Table 6.
Acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of physical activity on prescription.
| Statement | N (missing) | Agree n (%) | Neutral n (%) | Disagree n (%) | Mediana (IQR) | Mean (SD)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptability | ||||||
| PAP meets my approval | 125 | 107 (85.6) | 17 (13.6) | 1 (0.8) | 5 (5–5) | 4.36 (0.75) |
| PAP is appealing to me | 124 (1) | 107 (85.6) | 16 (12.8) | 1 (0.8) | 4.5 (4.5–5) | 4.35 (0.74) |
| I like PAP | 125 | 105 (84.0) | 18 (14.4) | 2 (1.6) | 4 (4–5) | 4,31 (0.78) |
| I welcome PAP | 124 (1) | 104 (83.2) | 18 (14.4) | 2 (1.6) | 5 (5–5) | 4.35 (0.79) |
| Appropriateness | ||||||
| PAP seems fitting | 123 (2) | 102 (81.6) | 16 (12.8) | 5 (4.0) | 5 (5–5) | 4.24 (0.90) |
| PAP seems suitable | 123 (2) | 104 (83.2) | 15 (12.0) | 4 (3.2) | 4 (4–5) | 4.32 (0.81) |
| PAP seems applicable | 121 (4) | 100 (80.0) | 19 (15.2) | 2 (1.6) | 5 (5–5) | 4.25 (0.78) |
| PAP seems like a good match | 117 (8) | 98 (78.4) | 12 (9.6) | 7 (5.6) | 4 (4–5) | 4.24 (0.87) |
| Feasibility | ||||||
| PAP seems implementable | 118 (7) | 98 (78.4) | 16 (12.8) | 4 (3.2) | 4 (4–5) | 4.23 (0.81) |
| PAP seems possible | 122 (3) | 110 (88.0) | 12 (9.6) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (5–5) | 4.43 (0.67) |
| PAP seems doable | 122 (3) | 103 (82.4) | 16 (12.8) | 3 (2.4) | 4 (4–5) | 4.25 (0.78) |
| PAP seems easy to use | 117 (8) | 89 (71.2) | 26 (20.8) | 2 (1.6) | 4 (4–5) | 3.99 (0.77) |
IQR, interquartile range; PAP, physical activity on prescription; SD, standard deviation. In the survey the items in appropriateness were formulated as PAP for children with obesity.
a
Medians and means are calculated on the original 5-point scales.