Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 1;10:979380. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.979380

TABLE 3.

Associations between OMS-diet and high-quality diet adherence with 7.5 years health outcomes (N = 671).

Depression Fatigue Disability
Diet adherence PHQ > 4 FSS > 5 Normal/mild vs. moderate Normal/mild vs. severe Moderate vs. severe
aRR (95% CI)
OMS dieta
None 1.00 [Ref] 1.00 [Ref] 1.00 [Ref] 1.00 [Ref] 1.00 [Ref]
Commenced 0.70 (0.44, 1.11) 1.09 (0.74, 1.60) 1.03 (0.57, 1.85) 2.07 (0.75, 5.69) 0.92 (0.32, 2.67)
Ceased 1.14 (0.90, 1.44) 1.25 (0.95, 1.66) 0.95 (0.59, 1.52) 1.51 (0.82, 2.75) 1.70 (0.86, 3.35)
Ongoing 0.80 (0.65, 0.97) ** 0.89 (0.71, 1.11) 1.11 (0.84, 1.48) 0.83 (0.58, 1.19) 0.76 (0.45, 1.26)
aRR (95% CI)
High-quality dietb
None 1.00 [Ref] 1.00 [Ref] 1.00 [Ref] 1.00 [Ref] 1.00 [Ref]
Commenced 0.97 (0.70, 1.33) 1.24 (0.88, 1.74) 1.07 (0.65, 1.74) 1.22 (0.64, 2.31) 1.06 (0.57, 1.98)
Ceased 1.12 (0.87, 1.44) 1.19 (0.89, 1.59) 0.87 (0.54, 1.41) 1.22 (0.32, 4.60) 0.70 (0.10, 4.88)
Ongoing 0.78 (0.64, 0.94) ** 0.97 (0.79, 1.20) 1.19 (0.91, 1.55) 1.14 (0.71, 1.84) 0.79 (0.49, 1.28)

aOMS-diet is compared against not following OMS-diet.

bHigh-quality diet is compared against DHQ scores below median. Models adjusted for 5- and 7.5-year ongoing symptoms due to recent relapse, 5-year outcomes, age, sex, MS phenotype, MS duration, perceived SES, education, employment, number of treated comorbidities, disability (for fatigue and depression), and use of antidepressant and anti-fatigue medication. Boldface denotes statistical significance (**p < 0.01). aRR, adjusted risk ratio; DHQ, diet habits questionnaire; FSS, fatigue severity scale; OMS, Overcoming MS.