Summary
While gaining interest as treatment for cancer and infectious disease, the clinical efficacy of Vγ9Vδ2 T cell-based immunotherapeutics has to date been limited. An improved understanding of γδ T cell heterogeneity across lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues, before and after pharmacological expansion, is required. Here, we describe the phenotype and tissue distribution of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells at steady state and following in vivo pharmacological expansion in pigtail macaques. Intravenous phosphoantigen administration with subcutaneous rhIL-2 drove robust expansion of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in blood and pulmonary mucosa, while expansion was confined to the pulmonary mucosa following intratracheal antigen administration. Peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion was polyclonal, and associated with a significant loss of CCR6 expression due to IL-2-mediated receptor downregulation. Overall, we show the tissue distribution and phenotype of in vivo pharmacologically expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells can be altered based on the antigen administration route, with implications for tissue trafficking and the clinical efficacy of Vγ9Vδ2 T cell immunotherapeutics.
Subject areas: Biological sciences, Immunology, Components of the immune system
Graphical abstract
Highlights
-
•
Pigtail macaque Vγ9Vδ2 T cell subpopulations are phenotypically conserved with humans
-
•
Intratracheal phosphoantigen treatment targets expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells to the lungs
-
•
Pigtail macaque in-vivo-expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in the blood lose CCR6 expression
-
•
CCR6 loss is partially dependent on rhIL-2 concentrations during in vitro expansion
Biological sciences; Immunology; Components of the immune system
Introduction
Vγ9Vδ2 T cells have garnered significant interest as immunotherapeutics for both cancer and infectious disease. These cells recognize prenyl pyrophosphate antigens (“phosphoantigens”) derived from microbial pathogens or host cells during times of stress. Vγ9Vδ2 T cells have a diverse functional repertoire including direct cytolysis, proinflammatory cytokine production, and antigen presentation.1,2 Vγ9Vδ2 T cells can be readily expanded pharmacologically, with their MHC-unrestricted nature opening the possibility for “off-the-shelf” therapeutic products.1,3,4,5 Multiple studies in preclinical animal models have reported promising results for both in vivo Vγ9Vδ2 T cell immunotherapy and adoptive transfer. However, clinical efficacy in small human trials has been limited to date.1,6 Improving this efficacy will likely require a multifactorial approach, including refinement of treatment protocols to selectively expand clinically effective subsets of the bulk Vγ9Vδ2 T cell population, and an improved understanding of Vγ9Vδ2 T cell tissue trafficking and retention.
While Vγ9Vδ2 T cells uniformly respond to phosphoantigens, they exhibit substantial phenotypic and functional heterogeneity. Distinct human Vγ9Vδ2 T cell subsets can be defined based on expression of CCR6, CD26, CD94, and granzyme B (GzmB), which differentiate cytokine-responsive cells from cytotoxic subsets.7,8,9 Whether distinct subsets can be selectively expanded in vitro or in vivo is poorly understood. Similarly, there are gaps in understanding of the tissue distribution and retention of pharmacologically expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. In humans, Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion in the blood has been well documented following in vivo stimulation,10,11,12,13,14,15 while in-vitro-expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells can be found in the blood following adoptive transfer.16,17,18,19,20,21 In contrast, reports of Vγ9Vδ2 T cell trafficking to other tissue sites in humans are sparse. Nonhuman primate (NHP) studies have provided some evidence for Vγ9Vδ2 T cell tissue trafficking to the lungs,22,23,24,25,26,27 gingival mucosa,25 and rectal mucosa25 after expansion or adoptive transfer. It is likely that successful Vγ9Vδ2 T cell-based immunotherapy will require trafficking of expanded cells to tissue sites of disease, and retention for a sufficient amount of time to exert a therapeutically beneficial effect. A better understanding of Vγ9Vδ2 T cell tissue trafficking, and how different expansion protocols may impact tissue trafficking, will aid in developing novel Vγ9Vδ2 T cell immunotherapies with improved clinical efficacy.
One major limitation to studying Vγ9Vδ2 T cells is the lack of relevant animal models, largely due to the lack of functional Vγ9, Vδ2, and/or relevant butyrophilin genes in most laboratory animal models.28 NHPs are a well-suited animal model to study Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in vivo since they naturally develop Vγ9Vδ2 T cells and there is a growing sophistication in reagents and resources available for NHP immunology research. However, characterization of the NHP Vγ9Vδ2 T cell population remains sparse, including identifying phenotypically and functionally distinct subsets analogous to humans.
In the present study, we evaluate the phenotype and clonality of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina; PTM) at steady state and following in vivo pharmacological expansion. PTMs are valuable preclinical animal models for multiple infectious diseases that are relevant for Vγ9Vδ2 T cell-based therapies, including influenza,29,30,31 HIV/Mycobacteria tuberculosis (Mtb) co-infection,32 and malaria.33 We find that phosphoantigen delivery to the airways can target in vivo Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion in the lungs, with minimal changes in peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies. In addition, we show that phosphoantigen and recombinant human IL-2 (rhIL-2)-mediated in vivo expansion is associated with a loss of CCR6 expression in peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells while maintaining Vγ9Vδ2 T cell clonal diversity.
Results
Circulating PTM and human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are phenotypically similar
While NHP Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are known to be phosphoantigen-reactive,34 it is unclear the extent to which circulating PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cell populations recapitulate the phenotypic and functional diversity of human cells.7 To assess this, we analyzed Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies and phenotype in cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 8 to 12 adult PTMs (Figure 1A). Peripheral blood Vδ2+ T cell frequencies were variable at 0.08%–11.5% (median: 1.19%, interquartile range [IQR]: 0.6–2.72%) of the total CD3+ T cell population (Figure 1B). As expected, the majority of Vδ2+ T cells co-expressed Vγ9 (median: 1.04% of CD3+ T cells, IQR: 0.51%–2.17%), with a less frequent Vγ9−Vδ2+ T cell population (median: 0.09% of CD3+ T cells, IQR: 0.07%–0.2%, p = 0.0425) (Figure 1B). The low frequency of Vγ9−Vδ2+ T cells, relative to Vγ9+Vδ2+ T cell frequencies, is consistent with human peripheral blood Vδ2+ T cell patterns.35,36 PTM peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells primarily exhibited a central memory-like (TCM; CD28+CD95+; median: 67.9%, IQR: 35.5%–75.7%) or effector memory-like phenotype (TEM; CD28−CD95+; median: 31.2%, IQR: 19.5%–52.9%), with a minimal naive population (Figure 1C). These patterns are analogous to human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells.7,37,38
Key phenotypic and functional Vγ9Vδ2 T cell subsets can be defined based on CD26/CD94 co-expression in humans (Figure 1D),7 and we therefore investigated if similar phenotypic subsets could be identified in PTMs. Although antibodies to detect CD9439 in NHPs are not available, we utilized an antibody to NKG2A as a surrogate marker, which dimerizes with CD94 on human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells.7 PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells were predominately CD26+NKG2A+ (median: 55.7% of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, IQR: 48.7%–75.4%; Figure 1E). In humans, CD26/CD94 expression on peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells is variable and donor dependent, though the CD26+CD94hi subset tends to predominate in adults (comprising ∼38% of the total Vγ9Vδ2 population).7 Consistent with observations in human cohorts,7 CD26+NKG2A+/− Vγ9Vδ2 T cells expressed higher levels of the cytokine and chemokine receptors CCR5, CCR6, CXCR3, and IL-18R, relative to CD26−NKG2A+/− Vγ9Vδ2 T cells (Figure 1F). In contrast, expression of DNAM-1, a cell adhesion molecule associated with cytotoxicity, was highest in CD26−NKG2A+ Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. In general, we find the phenotypic features of human peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are largely conserved across PTMs and humans.
Tissue distribution of PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells
While Vγ9Vδ2 T cells predominately reside in the peripheral blood, they can traffic to inflamed tissue sites.40 However, information on Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies and phenotypes across different tissue sites is limited. We evaluated the frequency and phenotype of PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in PBMCs and paired tissues from 2 to 6 PTMs, including lymph nodes, spleen, thymus, lung, liver, small intestine, and large intestine. Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies were highest in the liver (median: 2.9% of CD3+ T cells, IQR: 1.5%–4.0%), lung (median: 0.99% of CD3+ T cells, IQR: 0.4%–2.7%), and spleen (median: 0.8% of CD3+ T cells, IQR: 0.2%–1.7%) (Figure 2A). In contrast, low Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies were found in the small intestine (median: 0.0% of CD3+ T cells, IQR: 0.0%–0.2%), large intestine (median: 0.04% of CD3+ T cells, IQR: 0.0%–0.3%), and thymus (median: 0.2% of CD3+ T cells, IQR: 0.06%–0.5%).
Assessment of PTM Vγ9Vδ2 phenotype across tissue sites
Across the peripheral lymphoid tissues, thymus, lung, and liver, PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells predominately expressed a TCM surface phenotype (Figure 2B). In addition, Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in the lymph nodes, thymus, lung, and liver were predominately CD26+NKG2A+, like peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells (Figure 2C). Similar to blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, Vγ9Vδ2 T cells across all the tissue sites exhibited high expression of CCR5, CCR6, CXCR3, and IL-18R; an exception being CCR6+ Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies in the lungs (median CCR6 expression 50.5% of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, IQR: 20.5%–55.5%), which were reduced relative to the other tissue sites, but not statistically different (Figure S1A). PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells from all tissue sites expressed high frequencies of the transcription factor PLZF, which is associated with human Vγ9Vδ27,41 and other unconventional T cells42,43 (Figure S1B). As expected, CD69 expression was lowest on peripheral blood and lymph node Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, while pulmonary and hepatic-derived Vγ9Vδ2 T cells expressed high levels of CD69, consistent with its role in identifying tissue-resident lymphocytes (Figure 2D).44,45 Despite reports of T follicular helper (TFH)-like CXCR5+ Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in blood and peripheral lymphoid tissues of humans,46 we found minimal evidence for CXCR5+ Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in PTMs (Figure S1C). PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells also exhibited low Bcl6 expression, the canonical TFH transcription factor.47 Thymic Vγ9Vδ2 T cell Bcl6 expression was relatively increased compared to the other tissue sites, which may be a necessity for thymic Vγ9Vδ2 T cell development as with invariant natural killer T cells and mucosal-associated invariant T cells (MAIT cells).48
Functional capacity of tissue-specific Vγ9Vδ2 T cells
Given that PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells express both CXCR3 (a TH1-associated marker) and CCR6 (a TH17-associated marker),47 we next assessed cytokine production profiles across tissue sites via in vitro phosphoantigen stimulation. PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells showed high TNFα and IFNγ expression following (E)-1-Hydroxy-2-methyl-2-butenyl 4-pyrophosphate (HMB-PP; 20 ng/mL) stimulation (Figure 2E) with minimal IL-17A or GM-CSF expression (Figure S1D), which is consistent with previous Vγ9Vδ2 T cell studies in humans49,50,51,52 and NHPs.22,23,53 Across all sites, Vγ9Vδ2 T cells expressed high levels of Eomes, with variable T-bet expression (Figure S1E); these two transcription factors are associated with TH1 conventional T cell differentiation, consistent with the observed TNFα and IFNγ expression.47 Altogether, PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells express high levels of cytokine and chemokine surface receptors, as well as a TH1 cytokine profile following phosphoantigen stimulation. This surface receptor and cytokine profile is consistent with an “innate-like effector” transcriptional profile present in human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells.41 Additionally, unlike conventional TH17 cells, we see dissociation between CCR6 and IL-17A expression.
