Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 16;13:4336. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29949-3

Table 2.

List of the results of the evaluation of the 5 readers (CC = R1 Correct cases (round 1); CC R2 = Correct cases (round 2); WDD R1 = Wrong differential diagnoses (round 1); WDD R2 = Wrong differential diagnoses (round 2); EDD R1 = Empty differential diagnoses (round 1); EDD R2 = Empty differential diagnoses (round 2); MC R1 = Missed cases (round 1); MC R2 = Missed cases (round 1); WSC R1 = Weighted score (round 1); WSC R2 = Weighted score (round 2); TPC R1 = Time per case (round 1); TPC R2 = Time per case (round 2); ACC R1 = Accuracy (round 1); ACC R2 = Accuracy (round 2); k = Intra-rater agreement (Cohen’s kappa).

CC R1 CC R2 WDD R1 WDD R2 EDD R1 EDD R2 MC R1 MC R2 WSC R1 WSC R2 TPC R1 TPC R2 ACC R1 ACC R2 k
Rater 1 5 19 67 50 78 81 45 31 14 48 183.24 239.68 0.1 0.38 0.07
Rater 2 10 11 92 93 48 46 40 39 16 20 130.5 324.72 0.2 0.22 0.22
Rater 3 7 14 95 85 48 51 43 36 12 29 135.34 136.22 0.14 0.28 0.12
Rater 4 12 17 83 99 55 34 38 33 26 27 256.78 258.76 0.24 0.34 0.34
Rater 5 9 23 83 91 58 36 41 27 20 36 323.74 295.7 0.18 0.46 0.45
Mean 8.60 16.80 84.00 83.60 57.40 49.60 41.40 33.20 17.60 32.00 205.92 251.02 0.172 0.336
SD 2.70 4.60 10.91 19.44 12.32 18.90 2.70 4.60 5.55 10.61 83.15 72.10 0.054 0.092