Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 15;56(3):1943–1969. doi: 10.1007/s10644-023-09493-w

Table 12.

User satisfaction linear regression analysis

Robust
Coef Std.Err t P >|t| [95% Conf.Interval]
area_growth 0.026 0.060 0.430 0.664 − 0.093 0.145
female 0.039 0.045 0.880 0.380 − 0.049 0.127
age29_39 0.101 0.062 1.640 0.102 − 0.020 0.223
age40_50 0.189*** 0.065 2.890 0.004 0.060 0.318
age50plus 0.115 0.072 1.590 0.114 − 0.028 0.258
University − 0.015 0.039 − 0.390 0.694 − 0.093 0.062
non_single -0.045 0.054 -0.820 0.414 -0.152 0.063
non_urban 0.004 0.075 0.060 0.955 -0.143 0.151
working -0.007 0.048 -0.150 0.881 -0.101 0.087
price_reasonable 0.125*** 0.046 2.710 0.007 0.034 0.215
mistakes -0.122** 0.050 -2.460 0.014 -0.220 -0.024
serviced 0.320*** 0.055 5.860 0.000 0.212 0.427
whatmore_design -0.050 0.061 -0.810 0.419 -0.171 0.071
whatmore_space -0.082 0.053 -1.550 0.122 -0.186 0.022
_cons 0.552*** 0.096 5.730 0.000 0.362 0.742
Number of obs = 266
F (14, 251) = 5.32
Prob > F = 0.0000
R-squared = 0.3193
Root MSE = .3036

Highlighted results that are significant in the analysis and discussion indicated in bold

Asterisks *, ** and *** denote statistical significance at 10%, 5% and 1%