DNAM-154,55 and GzmB9 are both important markers for mediating cytotoxic activity against target cells and may be relevant in the context of Vγ9Vδ2 T cell-based immunotherapies. DNAM-1 expression in PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells was variable across the tissue sites and between individuals (Figure S1F). Pulmonary (median: 13.7% of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, IQR: 6.0%–18.0%) and thymic (median: 14.1% of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, IQR: 9.3%–22.1%) Vγ9Vδ2 T cells exhibited reduced DNAM-1 expression relative to other anatomic sites, which could indicate reduced cytolytic function of steady-state Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in these tissue sites. Likewise, GzmB expression was markedly reduced in all tissue-derived Vγ9Vδ2 T cells relative to peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells (Figure 2F).
Antigen administration route influences the tissue distribution of in-vivo-expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells
Given the steady-state presence of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells across multiple tissues, we next evaluated the impact of in vivo pharmacological expansion in a small (n = 7) macaque study designed to probe the phenotype and function of expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells across multiple sites, with an emphasis on pulmonary tissue trafficking. Adult male PTMs were treated with 1 of 4 different antigen treatment protocols (n = 1–2 per group; Figure 3A, Table 1) along with recombinant human IL-2 (rhIL-2) to stimulate in vivo Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion. The group 1 treatment protocol (Zoledronic acid monohydrate [Zol] intravenous [IV]) models commonly utilized in vivo Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion protocols in previous human clinical trials.13,56,57,58,59 The group 3 treatment protocol (HMB-PP IV and intratracheal [IT]) was designed to give the highest probability of in vivo Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion in the airway mucosa, by utilizing a phosphoantigen that very potently activates Vγ9Vδ2 T cells administered systemically and directly in the respiratory tract.60 Groups 2 (Zol IT) and 4 (IPP IT) were included to evaluate if antigens that are less potent at activating Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, relative to HMB-PP, can induce in vivo Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion in the pulmonary mucosa when instilled directly in the respiratory tract. Whole blood, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, lymph node biopsies, and rectal mucosal biopsies were collected at regular time intervals and compared to baseline samples to evaluate the change in Vγ9Vδ2 T cell phenotype and function (Figure 3A; gating strategy to identify Vγ9Vδ2 T cells: Figure 3B).
Table 1.
Animal ID | Age (yrs) | Weight (kg) | Antigen | rhIL-2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | NM11 | 16 | 18.6 | Zoledronic acid monohydrate (0.2 mg/kg IV) | 0.8x106 IU SC, q24 h for 5 days |
NM89 | 14 | 21.1 | |||
Group 2 | NM88 | 14 | 13.6 | Zoledronic acid monohydrate (0.5 mg, IT) | |
NM283 | 7 | 11.1 | |||
Group 3 | NM251 | 9 | 13.8 | HMB-PP (1 mg/kg IV + 0.25 mg IT) | |
NM295 | 7 | 8.6 | |||
Group 4 | NM269 | 8 | 12.0 | IPP (0.5 mg IT) |
Significant Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion was observed at day 4 post antigen administration in the blood (range: 12.2%–28.0% of CD3+ T cells across groups 1 and 3) compared to pre-expansion frequencies (range: 0.27%–1.25% of CD3+ T cells across groups 1 and 3) and was primarily restricted to animals that received intravenous antigen (Figure 3C). This was preceded by a transient decrease in Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies at day 2, similar to what has been observed in in vivo expansion studies with anti-butyrophilin 3A (BTN3A) monoclonal antibody immunotherapy.61 This decrease may reflect redistribution from the blood to other tissue sites, or may be due to activation-induced T cell receptor (TCR) downregulation.62 By day 8 post antigen administration, peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies had returned to baseline levels, indicating that the pharmacological expansion in the peripheral blood was relatively transient.
In tissue sites, Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion was identified in the BAL fluid of all 4 groups at day 8 post antigen administration (Figure 3D). The magnitude of change in Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequency was considerably variable across the groups, with group 3 having the largest increase in Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies (range: 10.81%–14.86% of CD3+ T cells at day 8 compared to 3.95%–6.81% at day 7), and group 2 having the smallest increase (range: 3.25%–7.72% of CD3+ T cells at day 8; 2.23%–6.09% at day 7). In addition, pulmonary Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies remained elevated in 4/7 macaques out to day 22 post antigen administration, suggesting a level tissue retention not observed in the peripheral blood. In contrast to the respiratory tract, no significant change in Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies was observed in the peripheral lymph node or rectal mucosa with any of the treatment groups (Figure 3E). Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies were low in all animals’ pre-treatment (Lymph node: 0.08%–0.87% of CD3+ T cells at day 7; Rectal mucosa: 0.04%–0.45% of CD3+ T cells at day 7) and remained consistently low throughout the observation period. These results show that changes to the antigen and route of administration can alter Vγ9Vδ2 T cell tissue distribution, with the potential for lung retention. In addition, we see that robust Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion in the blood does not necessarily translate to distribution in tissue sites, an important consideration for Vγ9Vδ2 T cell immunotherapies.
Loss of CCR6 expression on in-vivo-expanded peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells
We next evaluated if our in vivo expansion protocols caused significant changes in peripheral blood and pulmonary Vγ9Vδ2 T cell phenotype. A reduction in TCM-like Vγ9Vδ2 T cells was observed across all 7 animals in the study between day 4 and day 8 (p = 0.0334), with a concurrent increase in TEM phenotype (p = 0.015) (Figure 4A). This shift corresponds with contraction of the peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cell population in groups 1 and 3 animals. A transient increase in CD69 expression was observed at day 2 post antigen administration (Figure 4B), which likely reflects T cell activation following antigen and rhIL-2 administration and is consistent with findings from other Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion trials.61,63 While CCR5 and CXCR3 expression remained high throughout the observation period, there was a very substantial loss of CCR6 expression within the expanded peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells at day 4 (range: 10.4%–28.6% of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells) across groups 1 and 3 compared to pre-expansion frequencies (range: 86.3%–90.1% of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells at day 0) (Figure 4C). This effect was relatively transient, as most cells regained CCR6 expression by day 15 post antigen administration. In addition, a transient loss of CCR6 expression was also seen in the group 2 animals at day 4 (range: 13.1%–28.3% of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells; 77.3%–84.0% at day 0), despite a lack of robust expansion in the blood, suggesting the loss of CCR6 expression is not dependent on expansion. Likewise, a transient increase in GzmB expression was observed in expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells relative to baseline levels (Figure 4D).
In the BAL, expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells had a mixed TCM/TEM expression pattern, with considerable intra-individual variability across the groups (Figure S2A). In all animals, antigen administration was associated with a mild, progressive increase in TCM Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies, with a corresponding decrease in TEM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells (p = 0.0485). Similar to the peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, increased CD69 expression was observed in expanded BAL Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, which was maintained throughout the observation period in 6/7 animals (Figure S2B), corresponding with the observed tissue retention within the pulmonary tree. In contrast to circulating Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, BAL-derived cells maintained relatively constant expression of CCR5, CXCR3, CCR6, and GzmB (Figures S2C and S2D). Both CCR6 (range: 38.3%–72.6% of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells at day 7) and GzmB (median fluorescence intensities [MFI]: 89.9–116 at day 7) expression were reduced in BAL Vγ9Vδ2 T cell compared to paired peripheral blood samples, with no significant or consistent change following antigen administration. In summary, we see that in vivo pharmacological expansion can cause significant phenotypic changes in peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, which may impact effector functions in a therapeutic setting. Furthermore, we see evidence of persistently increased tissue-resident Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in the airway mucosa following both IV and IT antigen administration, with no persistent changes in their phenotypic profiles from pre-expanded samples. These changes may be important when considering trafficking and functionality in different tissues.
Comparable in vitro expansion of CCR6+ and CCR6- Vγ9Vδ2 T cells
Given that CCR6 defines a functionally and transcriptionally distinct Vγ9Vδ2 T cell population in humans,7,9,64 we explored whether the phenotypic changes of in-vivo-expanded cells were due to preferential proliferation of the CCR6- subset. To address this question, we performed in vitro expansions with sort-purified CCR6+ or CCR6- PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells cultured with autologous, Vδ2-depleted PBMCs (Figures 5A–5C, sort gating strategy: Figure S3). Between 2,865 and 209,300 sorted CCR6+ and CCR6- Vγ9Vδ2 T cells were cultured for 13 days with Zol (15 μM), rhIL-2 (1 x103 IU/mL), and Vδ2-depleted autologous PBMCs, to evaluate differences in expansion capacity and phenotype. Paired unsorted PBMCs were also expanded under identical conditions as controls. Similar to other NHP studies,63 there was considerable inter-individual variability in Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion capacity. However, the fold change was comparable between CCR6+ (median: 7.369, IQR: 4.1–203.1) and CCR6- Vγ9Vδ2 T cells (median: 7.942, IQR: 0.3–23.5) at the end of the expansion period, indicating that both populations expand in response to phosphoantigen and rhIL-2 stimulation (Figure 5D). Furthermore, GzmB and CCR6 expression frequencies were equivalent between the CCR6+ and CCR6- cultures, as well as with autologous-expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells from whole PBMCs (Figure 5E). Both sorted cultures and whole PBMC cultures maintained high CXCR3 expression, like the observed in vivo changes (Figure 5E). Overall, these data suggest the dominant CCR6- phenotype of in-vivo-expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells likely reflects receptor downregulation rather than preferential expansion of the minor CCR6- population. Other contributing factors may include CCR6+ Vγ9Vδ2 T cell trafficking into tissue compartments, as well as CCR6- Vγ9Vδ2 T cell egress from tissue compartments into the blood.
Cytokine and antigen exposure influences CCR6 and GzmB expression on PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in vitro
We next evaluated the impact of different antigen and cytokine treatment stimuli on PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cell phenotype to understand the mechanism of apparent CCR6 downregulation. PTM Vδ2+ T cells expanded with rhIL-2 (1 x103 IU/mL) and Zol (15 μM), HMB-PP (20 ng/mL), or isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP; 4 μg/mL) had equivalent changes in CCR6 and GzmB expression patterns, as well as comparable TNFα and IFNγ responses to mitogenic stimulation (Figure S4A), indicating the antigen type does not significantly influence the phenotypic changes or cytokine production capacity of expanded PTM Vδ2 T cells. In contrast, altering rhIL-2 concentrations (0.1, 0.5, or 1 x103 IU/mL) caused a titratable shift in expanded Vδ2 T cell phenotypes, where rhIL-2 concentration inversely correlated with CCR6 expression frequency, and directly correlated with GzmB expression frequency (Figure 6A and 6B). Vδ2 T cell recoveries were equivalent between expansions with high, medium, and low rhIL-2 concentrations, suggesting the changes in rhIL-2 concentration did not significantly impact Vδ2 T cell proliferation of survival (Figure S4B). In-vitro-expanded Vδ2 T cells consistently express TNFα and IFNγ following mitogenic stimulation with minimal GM-CSF and IL-17A expression, indicating their TH1-predominate cytokine expression profile is not affected by rhIL-2 concentrations (Figure S4C). Overall, our findings suggest that GzmB and CCR6 expression during antigen stimulation can be directly influenced by rhIL-2 concentrations.
