Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 17;31(3):866–874. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.11.017

Table 4.

Exploratory pharmacodynamic and efficacy outcome analysis results

Change from baseline
Difference, AZD8601 versus placebo (p)
AZD8601 3 mg (n = 7) Placebo (n = 4)
Pharmacodynamics at 3 months

15O-water PETa
 Treated area stress myocardial blood flow, mL/g/min 0.4342 0.4070 0.0272 (0.462)
 Treated area myocardial flow reserve, ratio 0.3729 0.3862 −0.0133 (0.513)

Efficacy at 6 months

Echocardiographya
 Left ventricular end-diastolic volume, mL −12.329 0.853 −13.182 (0.698)
 Left ventricular end-systolic volume, mL −11.919 9.099 −21.018 (0.852)
 Left ventricular ejection fraction, % 4.072 −5.296 9.367 (0.054)
 Global longitudinal strain, % 2.914 3.070 −0.156 (0.539)
Patient-reported outcomesa
 KCCQ overall summary score 17.04 −5.55 22.59 (0.044)
 SAQ physical limitation score 18.39 10.18 8.21 (0.247)
 SAQ angina stability score 6.91 6.66 0.26 (0.492)
 SAQ angina frequency score 26.73 18.22 8.52 (0.225)
 SAQ treatment satisfaction score 7.47 −4.21 11.68 (0.092)
 SAQ quality of life score 31.11 14.31 16.79 (0.145)
Cardiac biomarkerb
 N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, pmol/L 0.990 1.735 0.57 (0.108)

Data are from mixed-model repeated measures with treatment, visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction as fixed factors, subject as random factor, and baseline value as covariate. One-sided nominal p values are presented. KCCQ, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; PET, positron emission tomography; SAQ, Seattle Angina Questionnaire.

a

Least-squares mean change from baseline and least-squares mean difference versus placebo.

b

Ratio versus baseline and ratio versus placebo.