Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 16;33(6):2641–2654. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac232

Table 5.

Correlation between SWM performance and seed-to-voxel connectivity.

Seed Resulting cluster center of mass, MNI Cluster size P-uncorrected P-FDR Region labels
x y z
SWM accuracy (%)—positive correlation
R superior occipital gyrus 22 −16 70 42 <0.0001 0.038 R precentral gyrus
Card rotation time (s)—positive correlation
L middle occipital gyrus 48 0 8 42 0.0005 0.027 R insular cortex
R inferior frontal gyrus (triangularis) −10 −64 −4 117 <0.0001 <0.0001 L lingual gyrus
L cerebellum 6
L fusiform gyrus
44 −40 14 53 <0.0001 0.006 R supramarginal gyrus
R middle temporal gyrus
R superior occipital gyrus 2 −58 −24 74 <0.0001 0.001 Vermis 4 5
Vermis 6
L cerebellum 4 5
Card rotation time (s)—negative correlation
R inferior occipital gyrus −38 −84 24 41 0.0004 0.025 L lateral occipital cortex
Card rotation accuracy (%)—negative correlation
L middle occipital gyrus 42 12 22 48 0.0003 0.018 R inferior frontal gyrus
−44 −34 40 41 0.0006 0.021 L supramarginal gyrus

Note. Cluster-level FDR correction: P < 0.05. Minimum cluster size k = 10 for all analyses. Brain regions were labeled using the AAL atlas. L, left; R, right.