In addition to evaluating cytokine and antigen exposure influence on expanded PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, we also evaluated the phenotype of short-term Vγ9Vδ2 T cell stimulations. Cryopreserved PTM splenocytes were stimulated for 72 h with rhIL-2 or recombinant rhesus macaque IL-12 (rmIL-12) and IL-18 (rmIL-18), with or without phosphoantigen, to drive phenotypic changes in the Vγ9Vδ2 T cell population. Compared to unstimulated control samples, stimulation with rhIL-2 alone caused no significant changes in CCR6 expression (Figure 6C). However, CCR6 expression decreased in samples co-stimulated with rhIL-2 and antigen, or rmIL-12/rmIL-18 with or without antigen. Similarly, GzmB (Figure 6D) and IL-18R (Figure S5) expression was enhanced by stimulation with antigen and/or rmIL-12/rmIL-18. Overall, we find that both antigen-dependent and -independent activation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells drives concurrent phenotypic changes, including the downregulation of CCR6 and upregulation of GzmB. Notably, rhIL-2 concentration appeared to be the primary factor influencing CCR6 downregulation, suggesting that subtle changes in Vγ9Vδ2 stimulation protocols can impact the resulting therapeutic product or in vivo outcome.
Peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells maintain clonal diversity following in vivo expansion
While Vγ9Vδ2 T cells uniformly recognize phosphoantigens, they still undergo V(D)J recombination and generation of different clonotypes identical to conventional T cells. These different clonotypes have different functional binding avidities to target cells65 and likely respond to different pathogenic stimuli.66 To evaluate if our phosphoantigen/rhIL-2 in vivo expansion protocols selectively expanded specific clonotypes, we performed paired, single-cell TCR sequence analysis of peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells pre-expansion (day 14) and during peak expansion (day 4) in 4 animals (Groups 1 and 3) (Table 2). Between 99 and 147 (median: 109.5) paired TRDV2/TRGV9 sequences were recovered across all 4 animals and both timepoints for analysis (Table S1). TCRD and TCRG CDR3 length distributions remained similar between pre-expanded and expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells populations (Figures 7A and 7B). J-chain usage within the TCRD and TCRG also remained constant between the pre-expanded and expanded cells, with peripheral Vγ9Vδ2 T cells predominately expressing the TRDJ1∗01 and TRGJ1-2∗01 alleles in all 4 PTMs (Figure S6A). Surprisingly, the PTM peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cell population was very diverse at both steady state and following expansion, with no evidence of clonal selection occurring in vivo (Figures 7C–7E, Table S1). Between 68 and 100 unique TCRD sequences were recovered across all 4 animals and both timepoints, of which 15.0%–35.1% were identified in pre-expanded and expanded peripheral blood samples from the same animals (Figure 7F, Table S1). As expected, the total number of unique TCRG sequences was reduced relative to the TCRD sequences, with 27.7%–50.0% of the unique TCRG sequences being shared between pre-expanded and expanded samples in individual animals. Paired TCRG/TCRD had the highest number or unique clones with the lowest frequency of intra-individual sharing across timepoint due to the presence of “pseudoclonotypes”, which is well established within human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells where the germline-encoded CDR3γ9 chain pairs with multiple CDR3δ2 chains (Figure S6B, Table S1).35 In summary, we see that the PTM peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are clonally diverse under steady-state condition, despite a biased V- and J-chain usage. Furthermore, the polyclonality of this population is not significantly perturbed by the substantial in vivo expansion driven by phosphoantigen/rhIL-2 observed. This finding is relevant to human applications as clonal selection could impact Vγ9Vδ2 T cell immunotherapeutic efficacy against certain diseases.
Table 2.
Name | Sequence | |
---|---|---|
External Primers | macTCRDV2- External | CAT CTA TGG CCC TGG TTT CA |
macTCRDC- External | TGG CAG TCA AGA GAA AAT TG | |
macTCRGV9- External | AGA CCT GGT GAA GTC ATA C | |
macTCRGC- External | GTT GCT CTT TTC TTG CC | |
Internal Primers: TCRD | macTCRDV2- Internal | CAG AGA GAG ATG AAG GGT CTT AC |
macTCRDC- Internal | CAC TGG GAG AGA CGA CAA TAG | |
Internal Primers: TCRG | macTCRGV9- Internal | CCT GGT GAA GTC ATA CAG TTC C |
macTCRGC- Internal | AAT AGT GGG CTT GGG TGA AAT A |
Since Vγ9Vδ2 T cells public clonotypes have been well established in humans6,66 and NHPs,67 we next looked at TCRD and TCRG sequence sharing between individual animals. Within TCRD, TCRG, and paired TCRD/TCRG sequences, the majority of unique CDR3 sequences were identified in individual animals at a single timepoint, or in a single animal pre-expansion and during peak expansion (Figures S6C–S6E). Nineteen unique TCRD CDR3 sequences were identified in more than 1 PTM, between the 2 timepoints (Figure S6C). However, a conserved TCRD CDR3 sequence was not found in all 4 PTMs. In contrast, the TCRG sequences were far more conserved between individuals, with 55 unique CDR3 sequences identified in at least 2 PTMs (Figure S6D). Among these, 2 TCRG CDR3 sequences (CALWEVQQFGRKVKLF and CALWEVRQFGRKVKLF) were identified in all 4 animals at both time points, and an additional 5 sequences (CALWEAQQFGRKVKLF, CALWEGQQFGRKVKLF, CALWESQQFGRKVKLF, CALWEVRLSGRKVKLF, and CALWEVLQFGRKVKLF) were identified in all 4 animals at 1 timepoint minimum. This robust inter-individual sequence conservation is likely partially due to the germline-encoded Vγ9 CDR3.6,66 When TCRD and TCRG sequences were analyzed as pairs, the unique clonotypes were overwhelming confined to individuals, with only 3 unique sequence pairs being found in more than 1 PTM (Figure S6E). This further emphasizes the degree of clonal diversity within the bulk Vγ9Vδ2 T cell population both at steady state and following expansion, despite the presence of individual Vγ9 and Vδ2 CDR3 sharing between animals.
Discussion
Fine-tuning the specificity of Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion protocols to produce clinically efficacious γδ T cell immunotherapies requires a detailed understanding of the heterogeneity and antigen reactivity of this unique T cell subset. NHP models provide an opportunity to probe γδ T cell immunotherapy conditions and obtain multiple tissue samples. Here, we provide a comprehensive phenotypic analysis of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in PTMs, a relevant preclinical animal model for Vγ9Vδ2 T cell research. At steady state, we found that PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are predominately PLZF+, CCR5+, CCR6+, CXCR3+, and IL-18R+ across peripheral blood and tissue sites. This expression pattern is comparable with CD26hiCD94+ Vγ9Vδ2 T cells and MAIT cells in humans,7 as well as MAIT cells in PTMs.68 Analogous to humans and other NHPs, PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are also biased toward a TH1 cytokine response at steady state and following in vitro pharmacological expansion with phosphoantigen and rhIL-2. Following pharmacological expansion, PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells lose CCR6 expression both in vivo and in vitro, which is dependent on antigen and IL-2 stimulation.
PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies rapidly but transiently increased in the peripheral blood following IV HMB-PP or Zol, consistent with previous in vivo expansion trials in humans10,13,69 and NHPs.25,53,63 Furthermore, intravenous antigen administration resulted in Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion in the pulmonary mucosa, which could be targeted specifically to the pulmonary tract with IT antigen administration. Targeted Vγ9Vδ2 T cell delivery to the lungs may be beneficial therapeutically for pulmonary-based diseases like Mtb, against which Vγ9Vδ2 T cells have demonstrated antimicrobial activity.22,70 Both in-vivo-expanded24 and adoptively transferred22 Vγ9Vδ2 T cells have been shown to reduce Mtb disease burden in NHPs, underscoring their utility as immunotherapeutics. Our results highlight how antigen delivery routes can influence the tissue distribution of expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells.
The rapid downregulation of CCR6 expression on expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells may have implications for tissue trafficking/retention of these cells during immunotherapy, as well as provide insight into the development and differentiation of CCR6- Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. CCR6 downregulation was also observed with in-vitro-expanded PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, indicating these same tissue trafficking implications may also apply to ex-vivo-expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells for adoptive transfer. CCR6 mediates immune cell trafficking and retention in multiple anatomical and microanatomical sites, including gut-associated lymphoid tissues,71,72,73,74 lymph node subcapsular sinuses,75 liver,76,77 and lung.78,79 Pharmacological CCR6 downregulation on expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells may have hindered distribution to some sites in the present study, such as the rectal mucosa and lymph node. Expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cell retention in the airway mucosa is likely due to other chemotactic receptors that were expressed throughout the expansion period, like CCR5 and CXCR3. Although Ali et al.25 identified expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in the rectal mucosa of cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) following IV HMB-PP treatment, differences in HMB-PP dosages, timing between antigen administration and rectal mucosal sampling, and NHP species may explain the differences in these studies.
The impact of IL-2 concentration on CCR6 downregulation during in vitro γδ T cell expansion highlights the underappreciated impact of cytokine co-stimulation on Vγ9Vδ2 T cell phenotype. Several studies have demonstrated that human neonatal Vγ9Vδ2 T cell populations are dominated by CCR6+CD26+ cells,7,8 despite the fact that this population typically forms a minority of the Vγ9Vδ2 T cell repertoire in adults. Whether recurrent in vivo activation and exposure to cytokines such as IL-2 drives differentiation away from a CCR6+ phenotype is currently unknown, but should be explored in future studies.
Similar to human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, we found that CD26 and NKG2A co-expression was associated with increased cytokine and chemokine receptor expression. However, PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells were strongly biased toward the CD26+NKG2A+ Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in blood and tissue sites, in contrast to humans where CD26 and CD94 expression on peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells is more heterogeneous and donor dependent.7 CD26 expression delineates a distinct, IL-23-responsive Vγ9Vδ2 T cell subset in humans, which are phenotypically and transcriptionally similar to MAIT cells.7 In addition, CD26 binding to adenosine deaminase enhances TCR-independent Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation.7 Altogether, these findings indicate that PTM Vγ9Vδ2 T cells exhibit key characteristics of human Vγ9Vδ2 T cell subpopulations, but do not fully recapitulate the Vγ9Vδ2 T cell subpopulation diversity seen in humans. However, PTMs maintain the same predominate Vγ9Vδ2 T cell subpopulation as most adult humans (CD26+CD94hi), highlighting their value as models to study Vγ9Vδ2 T cell immunotherapies. Within PTMs, biased CD26+NKG2A+ Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies may reflect species-specific differences or be a result of husbandry practices. While phosphoantigen-reactive Vγ9Vδ2 T cells have been identified in multiple NHP species,53,63,80,81 data on Vγ9Vδ2 T cell subsets across different NHP species are lacking.
Peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells were polyclonal following expansion with intravenous HMB-PP or Zol, consistent with previous studies looking at the clonality of phosphoantigen- and aminobisphosphonate-expanded human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in vitro.82,83 While Vγ9Vδ2 T cells uniformly recognize phosphoantigens,66 Vγ9Vδ2 T cell clonotypes may be important in determining responsiveness to certain diseases. Multiple studies have reported oligoclonal Vγ9Vδ2 T cell selection in response to both infectious and non-infectious diseases.66,84,85 BCG-mediated in vitro Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion selects for a subset of the human peripheral Vγ9Vδ2 T cell repertoire compared to IPP.82 The impact of Vγ9Vδ2 T cell clonality on immunotherapeutic efficacy requires further investigation. However, our results indicate that in vivo pharmacological expansion with phosphoantigens or aminobisphosphonates does not selectively expand specific subsets of the Vγ9Vδ2 T cell clonal population.
