Table 4.
Comparison of post-operative clinical evaluation and functional outcome among the two groups
| All the patients | mTTa | AMPb | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-operative anterior drawers test | 0.77 | |||
| Grade 0 | 42 | 21 (56.8%) | 21 (65.6%) | |
| Grade 1 | 24 | 14 (37.8%) | 10 (31.3%) | |
| Grade 2 | 3 | 2 (5.4%) | 1(3.1%) | |
| Grade 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Post-operative Lachman test | 0.59 | |||
| Grade 0 | 34 | 16 (43.2%) | 18 (56.3%) | |
| Grade 1 | 29 | 17 (45.9%) | 12 (37.5%) | |
| Grade 2 | 6 | 4 (10.8%) | 2 (6.3%) | |
| Grade 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Post-operative pivot shift test | 0.04* | |||
| Grade 0 | 55 | 26 (70.3%) | 29 (90.6%) | |
| Grade 1 | 14 | 11 (29.7%) | 3 (9.4%) | |
| Grade 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Grade 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| KT-1000 (2-year follow-up) (mm) | 1.78 (± 0.92) | 2.14 (± 0.88) | 1.38 (± 0.79) | 0.000* |
| Post-operative KT-1000 values at 20 lbs (89 N) | 0.007* | |||
| < 3-mm side-to-side difference | 54 | 24 (64.9%) | 30 (93.8%) | |
| 3–5-mm side-to-side difference | 15 | 13 (35.1%) | 02 (6.3%) | |
| Hop limb symmetry index | 88.59 (± 4.06) | 87.26 (± 4.04) | 90.12 (± 3.56) | 0.003* |
| IKDC score | 87.17 (± 4.41) | 86.34 (± 3.97) | 88.13 (± 4.74) | 0.092 |
| Post-operative Lysholm’s score | 0.56 | |||
| Excellent | 47 | 23 (62.2%) | 24 75.0%) | |
| Good | 19 | 12 (32.4%) | 07 (21.9%) | |
| Fair | 3 | 2 (5.4%) | 1 (3.1%) | |
| Poor | 0 | 0 | 0 |
*p < 0.05 Student’s t test
amTT modified transtibial technique
bAMP anteromedial portal technique