Table 1.
Motivating need | Intervention design and implementation | |
---|---|---|
Problem to be addressed | Core functions (standardized) | Forms (tailored) |
1. Identify caregivers in distress who might benefit most from Bright IDEAS Mothers/caregivers of children with cancer experience significant distress associated with their children's diagnosis and treatment. |
A.Target ideal candidates for intervention B.Offer psychosocial support to mothers/caregivers of children newly diagnosed with cancer | Case studies and role-play |
2. Desire for evidence-based interventions to improve quality of clinical care Psychosocial care for mothers/caregivers is not consistently driven by scientific evidence or supported by local institutions |
A.Provide synchronous skill-building training guided by evidence-based methods used in the demonstration of Bright IDEAS | Amount and type of pre-training reading, e.g., peer-reviewed journal articles |
3. Bright IDEAS is a new intervention for most practitioners New psychosocial skills need to be integrated into the clinical workflow |
A.Provide training and case mentorship to help providers learn the intervention within a team-based care approach | Training videos and practice working through an in-person challenge |
4. Implementation of new clinical interventions is a combination of individual provider and institutional adoption Lack of institutional support and post-training participation reduces the likelihood of sustained individual adoption |
Create training agreements regarding institutional support | Letter of supervisor support required for attendance (participant expectations outlined in letter). In pediatric oncology, psychosocial practitioners can independently adopt evidence-based interventions. Institutional support meant that there was visible buy-in to support their adoption of this new intervention. The letter signaled an intention-to-adopt expectation associated with the training vs. a continuing-education mindset so they could get a free trip to a conference. |