In summary, we provide an extensive characterization of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in NHPs and find both that in vivo Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion can be modulated by the route of antigen administration and that pharmacological expansion protocols can impact Vγ9Vδ2 T cell phenotypes beyond cytokine and cytolytic marker expression. This improved understanding of the phenotype, clonality, and tissue distribution of pharmacologically expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in macaques provides an important step toward designing studies to most effectively target Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, to improve disease outcomes. Further studies are needed to evaluate how different antigens and dosages impact Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies, phenotype, and function, across different antigen administration routes. Incorporating anti-BTN3A monoclonal antibodies61 or nanoparticle-based antigen delivery86,87 may help further refine Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion in selected tissue sites due to differences in biodistribution, tissue retention, and BTN3A receptor usage. Improved protocols will likely need to be paired with optimized cytokine costimulatory treatments that selectively expand the most therapeutically effective Vγ9Vδ2 T cell subset and permits trafficking to the tissue(s) of interest. This deep characterization of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in NHP provides a rational basis for designing and testing improved Vγ9Vδ2 T cell immunotherapies.
Limitations of the study
The principal limitation of our in vivo Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion trial is the small sample sizes per group. While we were able to observe trends in Vγ9Vδ2 T cell frequencies and phenotypes over the observation period, larger studies will be required to more conclusively optimize antigen delivery, particularly given the inter-animal variability in Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion.63 We were unable to confirm if the transient CCR6 and GzmB phenotypic changes observed in peripheral blood Vγ9Vδ2 T cells during peak expansion (day 4) also occurred in the assessed tissue sites, due to limitations in the number and frequency of tissue samples that could be collected. All NHPs in the trial were adult males, with variability in age and bodyweight between the groups, which may have influenced our results. It is unknown how age, sex, and size impact tissue trafficking and phenotype of in-vivo-expanded Vδ2+Vγ9+ T cells, but these biological variables may have an effect. Determining the clinical impact of in vivo γδ T cell expansion will require additional studies to evaluate cytotoxic effector functions with different pharmacological expansion protocols, and incorporating infectious challenge with relevant pathogens, such as Mtb.
Similar to our in vivo expansion trial, our ex vivo Vγ9Vδ2 T cell phenotyping is limited by tissue availability and Vγ9Vδ2 T cell recovery from cryopreserved samples. In-depth characterization of tissue-specific Vγ9Vδ2 T cell populations could be augmented by future studies using freshly collected samples.
STAR★Methods
Key resources table
REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
---|---|---|
Antibodies | ||
Mouse monoclonal anti-Bcl6 Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated (clone: IG191E/A8) | BioLegend | Cat# 648306; RRID: AB_2565299 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD3 Alexa Fluor 700 conjugated (clone: SP34-2) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 557917; RRID: AB_396938 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD3 BUV805 conjugated (clone: SP34-2) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 742053; RRID: AB_2871342 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD20 BUV805 conjugated (clone: 2H7) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 612905; RRID: AB_2870192 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD20 BV510 conjugated (clone: 2H7) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 563067; RRID: AB_2737985 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD20 PE-CF594 conjugated (clone: 2H7) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 562295; RRID: AB_11153322 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD26 unconjugated (clone: clone5) | In house | N/A |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD28 BV711 conjugated (clone: CD28.2) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 563131; RRID: AB_2738020 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD45 BUV395 conjugated (clone: D058-1283) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 564099; RRID: AB_2738591 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD45 PE-Cy7 conjugated (clone: D058-1283) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 561294; RRID: AB_10612014 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD69 APC/Fire 750 conjugated (clone: FN50) | BioLegend | Cat# 310946; RRID: AB_2616709 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD94 APC conjugated (clone: HP-3D9) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 559876; RRID: AB_398679 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD95 BUV737 conjugated (clone: DX2) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 612790; RRID: AB_2870117 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD95 PE-Cy7 conjugated (clone: DX2) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 561633; RRID: AB_10894384 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD159a (NKG2A) APC conjugated (clone: Z199) | Beckman Coulter | Cat# A60797; RRID: AB_10643105 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD183 (CXCR3) Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated (clone: G025H7) | BioLegend | Cat# 353712; RRID: AB_10962948 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD183 (CXCR3) Alexa Fluor 700 conjugated (clone: G025H7) | BioLegend | Cat# 353742; RRID: AB_2616920 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD183 (CXCR3) PE-Dazzle594 (clone: G025H7) | BioLegend | Cat# 353736; RRID:AB_2564288 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD185 (CXCR5) PE-eFluor610 conjugated (clone: MU5UBEE) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 61-9185-42; RRID: AB_2574677 |
Rat monoclonal anti-CD195 (CCR5) BV421 conjugated (clone: J418F1) | BioLegend | Cat# 359118; RRID: AB_2563577 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD196 (CCR6) BV785 conjugated (clone: G034E3) | BioLegend | Cat# 353422; RRID: AB_2563660 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD218 (IL-18Rα) PE-Vio770 conjugated (clone: H44) | Miltenyi Biotec | Cat# 130-101-723; RRID: AB_2656352 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD226 (DNAM-1) BV605 conjugated (clone: 11A8) | BioLegend | Cat# 338324; RRID: AB_2721543 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-CD326 (Ep-CAM) PE-CF594 conjugated (clone: EBA-1) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 565399; RRID: AB_2739219 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-eomes PerCP-eFluor710 conjugated (clone: WD1928) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 46-4877-42; RRID: AB_2573759 |
Rat monoclonal anti-GM-CSF BV421 conjugated (clone: BVD2-21C11) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 562930; RRID: AB_2737899 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-granzyme B BV510 conjugated (clone: GB11) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 563388; RRID: AB_2738174 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-IFNγ BUV395 conjugated (clone: B27) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 563563; RRID: AB_2738277 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-IL-17A BV605 conjugated (clone: BL168) | BioLegend | Cat# 512326; RRID: AB_2563887 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-PLZF PE-CF594 conjugated (clone: R17-809) | BD Biosciences | Cat# 565738; RRID: AB_2739339 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-T-bet BV421 conjugated (clone: 4B10) | BioLegend | Cat# 644816; RRID: AB_10959653 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-TCR Vδ1 PE-Cy7 conjugated (clone: TS8.2) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 25-5679-42; RRID: AB_2762454 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-TCR Vδ2 FITC conjugated (clone: 15D) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# TCR2732; RRID:AB_417095 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-TCR Vδ2 unconjugated (clone: 15D) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# TCR1732; RRID: AB_417090 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-TCR Vγ9 FITC conjugated (clone: 7A5) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# TCR2720; RRID: AB_417094 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-TNFα APC-Cy7 conjugated (clone: MAb11) | BioLegend | Cat# 502944; RRID: AB_2562870 |
Goat polyclonal anti-mouse IgG (H + L) cross-adsorbed secondary PE conjugated | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# P-852; RRID: AB_2539848 |
Biological samples | ||
Healthy human whole blood | University of Melbourne, Department of Microbiology and Immunology | N/A |
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
Anti-PE MicroBeads | Miltenyi Biotec | Cat# 130-048-801 |
Cytofix | BD Biosciences | Cat# 554655 |
Cytofix/cytoperm kit | BD Biosciences | Cat# 554714 |
dNTP mix | Meridian Bioscience | Cat# BIO-39053 |
(E)-1-Hydroxy-2-methyl-2-butenyl 4-pyrophosphate lithium salt (HMB-PP) | Sigma Aldrich | Cat# 95098; CAS# 396726-03-7 |
Ficoll-Paque Plus | Sigma Aldrich | Cat# GE17-1440-03 |
GolgiPlug | BD Biosciences | Cat# 555029 |
GolgiStop | BD Biosciences | Cat# 554724 |
Igepal | Sigma Aldrich | Cat# I8896; CAS# 9002-93-1 |
Ionomycin | Sigma Aldrich | Cat# 13909; EC# 200-664-3 |
Isopentenyl pyrophosphate trilithium salt (IPP) | Sigma Aldrich | Cat# 00297; CAS# 18687-43-9 |
Live/dead fixable aqua dead cell stain | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# L34957 |
Live/dead fixable blue dead cell stain | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# L34962 |
Live/dead fixable green dead cell stain | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# L34970 |
Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate | Abcam | CAT# ab120297; CAS# 16561-29-8 |
Random hexamer primer | Meridian Bioscience | Cat# BIO-38028 |
Recombinant human IL-2 | Peprotech | Cat# 200-02; Accession# P60568 |
Recombinant rhesus macaque IL-12 | R and D Systems | Cat# 3216-RL-025; Accession# P48095 and NP_001038199 |
Recombinant rhesus macaque IL-18 | R and D Systems | Cat# 2548-RM-025; Accession# AAK13416 |
RNasin Plus Ribonuclease Inhibitor | Promega | Cat# N2615 |
Streptavidin PE-TR | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# SA1017 |
SYBR Safe DNA gel stain | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# S33102 |
Transcription buffer staining kit | BD Biosciences | Cat# 562574 |
Zoledronic acid monohydrate (Zol) | Sigma Aldrich | Cat# SML0223; CAS# 165800-06-6 |
Critical commercial assays | ||
Biotinylation Kit / Biotin Conjugation Kit (Fast, Type A) | Abcam | Cat# ab201795 |
HotStarTaq Plus DNA Polymerase | Qiagen | Cat# 203609 |
SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 18080044 |
Deposited data | ||
Aligned, single-cell TCRG/TCRD sequences | This paper | Mendeley Data: https://doi.org/10.17632/bpwtp95rpw.1 |
Experimental models: Organisms/strains | ||
Pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina) | Australian National Macaque Breeding Colony | N/A |
Oligonucleotides | ||
CAT CTA TGG CCC TGG TTT CA | Integrated DNA Technologies | Rakasz et al.88; Fwd, macTCRDV2- External |
TGG CAG TCA AGA GAA AAT TG | Integrated DNA Technologies | Rakasz et al.88; Rev, macTCRDC- External |
AGA CCT GGT GAA GTC ATA C | Integrated DNA Technologies | Rakasz et al.88; Fwd, macTCRGV9- External |
GTT GCT CTT CTT TTC TTG CC | Integrated DNA Technologies | Rakasz et al.88; Rev, macTCRGC- External |
CAG AGA GAG ATG AAG GGT CTT AC | Integrated DNA Technologies | Fwd, macTCRDV2- Internal |
CAC TGG GAG AGA CGA CAA TAG | Integrated DNA Technologies | Rev, macTCRDC- Internal |
CCT GGT GAA GTC ATA CAG TTC C | Integrated DNA Technologies | macTCRGV9- Internal |
AAT AGT GGG CTT GGG TGA AAT A | Integrated DNA Technologies | macTCRGC- Internal |
Software and algorithms | ||
Code for TCR sequence processing and analysis | This paper | GitHub: https://github.com/BarberAxthelm/Vd2-Vg9_TCR_Analysis |
BD FACSDiva | BD Biosciences | N/A |
Biorender | Biorender | https://biorender.com/ |
FlowJo (v10.8.1) | FlowJo, LLC, BD Biosciences | https://www.flowjo.com/ |
MiXCR (v3.0.13) | Bolotin et al.89 | https://docs.milaboratories.com/ |
Prism (v9.4.1) | GraphPad | https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/ |
RStudio (v4.1.3) | RStudio, PBC | https://www.rstudio.com/ |
circlize (v0.4.15) | Gu et al.90 | https://jokergoo.github.io/circlize_book/book/ |
ggalluvial (v0.12.3) | Brunson91 | https://corybrunson.github.io/ggalluvial/ |
msa (v1.26.0) | Bodenhofer et al.92 | http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/msa.html |
Parallel | R Core Team93 | https://www.R-project.org/ |
Tidyverse (v1.3.1) | Wickham et al.94 | https://www.tidyverse.org/ |
UpSetR (v1.4.0) | Conway et al.95 | https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/UpSetR/index.html |
vegan (v2.6-2) | Jari Oksanen, et al.96 | https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan |
Other | ||
BD FACSAria III cell sorter | BD Biosciences | N/A |
BD LSRFortessa cell analyzer | BD Biosciences | N/A |
CELL-DYN Emerald Hematology Analyzer | Abbott Laboratories | N/A |
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Jennifer Juno (jennifer.juno@unimelb.edu.au).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents.
