Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 16;582:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2023.03.005

Table 6.

DynaMut2 results for positively selected sites from proteins E, M, and N.

Protein Site Mutation Frequencya Predicted Stability Change (ΔΔGStability)
M 94 S → G 0.45% −0.19 kcal/mol (Destabilizing)
M 94 S → I 0.09% 0.65 kcal/mol (Stabilizing)
M 125 H → L 0.04% 1.83 kcal/mol (Stabilizing)
M 125 H → Q 0.04% 0.52 kcal/mol (Stabilizing)
M 125 H → Y 0.18% 2.04 kcal/mol (Stabilizing)
N 63 D → G 18.53% 0.08 kcal/mol (Stabilizing)
N 63 D → Y 0.04% 1.0 kcal/mol (Stabilizing)
N 151 P → L 0.22% −0.43 kcal/mol (Destabilizing)
N 151 P → S 0.09% −0.17 kcal/mol (Destabilizing)
N 265 T → I 0.04% −0.32 kcal/mol (Destabilizing)
N 289 Q → L 0.04% 0.42 kcal/mol (Stabilizing)
N 289 Q → H 0.22% −0.38 kcal/mol (Destabilizing)
N 296 T → I 0.09% −0.75 kcal/mol (Destabilizing)
N 362 T → I 0.18% −0.12 kcal/mol (Destabilizing)
N 362 T → K 0.09% −0.09 kcal/mol (Destabilizing)
a

Mutation frequency in the multiple sequence alignment (n = 2,240 sequences).