Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 23;8(2):e10474. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10474

TABLE 3.

Delivery strategies for various CRISPR–Cas formats

Viral delivery Physical delivery Chemical delivery Other emerging nonviral delivery
Strategy AAVs AVs LVs Bacteriop‐hages Microinjection Electroporation Hydrodynamic injection Cationic vectors CCPs AuNPs GO BP DNA nanostructure EVs
Delivery formats DNA DNA DNA DNA DNA, mRNA or protein DNA, mRNA or protein DNA, mRNA or protein DNA, mRNA or protein Protein Protein Protein Protein Protein Protein
Delivery efficiency ++ ++ +++ ++ + +++ +++ + + ++ +++ +++ +++ ++
Safety concern + ++ +++ + + + ++ + + + + + + +
Cost ++ ++ + ++ +++ +++ ++ + + ++ ++ ++ ++ +
Technical requirement ++ +++ + ++ +++ + +++ + ++ ++ ++ +++ +++ +
Major applications in vivo in vivo in vitro and ex vivo in vivo and in vivo in vitro and ex vivo in vitro and ex vivo in vitro and ex vivo in vitro and in vivo in vitro and in vivo in vitro and in vivo in vitro and in vivo in vitro and in vivo in vitro and in vivo in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo

Abbreviations: + denotes low; ++ denotes medium; +++ denotes high; AAV, adeno‐associated virus; AuNPs, gold nanoparticles; AV, adenovirus; BP, black phosphorus; CCPs, cell penetrating peptides; EVs, extracellular vesicles; GO, graphene oxide; LV, lentivirus.