Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Andrology. 2022 Oct 2;11(4):677–686. doi: 10.1111/andr.13295

Table 1:

Demographic and clinical features of all SEEDS participants (n = 91) and stratification by semen quality status.

Features All participants (n = 91)
Mean ± SD/count (%)
Normal Semen Quality (n = 59)
Mean ± SD/count (%)
Poor Semen Quality (n=32)
Mean ± SD/count (%)
Pvalue
Age (years) 36.2 ± 5.9 36.1 ± 6.2 36.4 ± 5.5 0.84
BMI (kg/m2) a 29.9 ± 5.5 29.6 ± 5.3 30.4 ± 5.9 0.55
Race b
 Hispanic white 73 (80.2%) 50 (90.1%) 23 (82.1%) 0.42
 Others 10 (11.0%) 5 (9.1%) 5 (17.9%)

Semen parameters 5th centile WHO references (n, %<WHO) Median (Range) Median (Range) Pvalue

Concentration (106/mL) 15 (8, 8.8) 78.8 (23.0 – 667.5) 30.9 (0.8 – 170.6) 2.40×10−5
Total motility (%) 40 (13, 14.3) 67 (40.0 – 91.0) 46.5 (5.0 – 87.0) 2.50×10−6
Normal morphology (%) c 4 (20, 22.0) 9.2 (4.0 – 21.0) 3.2 (0.5 – 10.5) 2.60×10−9
Count (106/ejaculate) 39 (9, 9.8) 185.4 (54.0 – 1,117.0) 99.8 (4.2 – 563.0) 9.80×10−4
Semen volume (mL) 1.5 (16, 17.6) 2.9 (0.5 – 7.5) 3.2 (0.7 – 6.5) 0.12

Missing data:

a

BMI (n = 3);

b

race (n = 8);

c

normal morphology (n = 4);

Represents statistical comparison (Student’s t-test/Mann–Whitney U test) of parameters between normal (n = 59) semen quality vs poor (n = 32) semen quality groups. Stratification was based on poor semen quality in one of sperm concentration, morphology or motility.