Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 1;10:979380. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.979380

TABLE 1.

Participant sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

Excluded participants
(0-year)
Study participants
(0-year)
Study participants
(at 7.5-year)
N = 1,795 N = 671 N = 671
Mean (SD)
Age, years (mean, SD) 45.7 (10.6) 45.7 (10.2) 53.3 (10.2)
MS duration, years (mean, SD) 8.15 (7.5) 7.88 (6.9) 15.5 (6.9)
n (%)
Sex
Male 288 (16.9%) 129 (19.2%) 129 (19.2%)
Female 1,415 (83.1%) 542 (80.8%) 542 (80.8%)
Country of residence
Aus/NZ 523 (29.1%) 314 (46.8%) 391 (41.2%)
UK 300 (16.7%) 119 (17.7%)** 180 (19.0%)
US/Canada 758 (42.2%) 157 (23.4%)*** 253 (26.7%)
Other 214 (11.9%) 81 (12.1%)** 124 (13.1%)
University degree
No 791 (44.4%) 208 (31.1%) 178 (26.8%)
Yes 992 (55.6%) 461 (68.9%)*** 486 (73.2%)
Employment
Paid employment 916 (51.4%) 438 (65.3%) 361 (54.6%)
Unemployed 349 (19.6%) 104 (15.5%)*** 80 (12.1%)
Retired 518 (29.1%) 129 (19.2%)*** 220 (33.3%)
BMI
Under/healthy 966 (54.6%) 435 (64.8%) 398 (59.3%)
Overweight 412 (23.3%) 144 (21.5%)* 155 (23.1%)
Obese 393 (22.2%) 92 (13.7%)*** 118 (17.6%)
MS type
Non-progressive 1,105 (63.0%) 486 (73.0%) 486 (73.0%)
Progressive 393 (22.4%) 105 (15.8%)*** 105 (15.8%)
Unsure/other 255 (14.6%) 75 (11.3%)** 75 (11.3%)
Disability (P-MSSS)
Normal/mild 894 (54.8%) 444 (68.0%) 445 (67.1%)
Moderate 436 (26.7%) 141 (21.6%)*** 153 (23.1%)
Severe 302 (18.5%) 68 (10.4%)*** 65 (9.8%)
Fatigue (FSS > 5)
No 749 (49.4%) 382 (61.3%) 381 (61.1%)
Yes 766 (50.6%) 241 (38.7%)*** 243 (38.9%)
Depression (PHQ-2 > 2)a
No 1,213 (77.2%) 586 (90.0%) 553 (87.0%)
Yes 359 (22.8%) 66 (10.1%)*** 83 (13.1%)
Comorbiditiesb
0 964 (53.7%) 411 (61.3%) 482 (71.8%)
≥ 1 831 (46.3%) 260 (38.8%)** 189 (28.2%)

aPHQ-2 was used at baseline (0-year) and PHQ-9 was used at 5- and 7.5-year timepoints.

bNumber of treated comorbidities. BMI, body mass index; MS, multiple sclerosis; na, not available; PHQ, patient health questionnaire; P-MSSS, patient-derived MS severity scores; SD, standard deviation. Percentages may not total exactly 100.0% due to rounding. Difference of variables between LTFU and study sample at baseline (*p < 0.05 **p < 0.01 ***p < 0.001) were assessed by t-test and log-binomial regression.