Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 16:1–44. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s10311-023-01589-z

Table 2.

Benefits and drawbacks of carbon dioxide capture processes (Younas et al. 2020; Osman et al. 2020; Karimi et al. 2021c)

Category Benefits Drawbacks
Post-combustion Maturity comparing with available carbon capture processes High energy consumption
Facility of retrofitting the technology to the new and existing plants Low concentration of CO2 in flue gas which reduces the efficiency of process
The presence of various impurities
Requires adsorbent with high CO2 uptake capacity and high selectivity
Pre-combustion High CO2 concentration in syngas and biogas enhances the efficiency of the process High capital cost
Fully developing for wide-scale adoption and commercialization Decay challenges regarding the hydrogen-rich fuel consumption
Low cost of adaptation The presence of impurities such as H2S and CO
Heat transfer problems
Oxy-fuel combustion Relatively simple technology High capital and operating cost
Suitable for retrofit High energy consumption
NOx is not significant Requires large quantities of oxygen

CO2, carbon dioxide; CO, carbon monoxide; H2S, hydrogen sulfide; and NOx, nitrogen oxides