Experimental model and subject details
Non-human primate studies and samples
All animal studies and associated procedures were approved by the Monash University Animal Ethics Committee (identification no. 21659). Seven purpose-bred, experimentally naïve, adult male (7-16 years old) pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina) were utilized for the in vivo Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell expansion trial. All animals were housed in indoor-outdoor housing at the Monash Animal Research Platform Gippsland Field Station. The macaques were allocated into 1 of 4 treatment groups (1-2 animals per group; Table 1) for the trial. In vivo Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell expansion treatment protocols consisted of zoledronic acid monohydrate (Zol; 0.2mg/kg intravenous (IV) or 0.5mg intratracheal (IT); Sigma Aldrich), (E)-1-Hydroxy-2-methyl-2-butenyl 4-pyrophosphate (HMB-PP; 1mg/kg IV + 0.25mg IT; Sigma Aldrich), or Isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP; 0.5mg IT; Sigma Aldrich) once at day 0, along with subcutaneous (SC) recombinant human IL-2 (rhIL-2; 0.8x106 IU SC q24h; Peprotech) for 5 days starting at day 0. IV antigen administrations were performed as 5-minute infusions (20mL total volume), and IT antigen administrations consisted of 5mL instillations at the approximate level of the thoracic inlet. Blood samples were collected at day 2, 4, 8, 15, and 22 post antigen treatment, and compared to paired baseline samples collected on day -14, -7, and 0. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and rectal mucosal biopsies were collected at day 8 and 22 post antigen treatment and compared to paired samples taken pre-treatment (day -7). Inguinal lymph node biopsies were collected on day 8 and compared to paired samples taken pre-treatment (day -7).
In vitro Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell expansions were performed with cryopreserved samples from juvenile pigtail macaques involved in previous trials. All animals were acquired from the Australian National Macaque Breeding Colony. Details on the previous studies the macaques were enrolled in have been published separately.29,97,98,99,100 All studies were approved by the relevant animal ethics committees.
Human ethics statement
Study protocols were approved by the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (identification no. 11395), and all subjects provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All associated procedures were conducted in accordance with approved guidelines.
Method details
Sample collection and processing
Whole blood samples were collected into sodium heparin vacutainer tubes. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated via Ficoll-Paque Plus density separation gradient (Human: 100% Ficoll; NHP: 95% Ficoll diluted with sterile PBS; Sigma Aldrich). Lymph node and rectal mucosal biopsy samples were mechanically dissociated, passed through 70μm cell strainers and resuspended in RPMI-1640 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 5% penicillin/streptomycin/glutamine (RF10).101,102 Gastrointestinal tract samples were pre-digested in RF10 with Collagenase (0.1mg/mL; Sigma Aldrich) and DNase (1.5U/mL; Roche) for 2 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2 with agitation, prior to mechanical dissociation. Macaque Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell phenotyping was performed on freshly isolated cells from PBMCs and tissues. The remaining samples were cryopreserved in 10% DMSO/ 90% FCS, and stored in liquid nitrogen. Human PBMCs were cryopreserved in 10%DMSO/ 90% FCS, prior to Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell phenotyping.
In vitro Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell expansion and stimulation
Cryopreserved pigtail macaque PBMCs or splenocytes were utilized for in vitro Vδ2 T-cell expansions. Bulk PBMC, seeded at 2e6 cells/mL, were cultured for 13 days in RF10 with Zol (15μM; Sigma Aldrich) and rhIL-2 (1x103 IU/mL, unless reported otherwise, Peprotech). For some experiments, CCR6+ and CCR6- Vδ2 T-cells were isolated by cell sorting and expanded in autologous Vδ2 T-cell-depleted PBMCs (1x106 cells at 2x106 cells/mL final concentration). Cell sorting consisted of viability dye and surface staining, and washing and resuspending the cells in PBS + 2% FCS. Samples were sorted with a BD FACS Aria III cell sorter. Vδ2 T-cell depletions were performed using anti-PE microbead (Miltenyi Biotec) following initial surface staining with unconjugated Vδ2 antibody (15D, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a PE conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (polyclonal, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Microbead labelling and MACS depletions were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All expansions were incubated at 37oC and 5% CO2. Media was replaced every 3-4 days (rhIL-2 was maintained throughout the culture period), and cultures were maintained at a maximum concentration of 2x106 cells/mL.
For intracellular cytokine stimulations, cryopreserved PBMCs or tissue samples were stimulated with HMB-PP (20ng/mL, Sigma Aldrich) or paired unstimulated controls for 16hrs. In vitro expanded Vδ2 T-cells were mitogenically stimulated with Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate (0.025μg/mL, Abcam) and Ionomycin (0.04μg/mL, Sigma Aldrich) for 6 hours prior to antibody labelling, with paired unstimulated controls. GolgiStop and GolgiPlug (BD) were added after 1 hour to both stimulations and unstimulated controls. 72-hour cytokine stimulations were performed with rhIL-2 (1x103 IU/mL, Peprotech), or recombinant rhesus macaque IL-12 (rmIL-12; 50ng/mL; R and D Systems) and recombinant rhesus macaque IL-18 (rmIL-18; 50ng/mL; R and D Systems) in RF10. Where indicated, Zol (15μM; Sigma Aldrich), HMB-PP (20ng/mL, Sigma Aldrich), or IPP (4mg/mL; Sigma Aldrich) were included in the stimulations. All stimulations were performed at 37oC and 5% CO2.
Single-cell TCR sequencing
Vγ9+Vδ2+CD3+CD20-Live/Dead- T-cells were dry-sorted into 96-well PCR Microplates (Axygen) with a BD FACSAria III cell sorter, and immediately sealed and stored at -20oC. cDNA synthesis was completed with a 25μl reaction volume consisting of: 5x First strand buffer (1x working concentration, 50mM Tris-HCl, 75mM KCl, 3mM MgCl2, pH 8.3; Thermo Fisher Scientific), RNasin Plus® RNase inhibitor (8 units, Promega), dithiothreitol (DTT; 5mM; Thermo Fisher Scientific), igepal (0.25%; Sigma Aldrich), random hexamer primers (6ng/μl; Meridian Bioscience), dNTPs (0.8mM each; Bio Line), Superscript III (40 units, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and molecular grade water (Sigma Aldrich). Reverse transcription reactions were completed with the following thermal cycler profile: 42oC, 10min; 25oC, 10min; 50oC, 60min; 94oC, 5min. Amplification of the TRDV2/TRGV9 TCR chains was accomplished with a multiplex, nested PCR, similar to what has been previously described for αβTCR sequencing analysis.103,104,105,106,107 Both initial and nested PCR reactions were completed with a 50μl reaction volume consisting of: 10x PCR buffer (1x working concentration, 15mM MgCl2, pH 8.7; Qiagen), dNTPs (0.2mM each; Bio Line), the appropriate forward and reverse primers (0.2μM each, Integrated DNA Technologies), HotStarTaq Plus DNA Polymerase (2.5 units; Qiagen), and molecular grade water (Sigma Aldrich). 5x Q solution (1x working concentration, Qiagen) was included in the nested PCR reactions. Initial and nested PCR reactions were completed with the following thermal cycler profile: 95oC, 5min (hot start); 94oC, 1min (denaturation); 56oC, 1min (annealing); 72oC, 1min (extension); and a final extension step (72oC, 10min) after 40 cycles were completed. PCR products were visualized on an agarose gel (1.5% agarose in 1x TAE, 1:10,000 SYBR Safe DNA gel stain; Thermo Fisher Scientific) to confirm the presence of an appropriately sized products, and samples were subsequently submitted for capillary electrophoresis sequencing (Macrogen, Inc).
PCR primer design
Previously published DNA oligonucleotide primers for macaque TRDV2, TRDC, TRGV9, and TRGC were utilized for the initial PCR reactions.88 Nested DNA oligonucleotide primers were designed based on published macaque sequences within the initial PCR product (Table 2). The final PCR products contained a segment of the TRDV2/TRGV9 regions, the entire CDR3 region, and a segment of the TRDC/TRGC regions (TRDV2 amplicon length: 267bp; TRGV9 amplicon length: 282bp).
Antibodies and flow cytometry
To characterize macaque lymphocytes following in vivo or in vitro expansion, samples were washed 1x with PBS, and stained with LIVE/DEAD viability dye (Aqua, Blue, or Green; Thermo Fisher Scientific) to exclude dead cells. Samples were then incubated for 30-min at 4oC in the dark with various combinations of surface antibodies: Vδ2 FITC or unconjugated (15D, Thermo Fisher Scientific), Vγ9 FITC (7A5, Thermo Fisher Scientific), NKG2A APC (Z199, Beckman Coulter), CD94 APC (HP-3D9, BD), CXCR3 Alexa647 or Alexa700 or PE-Dazzle594 (G025H7, Biolegend), CD3 Alexa700 or BUV805 (SP34.2, BD), CD69 APC-Fire750 (FN50, Biolegend), CCR5 BV421 (J418F1, Biolegend), DNAM/CD226 BV605 (11A8, Biolegend), CD28 BV711 (CD28.2, BD), CCR6 BV785 (G034E3, Biolegend), CD20 BV510 or BUV805 or PE-CF594 (2H7, BD), EpCam/CD326 PE-CF594 (EBA-1, BD), CD26 Biotin (Clone5, in-house), CXCR5 PE-eFluor610 (MU5UBEE, Thermo Fisher Scientific), Vδ1 PE-Cy7 (TS8.2, Thermo Fisher Scientific), IL-18Rα PE-Vio770 (H44, Miltenyi Biotec), CD45 BUV395 or PE-Cy7 (D058-1283, BD), and CD95 BUV737 or PE-Cy7 (DX2, BD). When the unconjugated Vδ2 antibody was utilized to identify macaque Vγ9Vδ2 T-cells, the samples were pre-incubated with the unconjugated antibody for 30min, followed by a 30min incubation with a PE goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (polyclonal, Thermo Fisher Scientific), prior to surface staining. An in-house developed anti-CD26 antibody was utilized to identify macaque CD26+ Vγ9Vδ2 T-cells (Jiang et al. Manuscript in preparation). CD26 antibody biotinylation was completed using a Type A Biotin Conjugation Kit (Abcam) per the manufacturer recommendations. Following surface staining with the biotinylated CD26 antibody, samples were incubated with a PE-TR Streptavidin secondary (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were washed with PBS + 2% FCS following each surface incubation and fixed with BD Cytofix Fixation Buffer after surface staining. To evaluate transcription factor expression, cells were permeabilized with the BD Transcription buffer staining kit according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, and subsequently labelled with transcription factor antibodies: Eomes PerCP-eFluor710 (WD1928, Thermo Fisher Scientific), Bcl6 Alexa647 (IG191E/A8, Biolegend), T-bet BV421 (4B10, Biolegend), and PLZF PE-CF594 (R17-809, BD). To evaluate cytokine or cytotoxic granule production, cells were permeabilized with BD Cytofix/cytoperm according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, prior to intracellular antibody labelling: TNFα APC-Cy7 (Mab11, Biolegend), GM-CSF BV421 (BVD2-21C11, BD), Granzyme B BV510 (GB11, BD), IL-17A BV605 (BL168, Biolegend), and IFNγ BUV395 (B27, BD). All samples were analyzed on a BD LSRFortessa cell analyzer using BD FACSDiva.
