Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 3;299(3):102983. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.102983

Table 1.

Kinetic folding parameters of X11 PDZ1-PDZ2 and PDZ1

pH kF (s−1) kU (s−1) KN–I
X11 PDZ1-PDZ2
 3.7 0.14 ± 0.02 0.16 ± 0.02 (2.72 ± 0.08) •10−2
 4.5 1.30 ± 0.08 0.078 ± 0.003 (5.7 ± 0.1) •10−4
 5.5 5.06 ± 0.05 0.068 ± 0.002 (2.45 ± 0.04) •10−5
 6.5 8.32 ± 0.05 0.071 ± 0.001 (8.12 ± 0.02) •10−6
 7.0 12.0 ± 0.1 0.077 ± 0.002 (8.19 ± 0.06) •10−6
 7.5 11.2 ± 0.1 0.107 ± 0.003 (6.53 ± 0.09) •10−6
 9.0 16.3 ± 0.1 0.077 ± 0.001 (8.47 ± 0.04) •10−6
PDZ1
 3.7 0.36 ± 0.05 0.32 ± 0.02 -
 4.5 1.51 ± 0.04 0.19 ± 0.05 -
 5.5 3.7 ± 0.04 0.16 ± 0.06 -
 6.5 4.5 ± 0.05 0.16 ± 0.07 -
 7.0 5.5 ± 0.03 0.34 ± 0.06 -
 7.5 5.8 ± 0.07 0.38 ± 0.08 -
 9.0 7.3 ± 0.06 0.33 ± 0.05 -

Folding parameters obtained for X11 PDZ1-PDZ2 and PDZ1 were calculated from a three-state and two-state, respectively. All data were recorded at 37 °C. To reduce errors, the chevron plots of each protein were globally fitted with shared m-values. For X11 PDZ1-PDZ2, the calculated m values from a three-state analysis were mF = 0.94 ± 0.03 kcal mol−1 M−1; mU = 0.15 ± 0.02 kcal mol−1 M−1; mKN–I = 1.09 ± 0.09 kcal mol−1 M−1, with a total mD–N = 2.2 ± 0.1. This value is in good agreement with the value of 2.1 ± 0.2 kcal mol−1 M−1 obtained from CD monitored denaturation experiments. On the other hand, in the case of PDZ1, a two-state fit returned the values of mF = 1.04 ± 0.04 kcal mol−1 M−1 and an mF = 0.15 ± 0.01 kcal mol−1 M−1 with a total mD–N = 1.2 ± 0.1 kcal mol−1 M−1. Also in this case, there is a good agreement with the equilibrium value monitored by CD melting, being mD–N = 1.0 ± 0.1 kcal mol−1 M−1.