Table 2.
Operationalizations | Percentage | Number (n = 495) | Example |
---|---|---|---|
Indicators | |||
None given | 0.20 | 1 | — |
Assets/housing | 8.10 | 40 | Home value, own home/car, neighborhood wealth/cohesion |
Composite | 5.25 | 26 | Hollingshead Index, Brazilian ABEP |
Demographic | 0.40 | 2 | Race, gender |
Education | 27.47 | 136 | Personal education (highest degree attained) |
Family structure | 4.24 | 21 | Teen mom, father present, number of children |
Income/poverty | 22.83 | 113 | Family income, neighborhood poverty rate |
Mannerisms | 2.83 | 14 | Extracurricular activities, verb use, name, clothing |
Occupation | 16.36 | 81 | Parental Duncan’s SEI |
Subjective | 10.30 | 51 | MacArthur ladder |
Uncategorized | 2.02 | 10 | Health insurance, welfare/aid, food insecurity |
Percentage | Number (n = 211) | Example | |
Modeling procedure | |||
None given | 0.50 | 1 | — |
DR–total | 40.76 | 86 | |
DR–formative | 3.49 | 3 | PCA, PLS |
DR–reflective | 6.98 | 6 | EFA, CFA |
DR–other composite: Readymade | 20.93 | 18 | Hollingshead Index, Duncan’s SEI |
DR–other composite: Ad hoc | 68.60 | 59 | Sum of maternal and paternal education |
Mixed | 5.20 | 11 | Mean of standardized income and education and income and education individually |
Multiple single indicators | 20.90 | 44 | Income and education |
Single indicator | 32.70 | 69 | Income or education |
Note: Percentages were obtained by dividing by the total number of indicators given or by the total number of modeling procedures used (e.g., counts of indicators were divided by the total number of indicators given, n = 495, across all studies) rather than the total number of studies. ABEP = Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa (Brazilian Research Enterprises Association); DR = dimension reduction; SEI = Socioeconomic Index; PCA = Principal Component Analysis; PLS = Partial Least Squares; EFA = Exploratory Factor Analysis; CFA = Confirmatory Factor Analysis.