Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 2;11:1008863. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1008863

Table 3.

Evaluation value and ranking of samples by CRITIC and entropy weight method in Fujian.

Integrated medical services Evaluation value of entropy weight method Evaluation value of the CRITIC method Ranking of entropy weight Ranking of CRITIC Difference between rankings
1 0.1748 0.4267 19 11 8
2 0.2520 0.4984 10 5 5
3 0.1386 0.3017 20 22 −2
4 0.3024 0.5271 6 4 2
5 0.2583 0.4260 9 12 −3
6 0.4148 0.5314 3 3 0
7 0.2186 0.4655 13 8 5
8 0.1290 0.3174 22 20 2
9 0.3322 0.4979 4 6 −2
10 0.1876 0.3432 17 18 −1
11 0.2661 0.4055 8 14 −6
12 0.1059 0.2623 23 23 0
13 0.1807 0.3162 18 21 −3
14 0.2392 0.4671 11 7 4
15 0.4576 0.5344 1 2 −1
16 0.4237 0.6235 2 1 1
17 0.2244 0.3714 12 17 −5
18 0.3096 0.4367 5 10 −5
19 0.2016 0.4081 15 13 2
20 0.1384 0.3179 21 19 2
21 0.3017 0.4516 7 9 −2
22 0.1977 0.3720 16 16 0
23 0.2145 0.3934 14 15 −1