Quantification and statistical analysis
Flow cytometry data from in vitro and in vivo experiments are presented as individual data points from individual animals +/- bars for the median and interquartile range (IQR). All associated statistical analysis and data presentation was performed using Prism (v9.4.1, GraphPad Software). Flow cytometry data was analyzed in FlowJo (v10.8.1, FlowJo LLC). Statistical analysis was completed with the indicated non-parametric tests in the figure legends. Fold change for cell expansions was calculated as a ratio of the final cell count divided by the initial cell count. In vitro Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell counts following expansion were calculated from total lymphocyte counts acquired with a CellDyn Emerald hematology analyzer (Abbott Laboratories), multiplied by the frequency of Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell as a percentage of the total lymphocyte population. TRDV2/TRGV9 sequences were processed using the MiXCR software package (v3.0.13; species: Macaca mulatta),89 including sequence alignment and filtering to only include productive, paired TRDV2/TRGV9 CDR3 sequences for downstream analysis. All subsequent TCR analysis and figure development was completed in R studio (v4.1.3; RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC) with the associated packages (Table S2) and code (https://github.com/BarberAxthelm/Vd2-Vg9_TCR_Analysis). Randomization tests were utilized to determine significance in diversity and richness differences between pre-expanded and in vivo expanded Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell populations in individual animals (n = 10,000 random distributions).108 For all statistical tests, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the Melbourne Cytometry Platform for provision of flow cytometry services, and Vanta Jameson and Magdaline Sakkas from the Melbourne Brain Center Flow Cytometry Facility for provision of sorting services. All nonhuman primate studies were conducted at the Monash Animal Research Platform Gippsland Field Station. We acknowledge and thank Irwin Ryan, Graham Shillito, and staff for provision of animal care and sample collection support throughout the animal trials. The study was funded by the NHMRC through Program (1149990) and Investigator grants (A.K.W., GNT1173433; J.A.J., GNT2009308). I.M.B.A. is supported by a Melbourne Research Scholarship through the University of Melbourne.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: I.M.B.A., S.J.K., and J.A.J.; Methodology: I.M.B.A., K.M.W., R.E., T.H.A., and A.K.W.; Software: I.M.B.A. and V.R.B.B.A.; Investigation: I.M.B.A. and K.M.W.; Resources: A.M.G.; Writing – Original Draft: I.M.B.A., S.J.K., and J.A.J.; Writing – Review & Editing: All authors; Visualization: I.M.B.A., S.J.K., and J.A.J.; Funding Acquisition: S.J.K. and J.A.J.; Supervision: S.J.K. and J.A.J.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Inclusion and diversity
We support inclusive, diverse, and equitable conduct of research.
Published: February 25, 2023
Footnotes
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106269.
Supplemental information
Data and code availability
Paired, aligned, single-cell TCRG/TCRD sequences, and associated flow cytometry sorting data, has been deposited at Mendeley Data, and is publicly available as of the date of publication (Mendeley Data: https://doi.org/10.17632/bpwtp95rpw.1).All other data reported in this paper will be shared by the lead contact upon request.
All original code has been deposited at GitHub (GitHub: https://github.com/BarberAxthelm/Vd2-Vg9_TCR_Analysis) and is publicly available as of the date of publication.
Any additional information required to re-analyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
References
- 1.Hoeres T., Smetak M., Pretscher D., Wilhelm M. Improving the efficiency of Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell immunotherapy in cancer. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:800. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lawand M., Déchanet-Merville J., Dieu-Nosjean M.-C. Key features of gamma-delta T-cell subsets in human diseases and their immunotherapeutic implications. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:761. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xu Y., Xiang Z., Alnaggar M., Kouakanou L., Li J., He J., Yang J., Hu Y., Chen Y., Lin L., et al. Allogeneic Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell immunotherapy exhibits promising clinical safety and prolongs the survival of patients with late-stage lung or liver cancer. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2021;18:427–439. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0515-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Perez C., Gruber I., Arber C. Off-the-Shelf Allogeneic T cell therapies for cancer: Opportunities and challenges using naturally occurring “universal” donor T cells. Front. Immunol. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.583716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kondo M., Izumi T., Fujieda N., Kondo A., Morishita T., Matsushita H., Kakimi K. Expansion of human peripheral blood γδ T cells using zoledronate. J. Vis. Exp. 2011 doi: 10.3791/3182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sebestyen Z., Prinz I., Déchanet-Merville J., Silva-Santos B., Kuball J. Translating gammadelta (γδ) T cells and their receptors into cancer cell therapies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020;19:169–184. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0038-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wragg K.M., Tan H.-X., Kristensen A.B., Nguyen-Robertson C.V., Kelleher A.D., Parsons M.S., Wheatley A.K., Berzins S.P., Pellicci D.G., Kent S.J., Juno J.A. High CD26 and low CD94 expression identifies an IL-23 responsive Vδ2+ T cell subset with a MAIT cell-like transcriptional profile. Cell Rep. 2020;31 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tan L., Fichtner A.S., Bruni E., Odak I., Sandrock I., Bubke A., Borchers A., Schultze-Florey C., Koenecke C., Förster R., et al. A fetal wave of human type 3 effector γδ cells with restricted TCR diversity persists into adulthood. Sci. Immunol. 2021;6 doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abf0125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ryan P.L., Sumaria N., Holland C.J., Bradford C.M., Izotova N., Grandjean C.L., Jawad A.S., Bergmeier L.A., Pennington D.J. Heterogeneous yet stable Vδ2(+) T-cell profiles define distinct cytotoxic effector potentials in healthy human individuals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:14378–14383. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611098113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wilhelm M., Kunzmann V., Eckstein S., Reimer P., Weissinger F., Ruediger T., Tony H.-P. γδ T cells for immune therapy of patients with lymphoid malignancies. Blood. 2003;102:200–206. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kunzmann V., Bauer E., Wilhelm M. γ/δ T-cell stimulation by Pamidronate. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999;340:737–738. doi: 10.1056/nejm199903043400914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Poquet Y., Kroca M., Halary F., Stenmark S., Peyrat M.-A., Bonneville M., Fournié J.J., Sjöstedt A. Expansion of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells is Triggered by Francisella tularensis -derived phosphoantigens in Tularemia but not after Tularemia vaccination. Infect. Immun. 1998;66:2107–2114. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.5.2107-2114.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Poccia F., Gioia C., Martini F., Sacchi A., Piacentini P., Tempestilli M., Agrati C., Amendola A., Abdeddaim A., Vlassi C., et al. Zoledronic acid and interleukin-2 treatment improves immunocompetence in HIV-infected persons by activating Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. Aids. 2009;23:555–565. doi: 10.1097/qad.0b013e3283244619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bertaina A., Zorzoli A., Petretto A., Barbarito G., Inglese E., Merli P., Lavarello C., Brescia L.P., De Angelis B., Tripodi G., et al. Zoledronic acid boosts γδ T-cell activity in children receiving αβ + T and CD19 + cell-depleted grafts from an HLA-haplo-identical donor. OncoImmunology. 2017;6 doi: 10.1080/2162402x.2016.1216291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dieli F., Gebbia N., Poccia F., Caccamo N., Montesano C., Fulfaro F., Arcara C., Valerio M.R., Meraviglia S., Di Sano C., et al. Induction of γδ T-lymphocyte effector functions by bisphosphonate zoledronic acid in cancer patients in vivo. Blood. 2003;102:2310–2311. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wilhelm M., Smetak M., Schaefer-Eckart K., Kimmel B., Birkmann J., Einsele H., Kunzmann V. Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of haploidentical γδ T cells. J. Transl. Med. 2014;12:45. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bennouna J., Bompas E., Neidhardt E.M., Rolland F., Philip I., Galéa C., Salot S., Saiagh S., Audrain M., Rimbert M., et al. Phase-I study of Innacell γδ, an autologous cell-therapy product highly enriched in γ9δ2 T lymphocytes, in combination with IL-2, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2008;57:1599–1609. doi: 10.1007/s00262-008-0491-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sakamoto M., Nakajima J., Murakawa T., Fukami T., Yoshida Y., Murayama T., Takamoto S., Matsushita H., Kakimi K. Adoptive immunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer using zoledronate-expanded γδ T cells. J. Immunother. 2011;34:202–211. doi: 10.1097/cji.0b013e318207ecfb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Noguchi A., Kaneko T., Kamigaki T., Fujimoto K., Ozawa M., Saito M., Ariyoshi N., Goto S. Zoledronate-activated Vγ9γδ T cell-based immunotherapy is feasible and restores the impairment of γδ T cells in patients with solid tumors. Cytotherapy. 2011;13:92–97. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2010.515581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Abe Y., Muto M., Nieda M., Nakagawa Y., Nicol A., Kaneko T., Goto S., Yokokawa K., Suzuki K. Clinical and immunological evaluation of zoledronate-activated Vγ9γδ T-cell-based immunotherapy for patients with multiple myeloma. Exp. Hematol. 2009;37:956–968. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2009.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nakajima J., Murakawa T., Fukami T., Goto S., Kaneko T., Yoshida Y., Takamoto S., Kakimi K. A phase I study of adoptive immunotherapy for recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer patients with autologous γδ T cells. Eur. J. Cardio. Thorac. Surg. 2010;37:1191–1197. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.11.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Qaqish A., Huang D., Chen C.Y., Zhang Z., Wang R., Li S., Yang E., Lu Y., Larsen M.H., Jacobs W.R., et al. Adoptive transfer of phosphoantigen-specific γδ T cell subset Attenuates Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in nonhuman primates. J. Immunol. 2017;198:4753–4763. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1602019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shen L., Frencher J., Huang D., Wang W., Yang E., Chen C.Y., Zhang Z., Wang R., Qaqish A., Larsen M.H., et al. Immunization of Vγ2Vδ2 T cells programs sustained effector memory responses that control tuberculosis in nonhuman primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:6371–6378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811380116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chen C.Y., Yao S., Huang D., Wei H., Sicard H., Zeng G., Jomaa H., Larsen M.H., Jacobs W.R., Wang R., et al. Phosphoantigen/IL2 expansion and differentiation of Vγ2Vδ2 T cells increase Resistance to tuberculosis in nonhuman primates. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ali Z., Shao L., Halliday L., Reichenberg A., Hintz M., Jomaa H., Chen Z.W. Prolonged (E)-4-Hydroxy-3-Methyl-But-2-Enyl pyrophosphate-driven antimicrobial and cytotoxic responses of pulmonary and systemic Vγ2Vδ2 T cells in macaques. J. Immunol. 2007;179:8287–8296. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.12.8287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huang D., Chen C.Y., Ali Z., Shao L., Shen L., Lockman H.A., Barnewall R.E., Sabourin C., Eestep J., Reichenberg A., et al. Antigen-specific Vgamma2Vdelta2 T effector cells confer homeostatic protection against pneumonic plaque lesions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:7553–7558. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811250106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ryan-Payseur B., Frencher J., Shen L., Chen C.Y., Huang D., Chen Z.W. Multieffector-functional immune responses of HMBPP-specific Vγ2Vδ2 T cells in nonhuman primates Inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes ΔactA prfA. J. Immunol. 