37.8
Age <55 Control Male; 62.1
2) Age >55Experiment Male; 68.0
Age >55 Control Male; 37.0
1) Age <55 Experiment; 6.8 ± 4.5
Age <55 Control; 8.9 ± 7.5
2) Age >55Experiment; 10.3 ± 5.8
Age >55 Control; 9.2 ± 6.0
1) Experiment Age <55; Black = 32.4, White = 54.1, Other = 13.5
Control Age <55; Black = 55.2, White = 37.9, Other = 6.9
2) Experiment Age >55; Black = 20.0, White = 76.0, Other = 4.0
Control Age >55; Black = 40.7, White = 55.6, Other = 3.7
Low
Crowley et al. (44) 2016 Type 2 Advanced Comprehensive Diabetes Care (ACDC) (telemonitoring) Usual Care 23 23 Experiment; 60 ± 8.4
Control; 60 ± 9.2
Experiment; Male = 100
Control; Male = 92
Experiment; Median (IQR) 12 ± 13
Control; Median (IQR) 12 ± 9
Experiment; White = 52.0, African American = 48.0, Other = 0.0
Control; White = 32.0, African American = 60.0, Other = 8
Low
Kardas et al. (45) 2016 Type 2 COMODITY12 mHealth System Usual Care 30 30 Experiment; 59.9 ± 5.31
Control; 59.0 ± 8.09
Experiment; Male = 57
Control; Male = 63
N/A N/A Low
Fukuoka et al. (46) 2015 Type 2 Mobile Phone–Based Diabetes Prevention Program (mDPP) App with Omron Pedometer Omron Pedometer only 31 30 Experiment; 57.1 ± 9.1 (36–76)
Control; 53.4 ± 8.7 (36–65)
Experiment; Male = 22.6
Control; Male = 23.3
N/A Experiment: Asian = 33.4, Hispanic/Latino = 13.3, White =43.3, More than 1 race = 10.0
Control; Asian = 12.9, African American = 9.7, Hispanic/Latino = 9.7,
White = 61.3, More than 1 race = 6.4
Acceptable
Block et al. (47) 2015 Prediabetes Alive-PD Smartphone App and Email Support Usual Care 163 176 Experiment; 55.0 ± 8.8
Control; 54.9 ± 9.1
Experiment; Male = 68.1
Control; Male = 69.3
N/A Experiment; White = 66.9, Hispanic = 4.3, Asian = 25.2, Other = 3.7
Control; White = 68.2, Hispanic = 8.0, Asian = 16.5, Other = 7.4
High
Wayne et al. (48) 2015 Type 2 Connected Wellness Platform from NexJ Systems, Inc. Usual Care 48 49 Experiment; 53.1 ± 10.9
Control; 53.3 ± 11.9
Experiment; Male = 35
Control; Male = 20
N/A N/A Acceptable
Shahid et al. (49) 2015 Type 2 Smartphone Intervention (App not specified) Usual Care 220 220 Experiment; 48.95 ± 8.83
Control; 49.21 ± 7.92
Experiment; Male = 61.4
Control; Male = 61.4
N/A N/A Low
Greenwood et al. (50) 2015 Type 2 Care Innovations Health Suite online portal (Intel-GE Care Innovations, Roseville, CA, USA) Usual Care 45 45 Experiment; 53.9 ± 10.4
Control; 57.5 ± 10.6
Experiment; Male = 75
Control; Male = 79
Experiment; 8.3 ± 5.5
Control; 8.1 ± 5.3
Experiment; White = 33, Hispanic = 7, Black/African American = 1, American Indian = 2, Asian/Pacific Islander = 3, Other = 2
Control; White = 31, Hispanic = 9, Black/African American = 2, American Indian = 1. Asian/Pacific Islander = 5. Other = 1
Acceptable
Drion et al. (51) 2015 Type 1 Diabetes Under Control (DBEES) Usual Care 31 32 Experiment; 33 ± 23
Control; 35 ± 18
Experiment; Male = 65
Control; Male = 61
Experiment; 18 ± 17
Control; 15 ± 14
N/A Low
Kirwan et al. (52) 2013 Type 1 Glucose Buddy Smartphone App Usual Care 36 36 Experiment; 35.97 ± 10.67
Control; 34.42 ± 10.26
Experiment; Male = 52
Control; Male = 25
Experiment; 19.69 ± 9.64
Control; 18.19 ± 9.77
N/A Low