2012;189:1285–1293. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Karunakaran M.M., Göbel T.W., Starick L., Walter L., Herrmann T. Vγ9 and Vδ2 T cell antigen receptor genes and butyrophilin 3 (BTN3) emerged with placental mammals and are concomitantly preserved in selected species like alpaca (Vicugna pacos) Immunogenetics. 2014;66:243–254. doi: 10.1007/s00251-014-0763-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jegaskanda S., Amarasena T.H., Laurie K.L., Tan H.-X., Butler J., Parsons M.S., Alcantara S., Petravic J., Davenport M.P., Hurt A.C., et al. Standard Trivalent influenza virus Protein vaccination does not Prime antibody-dependent Cellular cytotoxicity in macaques. J. Virol. 2013;87:13706–13718. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01666-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Baskin C.R., García-Sastre A., Tumpey T.M., Bielefeldt-Ohmann H., Carter V.S., Nistal-Villán E., Katze M.G. Integration of clinical data, Pathology, and cDNA Microarrays in influenza virus-infected pigtailed macaques ( Macaca nemestrina ) J. Virol. 2004;78:10420–10432. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.19.10420-10432.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Baas T., Baskin C.R., Diamond D.L., García-Sastre A., Bielefeldt-Ohmann H., Tumpey T.M., Thomas M.J., Carter V.S., Teal T.H., Van Hoeven N., et al. Integrated molecular Signature of disease: analysis of influenza virus-infected macaques through functional Genomics and Proteomics. J. Virol. 2006;80:10813–10828. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00851-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shen Y., Shen L., Sehgal P., Huang D., Qiu L., Du G., Letvin N.L., Chen Z.W. Clinical Latency and Reactivation of AIDS-Related Mycobacterial infections. J. Virol. 2004;78:14023–14032. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.24.14023-14032.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chakravarty S., Shears M.J., James E.R., Rai U., KC N., Conteh S., Lambert L.E., Duffy P.E., Murphy S.C., Hoffman S.L. Efficient infection of non-human primates with purified, cryopreserved Plasmodium knowlesi sporozoites. Malar. J. 2022;21:247. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04261-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen Z.W. Immune biology of Ag-specific γδ T cells in infections. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011;68:2409–2417. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0703-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Davey M.S., Willcox C.R., Hunter S., Kasatskaya S.A., Remmerswaal E.B.M., Salim M., Mohammed F., Bemelman F.J., Chudakov D.M., Oo Y.H., Willcox B.E. The human Vδ2+ T-cell compartment comprises distinct innate-like Vγ9+ and adaptive Vγ9- subsets. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:1760. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04076-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Davey M.S., Willcox C.R., Hunter S., Oo Y.H., Willcox B.E. Vδ2+ T cells—two subsets for the Price of One. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:2106. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Caccamo N., Dieli F., Wesch D., Jomaa H., Eberl M. Sex-specific phenotypical and functional differences in peripheral human Vγ9/Vδ2 T cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2006;79:663–666. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1105640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dieli F., Poccia F., Lipp M., Sireci G., Caccamo N., Di Sano C., Salerno A. Differentiation of effector/memory Vδ2 T cells and Migratory routes in lymph nodes or Inflammatory sites. J. Exp. Med. 2003;198:391–397. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ram D.R., Lucar O., Hueber B., Reeves R.K. Simian immunodeficiency virus infection Modulates CD94 + (KLRD1 + ) NK cells in rhesus macaques. J. Virol. 2019;93 doi: 10.1128/jvi.00731-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Khairallah C., Chu T.H., Sheridan B.S. Tissue Adaptations of memory and tissue-resident gamma delta T cells. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:2636. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McMurray J.L., von Borstel A., Taher T.E., Syrimi E., Taylor G.S., Sharif M., Rossjohn J., Remmerswaal E.B.M., Bemelman F.J., Vieira Braga F.A., et al. Transcriptional profiling of human Vδ1 T cells reveals a pathogen-driven adaptive differentiation program. Cell Rep. 2022;39 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Alonzo E.S., Sant’Angelo D.B. Development of PLZF-expressing innate T cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2011;23:220–227. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Eidson M., Wahlstrom J., Beaulieu A.M., Zaidi B., Carsons S.E., Crow P.K., Yuan J., Wolchok J.D., Horsthemke B., Wieczorek D., Sant'Angelo D.B. Altered development of NKT cells, γδ T cells, CD8 T cells and NK cells in a PLZF Deficient Patient. PLoS One. 2011;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hunter S., Willcox C.R., Davey M.S., Kasatskaya S.A., Jeffery H.C., Chudakov D.M., Oo Y.H., Willcox B.E. Human liver infiltrating γδ T cells are composed of clonally expanded circulating and tissue-resident populations. J. Hepatol. 2018;69:654–665. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zakeri N., Hall A., Swadling L., Pallett L.J., Schmidt N.M., Diniz M.O., Kucykowicz S., Amin O.E., Gander A., Pinzani M., et al. Characterisation and induction of tissue-resident gamma delta T-cells to target hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:1372. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29012-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Caccamo N., Battistini L., Bonneville M., Poccia F., Fournié J.J., Meraviglia S., Borsellino G., Kroczek R.A., La Mendola C., Scotet E., et al. CXCR5 identifies a subset of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells which Secrete IL-4 and IL-10 and help B cells for antibody production. J. Immunol. 2006;177:5290–5295. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.8.5290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhu X., Zhu J. CD4 T helper cell subsets and related human immunological Disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:8011. doi: 10.3390/ijms21218011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gioulbasani M., Galaras A., Grammenoudi S., Moulos P., Dent A.L., Sigvardsson M., Hatzis P., Kee B.L., Verykokakis M. The transcription factor BCL-6 controls early development of innate-like T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2020;21:1058–1069. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0737-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kroca M., Johansson A., Sjöstedt A., Tärnvik A. Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in human Legionellosis. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2001;8:949–954. doi: 10.1128/cdli.8.5.949-954.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tyler C.J., McCarthy N.E., Lindsay J.O., Stagg A.J., Moser B., Eberl M. Antigen-presenting human γδ T cells promote intestinal CD4+ T cell expression of IL-22 and mucosal Release of Calprotectin. J. Immunol. 2017;198:3417–3425. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.McCarthy N.E., Bashir Z., Vossenkämper A., Hedin C.R., Giles E.M., Bhattacharjee S., Brown S.G., Sanders T.J., Whelan K., MacDonald T.T., et al. Proinflammatory Vδ2+ T cells populate the human intestinal mucosa and enhance IFN-γ production by colonic αβ T cells. J. Immunol. 2013;191:2752–2763. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ness-Schwickerath K.J., Jin C., Morita C.T. Cytokine Requirements for the differentiation and expansion of IL-17A– and IL-22–Producing human Vγ2Vδ2 T cells. J. Immunol. 2010;184:7268–7280. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sicard H., Ingoure S., Luciani B., Serraz C., Fournié J.J., Bonneville M., Tiollier J., Romagné F. In vivo Immunomanipulation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells with a Synthetic phosphoantigen in a preclinical nonhuman primate model. J. Immunol. 2005;175:5471–5480. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.8.5471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.El-Sherbiny Y.M., Meade J.L., Holmes T.D., McGonagle D., Mackie S.L., Morgan A.W., Cook G., Feyler S., Richards S.J., Davies F.E., et al. The Requirement for DNAM-1, NKG2D, and NKp46 in the natural killer cell-mediated killing of myeloma cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8444–8449. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-4230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhang Z., Wu N., Lu Y., Davidson D., Colonna M., Veillette A. DNAM-1 controls NK cell activation via an ITT-like motif. J. Exp. Med. 2015;212:2165–2182. doi: 10.1084/jem.20150792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Meraviglia S., Eberl M., Vermijlen D., Todaro M., Buccheri S., Cicero G., La Mendola C., Guggino G., D’Asaro M., Orlando V., et al. In vivo manipulation of Vgamma9Vdelta2 T cells with zoledronate and low-dose interleukin-2 for immunotherapy of advanced breast cancer patients. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2010;161:290–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04167.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lang J.M., Kaikobad M.R., Wallace M., Staab M.J., Horvath D.L., Wilding G., Liu G., Eickhoff J.C., McNeel D.G., Malkovsky M. Pilot trial of interleukin-2 and zoledronic acid to augment γδ T cells as treatment for patients with refractory renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2011;60:1447–1460. doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-1049-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kunzmann V., Smetak M., Kimmel B., Weigang-Koehler K., Goebeler M., Birkmann J., Becker J., Schmidt-Wolf I.G.H., Einsele H., Wilhelm M. Tumor-promoting versus tumor-antagonizing roles of γδ T cells in cancer immunotherapy: results from a Prospective phase I/II trial. J. Immunother. 2012;35:205–213. doi: 10.1097/cji.0b013e318245bb1e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Pressey J.G., Adams J., Harkins L., Kelly D., You Z., Lamb L.S. In vivo expansion and activation of γδ T cells as immunotherapy for refractory neuroblastoma: a phase 1 study. Medicine. 2016;95 doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000004909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hintz M., Reichenberg A., Altincicek B., Bahr U., Gschwind R.M., Kollas A.-K., Beck E., Wiesner J., Eberl M., Jomaa H. Identification of (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate as a major activator for human γδ T cells in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 2001;509:317–322. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)03191-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.De Gassart A., Le K.-S., Brune P., Agaugué S., Sims J., Goubard A., Castellano R., Joalland N., Scotet E., Collette Y., et al. Development of ICT01, a first-in-class, anti-BTN3A antibody for activating Vγ9Vδ2 T cell–mediated antitumor immune response. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021;13 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj0835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sireci G., Espinosa E., Sano C., Dieli F., Fournié J.J., Salerno A. Differential activation of human γ δ cells by nonpeptide phosphoantigens. Eur. J. Immunol. 2001;31:1628–1635. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Casetti R., Perretta G., Taglioni A., Mattei M., Colizzi V., Dieli F., D’Offizi G., Malkovsky M., Poccia F. Drug-induced expansion and differentiation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in vivo: the role of exogenous IL-2. J. Immunol. 2005;175:1593–1598. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.3.1593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Cazzetta V., Bruni E., Terzoli S., Carenza C., Franzese S., Piazza R., Marzano P., Donadon M., Torzilli G., Cimino M., et al. NKG2A expression identifies a subset of human Vδ2 T cells exerting the highest antitumor effector functions. Cell Rep. 2021;37 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Vyborova A., Beringer D.X., Fasci D., Karaiskaki F., van Diest E., Kramer L., de Haas A., Sanders J., Janssen A., Straetemans T., et al. γ9δ2T cell diversity and the receptor interface with tumor cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2020;130:4637–4651. doi: 10.1172/jci132489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Willcox C.R., Davey M.S., Willcox B.E. Development and selection of the human Vγ9Vδ2+ T-cell repertoire. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1501. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.MacDougall A., Enders P., Hatfield G., Pauza D., Rakasz E. Vγ2 TCR repertoire overlap in different anatomical compartments of healthy, unrelated rhesus macaques. J. Immunol. 2001;166:2296–2302. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.4.2296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Juno J.A., Wragg K.M., Amarasena T., Meehan B.S., Mak J.Y.W., Liu L., Fairlie D.P., McCluskey J., Eckle S.B.G., Kent S.J. MAIT cells upregulate α4β7 in response to acute simian immunodeficiency virus/simian hiv infection but are resistant to peripheral depletion in pigtail macaques. J. Immunol. 2019;202:2105–2120. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bennouna J., Levy V., Sicard H., Senellart H., Audrain M., Hiret S., Rolland F., Bruzzoni-Giovanelli H., Rimbert M., Galéa C., et al. Phase I study of bromohydrin pyrophosphate (BrHPP, IPH 1101), a Vγ9Vδ2 T lymphocyte agonist in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2010;59:1521–1530. doi: 10.1007/s00262-010-0879-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Spencer C.T., Abate G., Sakala I.G., Xia M., Truscott S.M., Eickhoff C.S., Linn R., Blazevic A., Metkar S.S., Peng G., et al. Granzyme A produced by γ9δ2 T cells induces human macrophages to inhibit growth of an intracellular pathogen. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wang C., Kang S.G., Lee J., Sun Z., Kim C.H. The roles of CCR6 in migration of Th17 cells and regulation of effector T-cell balance in the gut. Mucosal Immunol. 2009;2:173–183. doi: 10.1038/mi.2008.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lee A.Y.S., Körner H. The CCR6-CCL20 axis in humoral immunity and T-B cell immunobiology. Immunobiology. 2019;224:449–454. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2019.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.WILLIAMS I.R. CCR6 and CCL20. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006;1072:52–61. doi: 10.1196/annals.1326.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Meitei H.T., Jadhav N., Lal G. CCR6-CCL20 axis as a therapeutic target for autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2021;20 doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zhang Y., Roth T.L., Gray E.E., Chen H., Rodda L.B., Liang Y., Ventura P., Villeda S., Crocker P.R., Cyster J.G. Migratory and adhesive cues controlling innate-like lymphocyte surveillance of the pathogen-exposed surface of the lymph node. Elife. 2016;5 doi: 10.7554/elife.18156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mehta H., Lett M.J., Klenerman P., Filipowicz Sinnreich M. MAIT cells in liver inflammation and fibrosis. Semin. Immunopathol. 2022;44:429–444. doi: 10.1007/s00281-022-00949-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Affò S., Rodrigo-Torres D., Blaya D., Morales-Ibanez O., Coll M., Millán C., Altamirano J., Arroyo V., Caballería J., Bataller R., et al. Chemokine receptor Ccr6 deficiency alters hepatic Inflammatory cell recruitment and promotes liver inflammation and fibrosis. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Facco M., Baesso I., Miorin M., Bortoli M., Cabrelle A., Boscaro E., Gurrieri C., Trentin L., Zambello R., Calabrese F., et al. Expression and role of CCR6/CCL20 chemokine axis in pulmonary sarcoidosis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2007;82:946–955. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0307133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ito T., Carson W.F., Cavassani K.A., Connett J.M., Kunkel S.L. CCR6 as a mediator of immunity in the lung and gut. Exp. Cell Res. 2011;317:613–619. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Workalemahu G., Wang H., Puan K.-J., Nada M.H., Kuzuyama T., Jones B.D., Jin C., Morita C.T. Metabolic engineering of Salmonella vaccine bacteria to boost human Vγ2Vδ2 T cell immunity. J. Immunol. 2014;193:708–721. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hao J., Wu X., Xia S., Li Z., Wen T., Zhao N., Wu Z., Wang P., Zhao L., Yin Z. Current progress in γδ T-cell biology. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2010;7:409–413. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2010.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Spencer C.T., Abate G., Blazevic A., Hoft D.F. Only a subset of phosphoantigen-responsive γ9δ2 T cells mediate protective tuberculosis immunity. J. Immunol. 2008;181:4471–4484. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.7.4471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Fichtner A.S., Bubke A., Rampoldi F., Wilharm A., Tan L., Steinbrück L., Schultze-Florey C., von Kaisenberg C., Prinz I., Herrmann T., Ravens S. TCR repertoire analysis reveals phosphoantigen-induced polyclonal proliferation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in neonates and adults. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2020;107:1023–1032. doi: 10.1002/jlb.1ma0120-427rr. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Shimonkevitz R., Colburn C., Burnham J.A., Murray R.S., Kotzin B.L. Clonal expansions of activated gamma/delta T cells in recent-onset multiple sclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:923–927. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.3.923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Huang D., Chen C.Y., Zhang M., Qiu L., Shen Y., Du G., Zhou K., Wang R., Chen Z.W. Clonal immune responses of Mycobacterium-specific γδ T cells in tuberculous and non-tuberculous tissues during M. tuberculosis infection. PLoS One. 2012;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Vu M.N., Kelly H.G., Tan H.X., Juno J.A., Esterbauer R., Davis T.P., Truong N.P., Wheatley A.K., Kent S.J. Hemagglutinin functionalized liposomal vaccines enhance germinal center and follicular helper T cell immunity. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021;10 doi: 10.1002/adhm.202002142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Li X., Valdes S.A., Alzhrani R.F., Hufnagel S., Hursting S.D., Cui Z. Zoledronic acid-containing nanoparticles with minimum premature release show enhanced activity against extraskeletal tumor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11:7311–7319. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b16588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Rakasz E., MacDougall A.V., Zayas M.T., Helgelund J.L., Ruckward T.J., Hatfield G., Dykhuizen M., Mitchen J.L., Evans P.S., Pauza C.D. γδ T cell receptor repertoire in blood and colonic mucosa of rhesus macaques. J. Med. Primatol. 2000;29:387–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2000.290602.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Bolotin D.A., Poslavsky S., Mitrophanov I., Shugay M., Mamedov I.Z., Putintseva E.V., Chudakov D.M. MiXCR: software for comprehensive adaptive immunity profiling. Nat. Methods. 2015;12:380–381. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Gu Z., Gu L., Eils R., Schlesner M., Brors B. circlize implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2811–2812. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Brunson J. ggalluvial: Layered Grammar for Alluvial Plots. J. Open Source Softw. 2020;5:2017. doi: 10.21105/joss.02017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Bodenhofer U., Bonatesta E., Horejš-Kainrath C., Hochreiter S. msa: an R package for multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3997–3999. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.R Core Team . R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2022. https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
- 94.Wickham H., Averick M., Bryan J., Chang W., McGowan L., François R., Grolemund G., Hayes A., Henry L., Hester J., et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 2019;4:1686. doi: 10.21105/joss.01686. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Conway J.R., Lex A., Gehlenborg N. UpSetR: an R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2938–2940. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Oksanen, J., Simpson, G.L., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin P.R., O'Hara, R.B., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H., Szoecs, E., et al., (2022). vegan: Community Ecology Package. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
- 97.Parsons M.S., Lee W.S., Kristensen A.B., Amarasena T., Khoury G., Wheatley A.K., Reynaldi A., Wines B.D., Hogarth P.M., Davenport M.P., Kent S.J. Fc-dependent functions are redundant to efficacy of anti-HIV antibody PGT121 in macaques. J. Clin. Invest. 2019;129:182–191. doi: 10.1172/jci122466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Li J., Ahmet F., Sullivan L.C., Brooks A.G., Kent S.J., De Rose R., Salazar A.M., Reis e Sousa C., Shortman K., Lahoud M.H., et al. Antibodies targeting Clec9A promote strong humoral immunity without adjuvant in mice and non-human primates. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015;45:854–864. doi: 10.1002/eji.201445127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Parsons M.S., Lloyd S.B., Lee W.S., Kristensen A.B., Amarasena T., Center R.J., Keele B.F., Lifson J.D., LaBranche C.C., Montefiori D., et al. Partial efficacy of a broadly neutralizing antibody against cell-associated SHIV infection. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017;9 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Khanna M., Jackson R.J., Alcantara S., Amarasena T.H., Li Z., Kelleher A.D., Kent S.J., Ranasinghe C. Mucosal and systemic SIV-specific cytotoxic CD4 + T cell hierarchy in protection following intranasal/intramuscular recombinant pox-viral vaccination of pigtail macaques. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:5661. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41506-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Barber-Axthelm I.M., Kelly H.G., Esterbauer R., Wragg K.M., Gibbon A.M., Lee W.S., Wheatley A.K., Kent S.J., Tan H.-X., Juno J.A. Coformulation with tattoo ink for immunological assessment of vaccine immunogenicity in the draining lymph node. J. Immunol. 2021;207:735–744. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kelly H.G., Tan H.-X., Juno J.A., Esterbauer R., Ju Y., Jiang W., Wimmer V.C., Duckworth B.C., Groom J.R., Caruso F., et al. Self-assembling influenza nanoparticle vaccines drive extended germinal center activity and memory B cell maturation. Jci Insight. 2020;5 doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.136653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Dash P., McClaren J.L., Oguin T.H., Rothwell W., Todd B., Morris M.Y., Becksfort J., Reynolds C., Brown S.A., Doherty P.C., Thomas P.G. Paired analysis of TCRα and TCRβ chains at the single-cell level in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:288–295. doi: 10.1172/jci44752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Wang G.C., Dash P., McCullers J.A., Doherty P.C., Thomas P.G. T cell receptor αβ diversity inversely correlates with pathogen-specific antibody levels in human cytomegalovirus infection. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012;4:128ra42. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Rowntree L.C., Petersen J., Juno J.A., Chaurasia P., Wragg K., Koutsakos M., Hensen L., Wheatley A.K., Kent S.J., Rossjohn J., et al. SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T-cell responses and TCR signatures in the context of a prominent HLA-A∗24:02 allomorph. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2021;99:990–1000. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Valkenburg S.A., Josephs T.M., Clemens E.B., Grant E.J., Nguyen T.H.O., Wang G.C., Price D.A., Miller A., Tong S.Y.C., Thomas P.G., et al. Molecular basis for universal HLA-A∗0201–restricted CD8+ T-cell immunity against influenza viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:4440–4445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603106113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Nguyen T.H.O., Rowntree L.C., Pellicci D.G., Bird N.L., Handel A., Kjer-Nielsen L., Kedzierska K., Kotsimbos T.C., Mifsud N.A. Recognition of distinct Cross-reactive virus-specific CD8+ T cells reveals a unique TCR Signature in a clinical setting. J. Immunol. 2014;192:5039–5049. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Venturi V., Kedzierska K., Turner S.J., Doherty P.C., Davenport M.P. Methods for comparing the diversity of samples of the T cell receptor repertoire. J. Immunol. Methods. 2007;321:182–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2007.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Paired, aligned, single-cell TCRG/TCRD sequences, and associated flow cytometry sorting data, has been deposited at Mendeley Data, and is publicly available as of the date of publication (Mendeley Data: https://doi.org/10.17632/bpwtp95rpw.1).All other data reported in this paper will be shared by the lead contact upon request.
All original code has been deposited at GitHub (GitHub: https://github.com/BarberAxthelm/Vd2-Vg9_TCR_Analysis) and is publicly available as of the date of publication.
Any additional information required to re-analyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.